---
entity_slug: treaty
evaluator: null
evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T06:34:23.388943'
overall_score: 3.4
scores:
- name: definition_precision
  value: 3.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: The definition correctly identifies treaty as one of three mechanisms
    for exchange, but lacks precision about what distinguishes treaties from other
    formal agreements. The definition could be more specific about the formal, negotiated
    nature that differentiates treaties from simpler barter or purchase arrangements.
- name: source_grounding
  value: 4.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: This entity is well-grounded in Smith's actual text from Book I, Chapter
    2, where he explicitly lists "treaty, barter, and purchase" as the three means
    of obtaining mutual good offices. The concept directly reflects Smith's categorization
    rather than introducing external interpretations.
- name: domain_placement
  value: 5.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: The placement in the "Exchange" domain is entirely appropriate, as treaties
    represent one of the fundamental mechanisms Smith identifies for economic exchange
    and obtaining mutual benefits in civilized society.
- name: vsm_relevance
  value: 2.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: Treaties as formal exchange mechanisms don't map clearly to any specific
    VSM system - they could potentially relate to S1 (operations), S2 (coordination),
    or S3 (regulation) depending on context. The concept is more about exchange methodology
    than organizational cybernetics.
- name: explanatory_value
  value: 3.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: While the entity identifies an important mechanism in Smith's framework
    of exchange, it provides limited explanatory power beyond categorization. It names
    a phenomenon but doesn't deeply illuminate the structural relations or mechanisms
    that make treaties effective for mutual benefit.
---

# Evaluation: Treaty

## definition_precision — 3.0 / 5.0

The definition correctly identifies treaty as one of three mechanisms for exchange, but lacks precision about what distinguishes treaties from other formal agreements. The definition could be more specific about the formal, negotiated nature that differentiates treaties from simpler barter or purchase arrangements.

## source_grounding — 4.0 / 5.0

This entity is well-grounded in Smith's actual text from Book I, Chapter 2, where he explicitly lists "treaty, barter, and purchase" as the three means of obtaining mutual good offices. The concept directly reflects Smith's categorization rather than introducing external interpretations.

## domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0

The placement in the "Exchange" domain is entirely appropriate, as treaties represent one of the fundamental mechanisms Smith identifies for economic exchange and obtaining mutual benefits in civilized society.

## vsm_relevance — 2.0 / 5.0

Treaties as formal exchange mechanisms don't map clearly to any specific VSM system - they could potentially relate to S1 (operations), S2 (coordination), or S3 (regulation) depending on context. The concept is more about exchange methodology than organizational cybernetics.

## explanatory_value — 3.0 / 5.0

While the entity identifies an important mechanism in Smith's framework of exchange, it provides limited explanatory power beyond categorization. It names a phenomenon but doesn't deeply illuminate the structural relations or mechanisms that make treaties effective for mutual benefit.
