---
entity_slug: hop_garden
evaluator: null
evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T05:35:10.972122'
overall_score: 4.2
scores:
- name: definition_precision
  value: 4.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: The definition is clear and specific, identifying hop gardens as specialized
    agricultural land for hop cultivation used in beer production. It avoids circularity
    and distinguishes this from general agricultural land through its specialized
    nature and higher rent potential.
- name: source_grounding
  value: 5.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: This entity is well-grounded in Smith's actual text from Book I, Chapter
    11, where he specifically discusses hop gardens as examples of specialized agricultural
    production that command higher rents due to their intensive cultivation requirements
    and valuable output.
- name: domain_placement
  value: 5.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: The "Production" domain assignment is entirely appropriate, as hop gardens
    represent a specific form of agricultural production with distinct economic characteristics.
    This fits naturally within Smith's analysis of different types of productive activities
    and their economic returns.
- name: vsm_relevance
  value: 3.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: Hop gardens map most naturally to S1 (primary operations) as a specific
    productive activity, but the concept is relatively VSM-neutral. While it represents
    operational production, it doesn't strongly illuminate coordination, regulation,
    intelligence, or policy functions within an economic system.
- name: explanatory_value
  value: 4.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: This entity provides good explanatory value by illustrating Smith's broader
    principle that specialized, intensive agricultural production can command higher
    rents and returns than general farming. It demonstrates the economic mechanism
    linking specialization, investment intensity, and rental returns in agricultural
    markets.
---

# Evaluation: Hop Garden

## definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0

The definition is clear and specific, identifying hop gardens as specialized agricultural land for hop cultivation used in beer production. It avoids circularity and distinguishes this from general agricultural land through its specialized nature and higher rent potential.

## source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0

This entity is well-grounded in Smith's actual text from Book I, Chapter 11, where he specifically discusses hop gardens as examples of specialized agricultural production that command higher rents due to their intensive cultivation requirements and valuable output.

## domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0

The "Production" domain assignment is entirely appropriate, as hop gardens represent a specific form of agricultural production with distinct economic characteristics. This fits naturally within Smith's analysis of different types of productive activities and their economic returns.

## vsm_relevance — 3.0 / 5.0

Hop gardens map most naturally to S1 (primary operations) as a specific productive activity, but the concept is relatively VSM-neutral. While it represents operational production, it doesn't strongly illuminate coordination, regulation, intelligence, or policy functions within an economic system.

## explanatory_value — 4.0 / 5.0

This entity provides good explanatory value by illustrating Smith's broader principle that specialized, intensive agricultural production can command higher rents and returns than general farming. It demonstrates the economic mechanism linking specialization, investment intensity, and rental returns in agricultural markets.
