---
entity_slug: adulteration_of_metals
evaluator: null
evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T00:19:45.942275'
overall_score: 4.4
scores:
- name: definition_precision
  value: 4.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: 'The definition is precise and captures a distinct fraudulent practice
    with clear mechanics (mixing cheaper materials with precious metals to deceive).
    It avoids circularity and specifies the key elements: deception, material composition,
    and difficulty of detection without assaying.'
- name: source_grounding
  value: 5.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: This entity is well-grounded in Smith's actual discussion of currency
    problems in Book I, Chapter 4, where he explicitly addresses how unstamped metals
    create opportunities for fraud through adulteration. The concept directly reflects
    Smith's concerns about metal purity verification.
- name: domain_placement
  value: 5.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: The "Regulation" domain assignment is correct, as adulteration of metals
    represents a market failure that Smith identifies as requiring institutional solutions
    (like official stamping/certification). This fits squarely within regulatory concerns
    about market integrity and fraud prevention.
- name: vsm_relevance
  value: 4.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: This entity maps naturally to S3 (internal regulation/audit) as it represents
    a control problem requiring verification and quality assurance mechanisms. It
    also touches on S2 (coordination) since adulteration creates market oscillations
    and trust breakdowns that need systematic dampening.
- name: explanatory_value
  value: 4.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: "The entity illuminates an important structural mechanism in Smith's\
    \ monetary theory\u2014how the absence of certification systems enables fraud\
    \ and undermines market function. It explains a specific causal relationship between\
    \ institutional gaps and market failures rather than merely naming a surface phenomenon."
---

# Evaluation: Adulteration Of Metals

## definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0

The definition is precise and captures a distinct fraudulent practice with clear mechanics (mixing cheaper materials with precious metals to deceive). It avoids circularity and specifies the key elements: deception, material composition, and difficulty of detection without assaying.

## source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0

This entity is well-grounded in Smith's actual discussion of currency problems in Book I, Chapter 4, where he explicitly addresses how unstamped metals create opportunities for fraud through adulteration. The concept directly reflects Smith's concerns about metal purity verification.

## domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0

The "Regulation" domain assignment is correct, as adulteration of metals represents a market failure that Smith identifies as requiring institutional solutions (like official stamping/certification). This fits squarely within regulatory concerns about market integrity and fraud prevention.

## vsm_relevance — 4.0 / 5.0

This entity maps naturally to S3 (internal regulation/audit) as it represents a control problem requiring verification and quality assurance mechanisms. It also touches on S2 (coordination) since adulteration creates market oscillations and trust breakdowns that need systematic dampening.

## explanatory_value — 4.0 / 5.0

The entity illuminates an important structural mechanism in Smith's monetary theory—how the absence of certification systems enables fraud and undermines market function. It explains a specific causal relationship between institutional gaps and market failures rather than merely naming a surface phenomenon.
