---
entity_slug: bank_credit_quality
evaluator: null
evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T00:38:07.244071'
overall_score: 4.2
scores:
- name: definition_precision
  value: 4.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: The definition clearly distinguishes bank credit quality as the standard
    of borrowers and investments, linking it specifically to repayment likelihood
    and banking stability. It avoids circularity and captures a distinct concept,
    though it could be slightly more precise about measurement criteria.
- name: source_grounding
  value: 4.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: Smith does examine banking practices and the importance of sound lending
    in Book II, Chapter 2, discussing how banks should evaluate borrowers and maintain
    prudent standards. The concept aligns well with his analysis of banking operations
    and their economic effects.
- name: domain_placement
  value: 5.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: '"Regulation" is the appropriate domain since credit quality standards
    are fundamentally about how banks regulate their lending practices and maintain
    institutional stability. This fits perfectly within regulatory and prudential
    banking concepts.'
- name: vsm_relevance
  value: 4.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: This entity maps well to S3 (internal regulation/audit) as credit quality
    assessment is a key internal control mechanism for banks. It also has relevance
    to S2 (coordination) in terms of maintaining system stability across the banking
    sector.
- name: explanatory_value
  value: 4.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: The entity illuminates an important mechanism by which banks maintain
    stability and contribute to economic development through prudent lending standards.
    It explains a structural relationship between lending practices and broader economic
    outcomes rather than merely naming a surface phenomenon.
---

# Evaluation: Bank Credit Quality

## definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0

The definition clearly distinguishes bank credit quality as the standard of borrowers and investments, linking it specifically to repayment likelihood and banking stability. It avoids circularity and captures a distinct concept, though it could be slightly more precise about measurement criteria.

## source_grounding — 4.0 / 5.0

Smith does examine banking practices and the importance of sound lending in Book II, Chapter 2, discussing how banks should evaluate borrowers and maintain prudent standards. The concept aligns well with his analysis of banking operations and their economic effects.

## domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0

"Regulation" is the appropriate domain since credit quality standards are fundamentally about how banks regulate their lending practices and maintain institutional stability. This fits perfectly within regulatory and prudential banking concepts.

## vsm_relevance — 4.0 / 5.0

This entity maps well to S3 (internal regulation/audit) as credit quality assessment is a key internal control mechanism for banks. It also has relevance to S2 (coordination) in terms of maintaining system stability across the banking sector.

## explanatory_value — 4.0 / 5.0

The entity illuminates an important mechanism by which banks maintain stability and contribute to economic development through prudent lending standards. It explains a structural relationship between lending practices and broader economic outcomes rather than merely naming a surface phenomenon.
