---
entity_slug: colonial_economic_system
evaluator: null
evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T04:50:40.956601'
overall_score: 4.4
scores:
- name: definition_precision
  value: 4.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: The definition clearly delineates the colonial system's key components
    (exclusive trade, administrative control, military protection) and its fundamental
    asymmetric relationship structure. It avoids circularity and captures the essential
    economic dependency mechanism Smith critiques.
- name: source_grounding
  value: 5.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: This entity directly reflects Smith's extensive analysis in Book IV,
    Chapter 8, where he systematically examines colonial costs versus benefits and
    critiques the mercantile colonial framework. The definition accurately captures
    his core arguments about colonies as economic dependencies and cost burdens.
- name: domain_placement
  value: 5.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: '"Regulation" is the correct domain placement as Smith treats the colonial
    system as a regulatory framework that artificially constrains trade flows and
    market relationships. This fits perfectly within his broader critique of mercantile
    regulations that distort natural economic processes.'
- name: vsm_relevance
  value: 3.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: The colonial system spans multiple VSM functions - S1 (economic operations),
    S3 (administrative control), and S4 (strategic positioning) - making it somewhat
    diffuse from a VSM perspective. While it has clear regulatory and operational
    aspects, it doesn't map cleanly to a single VSM system.
- name: explanatory_value
  value: 5.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: This entity provides substantial explanatory power by illuminating the
    structural mechanisms of colonial economic extraction and control that Smith identifies
    as fundamentally inefficient. It reveals how regulatory frameworks can create
    systematic economic distortions rather than merely naming a historical phenomenon.
---

# Evaluation: Colonial Economic System

## definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0

The definition clearly delineates the colonial system's key components (exclusive trade, administrative control, military protection) and its fundamental asymmetric relationship structure. It avoids circularity and captures the essential economic dependency mechanism Smith critiques.

## source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0

This entity directly reflects Smith's extensive analysis in Book IV, Chapter 8, where he systematically examines colonial costs versus benefits and critiques the mercantile colonial framework. The definition accurately captures his core arguments about colonies as economic dependencies and cost burdens.

## domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0

"Regulation" is the correct domain placement as Smith treats the colonial system as a regulatory framework that artificially constrains trade flows and market relationships. This fits perfectly within his broader critique of mercantile regulations that distort natural economic processes.

## vsm_relevance — 3.0 / 5.0

The colonial system spans multiple VSM functions - S1 (economic operations), S3 (administrative control), and S4 (strategic positioning) - making it somewhat diffuse from a VSM perspective. While it has clear regulatory and operational aspects, it doesn't map cleanly to a single VSM system.

## explanatory_value — 5.0 / 5.0

This entity provides substantial explanatory power by illuminating the structural mechanisms of colonial economic extraction and control that Smith identifies as fundamentally inefficient. It reveals how regulatory frameworks can create systematic economic distortions rather than merely naming a historical phenomenon.
