---
entity_slug: economic_system_outcomes
evaluator: null
evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T05:19:26.313408'
overall_score: 3.0
scores:
- name: definition_precision
  value: 3.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: The definition captures a meaningful concept about evaluating economic
    system results, but it's somewhat broad and could be more precise about what constitutes
    "outcomes" versus other related concepts like performance metrics or effectiveness
    measures. The inclusion of both wealth generation and distribution effects adds
    useful specificity.
- name: source_grounding
  value: 2.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: While Smith does compare different economic systems throughout Book IV,
    this entity appears to abstract beyond what the source explicitly discusses -
    Smith focuses more on the mechanisms and principles of systems rather than systematically
    analyzing "outcomes" as a distinct analytical category. The concept feels more
    like a modern analytical framework imposed on Smith's work.
- name: domain_placement
  value: 4.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: '"General Theory" is appropriate since this concept would span across
    Smith''s analysis of different economic arrangements rather than belonging to
    a specific system like mercantilism or physiocracy. The cross-cutting nature of
    evaluating system results fits well in this domain.'
- name: vsm_relevance
  value: 4.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: This entity maps well to S3 (internal regulation/audit) as it concerns
    monitoring and evaluating system performance, and potentially S4 (intelligence)
    as outcomes inform adaptation and policy decisions. The evaluative nature of outcomes
    assessment is central to viable system functioning.
- name: explanatory_value
  value: 2.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: This entity primarily names a category of analysis rather than illuminating
    specific mechanisms or structural relations that Smith identifies. It's more of
    a meta-analytical concept that could apply to any economic system evaluation rather
    than revealing particular insights about how wealth creation actually works.
---

# Evaluation: Economic System Outcomes

## definition_precision — 3.0 / 5.0

The definition captures a meaningful concept about evaluating economic system results, but it's somewhat broad and could be more precise about what constitutes "outcomes" versus other related concepts like performance metrics or effectiveness measures. The inclusion of both wealth generation and distribution effects adds useful specificity.

## source_grounding — 2.0 / 5.0

While Smith does compare different economic systems throughout Book IV, this entity appears to abstract beyond what the source explicitly discusses - Smith focuses more on the mechanisms and principles of systems rather than systematically analyzing "outcomes" as a distinct analytical category. The concept feels more like a modern analytical framework imposed on Smith's work.

## domain_placement — 4.0 / 5.0

"General Theory" is appropriate since this concept would span across Smith's analysis of different economic arrangements rather than belonging to a specific system like mercantilism or physiocracy. The cross-cutting nature of evaluating system results fits well in this domain.

## vsm_relevance — 4.0 / 5.0

This entity maps well to S3 (internal regulation/audit) as it concerns monitoring and evaluating system performance, and potentially S4 (intelligence) as outcomes inform adaptation and policy decisions. The evaluative nature of outcomes assessment is central to viable system functioning.

## explanatory_value — 2.0 / 5.0

This entity primarily names a category of analysis rather than illuminating specific mechanisms or structural relations that Smith identifies. It's more of a meta-analytical concept that could apply to any economic system evaluation rather than revealing particular insights about how wealth creation actually works.
