---
entity_slug: colonial_economic_policy_effectiveness
evaluator: null
evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T04:46:52.881287'
overall_score: 4.0
scores:
- name: definition_precision
  value: 3.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: The definition captures a meaningful concept about policy effectiveness
    but remains somewhat vague with phrases like "intended economic outcomes" and
    "more open policies typically prove more effective." It could be more precise
    about what constitutes effectiveness and how it's measured.
- name: source_grounding
  value: 4.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: This entity is well-grounded in Smith's actual analysis in Book IV, Chapter
    7, where he extensively critiques monopolistic colonial policies and argues for
    more liberal approaches. The characterization of Smith's position on policy effectiveness
    versus monopoly approaches accurately reflects the source text.
- name: domain_placement
  value: 5.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: The "Regulation" domain is perfectly appropriate for this entity, as
    it directly concerns the effectiveness of different regulatory approaches to colonial
    management. This is fundamentally about regulatory policy choices and their outcomes.
- name: vsm_relevance
  value: 4.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: This entity maps well to S3 (internal regulation/audit) as it concerns
    evaluating and optimizing regulatory approaches, and potentially S4 (intelligence/adaptation)
    as it involves learning which policies work better in different environments.
    It has clear VSM relevance for organizational learning and regulatory effectiveness.
- name: explanatory_value
  value: 4.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: This entity provides genuine explanatory power by illuminating the structural
    relationship between policy approach (monopolistic vs. open) and outcomes, helping
    explain why certain colonial policies systematically failed while others succeeded.
    It reveals an important mechanism in Smith's economic thinking about institutional
    design.
---

# Evaluation: Colonial Economic Policy Effectiveness

## definition_precision — 3.0 / 5.0

The definition captures a meaningful concept about policy effectiveness but remains somewhat vague with phrases like "intended economic outcomes" and "more open policies typically prove more effective." It could be more precise about what constitutes effectiveness and how it's measured.

## source_grounding — 4.0 / 5.0

This entity is well-grounded in Smith's actual analysis in Book IV, Chapter 7, where he extensively critiques monopolistic colonial policies and argues for more liberal approaches. The characterization of Smith's position on policy effectiveness versus monopoly approaches accurately reflects the source text.

## domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0

The "Regulation" domain is perfectly appropriate for this entity, as it directly concerns the effectiveness of different regulatory approaches to colonial management. This is fundamentally about regulatory policy choices and their outcomes.

## vsm_relevance — 4.0 / 5.0

This entity maps well to S3 (internal regulation/audit) as it concerns evaluating and optimizing regulatory approaches, and potentially S4 (intelligence/adaptation) as it involves learning which policies work better in different environments. It has clear VSM relevance for organizational learning and regulatory effectiveness.

## explanatory_value — 4.0 / 5.0

This entity provides genuine explanatory power by illuminating the structural relationship between policy approach (monopolistic vs. open) and outcomes, helping explain why certain colonial policies systematically failed while others succeeded. It reveals an important mechanism in Smith's economic thinking about institutional design.
