---
entity_slug: bank_information_asymmetry
evaluator: null
evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T00:42:25.594624'
overall_score: 4.0
scores:
- name: definition_precision
  value: 4.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: The definition clearly articulates the concept of information asymmetry
    in banking contexts, distinguishing it from general market information problems.
    It specifies the parties involved (banks vs. other market participants) and the
    consequences (effects on credit allocation and risk assessment).
- name: source_grounding
  value: 3.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: While Smith does discuss banking operations and credit assessment in
    Book II, Chapter 2, the specific framing of "information asymmetry" uses modern
    economic terminology that may not directly reflect Smith's 18th-century conceptual
    framework. The underlying ideas about banks' superior knowledge are present, but
    the theoretical construct is somewhat anachronistic.
- name: domain_placement
  value: 5.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: The "Exchange" domain is perfectly appropriate for this concept, as information
    asymmetry fundamentally concerns how information flows (or fails to flow) between
    parties in financial transactions. This is a core aspect of exchange mechanisms
    and market functioning.
- name: vsm_relevance
  value: 4.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: This entity maps well to S4 (intelligence/environmental adaptation) as
    it concerns how banks gather and process information about their environment to
    make lending decisions. It also relates to S3 (internal regulation) in terms of
    risk management processes that banks must implement to handle information gaps.
- name: explanatory_value
  value: 4.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: The concept provides significant explanatory power for understanding
    banking mechanisms, credit markets, and financial intermediation. It illuminates
    why banks exist as specialized institutions and explains structural features of
    financial systems rather than merely describing surface phenomena.
---

# Evaluation: Bank Information Asymmetry

## definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0

The definition clearly articulates the concept of information asymmetry in banking contexts, distinguishing it from general market information problems. It specifies the parties involved (banks vs. other market participants) and the consequences (effects on credit allocation and risk assessment).

## source_grounding — 3.0 / 5.0

While Smith does discuss banking operations and credit assessment in Book II, Chapter 2, the specific framing of "information asymmetry" uses modern economic terminology that may not directly reflect Smith's 18th-century conceptual framework. The underlying ideas about banks' superior knowledge are present, but the theoretical construct is somewhat anachronistic.

## domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0

The "Exchange" domain is perfectly appropriate for this concept, as information asymmetry fundamentally concerns how information flows (or fails to flow) between parties in financial transactions. This is a core aspect of exchange mechanisms and market functioning.

## vsm_relevance — 4.0 / 5.0

This entity maps well to S4 (intelligence/environmental adaptation) as it concerns how banks gather and process information about their environment to make lending decisions. It also relates to S3 (internal regulation) in terms of risk management processes that banks must implement to handle information gaps.

## explanatory_value — 4.0 / 5.0

The concept provides significant explanatory power for understanding banking mechanisms, credit markets, and financial intermediation. It illuminates why banks exist as specialized institutions and explains structural features of financial systems rather than merely describing surface phenomena.
