---
entity_slug: public_lottery
evaluator: null
evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T06:13:29.706363'
overall_score: 4.0
scores:
- name: definition_precision
  value: 4.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: The definition clearly distinguishes public lottery as a government-sponsored
    gambling scheme and precisely captures Smith's analytical use of it as an illustration
    of systematic cognitive bias regarding risk assessment. The definition avoids
    circularity and identifies the specific behavioral economics insight Smith derives
    from this example.
- name: source_grounding
  value: 5.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: This entity is directly grounded in Smith's actual text from Book I,
    Chapter 10, where he explicitly uses public lotteries as an analytical tool to
    explain how people misjudge probabilities. The behavioral insight about overvaluing
    gains and undervaluing losses accurately reflects Smith's argument without introducing
    external concepts.
- name: domain_placement
  value: 4.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: '"General Theory" is appropriate as this concept illustrates Smith''s
    broader theoretical insights about human psychology and market behavior rather
    than belonging to a specific economic sector. The lottery example serves as a
    foundational building block for understanding labor market dynamics and risk assessment
    across multiple domains.'
- name: vsm_relevance
  value: 2.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: This entity represents a cognitive/behavioral phenomenon rather than
    an organizational system or function, making it largely VSM-neutral. While it
    might tangentially relate to S4 (intelligence/environmental adaptation) in terms
    of how individuals process information about opportunities, it doesn't naturally
    map to VSM system categories.
- name: explanatory_value
  value: 5.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: This entity provides significant explanatory power by illuminating the
    psychological mechanism underlying market inefficiencies and career choices, explaining
    why certain professions remain overcrowded despite poor average outcomes. It reveals
    a fundamental structural relationship between human psychology and economic behavior
    that Smith uses to explain broader market phenomena.
---

# Evaluation: Public Lottery

## definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0

The definition clearly distinguishes public lottery as a government-sponsored gambling scheme and precisely captures Smith's analytical use of it as an illustration of systematic cognitive bias regarding risk assessment. The definition avoids circularity and identifies the specific behavioral economics insight Smith derives from this example.

## source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0

This entity is directly grounded in Smith's actual text from Book I, Chapter 10, where he explicitly uses public lotteries as an analytical tool to explain how people misjudge probabilities. The behavioral insight about overvaluing gains and undervaluing losses accurately reflects Smith's argument without introducing external concepts.

## domain_placement — 4.0 / 5.0

"General Theory" is appropriate as this concept illustrates Smith's broader theoretical insights about human psychology and market behavior rather than belonging to a specific economic sector. The lottery example serves as a foundational building block for understanding labor market dynamics and risk assessment across multiple domains.

## vsm_relevance — 2.0 / 5.0

This entity represents a cognitive/behavioral phenomenon rather than an organizational system or function, making it largely VSM-neutral. While it might tangentially relate to S4 (intelligence/environmental adaptation) in terms of how individuals process information about opportunities, it doesn't naturally map to VSM system categories.

## explanatory_value — 5.0 / 5.0

This entity provides significant explanatory power by illuminating the psychological mechanism underlying market inefficiencies and career choices, explaining why certain professions remain overcrowded despite poor average outcomes. It reveals a fundamental structural relationship between human psychology and economic behavior that Smith uses to explain broader market phenomena.
