---
entity_slug: assaying
evaluator: null
evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T00:35:54.499834'
overall_score: 4.4
scores:
- name: definition_precision
  value: 4.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: The definition is precise and captures a distinct technical process -
    testing metal purity to verify quality in exchange. It clearly distinguishes assaying
    from other metal-related processes and specifies its role in addressing uncertainty
    about metal quality.
- name: source_grounding
  value: 5.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: This entity is directly grounded in Smith's text where he explicitly
    discusses the inconveniences of using unstamped metals, including the difficulty
    and uncertainty of determining their purity. The concept emerges naturally from
    Smith's analysis of early exchange mechanisms.
- name: domain_placement
  value: 5.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: The "Exchange" domain placement is correct, as assaying is fundamentally
    about verifying the quality of exchange media (metals) to facilitate trade. This
    fits perfectly within Smith's discussion of the evolution of exchange mechanisms.
- name: vsm_relevance
  value: 4.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: Assaying maps well to S3 (internal regulation/audit) as it represents
    a quality control and verification function within exchange systems. It could
    also relate to S2 (coordination) by reducing uncertainty and enabling smoother
    transactions between parties.
- name: explanatory_value
  value: 4.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: This entity illuminates a crucial mechanism in the evolution of money
    - how societies addressed the problem of verifying exchange media quality. It
    helps explain why stamped coinage emerged as a solution to the assaying problem,
    showing structural relations in monetary development.
---

# Evaluation: Assaying

## definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0

The definition is precise and captures a distinct technical process - testing metal purity to verify quality in exchange. It clearly distinguishes assaying from other metal-related processes and specifies its role in addressing uncertainty about metal quality.

## source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0

This entity is directly grounded in Smith's text where he explicitly discusses the inconveniences of using unstamped metals, including the difficulty and uncertainty of determining their purity. The concept emerges naturally from Smith's analysis of early exchange mechanisms.

## domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0

The "Exchange" domain placement is correct, as assaying is fundamentally about verifying the quality of exchange media (metals) to facilitate trade. This fits perfectly within Smith's discussion of the evolution of exchange mechanisms.

## vsm_relevance — 4.0 / 5.0

Assaying maps well to S3 (internal regulation/audit) as it represents a quality control and verification function within exchange systems. It could also relate to S2 (coordination) by reducing uncertainty and enabling smoother transactions between parties.

## explanatory_value — 4.0 / 5.0

This entity illuminates a crucial mechanism in the evolution of money - how societies addressed the problem of verifying exchange media quality. It helps explain why stamped coinage emerged as a solution to the assaying problem, showing structural relations in monetary development.
