---
entity_slug: colony_economic_system_equilibrium
evaluator: null
evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T04:53:43.843593'
overall_score: 2.6
scores:
- name: definition_precision
  value: 2.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: The definition is vague and relies on undefined terms like "stable state,"
    "naturally tend," and "balanced growth" without specifying what constitutes equilibrium
    or how it's measured. It reads more like a general economic principle than a precise,
    operationalizable concept.
- name: source_grounding
  value: 3.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: While Smith does discuss colonial economies and their natural development,
    the specific framing of a "stable equilibrium state" with "balanced growth across
    sectors" appears to impose modern equilibrium theory concepts that may not reflect
    Smith's actual analytical framework. The general idea of natural development is
    present, but the equilibrium terminology seems anachronistic.
- name: domain_placement
  value: 2.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: '"Accumulation" seems like a poor fit for what is described as a systemic
    equilibrium state. This concept appears more related to systemic coordination
    or regulation rather than the process of capital accumulation per se.'
- name: vsm_relevance
  value: 4.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: This entity maps well to VSM System 3 (internal regulation) as it describes
    the self-regulating tendency of colonial economic systems to achieve balance.
    It could also relate to S2 (coordination) in terms of how different sectors coordinate
    naturally.
- name: explanatory_value
  value: 2.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: The entity names a phenomenon (tendency toward equilibrium) but doesn't
    illuminate the specific mechanisms by which colonial economies achieve this balance
    or what structural relations enable it. It remains at a high level of abstraction
    without explanatory depth.
---

# Evaluation: Colony Economic System Equilibrium

## definition_precision — 2.0 / 5.0

The definition is vague and relies on undefined terms like "stable state," "naturally tend," and "balanced growth" without specifying what constitutes equilibrium or how it's measured. It reads more like a general economic principle than a precise, operationalizable concept.

## source_grounding — 3.0 / 5.0

While Smith does discuss colonial economies and their natural development, the specific framing of a "stable equilibrium state" with "balanced growth across sectors" appears to impose modern equilibrium theory concepts that may not reflect Smith's actual analytical framework. The general idea of natural development is present, but the equilibrium terminology seems anachronistic.

## domain_placement — 2.0 / 5.0

"Accumulation" seems like a poor fit for what is described as a systemic equilibrium state. This concept appears more related to systemic coordination or regulation rather than the process of capital accumulation per se.

## vsm_relevance — 4.0 / 5.0

This entity maps well to VSM System 3 (internal regulation) as it describes the self-regulating tendency of colonial economic systems to achieve balance. It could also relate to S2 (coordination) in terms of how different sectors coordinate naturally.

## explanatory_value — 2.0 / 5.0

The entity names a phenomenon (tendency toward equilibrium) but doesn't illuminate the specific mechanisms by which colonial economies achieve this balance or what structural relations enable it. It remains at a high level of abstraction without explanatory depth.
