---
entity_slug: colonial_economic_stability
evaluator: null
evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T04:47:18.526839'
overall_score: 4.0
scores:
- name: definition_precision
  value: 3.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: The definition captures a coherent concept of economic resilience but
    is somewhat broad, encompassing multiple related phenomena (growth consistency,
    market management, adaptability). While not circular, it could be more precise
    about what specifically constitutes "stability" versus other economic outcomes.
- name: source_grounding
  value: 4.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: This entity is well-grounded in Smith's actual arguments about colonial
    monopolies creating artificial dependencies and limiting adaptive capacity. The
    connection between economic freedom, diversification, and stability reflects Smith's
    explicit reasoning about the negative effects of restrictive colonial policies.
- name: domain_placement
  value: 5.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: '"General Theory" is the appropriate domain placement as this entity
    represents a broad theoretical principle about the relationship between economic
    freedom and stability that applies across Smith''s analysis. It''s not specific
    to particular mechanisms but rather a general economic principle.'
- name: vsm_relevance
  value: 4.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: This entity maps well to VSM System 4 (intelligence/environmental adaptation)
    as it concerns an economy's ability to adapt to changing conditions and external
    shocks. It also relates to System 2 (anti-oscillation) through its focus on managing
    market fluctuations and maintaining stability.
- name: explanatory_value
  value: 4.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: The entity provides genuine explanatory power by illuminating the structural
    relationship between economic freedom, diversification, and systemic resilience.
    It helps explain why Smith advocates against monopolistic colonial arrangements
    by showing the stability benefits of more open economic systems.
---

# Evaluation: Colonial Economic Stability

## definition_precision — 3.0 / 5.0

The definition captures a coherent concept of economic resilience but is somewhat broad, encompassing multiple related phenomena (growth consistency, market management, adaptability). While not circular, it could be more precise about what specifically constitutes "stability" versus other economic outcomes.

## source_grounding — 4.0 / 5.0

This entity is well-grounded in Smith's actual arguments about colonial monopolies creating artificial dependencies and limiting adaptive capacity. The connection between economic freedom, diversification, and stability reflects Smith's explicit reasoning about the negative effects of restrictive colonial policies.

## domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0

"General Theory" is the appropriate domain placement as this entity represents a broad theoretical principle about the relationship between economic freedom and stability that applies across Smith's analysis. It's not specific to particular mechanisms but rather a general economic principle.

## vsm_relevance — 4.0 / 5.0

This entity maps well to VSM System 4 (intelligence/environmental adaptation) as it concerns an economy's ability to adapt to changing conditions and external shocks. It also relates to System 2 (anti-oscillation) through its focus on managing market fluctuations and maintaining stability.

## explanatory_value — 4.0 / 5.0

The entity provides genuine explanatory power by illuminating the structural relationship between economic freedom, diversification, and systemic resilience. It helps explain why Smith advocates against monopolistic colonial arrangements by showing the stability benefits of more open economic systems.
