---
entity_slug: colony_trade_monopoly
evaluator: null
evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T04:56:43.126981'
overall_score: 4.4
scores:
- name: definition_precision
  value: 4.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: The definition clearly delineates the specific mechanisms of colonial
    trade monopoly - exclusive control, prohibition of direct trade, port/seasonal
    restrictions, and profit extraction channels. It avoids circularity and captures
    a distinct institutional arrangement rather than a vague concept.
- name: source_grounding
  value: 5.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: This entity is directly grounded in Smith's extensive critique of mercantilist
    colonial policy in Book IV, Chapter 7, where he systematically analyzes how exclusive
    trading privileges distort natural economic development. The definition accurately
    reflects Smith's specific arguments about monopoly effects on both colonies and
    mother countries.
- name: domain_placement
  value: 5.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: '"Regulation" is the correct domain placement as this represents a formal
    institutional mechanism that governs trade relationships through legal restrictions
    and exclusive privileges. It clearly belongs in the regulatory rather than market
    or production categories.'
- name: vsm_relevance
  value: 3.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: This entity maps primarily to S3 (internal regulation) as it represents
    a control mechanism within the imperial economic system, though it also touches
    S4 (intelligence/adaptation) regarding how empires manage external trade relationships.
    The mapping is reasonable but not as clear-cut as purely operational or policy
    entities.
- name: explanatory_value
  value: 5.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: This entity provides substantial explanatory power by illuminating the
    specific institutional mechanism through which mercantilist theory was implemented
    and how it created systematic distortions in capital allocation and market development.
    It reveals the structural relationship between political control and economic
    extraction that Smith critiqued.
---

# Evaluation: Colony Trade Monopoly

## definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0

The definition clearly delineates the specific mechanisms of colonial trade monopoly - exclusive control, prohibition of direct trade, port/seasonal restrictions, and profit extraction channels. It avoids circularity and captures a distinct institutional arrangement rather than a vague concept.

## source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0

This entity is directly grounded in Smith's extensive critique of mercantilist colonial policy in Book IV, Chapter 7, where he systematically analyzes how exclusive trading privileges distort natural economic development. The definition accurately reflects Smith's specific arguments about monopoly effects on both colonies and mother countries.

## domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0

"Regulation" is the correct domain placement as this represents a formal institutional mechanism that governs trade relationships through legal restrictions and exclusive privileges. It clearly belongs in the regulatory rather than market or production categories.

## vsm_relevance — 3.0 / 5.0

This entity maps primarily to S3 (internal regulation) as it represents a control mechanism within the imperial economic system, though it also touches S4 (intelligence/adaptation) regarding how empires manage external trade relationships. The mapping is reasonable but not as clear-cut as purely operational or policy entities.

## explanatory_value — 5.0 / 5.0

This entity provides substantial explanatory power by illuminating the specific institutional mechanism through which mercantilist theory was implemented and how it created systematic distortions in capital allocation and market development. It reveals the structural relationship between political control and economic extraction that Smith critiqued.
