---
entity_slug: statutes_of_apprenticeship_effects
evaluator: null
evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T06:25:36.532758'
overall_score: 4.2
scores:
- name: definition_precision
  value: 4.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: The definition clearly captures a specific asymmetric effect of apprenticeship
    laws - their ability to raise wages above natural rates during prosperity versus
    forcing them below during decline. The concept is distinct and well-bounded, though
    it could be slightly more precise about the mechanisms involved.
- name: source_grounding
  value: 5.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: This entity directly reflects Smith's analysis in Book I, Chapter 7,
    where he explicitly discusses how apprenticeship statutes have different effects
    during prosperity versus decline, and notes their more durable effect in raising
    wages than reducing them. The temporal aspect about effects lasting only as long
    as workers' lives is also grounded in the source text.
- name: domain_placement
  value: 5.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: '"Regulation" is the correct domain placement as this entity specifically
    concerns the effects of legal statutes (apprenticeship laws) on labor markets.
    This is clearly a regulatory mechanism rather than a natural market phenomenon.'
- name: vsm_relevance
  value: 3.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: This entity has moderate VSM relevance, primarily mapping to S2 (coordination)
    as it describes how regulations attempt to coordinate labor markets, though with
    unintended oscillatory effects. It also touches on S3 (internal regulation) through
    its regulatory mechanism, but the mapping is not as natural as more operational
    concepts.
- name: explanatory_value
  value: 4.0
  max_value: 5.0
  rationale: The entity provides genuine explanatory power by illuminating the asymmetric
    and temporal dynamics of how regulatory interventions affect wage determination.
    It reveals an important structural mechanism about how legal constraints interact
    with market forces over time, rather than merely describing a surface phenomenon.
---

# Evaluation: Statutes Of Apprenticeship Effects

## definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0

The definition clearly captures a specific asymmetric effect of apprenticeship laws - their ability to raise wages above natural rates during prosperity versus forcing them below during decline. The concept is distinct and well-bounded, though it could be slightly more precise about the mechanisms involved.

## source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0

This entity directly reflects Smith's analysis in Book I, Chapter 7, where he explicitly discusses how apprenticeship statutes have different effects during prosperity versus decline, and notes their more durable effect in raising wages than reducing them. The temporal aspect about effects lasting only as long as workers' lives is also grounded in the source text.

## domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0

"Regulation" is the correct domain placement as this entity specifically concerns the effects of legal statutes (apprenticeship laws) on labor markets. This is clearly a regulatory mechanism rather than a natural market phenomenon.

## vsm_relevance — 3.0 / 5.0

This entity has moderate VSM relevance, primarily mapping to S2 (coordination) as it describes how regulations attempt to coordinate labor markets, though with unintended oscillatory effects. It also touches on S3 (internal regulation) through its regulatory mechanism, but the mapping is not as natural as more operational concepts.

## explanatory_value — 4.0 / 5.0

The entity provides genuine explanatory power by illuminating the asymmetric and temporal dynamics of how regulatory interventions affect wage determination. It reveals an important structural mechanism about how legal constraints interact with market forces over time, rather than merely describing a surface phenomenon.
