---
entity_slug: economic_geography_determinism
evaluator: null
evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T05:10:29.821204'
overall_score: 4.4
scores:
- name: definition_precision
  value: 4.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: The definition clearly distinguishes between geographical features determining
    economic patterns versus merely influencing them, and specifies the mechanisms
    (market extent, division of labour). The concept is well-bounded and avoids circularity.
- name: source_grounding
  value: 5.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: This directly reflects Smith's explicit argument in Book I, Chapter 3
    about how water-carriage determines the initial location of industry and the sequence
    of economic development from coastal to inland areas. The deterministic framing
    accurately captures Smith's strong causal claims.
- name: domain_placement
  value: 5.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: '"General Theory" is the correct domain placement as this represents
    a fundamental theoretical principle about how geography shapes economic development
    patterns, rather than a specific mechanism or policy application.'
- name: vsm_relevance
  value: 4.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: This maps well to S4 (intelligence/environmental adaptation) as it concerns
    how economic systems must adapt to and work within geographical constraints and
    opportunities. It represents a key environmental factor that shapes system viability.
- name: explanatory_value
  value: 4.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: This provides genuine explanatory power by identifying geography as a
    structural determinant of economic possibilities, helping explain why certain
    development patterns emerge and why market extent varies systematically across
    locations.
---

# Evaluation: Economic Geography Determinism

## definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0

The definition clearly distinguishes between geographical features determining economic patterns versus merely influencing them, and specifies the mechanisms (market extent, division of labour). The concept is well-bounded and avoids circularity.

## source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0

This directly reflects Smith's explicit argument in Book I, Chapter 3 about how water-carriage determines the initial location of industry and the sequence of economic development from coastal to inland areas. The deterministic framing accurately captures Smith's strong causal claims.

## domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0

"General Theory" is the correct domain placement as this represents a fundamental theoretical principle about how geography shapes economic development patterns, rather than a specific mechanism or policy application.

## vsm_relevance — 4.0 / 5.0

This maps well to S4 (intelligence/environmental adaptation) as it concerns how economic systems must adapt to and work within geographical constraints and opportunities. It represents a key environmental factor that shapes system viability.

## explanatory_value — 4.0 / 5.0

This provides genuine explanatory power by identifying geography as a structural determinant of economic possibilities, helping explain why certain development patterns emerge and why market extent varies systematically across locations.
