---
entity_slug: value_in_exchange
evaluator: null
evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T06:36:26.078722'
overall_score: 4.2
scores:
- name: definition_precision
  value: 4.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: The definition clearly distinguishes value in exchange from value in
    use and precisely captures the concept as purchasing power or command over other
    goods. It avoids circularity by defining exchange value in terms of what can be
    obtained through trade rather than simply referring back to exchange.
- name: source_grounding
  value: 5.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: This concept is directly and explicitly discussed by Smith in Book I,
    Chapter 4, where he makes the famous distinction between value in use and value
    in exchange using the water-diamond paradox. The entity accurately reflects Smith's
    original formulation without adding external interpretations.
- name: domain_placement
  value: 5.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: The "Exchange" domain is perfectly appropriate since this concept is
    fundamentally about how goods trade against each other in markets. This is a core
    mechanism of exchange processes rather than production, distribution, or consumption.
- name: vsm_relevance
  value: 2.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: This concept is quite abstract and doesn't map naturally to any specific
    VSM system - it's more of a fundamental property that emerges from market interactions
    rather than an operational, coordinative, regulatory, intelligence, or policy
    function. It operates across multiple VSM levels without being specific to any.
- name: explanatory_value
  value: 5.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: This entity provides crucial explanatory power by illuminating the fundamental
    mechanism that drives market exchange - the paradox that utility and exchange
    value can diverge dramatically. It explains a core structural relation in how
    markets determine relative prices and purchasing power.
---

# Evaluation: Value In Exchange

## definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0

The definition clearly distinguishes value in exchange from value in use and precisely captures the concept as purchasing power or command over other goods. It avoids circularity by defining exchange value in terms of what can be obtained through trade rather than simply referring back to exchange.

## source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0

This concept is directly and explicitly discussed by Smith in Book I, Chapter 4, where he makes the famous distinction between value in use and value in exchange using the water-diamond paradox. The entity accurately reflects Smith's original formulation without adding external interpretations.

## domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0

The "Exchange" domain is perfectly appropriate since this concept is fundamentally about how goods trade against each other in markets. This is a core mechanism of exchange processes rather than production, distribution, or consumption.

## vsm_relevance — 2.0 / 5.0

This concept is quite abstract and doesn't map naturally to any specific VSM system - it's more of a fundamental property that emerges from market interactions rather than an operational, coordinative, regulatory, intelligence, or policy function. It operates across multiple VSM levels without being specific to any.

## explanatory_value — 5.0 / 5.0

This entity provides crucial explanatory power by illuminating the fundamental mechanism that drives market exchange - the paradox that utility and exchange value can diverge dramatically. It explains a core structural relation in how markets determine relative prices and purchasing power.
