---
entity_slug: capital_employment_security_gradient
evaluator: null
evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T04:40:54.516689'
overall_score: 4.6
scores:
- name: definition_precision
  value: 4.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: The definition clearly articulates a spectrum of security levels across
    different capital employment types, with specific examples and clear ordering
    from most to least secure. The concept is distinct and well-bounded, though it
    could benefit from more precise criteria for what constitutes "security" in this
    context.
- name: source_grounding
  value: 5.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: This concept is directly grounded in Smith's analysis in Book III, Chapter
    1, where he explicitly discusses how different forms of capital employment carry
    varying degrees of security and risk. Smith clearly establishes this hierarchy
    and uses it to explain investment preferences and economic development patterns.
- name: domain_placement
  value: 5.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: The placement in the "Accumulation" domain is highly appropriate, as
    this gradient directly relates to how capital is accumulated, allocated, and employed
    across different investment opportunities. This is fundamentally about capital
    formation and deployment decisions.
- name: vsm_relevance
  value: 4.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: This entity maps well to S4 (intelligence/environmental adaptation) as
    it represents how economic actors assess and respond to environmental risks and
    opportunities when making capital allocation decisions. It also has some relevance
    to S1 as it affects primary operational choices.
- name: explanatory_value
  value: 5.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: This concept provides significant explanatory power by revealing the
    underlying mechanism that drives capital allocation decisions and the natural
    progression of economic development. It explains why certain investment patterns
    emerge and persist, making it a valuable analytical tool rather than mere description.
---

# Evaluation: Capital Employment Security Gradient

## definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0

The definition clearly articulates a spectrum of security levels across different capital employment types, with specific examples and clear ordering from most to least secure. The concept is distinct and well-bounded, though it could benefit from more precise criteria for what constitutes "security" in this context.

## source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0

This concept is directly grounded in Smith's analysis in Book III, Chapter 1, where he explicitly discusses how different forms of capital employment carry varying degrees of security and risk. Smith clearly establishes this hierarchy and uses it to explain investment preferences and economic development patterns.

## domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0

The placement in the "Accumulation" domain is highly appropriate, as this gradient directly relates to how capital is accumulated, allocated, and employed across different investment opportunities. This is fundamentally about capital formation and deployment decisions.

## vsm_relevance — 4.0 / 5.0

This entity maps well to S4 (intelligence/environmental adaptation) as it represents how economic actors assess and respond to environmental risks and opportunities when making capital allocation decisions. It also has some relevance to S1 as it affects primary operational choices.

## explanatory_value — 5.0 / 5.0

This concept provides significant explanatory power by revealing the underlying mechanism that drives capital allocation decisions and the natural progression of economic development. It explains why certain investment patterns emerge and persist, making it a valuable analytical tool rather than mere description.
