---
entity_slug: natural_inclinations_thwarting
evaluator: null
evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T05:59:04.028277'
overall_score: 4.6
scores:
- name: definition_precision
  value: 4.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: The definition is quite precise, clearly distinguishing between natural
    economic preferences and artificial institutional interference that disrupts capital
    flow. It avoids circularity by specifying the mechanism (legal/customary restrictions)
    and the outcome (forced investment in less preferred uses).
- name: source_grounding
  value: 5.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: "This concept is directly grounded in Smith's analysis in Book III, Chapter\
    \ 1, where he explicitly discusses how human institutions interfere with the natural\
    \ order of economic development. The specific reference to the inversion of natural\
    \ progression (agriculture \u2192 manufacturing \u2192 foreign trade) in European\
    \ states is faithful to Smith's argument."
- name: domain_placement
  value: 5.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: The "Regulation" domain placement is exactly correct, as this entity
    describes how regulatory and institutional constraints interfere with natural
    market mechanisms. This is fundamentally about the regulatory environment's impact
    on economic behavior.
- name: vsm_relevance
  value: 4.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: This entity maps well to S3 (internal regulation) as it describes how
    regulatory mechanisms can malfunction by constraining rather than enabling optimal
    resource allocation. It also has relevance to S2 (coordination) since it describes
    institutional failures that create oscillations away from natural economic patterns.
- name: explanatory_value
  value: 5.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: This entity provides significant explanatory power by identifying a key
    mechanism through which institutional design can distort economic development
    patterns. It illuminates the structural relationship between regulatory frameworks
    and capital allocation efficiency, going beyond mere description to explain causation.
---

# Evaluation: Natural Inclinations Thwarting

## definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0

The definition is quite precise, clearly distinguishing between natural economic preferences and artificial institutional interference that disrupts capital flow. It avoids circularity by specifying the mechanism (legal/customary restrictions) and the outcome (forced investment in less preferred uses).

## source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0

This concept is directly grounded in Smith's analysis in Book III, Chapter 1, where he explicitly discusses how human institutions interfere with the natural order of economic development. The specific reference to the inversion of natural progression (agriculture → manufacturing → foreign trade) in European states is faithful to Smith's argument.

## domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0

The "Regulation" domain placement is exactly correct, as this entity describes how regulatory and institutional constraints interfere with natural market mechanisms. This is fundamentally about the regulatory environment's impact on economic behavior.

## vsm_relevance — 4.0 / 5.0

This entity maps well to S3 (internal regulation) as it describes how regulatory mechanisms can malfunction by constraining rather than enabling optimal resource allocation. It also has relevance to S2 (coordination) since it describes institutional failures that create oscillations away from natural economic patterns.

## explanatory_value — 5.0 / 5.0

This entity provides significant explanatory power by identifying a key mechanism through which institutional design can distort economic development patterns. It illuminates the structural relationship between regulatory frameworks and capital allocation efficiency, going beyond mere description to explain causation.
