392 lines
11 KiB
Markdown
392 lines
11 KiB
Markdown
|
Below is a **PRD for the markidocx product**, structured according to your **InfoTechPrimer PRD model** and respecting the principle of **implementation independence** (no CLI flags, API routes, or architecture details).
|
|||
|
|
Implementation specifics such as CLI/REST/MCP interfaces belong in the **FRS**, which would normally follow this PRD.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
# PRD
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
*Product Requirement Document*
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
# Product Requirements Document: markidocx
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## 1. Definition
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
**markidocx** is a product that enables **reliable round-trip editing between Markdown and Microsoft Word documents** while preserving document structure and semantic intent.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
The product addresses a recurring coordination problem in technical documentation and knowledge workflows:
|
|||
|
|
Markdown is widely used for structured authoring and version-controlled collaboration, while Word remains the dominant format for editorial review, stakeholder collaboration, and formal document exchange.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
markidocx provides a controlled workflow in which:
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
* Markdown remains the **canonical structured source**
|
|||
|
|
* Word serves as a **managed editorial interface**
|
|||
|
|
* repeated conversion cycles preserve semantic structure
|
|||
|
|
* template-driven styling separates presentation from content
|
|||
|
|
* large multi-file documents remain manageable across the editing lifecycle
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
The product is intended for organizations that require **structured documentation workflows with Word-based collaboration**, including engineering teams, documentation teams, standards bodies, and regulated environments.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## 2. Context
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
markidocx operates at the intersection of:
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
* **technical documentation systems**
|
|||
|
|
* **collaborative editorial workflows**
|
|||
|
|
* **requirements and specification authoring**
|
|||
|
|
* **knowledge management infrastructures**
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
In many modern documentation environments:
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
* engineers and technical authors write in **Markdown**
|
|||
|
|
* documents are stored in **version-controlled repositories**
|
|||
|
|
* external stakeholders and reviewers operate primarily in **Word**
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
This mismatch creates friction:
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
* Word-based edits often break structured content
|
|||
|
|
* Markdown workflows are inaccessible to non-technical reviewers
|
|||
|
|
* conversion pipelines introduce structural drift
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
markidocx exists to bridge these environments by establishing a **controlled round-trip workflow** where:
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
* Markdown remains structurally authoritative
|
|||
|
|
* Word editing is supported within a defined semantic envelope
|
|||
|
|
* conversion processes are deterministic and inspectable
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
The product acts as a **boundary system between structured authoring and editorial collaboration**.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## 3. Core Concepts
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
### Round-Trip Editing
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Round-trip editing is the ability to export a document into another format for editing and later re-import the modified document while preserving structural meaning.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
markidocx establishes a disciplined round-trip process between Markdown and Word.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
### Canonical Source Model
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
The canonical source of truth is **Markdown structured documents**.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Word documents generated by the system are considered **editorial projections** of the canonical source rather than independent authoritative artifacts.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
### Semantic Preservation
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
The product guarantees preservation of document semantics across editing cycles within defined feature levels.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Preserved semantics include structural constructs such as headings, lists, references, and citations.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
### Template-Driven Presentation
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Document presentation is controlled by **document templates and style definitions**.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
This allows the same content to be exported in different presentation forms without modifying the source.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Built-in document families include:
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
* article
|
|||
|
|
* book
|
|||
|
|
* website
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
### Multi-File Document Composition
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Large documents are often structured across multiple files for maintainability.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
markidocx supports multi-file composition and ensures that editing cycles do not collapse this structure unnecessarily.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
### Feature Levels
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
markidocx distinguishes between two functional feature tiers:
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
**LEVEL1 – Core Document Structure**
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
* headings
|
|||
|
|
* lists
|
|||
|
|
* tables
|
|||
|
|
* footnotes
|
|||
|
|
* images
|
|||
|
|
* links
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
**LEVEL3 – Advanced Scholarly / Technical Features**
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
* cross references
|
|||
|
|
* numbered figures
|
|||
|
|
* automatic diagrams
|
|||
|
|
* bibliography
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Feature levels define the guarantees the system provides during round-trip editing.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
### Drift Detection
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Structural drift may occur when editing documents in Word.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
markidocx introduces mechanisms to detect and report semantic differences between:
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
* original Markdown sources
|
|||
|
|
* re-imported Markdown versions
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
This allows users to understand and manage structural changes.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## 4. Scope and Non-Scope
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
### In Scope
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
The product must support:
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
* Markdown ↔ Word round-trip editing
|
|||
|
|
* multi-file document composition
|
|||
|
|
* template-based document styling
|
|||
|
|
* two defined feature levels (LEVEL1 and LEVEL3)
|
|||
|
|
* preservation of document structure across editing cycles
|
|||
|
|
* detection and reporting of semantic drift
|
|||
|
|
* support for editorial collaboration workflows
|
|||
|
|
* extensibility through additional document templates and styles
|
|||
|
|
* automated testing of round-trip behavior using product documentation
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
The product must provide interfaces that enable:
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
* local document workflows
|
|||
|
|
* automated integration into documentation pipelines
|
|||
|
|
* programmatic interaction through service interfaces
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
### Out of Scope
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
The product does not attempt to:
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
* replace word processors
|
|||
|
|
* provide a graphical document editor
|
|||
|
|
* support arbitrary Word document constructs
|
|||
|
|
* act as a full document layout system
|
|||
|
|
* enforce a specific documentation methodology
|
|||
|
|
* replace existing publishing systems
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
markidocx focuses specifically on **structured round-trip workflows**, not full document production ecosystems.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## 5. Practical Implications
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Adopting markidocx introduces a structured approach to document collaboration.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Benefits include:
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
* improved collaboration between technical and non-technical stakeholders
|
|||
|
|
* preservation of structured documentation in version-controlled environments
|
|||
|
|
* reduced manual cleanup after Word-based reviews
|
|||
|
|
* deterministic document generation workflows
|
|||
|
|
* improved traceability between authored content and reviewed documents
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Trade-offs include:
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
* the need to operate within supported feature boundaries
|
|||
|
|
* the requirement to use defined templates and styles
|
|||
|
|
* occasional limitations when importing highly customized Word content
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
The system is particularly valuable for organizations that:
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
* maintain long-lived technical documentation
|
|||
|
|
* operate cross-disciplinary teams
|
|||
|
|
* require traceable document evolution
|
|||
|
|
* manage complex specifications or manuals
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## 6. Product Use Cases
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
The product must support the following key use cases.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
### Technical Review Workflow
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
A document written in Markdown is exported to Word for review by stakeholders and later re-imported with edits incorporated into the Markdown source.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
### Multi-Chapter Document Editing
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
A large multi-file document is exported as a single Word document for external review and later re-imported without collapsing the source structure.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
### Specification Publishing
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
A technical specification written in Markdown is exported using a formal template suitable for distribution and archival.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
### Documentation Collaboration
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Technical authors maintain Markdown sources while subject matter experts provide editorial feedback using Word.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
### Knowledge System Integration
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
The product integrates with documentation pipelines, knowledge repositories, or automated publication workflows.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
### Regression Testing of Documentation
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
The product documentation itself serves as a round-trip editing test corpus, validating product functionality across releases.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## 7. Constraints and Assumptions
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
### Constraints
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
* Word document editing environments vary widely.
|
|||
|
|
* Markdown dialects differ across ecosystems.
|
|||
|
|
* Some Word features cannot be reliably mapped to Markdown.
|
|||
|
|
* Diagram and bibliography rendering depend on external tools.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
The product must therefore operate within defined semantic boundaries.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
### Assumptions
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
* Markdown remains the authoritative authoring format.
|
|||
|
|
* Word is used primarily for editing and review rather than canonical storage.
|
|||
|
|
* document structure is maintained using supported constructs.
|
|||
|
|
* editorial users operate within template-defined formatting environments.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## 8. Success Criteria
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
markidocx is considered successful when it achieves the following outcomes.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
### Structural Stability
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Repeated Markdown → Word → Markdown cycles preserve document structure within supported feature levels.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
### Editorial Accessibility
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Non-technical stakeholders can review and edit documents without interacting directly with Markdown sources.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
### Template Flexibility
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Organizations can apply different document presentation styles without altering content.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
### Multi-Document Scalability
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Large documents composed from multiple files remain manageable across editing cycles.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
### Detectable Drift
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Structural changes introduced during editing are visible and analyzable.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
### Pipeline Compatibility
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
The product integrates into automated documentation and publishing pipelines.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
### Testable Documentation
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
The product documentation itself can be used as a stable end-to-end validation corpus.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## 9. Dependencies
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
The product depends on:
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
* document conversion technologies capable of translating between Markdown and Word formats
|
|||
|
|
* diagram rendering tools for automated diagrams
|
|||
|
|
* citation and bibliography processing tools
|
|||
|
|
* structured document templates
|
|||
|
|
* consistent Markdown dialect support
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
External dependencies must be manageable without introducing excessive operational complexity.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## 10. Risks
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
### Semantic Drift Risk
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Editing in Word may unintentionally alter document structure.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
### Template Misuse
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Users may modify templates in ways that break round-trip guarantees.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
### Over-complex Feature Expectations
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Users may expect support for all Word features, which is not feasible.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
### Workflow Discipline
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Successful operation depends on maintaining structured authoring practices.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## 11. Related Concepts
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
* Markdown Documentation Systems
|
|||
|
|
* Structured Authoring
|
|||
|
|
* Technical Writing Pipelines
|
|||
|
|
* Documentation-as-Code
|
|||
|
|
* Word Editorial Workflows
|
|||
|
|
* Publishing Toolchains
|
|||
|
|
* Knowledge Repositories
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Adjacent artifacts include:
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
* Functional Requirements Specification (FRS)
|
|||
|
|
* Architecture Documentation
|
|||
|
|
* Technical Specifications
|
|||
|
|
* Template and Style Definitions
|
|||
|
|
* Round-Trip Validation Reports
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## 12. Appendix: Product Positioning
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
markidocx belongs to a class of tools that bridge structured authoring and editorial collaboration.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Compared with typical Markdown toolchains, the product focuses specifically on **controlled editorial round-trip workflows** rather than pure publishing.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Compared with office-based authoring systems, the product preserves **version-controlled structured sources**.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Its value lies in enabling **structured documentation ecosystems that remain compatible with Word-centric collaboration environments**.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
xxx
|