---
entity_slug: bank_regulatory_evolution
evaluator: null
evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T00:49:20.745463'
overall_score: 4.0
scores:
- name: definition_precision
  value: 3.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: The definition captures a coherent concept of regulatory development
    over time, but uses somewhat vague terms like "minimal formal rules" and "comprehensive
    frameworks" without clear boundaries. The concept is distinct but could be more
    precisely delineated.
- name: source_grounding
  value: 4.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: Smith does indeed analyze the historical development of banking practices
    and their regulation in Book II, Chapter 2, examining how banking evolved in response
    to various pressures and crises. The entity accurately reflects his historical
    approach to understanding banking regulation.
- name: domain_placement
  value: 5.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: '"Regulation" is the appropriate domain for this entity, as it directly
    concerns the development of regulatory frameworks governing banking institutions.
    This clearly falls within regulatory rather than operational or market domains.'
- name: vsm_relevance
  value: 4.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: This entity maps well to S3 (internal regulation/audit) as it concerns
    regulatory mechanisms, and also connects to S4 (intelligence/environmental adaptation)
    since regulatory evolution represents adaptive responses to environmental changes
    and crises. The evolutionary aspect shows clear VSM system interactions.
- name: explanatory_value
  value: 4.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: The entity illuminates an important structural mechanism - how regulatory
    frameworks adapt and develop in response to systemic pressures and failures. This
    provides genuine insight into the dynamic relationship between banking practice
    and regulatory oversight rather than merely describing surface phenomena.
---

# Evaluation: Bank Regulatory Evolution

## definition_precision — 3.0 / 5.0

The definition captures a coherent concept of regulatory development over time, but uses somewhat vague terms like "minimal formal rules" and "comprehensive frameworks" without clear boundaries. The concept is distinct but could be more precisely delineated.

## source_grounding — 4.0 / 5.0

Smith does indeed analyze the historical development of banking practices and their regulation in Book II, Chapter 2, examining how banking evolved in response to various pressures and crises. The entity accurately reflects his historical approach to understanding banking regulation.

## domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0

"Regulation" is the appropriate domain for this entity, as it directly concerns the development of regulatory frameworks governing banking institutions. This clearly falls within regulatory rather than operational or market domains.

## vsm_relevance — 4.0 / 5.0

This entity maps well to S3 (internal regulation/audit) as it concerns regulatory mechanisms, and also connects to S4 (intelligence/environmental adaptation) since regulatory evolution represents adaptive responses to environmental changes and crises. The evolutionary aspect shows clear VSM system interactions.

## explanatory_value — 4.0 / 5.0

The entity illuminates an important structural mechanism - how regulatory frameworks adapt and develop in response to systemic pressures and failures. This provides genuine insight into the dynamic relationship between banking practice and regulatory oversight rather than merely describing surface phenomena.
