---
entity_slug: economic_system_influence
evaluator: null
evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T05:17:04.852886'
overall_score: 2.2
scores:
- name: definition_precision
  value: 2.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: The definition is overly broad and vague, essentially describing "the
    effects of economic systems on society" without identifying any specific mechanisms
    or distinct conceptual boundaries. It reads more like a general category than
    a precise analytical concept.
- name: source_grounding
  value: 2.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: While Smith does discuss different economic systems and their effects
    throughout Book IV, this entity appears to be a modern analytical abstraction
    rather than a concept Smith himself articulated. The attribution to "Book IV,
    Chapter 0" is problematic since Book IV doesn't have a Chapter 0.
- name: domain_placement
  value: 3.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: '"General Theory" is appropriate given the broad, abstract nature of
    this concept, though the entity is so general it could arguably fit in multiple
    domains. The placement reflects the entity''s lack of specificity rather than
    clear conceptual boundaries.'
- name: vsm_relevance
  value: 2.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: "This entity is too abstract and general to map meaningfully to any specific\
    \ VSM system\u2014it could theoretically relate to all systems (S1-S5) but provides\
    \ no clear structural insight. It lacks the specificity needed for useful VSM\
    \ analysis."
- name: explanatory_value
  value: 2.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: The entity merely names a very general phenomenon (economic systems have
    effects) without illuminating any specific mechanisms, causal relationships, or
    structural principles that would advance understanding of political economy. It
    adds little beyond stating the obvious.
---

# Evaluation: Economic System Influence

## definition_precision — 2.0 / 5.0

The definition is overly broad and vague, essentially describing "the effects of economic systems on society" without identifying any specific mechanisms or distinct conceptual boundaries. It reads more like a general category than a precise analytical concept.

## source_grounding — 2.0 / 5.0

While Smith does discuss different economic systems and their effects throughout Book IV, this entity appears to be a modern analytical abstraction rather than a concept Smith himself articulated. The attribution to "Book IV, Chapter 0" is problematic since Book IV doesn't have a Chapter 0.

## domain_placement — 3.0 / 5.0

"General Theory" is appropriate given the broad, abstract nature of this concept, though the entity is so general it could arguably fit in multiple domains. The placement reflects the entity's lack of specificity rather than clear conceptual boundaries.

## vsm_relevance — 2.0 / 5.0

This entity is too abstract and general to map meaningfully to any specific VSM system—it could theoretically relate to all systems (S1-S5) but provides no clear structural insight. It lacks the specificity needed for useful VSM analysis.

## explanatory_value — 2.0 / 5.0

The entity merely names a very general phenomenon (economic systems have effects) without illuminating any specific mechanisms, causal relationships, or structural principles that would advance understanding of political economy. It adds little beyond stating the obvious.
