---
entity_slug: national_animosity_in_commerce
evaluator: null
evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T05:56:41.816184'
overall_score: 4.6
scores:
- name: definition_precision
  value: 4.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: The definition clearly distinguishes national animosity from other trade
    concepts by focusing on hostile attitudes that frame trade as warfare rather than
    mutual benefit. It avoids circularity and identifies specific manifestations like
    retaliatory restrictions and harm-focused policies.
- name: source_grounding
  value: 5.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: This concept is directly grounded in Smith's analysis in Book IV, Chapter
    3, where he explicitly discusses how nationalistic hostility drives irrational
    trade policies. Smith clearly identifies animosity between nations as a key factor
    that merchants exploit to secure protections.
- name: domain_placement
  value: 5.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: The "Regulation" domain is perfectly appropriate since this concept deals
    with how emotional and political factors influence the creation of trade regulations
    and barriers. It captures the non-economic drivers behind regulatory policy formation.
- name: vsm_relevance
  value: 4.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: This maps well to S4 (intelligence/environmental adaptation) as it represents
    a dysfunction in how nations perceive and respond to their trading environment,
    treating partners as threats rather than opportunities. It could also relate to
    S5 (identity/policy) regarding national identity formation.
- name: explanatory_value
  value: 5.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: This entity provides significant explanatory power by identifying a key
    psychological and political mechanism that drives economically irrational trade
    policies. It explains why nations often adopt self-defeating protectionist measures
    despite clear economic evidence against them.
---

# Evaluation: National Animosity In Commerce

## definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0

The definition clearly distinguishes national animosity from other trade concepts by focusing on hostile attitudes that frame trade as warfare rather than mutual benefit. It avoids circularity and identifies specific manifestations like retaliatory restrictions and harm-focused policies.

## source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0

This concept is directly grounded in Smith's analysis in Book IV, Chapter 3, where he explicitly discusses how nationalistic hostility drives irrational trade policies. Smith clearly identifies animosity between nations as a key factor that merchants exploit to secure protections.

## domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0

The "Regulation" domain is perfectly appropriate since this concept deals with how emotional and political factors influence the creation of trade regulations and barriers. It captures the non-economic drivers behind regulatory policy formation.

## vsm_relevance — 4.0 / 5.0

This maps well to S4 (intelligence/environmental adaptation) as it represents a dysfunction in how nations perceive and respond to their trading environment, treating partners as threats rather than opportunities. It could also relate to S5 (identity/policy) regarding national identity formation.

## explanatory_value — 5.0 / 5.0

This entity provides significant explanatory power by identifying a key psychological and political mechanism that drives economically irrational trade policies. It explains why nations often adopt self-defeating protectionist measures despite clear economic evidence against them.
