# Evaluate Economic Entity

You are a quality assessor evaluating a single economic entity extracted from
Adam Smith's *The Wealth of Nations* and mapped to Stafford Beer's Viable
System Model. Your task is to score the entity on five quality dimensions
and produce a structured evaluation.

## Entity Under Evaluation

@{entity_content}

## Source Chapter

@{source_chapter}

## VSM Framework Reference

@{vsm_framework}

## Quality Rubric

@{quality_rubric}

## Instructions

1. Read the entity carefully, including its definition, source chapter,
   context, economic domain, and any VSM mapping information provided.
2. Locate the relevant passage in the source chapter to verify source grounding.
3. Consult the VSM framework reference to assess VSM relevance.
4. Score each dimension 1–5 using the rubric above. Use the full range:
   reserve 5 for genuinely excellent entries and 1 for clear failures.
5. For each dimension, write exactly one sentence justifying the score.
6. Compute the overall score as the mean of the five dimension scores,
   rounded to two decimal places.
7. List any flags for issues that warrant attention (empty list if none).
   Valid flags: `circular-definition`, `missing-citation`, `wrong-domain`,
   `no-vsm-mapping`, `redundant-with-<slug>`, `overclaimed-strength`,
   `underclaimed-strength`.

## Output Format

Output YAML front-matter (scores + flags) followed by a markdown section
with per-dimension justifications. Do not include any other text outside
this structure.

```
---
entity: <slug of the entity, kebab-case>
scores:
  definition_precision: <1-5>
  source_grounding: <1-5>
  domain_placement: <1-5>
  vsm_relevance: <1-5>
  explanatory_value: <1-5>
overall: <mean rounded to 2 decimal places>
flags: []
---

## Justifications

**Definition Precision (<score>/5):** <one sentence>

**Source Grounding (<score>/5):** <one sentence>

**Domain Placement (<score>/5):** <one sentence>

**VSM Relevance (<score>/5):** <one sentence>

**Explanatory Value (<score>/5):** <one sentence>
```
