---
entity_slug: economic_system_analysis
evaluator: null
evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T05:12:49.904979'
overall_score: 2.2
scores:
- name: definition_precision
  value: 2.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: The definition is overly broad and circular, essentially defining economic
    system analysis as "examining economic arrangements to understand how they function."
    It lacks specificity about what distinguishes this from general economic inquiry
    and reads more like a generic description than a precise conceptual definition.
- name: source_grounding
  value: 2.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: While Smith does analyze different economic systems in Book IV, the entity
    appears to abstract this into a meta-concept that Smith himself doesn't explicitly
    articulate. The source chapter reference "Book IV, Chapter 0" is problematic since
    Book IV doesn't have a Chapter 0, suggesting weak textual grounding.
- name: domain_placement
  value: 3.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: '"General Theory" is appropriate given the broad, methodological nature
    of the concept, though the entity is so abstract it could arguably fit in multiple
    domains. The placement isn''t incorrect but reflects the entity''s lack of conceptual
    specificity.'
- name: vsm_relevance
  value: 2.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: This entity is too abstract and meta-analytical to map meaningfully to
    any specific VSM system. It describes a general analytical approach rather than
    a functional component of an economic system, making it largely VSM-neutral but
    not in a useful way.
- name: explanatory_value
  value: 2.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: The entity adds little explanatory power beyond naming what economists
    generally do when studying systems. It doesn't illuminate specific mechanisms,
    structural relations, or provide insights that wouldn't be captured by more concrete
    analytical concepts Smith actually discusses.
---

# Evaluation: Economic System Analysis

## definition_precision — 2.0 / 5.0

The definition is overly broad and circular, essentially defining economic system analysis as "examining economic arrangements to understand how they function." It lacks specificity about what distinguishes this from general economic inquiry and reads more like a generic description than a precise conceptual definition.

## source_grounding — 2.0 / 5.0

While Smith does analyze different economic systems in Book IV, the entity appears to abstract this into a meta-concept that Smith himself doesn't explicitly articulate. The source chapter reference "Book IV, Chapter 0" is problematic since Book IV doesn't have a Chapter 0, suggesting weak textual grounding.

## domain_placement — 3.0 / 5.0

"General Theory" is appropriate given the broad, methodological nature of the concept, though the entity is so abstract it could arguably fit in multiple domains. The placement isn't incorrect but reflects the entity's lack of conceptual specificity.

## vsm_relevance — 2.0 / 5.0

This entity is too abstract and meta-analytical to map meaningfully to any specific VSM system. It describes a general analytical approach rather than a functional component of an economic system, making it largely VSM-neutral but not in a useful way.

## explanatory_value — 2.0 / 5.0

The entity adds little explanatory power beyond naming what economists generally do when studying systems. It doesn't illuminate specific mechanisms, structural relations, or provide insights that wouldn't be captured by more concrete analytical concepts Smith actually discusses.
