INTENT.md frontmatter governs and layer.yaml is marked derived from it. standard_version is removed from both forms (A12). The checker and its tests change in the same commit: they no longer require the field, they reject it, they fold case against the four-token vocabulary (A9) instead of comparing with plain equality, and they still fail a layer disagreement that survives the fold (A11). Neither layer value is re-spelled. The ruling answers kings-guard's "validated-against" reading of the field (§5: version-scoped state belongs in the derived conformance record), so that version now lives in the checker as VALIDATED_AGAINST and is printed in every run's output. The standard: path in INTENT.md is unversioned to match the reference form. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Assistant: claude-code Assistant-Model: opus Assistant-Process: 63291@bnt-lap001 Assistant-Session: 8bd77868-ca68-4f49-bb1e-d539ecc0d703
201 lines
7.7 KiB
Python
201 lines
7.7 KiB
Python
"""kings-guard's layer declaration is checkable, not merely asserted (§11).
|
|
|
|
The claim under test is the one our whole position rests on: no direct
|
|
Tooling-layer client. A test that only ran the checker against a clean tree
|
|
would prove nothing — it would pass just as happily if the checker were broken.
|
|
So the negative case is exercised too, on a synthetic tree.
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
from __future__ import annotations
|
|
|
|
import subprocess
|
|
import sys
|
|
from pathlib import Path
|
|
|
|
import pytest
|
|
|
|
yaml = pytest.importorskip("yaml")
|
|
|
|
ROOT = Path(__file__).resolve().parents[1]
|
|
SCRIPT = ROOT / "scripts" / "check_layer_conformance.py"
|
|
DECL = ROOT / "layer.yaml"
|
|
|
|
|
|
def _run(*args: str) -> subprocess.CompletedProcess[str]:
|
|
return subprocess.run(
|
|
[sys.executable, str(SCRIPT), *args],
|
|
capture_output=True,
|
|
text=True,
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_declaration_exists_and_declares_staff():
|
|
"""§11: an estate-authored repository declares its layer machine-readably."""
|
|
assert DECL.exists(), "no layer.yaml — §11 requires a machine-readable declaration"
|
|
data = yaml.safe_load(DECL.read_text())
|
|
assert data["repository"] == "kings-guard"
|
|
# Folded, not equal: §3's vocabulary is case-insensitive (GH-DEC-2026-017 §2).
|
|
# An equality assertion here would perform the re-spelling the ruling declined.
|
|
assert data["layer"].lower() == "staff"
|
|
assert data["framework"] == "netkingdom-security-layer-model"
|
|
|
|
|
|
def _load_checker():
|
|
import importlib.util
|
|
|
|
spec = importlib.util.spec_from_file_location("check_layer_conformance", SCRIPT)
|
|
module = importlib.util.module_from_spec(spec)
|
|
spec.loader.exec_module(module)
|
|
return module
|
|
|
|
|
|
def _intent_frontmatter() -> dict:
|
|
lines = (ROOT / "INTENT.md").read_text().splitlines()
|
|
assert lines[0].strip() == "---"
|
|
end = lines[1:].index("---") + 1
|
|
return yaml.safe_load("\n".join(lines[1:end]))
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_intent_governs_and_the_sidecar_is_marked_derived():
|
|
"""GH-DEC-2026-017 §1 / A11: INTENT.md governs; layer.yaml is derived from it."""
|
|
front = _intent_frontmatter()
|
|
assert front["layer"].lower() == "staff"
|
|
data = yaml.safe_load(DECL.read_text())
|
|
assert data["derived"] is True
|
|
assert data["derived_from"] == "INTENT.md"
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_no_standard_version_in_either_form():
|
|
"""GH-DEC-2026-017 §5 / A12: a layer declaration carries no standard version."""
|
|
assert "standard_version" not in _intent_frontmatter()
|
|
assert "standard_version" not in yaml.safe_load(DECL.read_text())
|
|
# The validated-against version moved to the conformance record, not away.
|
|
assert _load_checker().VALIDATED_AGAINST.startswith(
|
|
"net-kingdom/canon/standards/security-layer-model"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_the_two_forms_agree_after_folding_case():
|
|
"""`Staff` in INTENT.md and `staff` in layer.yaml are one value, not a finding."""
|
|
module = _load_checker()
|
|
front = _intent_frontmatter()
|
|
data = yaml.safe_load(DECL.read_text())
|
|
assert not module.forms_disagree(front["layer"], data["layer"])
|
|
assert not module.forms_disagree("Staff", "STAFF")
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_a_real_layer_disagreement_survives_the_fold():
|
|
"""The fold must not blind the check: Staff vs Engine is still a finding."""
|
|
module = _load_checker()
|
|
assert module.forms_disagree("Staff", "engine")
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_vocabulary_is_the_four_tokens_including_taxonomy():
|
|
"""A9: closed at four tokens; a three-token validator carries the defect."""
|
|
assert _load_checker().LAYER_VOCABULARY == {"taxonomy", "tooling", "engine", "staff"}
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_checker_rejects_a_declaration_carrying_a_standard_version(tmp_path, monkeypatch):
|
|
module = _load_checker()
|
|
decl = tmp_path / "layer.yaml"
|
|
decl.write_text(DECL.read_text() + '\nstandard_version: "0.7"\n')
|
|
monkeypatch.setattr(module, "DECL", decl)
|
|
monkeypatch.setattr(module, "ROOT", tmp_path)
|
|
with pytest.raises(SystemExit) as exc:
|
|
module.load_declaration()
|
|
assert exc.value.code == 2
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_checker_rejects_an_unmarked_sidecar(tmp_path, monkeypatch):
|
|
module = _load_checker()
|
|
data = yaml.safe_load(DECL.read_text())
|
|
data.pop("derived")
|
|
decl = tmp_path / "layer.yaml"
|
|
decl.write_text(yaml.safe_dump(data))
|
|
monkeypatch.setattr(module, "DECL", decl)
|
|
monkeypatch.setattr(module, "ROOT", tmp_path)
|
|
with pytest.raises(SystemExit) as exc:
|
|
module.load_declaration()
|
|
assert exc.value.code == 2
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_no_tooling_contacts_declared():
|
|
"""The blocked-clean position: nothing to declare, because nothing is touched."""
|
|
data = yaml.safe_load(DECL.read_text())
|
|
assert data["tooling_contacts"] == [], (
|
|
"a Tooling contact appeared in the declaration; kings-guard's blocked-clean "
|
|
"position under §11 no longer holds and KG-DEC-2026-001 needs revisiting"
|
|
)
|
|
for shape, entries in data["declared_shapes"].items():
|
|
assert entries == [], f"§5.{shape} shape declared; see comment above"
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_unowned_capabilities_carry_the_gap_record_fields():
|
|
"""§5.3 field shape, reused for §13 unowned-capability rows (§17 gap-record)."""
|
|
data = yaml.safe_load(DECL.read_text())
|
|
caps = data["unowned_capabilities"]
|
|
assert caps, "the three known gaps should be declared"
|
|
for cap in caps:
|
|
for field in ("capability", "intended_owner", "blocked_on", "review", "state"):
|
|
assert cap.get(field), f"{cap.get('id')} missing '{field}'"
|
|
assert cap["state"] == "unowned-capability"
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_checker_passes_on_the_real_tree():
|
|
result = _run()
|
|
assert result.returncode == 0, result.stderr
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_agent_principal_rule_checks_are_honest():
|
|
"""§3.4 claims that are tests, and claims that remain assertions, are named."""
|
|
data = yaml.safe_load(DECL.read_text())
|
|
checks = data["agent_principal_rule_checks"]
|
|
assert checks["no_standing_credential"]["form"] == "test"
|
|
assert checks["memory_is_not_a_state_plane"]["form"] == "test"
|
|
assert checks["tool_use_shapes"]["form"] == "assertion"
|
|
assert checks["reconstructable_as_caller"]["form"] == "mixed"
|
|
assert data["agent_principal_rules"]["no_standing_credential"] is True
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_checker_catches_a_standing_credential(tmp_path, monkeypatch):
|
|
import importlib.util
|
|
|
|
spec = importlib.util.spec_from_file_location("check_layer_conformance", SCRIPT)
|
|
module = importlib.util.module_from_spec(spec)
|
|
spec.loader.exec_module(module)
|
|
|
|
fake_src = tmp_path / "src" / "kings_guard"
|
|
fake_src.mkdir(parents=True)
|
|
(fake_src / "secrets.py").write_text('VAULT_TOKEN = "s.standing-secret"\n')
|
|
(tmp_path / ".env").write_text("OPENBAO_TOKEN=s.also-standing\n")
|
|
monkeypatch.setattr(module, "SRC", fake_src)
|
|
monkeypatch.setattr(module, "ROOT", tmp_path)
|
|
|
|
hits = module.scan_standing_credentials()
|
|
assert hits, "a standing credential was not detected — the checker is blind"
|
|
kinds = " ".join(reason for _, reason in hits)
|
|
assert "credential-shaped file" in kinds or "standing-credential" in kinds
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_checker_catches_an_undeclared_tooling_client(tmp_path, monkeypatch):
|
|
"""The negative case: a direct OpenBao client must fail the check.
|
|
|
|
This is the convenience §6 warns about — it would arrive as one import.
|
|
"""
|
|
import importlib.util
|
|
|
|
spec = importlib.util.spec_from_file_location("check_layer_conformance", SCRIPT)
|
|
module = importlib.util.module_from_spec(spec)
|
|
spec.loader.exec_module(module)
|
|
|
|
fake_src = tmp_path / "src" / "kings_guard"
|
|
fake_src.mkdir(parents=True)
|
|
(fake_src / "effector.py").write_text(
|
|
"import hvac\n\n\ndef contain(actor):\n hvac.Client().revoke(actor)\n"
|
|
)
|
|
monkeypatch.setattr(module, "SRC", fake_src)
|
|
monkeypatch.setattr(module, "ROOT", tmp_path)
|
|
|
|
hits = module.scan()
|
|
assert hits, "a direct OpenBao client was not detected — the checker is blind"
|
|
assert hits[0][1] == "hvac"
|