---
entity_slug: agricultural_surplus
evaluator: null
evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T00:32:03.090020'
overall_score: 4.4
scores:
- name: definition_precision
  value: 4.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: The definition is clear and precise, distinguishing agricultural surplus
    as the specific excess beyond maintenance costs for farmers, laborers, and livestock.
    It avoids circularity and establishes concrete boundaries for what constitutes
    this surplus.
- name: source_grounding
  value: 5.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: This concept is directly grounded in Smith's analysis in Book I, Chapter
    11, where he explicitly discusses how rent derives from the surplus produce of
    land after necessary cultivation costs. The entity accurately reflects Smith's
    theoretical framework without introducing foreign concepts.
- name: domain_placement
  value: 5.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: '"Production" is the correct domain assignment, as agricultural surplus
    is fundamentally about the productive capacity of land and the output that exceeds
    input requirements. This fits naturally within production economics rather than
    exchange or distribution domains.'
- name: vsm_relevance
  value: 3.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: Agricultural surplus maps reasonably well to S1 (primary operations)
    as it represents the fundamental productive output of the agricultural system.
    However, it also has elements relevant to S3 (resource allocation) and S4 (environmental
    adaptation), making its VSM placement somewhat diffuse.
- name: explanatory_value
  value: 5.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: This entity provides significant explanatory power by illuminating the
    fundamental mechanism underlying rent theory and the basis for non-agricultural
    economic activity. It reveals the structural relationship between agricultural
    productivity and broader economic organization in Smith's framework.
---

# Evaluation: Agricultural Surplus

## definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0

The definition is clear and precise, distinguishing agricultural surplus as the specific excess beyond maintenance costs for farmers, laborers, and livestock. It avoids circularity and establishes concrete boundaries for what constitutes this surplus.

## source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0

This concept is directly grounded in Smith's analysis in Book I, Chapter 11, where he explicitly discusses how rent derives from the surplus produce of land after necessary cultivation costs. The entity accurately reflects Smith's theoretical framework without introducing foreign concepts.

## domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0

"Production" is the correct domain assignment, as agricultural surplus is fundamentally about the productive capacity of land and the output that exceeds input requirements. This fits naturally within production economics rather than exchange or distribution domains.

## vsm_relevance — 3.0 / 5.0

Agricultural surplus maps reasonably well to S1 (primary operations) as it represents the fundamental productive output of the agricultural system. However, it also has elements relevant to S3 (resource allocation) and S4 (environmental adaptation), making its VSM placement somewhat diffuse.

## explanatory_value — 5.0 / 5.0

This entity provides significant explanatory power by illuminating the fundamental mechanism underlying rent theory and the basis for non-agricultural economic activity. It reveals the structural relationship between agricultural productivity and broader economic organization in Smith's framework.
