Bernd's decision: role words (customer/vendor) collide with the separate
capability-role dimension a tenant can hold (PLTF/IAM/VEN/CUS, per
net-kingdom/docs/princedom-isolation-exploration.md's unratified model --
Binky itself is both CUS and, later, VEN). Tenants are grouped instead by
onboarding-risk/entity-shape, orthogonal to role: trial, friendly, single,
small, medium, large, enterprise, consumer, family, community, association,
agentic.
Binky maps to friendly -> tenant:friendly:binky, replacing the earlier
tenant:customer:binky throughout this workplan.
Two open questions flagged, not resolved here: where tenant:coulomb (the
platform's own internal/reference tenant) fits this external-shaped grouping
list, and whether net-kingdom should ratify this list into
iam-profile_v0.2.md's Tenant Claim section, since it currently still
documents the old customer/sandbox suggested identifiers and NetKingdom
owns that canon per ADR-0011.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
tegwick
df26aee844