---
entity_slug: original_government_manners
evaluator: null
evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T06:04:03.749573'
overall_score: 4.0
scores:
- name: definition_precision
  value: 3.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: The definition captures a distinct concept about persistent institutional
    characteristics, but it's somewhat vague about what specifically constitutes these
    "manners" and how they mechanistically create barriers. The connection between
    social customs and economic development patterns could be more precisely articulated.
- name: source_grounding
  value: 4.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: This appears well-grounded in Smith's analysis of European economic development
    in Book III, Chapter 1, where he discusses how historical governmental structures
    influenced economic patterns. The concept of institutional persistence affecting
    natural economic progression aligns with Smith's historical analysis.
- name: domain_placement
  value: 5.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: '"Regulation" is the correct domain placement, as this entity deals with
    governmental structures and institutional frameworks that regulate economic activity.
    The focus on governmental manners and their constraining effects on economic development
    clearly falls within regulatory concerns.'
- name: vsm_relevance
  value: 4.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: This entity maps well to S5 (identity/policy) as it concerns the fundamental
    governmental identity and policy frameworks that persist over time and shape systemic
    behavior. It also has relevance to S3 (internal regulation) in terms of how these
    institutional patterns regulate economic development.
- name: explanatory_value
  value: 4.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: The entity provides genuine explanatory power by identifying institutional
    persistence as a mechanism that explains why European economic development diverged
    from Smith's "natural" progression. It illuminates how historical path dependence
    creates structural constraints on economic development patterns.
---

# Evaluation: Original Government Manners

## definition_precision — 3.0 / 5.0

The definition captures a distinct concept about persistent institutional characteristics, but it's somewhat vague about what specifically constitutes these "manners" and how they mechanistically create barriers. The connection between social customs and economic development patterns could be more precisely articulated.

## source_grounding — 4.0 / 5.0

This appears well-grounded in Smith's analysis of European economic development in Book III, Chapter 1, where he discusses how historical governmental structures influenced economic patterns. The concept of institutional persistence affecting natural economic progression aligns with Smith's historical analysis.

## domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0

"Regulation" is the correct domain placement, as this entity deals with governmental structures and institutional frameworks that regulate economic activity. The focus on governmental manners and their constraining effects on economic development clearly falls within regulatory concerns.

## vsm_relevance — 4.0 / 5.0

This entity maps well to S5 (identity/policy) as it concerns the fundamental governmental identity and policy frameworks that persist over time and shape systemic behavior. It also has relevance to S3 (internal regulation) in terms of how these institutional patterns regulate economic development.

## explanatory_value — 4.0 / 5.0

The entity provides genuine explanatory power by identifying institutional persistence as a mechanism that explains why European economic development diverged from Smith's "natural" progression. It illuminates how historical path dependence creates structural constraints on economic development patterns.
