1548 lines
62 KiB
Markdown
1548 lines
62 KiB
Markdown
|
|
# Extract Economic Entities
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
You are an analytical economist specializing in classical economic theory.
|
|||
|
|
Your task is to extract distinct economic entities from a chapter of
|
|||
|
|
Adam Smith's *The Wealth of Nations*.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## Source Chapter
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
id: book-4-chapter-06
|
|||
|
|
title: "OF TREATIES OF COMMERCE."
|
|||
|
|
book: "4"
|
|||
|
|
chapter: 6
|
|||
|
|
artifact_type: content
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
CHAPTER VI.
|
|||
|
|
OF TREATIES OF COMMERCE.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
When a nation binds itself by treaty, either to permit the entry of
|
|||
|
|
certain goods from one foreign country which it prohibits from all others,
|
|||
|
|
or to exempt the goods of one country from duties to which it subjects
|
|||
|
|
those of all others, the country, or at least the merchants and
|
|||
|
|
manufacturers of the country, whose commerce is so favoured, must
|
|||
|
|
necessarily derive great advantage from the treaty. Those merchants and
|
|||
|
|
manufacturers enjoy a sort of monopoly in the country which is so
|
|||
|
|
indulgent to them. That country becomes a market, both more extensive and
|
|||
|
|
more advantageous for their goods: more extensive, because the goods of
|
|||
|
|
other nations being either excluded or subjected to heavier duties, it
|
|||
|
|
takes off a greater quantity of theirs; more advantageous, because the
|
|||
|
|
merchants of the favoured country, enjoying a sort of monopoly there, will
|
|||
|
|
often sell their goods for a better price than if exposed to the free
|
|||
|
|
competition of all other nations.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Such treaties, however, though they may be advantageous to the merchants
|
|||
|
|
and manufacturers of the favoured, are necessarily disadvantageous to
|
|||
|
|
those of the favouring country. A monopoly is thus granted against them to
|
|||
|
|
a foreign nation; and they must frequently buy the foreign goods they have
|
|||
|
|
occasion for, dearer than if the free competition of other nations was
|
|||
|
|
admitted. That part of its own produce with which such a nation purchases
|
|||
|
|
foreign goods, must consequently be sold cheaper; because, when two things
|
|||
|
|
are exchanged for one another, the cheapness of the one is a necessary
|
|||
|
|
consequence, or rather is the same thing, with the dearness of the other.
|
|||
|
|
The exchangeable value of its annual produce, therefore, is likely to be
|
|||
|
|
diminished by every such treaty. This diminution, however, can scarce
|
|||
|
|
amount to any positive loss, but only to a lessening of the gain which it
|
|||
|
|
might otherwise make. Though it sells its goods cheaper than it otherwise
|
|||
|
|
might do, it will not probably sell them for less than they cost; nor, as
|
|||
|
|
in the case of bounties, for a price which will not replace the capital
|
|||
|
|
employed in bringing them to market, together with the ordinary profits of
|
|||
|
|
stock. The trade could not go on long if it did. Even the favouring
|
|||
|
|
country, therefore, may still gain by the trade, though less than if there
|
|||
|
|
was a free competition.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Some treaties of commerce, however, have been supposed advantageous, upon
|
|||
|
|
principles very different from these; and a commercial country has
|
|||
|
|
sometimes granted a monopoly of this kind, against itself, to certain
|
|||
|
|
goods of a foreign nation, because it expected, that in the whole commerce
|
|||
|
|
between them, it would annually sell more than it would buy, and that a
|
|||
|
|
balance in gold and silver would be annually returned to it. It is upon
|
|||
|
|
this principle that the treaty of commerce between England and Portugal,
|
|||
|
|
concluded in 1703 by Mr Methuen, has been so much commended. The following
|
|||
|
|
is a literal translation of that treaty, which consists of three articles
|
|||
|
|
only.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
ART. I. His sacred royal majesty of Portugal promises, both in his own
|
|||
|
|
name and that of his successors, to admit for ever hereafter, into
|
|||
|
|
Portugal, the woollen cloths, and the rest of the woollen manufactures of
|
|||
|
|
the British, as was accustomed, till they were prohibited by the law;
|
|||
|
|
nevertheless upon this condition:
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
ART. II. That is to say, that her sacred royal majesty of Great Britain
|
|||
|
|
shall, in her own name, and that of her successors, be obliged, for ever
|
|||
|
|
hereafter, to admit the wines of the growth of Portugal into Britain; so
|
|||
|
|
that at no time, whether there shall be peace or war between the kingdoms
|
|||
|
|
of Britain and France, any thing more shall be demanded for these wines by
|
|||
|
|
the name of custom or duty, or by whatsoever other title, directly or
|
|||
|
|
indirectly, whether they shall be imported into Great Britain in pipes or
|
|||
|
|
hogsheads, or other casks, than what shall be demanded for the like
|
|||
|
|
quantity or measure of French wine, deducting or abating a third part of
|
|||
|
|
the custom or duty. But if, at any time, this deduction or abatement of
|
|||
|
|
customs, which is to be made as aforesaid, shall in any manner be
|
|||
|
|
attempted and prejudiced, it shall be just and lawful for his sacred royal
|
|||
|
|
majesty of Portugal, again to prohibit the woollen cloths, and the rest of
|
|||
|
|
the British woollen manufactures.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
ART. III. The most excellent lords the plenipotentiaries promise and take
|
|||
|
|
upon themselves, that their above named masters shall ratify this treaty;
|
|||
|
|
and within the space of two months the ratification shall be exchanged.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
By this treaty, the crown of Portugal becomes bound to admit the English
|
|||
|
|
woollens upon the same footing as before the prohibition; that is, not to
|
|||
|
|
raise the duties which had been paid before that time. But it does not
|
|||
|
|
become bound to admit them upon any better terms than those of any other
|
|||
|
|
nation, of France or Holland, for example. The crown of Great Britain, on
|
|||
|
|
the contrary, becomes bound to admit the wines of Portugal, upon paying
|
|||
|
|
only two-thirds of the duty which is paid for those of France, the wines
|
|||
|
|
most likely to come into competition with them. So far this treaty,
|
|||
|
|
therefore, is evidently advantageous to Portugal, and disadvantageous to
|
|||
|
|
Great Britain.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
It has been celebrated, however, as a masterpiece of the commercial policy
|
|||
|
|
of England. Portugal receives annually from the Brazils a greater quantity
|
|||
|
|
of gold than can be employed in its domestic commerce, whether in the
|
|||
|
|
shape of coin or of plate. The surplus is too valuable to be allowed to
|
|||
|
|
lie idle and locked up in coffers; and as it can find no advantageous
|
|||
|
|
market at home, it must, notwithstanding; any prohibition, be sent abroad,
|
|||
|
|
and exchanged for something for which there is a more advantageous market
|
|||
|
|
at home. A large share of it comes annually to England, in return either
|
|||
|
|
for English goods, or for those of other European nations that receive
|
|||
|
|
their returns through England. Mr Barretti was informed, that the weekly
|
|||
|
|
packet-boat from Lisbon brings, one week with another, more than £50,000
|
|||
|
|
in gold to England. The sum had probably been exaggerated. It would amount
|
|||
|
|
to more than £2,600,000 a year, which is more than the Brazils are
|
|||
|
|
supposed to afford.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Our merchants were, some years ago, out of humour with the crown of
|
|||
|
|
Portugal. Some privileges which had been granted them, not by treaty, but
|
|||
|
|
by the free grace of that crown, at the solicitation, indeed, it is
|
|||
|
|
probable, and in return for much greater favours, defence and protection
|
|||
|
|
from the crown of Great Britain, had been either infringed or revoked. The
|
|||
|
|
people, therefore, usually most interested in celebrating the Portugal
|
|||
|
|
trade, were then rather disposed to represent it as less advantageous than
|
|||
|
|
it had commonly been imagined. The far greater part, almost the whole,
|
|||
|
|
they pretended, of this annual importation of gold, was not on account of
|
|||
|
|
Great Britain, but of other European nations; the fruits and wines of
|
|||
|
|
Portugal annually imported into Great Britain nearly compensating the
|
|||
|
|
value of the British goods sent thither.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Let us suppose, however, that the whole was on account of Great Britain,
|
|||
|
|
and that it amounted to a still greater sum than Mr Barretti seems to
|
|||
|
|
imagine; this trade would not, upon that account, be more advantageous
|
|||
|
|
than any other, in which, for the same value sent out, we received an
|
|||
|
|
equal value of consumable goods in return.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
It is but a very small part of this importation which, it can be supposed,
|
|||
|
|
is employed as an annual addition, either to the plate or to the coin of
|
|||
|
|
the kingdom. The rest must all be sent abroad, and exchanged for
|
|||
|
|
consumable goods of some kind or other. But if those consumable goods were
|
|||
|
|
purchased directly with the produce of English industry, it would be more
|
|||
|
|
for the advantage of England, than first to purchase with that produce the
|
|||
|
|
gold of Portugal, and afterwards to purchase with that gold those
|
|||
|
|
consumable goods. A direct foreign trade of consumption is always more
|
|||
|
|
advantageous than a round-about one; and to bring the same value of
|
|||
|
|
foreign goods to the home market requires a much smaller capital in the
|
|||
|
|
one way than in the ether. If a smaller share of its industry, therefore,
|
|||
|
|
had been employed in producing goods fit for the Portugal market, and a
|
|||
|
|
greater in producing those lit for the other markets, where those
|
|||
|
|
consumable goods for which there is a demand in Great Britain are to be
|
|||
|
|
had, it would have been more for the advantage of England. To procure both
|
|||
|
|
the gold which it wants for its own use, and the consumable goods, would,
|
|||
|
|
in this way, employ a much smaller capital than at present. There would be
|
|||
|
|
a spare capital, therefore, to be employed for other purposes, in exciting
|
|||
|
|
an additional quantity of industry, and in raising a greater annual
|
|||
|
|
produce.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Though Britain were entirely excluded from the Portugal trade, it could
|
|||
|
|
find very little difficulty in procuring all the annual supplies of gold
|
|||
|
|
which it wants, either for the purposes of plate, or of coin, or of
|
|||
|
|
foreign trade. Gold, like every other commodity, is always somewhere or
|
|||
|
|
another to be got for its value by those who have that value to give for
|
|||
|
|
it. The annual surplus of gold in Portugal, besides, would still be sent
|
|||
|
|
abroad, and though not carried away by Great Britain, would be carried
|
|||
|
|
away by some other nation, which would be glad to sell it again for its
|
|||
|
|
price, in the same manner as Great Britain does at present. In buying gold
|
|||
|
|
of Portugal, indeed, we buy it at the first hand; whereas, in buying it of
|
|||
|
|
any other nation, except Spain, we should buy it at the second, and might
|
|||
|
|
pay somewhat dearer. This difference, however, would surely be too
|
|||
|
|
insignificant to deserve the public attention.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Almost all our gold, it is said, comes from Portugal. With other nations,
|
|||
|
|
the balance of trade is either against as, or not much in our favour. But
|
|||
|
|
we should remember, that the more gold we import from one country, the
|
|||
|
|
less we must necessarily import from all others. The effectual demand for
|
|||
|
|
gold, like that for every other commodity, is in every country limited to
|
|||
|
|
a certain quantity. If nine-tenths of this quantity are imported from one
|
|||
|
|
country, there remains a tenth only to be imported from all others. The
|
|||
|
|
more gold, besides, that is annually imported from some particular
|
|||
|
|
countries, over and above what is requisite for plate and for coin, the
|
|||
|
|
more must necessarily be exported to some others: and the more that most
|
|||
|
|
insignificant object of modern policy, the balance of trade, appears to be
|
|||
|
|
in our favour with some particular countries, the more it must necessarily
|
|||
|
|
appear to be against us with many others.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
It was upon this silly notion, however, that England could not subsist
|
|||
|
|
without the Portugal trade, that, towards the end of the late war, France
|
|||
|
|
and Spain, without pretending either offence or provocation, required the
|
|||
|
|
king of Portugal to exclude all British ships from his ports, and, for the
|
|||
|
|
security of this exclusion, to receive into them French or Spanish
|
|||
|
|
garrisons. Had the king of Portugal submitted to those ignominious terms
|
|||
|
|
which his brother-in-law the king of Spain proposed to him, Britain would
|
|||
|
|
have been freed from a much greater inconveniency than the loss of the
|
|||
|
|
Portugal trade, the burden of supporting a very weak ally, so unprovided
|
|||
|
|
of every thing for his own defence, that the whole power of England, had
|
|||
|
|
it been directed to that single purpose, could scarce, perhaps, have
|
|||
|
|
defended him for another campaign. The loss of the Portugal trade would,
|
|||
|
|
no doubt, have occasioned a considerable embarrassment to the merchants at
|
|||
|
|
that time engaged in it, who might not, perhaps, have found out, for a
|
|||
|
|
year or two, any other equally advantageous method of employing their
|
|||
|
|
capitals; and in this would probably have consisted all the inconveniency
|
|||
|
|
which England could have suffered from this notable piece of commercial
|
|||
|
|
policy.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
The great annual importation of gold and silver is neither for the purpose
|
|||
|
|
of plate nor of coin, but of foreign trade. A round-about foreign trade of
|
|||
|
|
consumption can be carried on more advantageously by means of these metals
|
|||
|
|
than of almost any other goods. As they are the universal instruments of
|
|||
|
|
commerce, they are more readily received in return for all commodities
|
|||
|
|
than any other goods; and, on account of their small bulk and great value,
|
|||
|
|
it costs less to transport them backward and forward from one place to
|
|||
|
|
another than almost any other sort of merchandize, and they lose less of
|
|||
|
|
their value by being so transported. Of all the commodities, therefore,
|
|||
|
|
which are bought in one foreign country, for no other purpose but to be
|
|||
|
|
sold or exchanged again for some other goods in another, there are none so
|
|||
|
|
convenient as gold and silver. In facilitating all the different
|
|||
|
|
round-about foreign trades of consumption which are carried on in Great
|
|||
|
|
Britain, consists the principal advantage of the Portugal trade; and
|
|||
|
|
though it is not a capital advantage, it is, no doubt, a considerable one.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
That any annual addition which, it can reasonably be supposed, is made
|
|||
|
|
either to the plate or to the coin of the kingdom, could require but a
|
|||
|
|
very small annual importation of gold and silver, seems evident enough;
|
|||
|
|
and though we had no direct trade with Portugal, this small quantity could
|
|||
|
|
always, somewhere or another, be very easily got.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Though the goldsmiths trade be very considerable in Great Britain, the far
|
|||
|
|
greater part of the new plate which they annually sell, is made from other
|
|||
|
|
old plate melted down; so that the addition annually made to the whole
|
|||
|
|
plate of the kingdom cannot be very great, and could require but a very
|
|||
|
|
small annual importation.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
It is the same case with the coin. Nobody imagines, I believe, that even
|
|||
|
|
the greater part of the annual coinage, amounting, for ten years together,
|
|||
|
|
before the late reformation of the gold coin, to upwards of £800,000
|
|||
|
|
a-year in gold, was an annual addition to the money before current in the
|
|||
|
|
kingdom. In a country where the expense of the coinage is defrayed by the
|
|||
|
|
government, the value of the coin, even when it contains its full standard
|
|||
|
|
weight of gold and silver, can never be much greater than that of an equal
|
|||
|
|
quantity of those metals uncoined, because it requires only the trouble of
|
|||
|
|
going to the mint, and the delay, perhaps, of a few weeks, to procure for
|
|||
|
|
any quantity of uncoined gold and silver an equal quantity of those metals
|
|||
|
|
in coin; but in every country the greater part of the current coin is
|
|||
|
|
almost always more or less worn, or otherwise degenerated from its
|
|||
|
|
standard. In Great Britain it was, before the late reformation, a good
|
|||
|
|
deal so, the gold being more than two per cent., and the silver more than
|
|||
|
|
eight per cent. below its standard weight. But if forty-four guineas and
|
|||
|
|
a-half, containing their full standard weight, a pound weight of gold,
|
|||
|
|
could purchase very little more than a pound weight of uncoined gold;
|
|||
|
|
forty-four guineas and a-half, wanting a part of their weight, could not
|
|||
|
|
purchase a pound weight, and something was to be added, in order to make
|
|||
|
|
up the deficiency. The current price of gold bullion at market, therefore,
|
|||
|
|
instead of being the same with the mint price, or £46:14:6, was then about
|
|||
|
|
£47:14s., and sometimes about £48. When the greater part of the coin,
|
|||
|
|
however, was in this degenerate condition, forty four guineas and a-half,
|
|||
|
|
fresh from the mint, would purchase no more goods in the market than any
|
|||
|
|
other ordinary guineas; because, when they came into the coffers of the
|
|||
|
|
merchant, being confounded with other money, they could not afterwards be
|
|||
|
|
distinguished without more trouble than the difference was worth. Like
|
|||
|
|
other guineas, they were worth no more than £46:14:6. If thrown into the
|
|||
|
|
melting pot, however, they produced, without any sensible loss, a pound
|
|||
|
|
weight of standard gold, which could be sold at any time for between
|
|||
|
|
£47:14s. and £48, either in gold or silver, as fit for all the purposes of
|
|||
|
|
coin as that which had been melted down. There was an evident profit,
|
|||
|
|
therefore, in melting down new-coined money; and it was done so
|
|||
|
|
instantaneously, that no precaution of government could prevent it. The
|
|||
|
|
operations of the mint were, upon this account, somewhat like the web of
|
|||
|
|
Penelope; the work that was done in the day was undone in the night. The
|
|||
|
|
mint was employed, not so much in making daily additions to the coin, as
|
|||
|
|
in replacing the very best part of it, which was daily melted down.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Were the private people who carry their gold and silver to the mint to pay
|
|||
|
|
themselves for the coinage, it would add to the value of those metals, in
|
|||
|
|
the same manner as the fashion does to that of plate. Coined gold and
|
|||
|
|
silver would be more valuable than uncoined. The seignorage, if it was not
|
|||
|
|
exorbitant, would add to the bullion the whole value of the duty; because,
|
|||
|
|
the government having everywhere the exclusive privilege of coining, no
|
|||
|
|
coin can come to market cheaper than they think proper to afford it. If
|
|||
|
|
the duty was exorbitant, indeed, that is, if it was very much above the
|
|||
|
|
real value of the labour and expense requisite for coinage, false coiners,
|
|||
|
|
both at home and abroad, might be encouraged, by the great difference
|
|||
|
|
between the value of bullion and that of coin, to pour in so great a
|
|||
|
|
quantity of counterfeit money as might reduce the value of the government
|
|||
|
|
money. In France, however, though the seignorage is eight per cent., no
|
|||
|
|
sensible inconveniency of this kind is found to arise from it. The dangers
|
|||
|
|
to which a false coiner is everywhere exposed, if he lives in the country
|
|||
|
|
of which he counterfeits the coin, and to which his agents or
|
|||
|
|
correspondents are exposed, if he lives in a foreign country, are by far
|
|||
|
|
too great to be incurred for the sake of a profit of six or seven per
|
|||
|
|
cent.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
The seignorage in France raises the value of the coin higher than in
|
|||
|
|
proportion to the quantity of pure gold which it contains. Thus, by the
|
|||
|
|
edict of January 1726, the mint price of fine gold of twenty-four carats
|
|||
|
|
was fixed at seven hundred and forty livres nine sous and one denier
|
|||
|
|
one-eleventh the mark of eight Paris ounces. {See Dictionnaire des
|
|||
|
|
Monnoies, tom. ii. article Seigneurage, p. 439, par 81. Abbot de
|
|||
|
|
Bazinghen, Conseiller-Commissaire en la Cour des Monnoies à Paris.} The
|
|||
|
|
gold coin of France, making an allowance for the remedy of the mint,
|
|||
|
|
contains twenty-one carats and three-fourths of fine gold, and two carats
|
|||
|
|
one-fourth of alloy. The mark of standard gold, therefore, is worth no
|
|||
|
|
more than about six hundred and seventy-one livres ten deniers. But in
|
|||
|
|
France this mark of standard gold is coined into thirty louis d’ors of
|
|||
|
|
twenty-four livres each, or into seven hundred and twenty livres. The
|
|||
|
|
coinage, therefore, increases the value of a mark of standard gold
|
|||
|
|
bullion, by the difference between six hundred and seventy-one livres ten
|
|||
|
|
deniers and seven hundred and twenty livres, or by forty-eight livres
|
|||
|
|
nineteen sous and two deniers.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
A seignorage will, in many cases, take away altogether, and will in all
|
|||
|
|
cases diminish, the profit of melting down the new coin. This profit
|
|||
|
|
always arises from the difference between the quantity of bullion which
|
|||
|
|
the common currency ought to contain and that which it actually does
|
|||
|
|
contain. If this difference is less than the seignorage, there will be
|
|||
|
|
loss instead of profit. If it is equal to the seignorage, there will be
|
|||
|
|
neither profit nor loss. If it is greater than the seignorage, there will,
|
|||
|
|
indeed, be some profit, but less than if there was no seignorage. If,
|
|||
|
|
before the late reformation of the gold coin, for example, there had been
|
|||
|
|
a seignorage of five per cent. upon the coinage, there would have been a
|
|||
|
|
loss of three per cent. upon the melting down of the gold coin. If the
|
|||
|
|
seignorage had been two per cent., there would have been neither profit
|
|||
|
|
nor loss. If the seignorage had been one per cent., there would have been
|
|||
|
|
a profit but of one per cent. only, instead of two per cent. Wherever
|
|||
|
|
money is received by tale, therefore, and not by weight, a seignorage is
|
|||
|
|
the most effectual preventive of the melting down of the coin, and, for
|
|||
|
|
the same reason, of its exportation. It is the best and heaviest pieces
|
|||
|
|
that are commonly either melted down or exported, because it is upon such
|
|||
|
|
that the largest profits are made.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
The law for the encouragement of the coinage, by rendering it duty-free,
|
|||
|
|
was first enacted during the reign of Charles II. for a limited time, and
|
|||
|
|
afterwards continued, by different prolongations, till 1769, when it was
|
|||
|
|
rendered perpetual. The bank of England, in order to replenish their
|
|||
|
|
coffers with money, are frequently obliged to carry bullion to the mint;
|
|||
|
|
and it was more for their interest, they probably imagined, that the
|
|||
|
|
coinage should be at the expense of the government than at their own. It
|
|||
|
|
was probably out of complaisance to this great company, that the
|
|||
|
|
government agreed to render this law perpetual. Should the custom of
|
|||
|
|
weighing gold, however, come to be disused, as it is very likely to be on
|
|||
|
|
account of its inconveniency; should the gold coin of England come to be
|
|||
|
|
received by tale, as it was before the late recoinage this great company
|
|||
|
|
may, perhaps, find that they have, upon this, as upon some other
|
|||
|
|
occasions, mistaken their own interest not a little.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Before the late recoinage, when the gold currency of England was two per
|
|||
|
|
cent. below its standard weight, as there was no seignorage, it was two
|
|||
|
|
per cent. below the value of that quantity of standard gold bullion which
|
|||
|
|
it ought to have contained. When this great company, therefore, bought
|
|||
|
|
gold bullion in order to have it coined, they were obliged to pay for it
|
|||
|
|
two per cent. more than it was worth after the coinage. But if there had
|
|||
|
|
been a seignorage of two per cent. upon the coinage, the common gold
|
|||
|
|
currency, though two per cent. below its standard weight, would,
|
|||
|
|
notwithstanding, have been equal in value to the quantity of standard gold
|
|||
|
|
which it ought to have contained; the value of the fashion compensating in
|
|||
|
|
this case the diminution of the weight. They would, indeed, have had the
|
|||
|
|
seignorage to pay, which being two per cent., their loss upon the whole
|
|||
|
|
transaction would have been two per cent., exactly the same, but no
|
|||
|
|
greater than it actually was.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
If the seignorage had been five per cent. and the gold currency only two
|
|||
|
|
per cent. below its standard weight, the bank would, in this case, have
|
|||
|
|
gained three per cent. upon the price of the bullion; but as they would
|
|||
|
|
have had a seignorage of five per cent. to pay upon the coinage, their
|
|||
|
|
loss upon the whole transaction would, in the same manner, have been
|
|||
|
|
exactly two per cent.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
If the seignorage had been only one per cent., and the gold currency two
|
|||
|
|
per cent. below its standard weight, the bank would, in this case, have
|
|||
|
|
lost only one per cent. upon the price of the bullion; but as they would
|
|||
|
|
likewise have had a seignorage of one per cent. to pay, their loss upon
|
|||
|
|
the whole transaction would have been exactly two per cent., in the same
|
|||
|
|
manner as in all other cases.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
If there was a reasonable seignorage, while at the same time the coin
|
|||
|
|
contained its full standard weight, as it has done very nearly since the
|
|||
|
|
late recoinage, whatever the bank might lose by the seignorage, they would
|
|||
|
|
gain upon the price of the bullion; and whatever they might gain upon the
|
|||
|
|
price of the bullion, they would lose by the seignorage. They would
|
|||
|
|
neither lose nor gain, therefore, upon the whole transaction, and they
|
|||
|
|
would in this, as in all the foregoing cases, be exactly in the same
|
|||
|
|
situation as if there was no seignorage.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
When the tax upon a commodity is so moderate as not to encourage
|
|||
|
|
smuggling, the merchant who deals in it, though he advances, does not
|
|||
|
|
properly pay the tax, as he gets it back in the price of the commodity.
|
|||
|
|
The tax is finally paid by the last purchaser or consumer. But money is a
|
|||
|
|
commodity, with regard to which every man is a merchant. Nobody buys it
|
|||
|
|
but in order to sell it again; and with regard to it there is, in ordinary
|
|||
|
|
cases, no last purchaser or consumer. When the tax upon coinage,
|
|||
|
|
therefore, is so moderate as not to encourage false coining, though every
|
|||
|
|
body advances the tax, nobody finally pays it; because every body gets it
|
|||
|
|
back in the advanced value of the coin.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
A moderate seignorage, therefore, would not, in any case, augment the
|
|||
|
|
expense of the bank, or of any other private persons who carry their
|
|||
|
|
bullion to the mint in order to be coined; and the want of a moderate
|
|||
|
|
seignorage does not in any case diminish it. Whether there is or is not a
|
|||
|
|
seignorage, if the currency contains its full standard weight, the coinage
|
|||
|
|
costs nothing to anybody; and if it is short of that weight, the coinage
|
|||
|
|
must always cost the difference between the quantity of bullion which
|
|||
|
|
ought to be contained in it, and that which actually is contained in it.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
The government, therefore, when it defrays the expense of coinage, not
|
|||
|
|
only incurs some small expense, but loses some small revenue which it
|
|||
|
|
might get by a proper duty; and neither the bank, nor any other private
|
|||
|
|
persons, are in the smallest degree benefited by this useless piece of
|
|||
|
|
public generosity.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
The directors of the bank, however, would probably be unwilling to agree
|
|||
|
|
to the imposition of a seignorage upon the authority of a speculation
|
|||
|
|
which promises them no gain, but only pretends to insure them from any
|
|||
|
|
loss. In the present state of the gold coin, and as long as it continues
|
|||
|
|
to be received by weight, they certainly would gain nothing by such a
|
|||
|
|
change. But if the custom of weighing the gold coin should ever go into
|
|||
|
|
disuse, as it is very likely to do, and if the gold coin should ever fall
|
|||
|
|
into the same state of degradation in which it was before the late
|
|||
|
|
recoinage, the gain, or more properly the savings, of the bank,
|
|||
|
|
in consequence of the imposition of a seignorage, would probably be very
|
|||
|
|
considerable. The bank of England is the only company which sends any
|
|||
|
|
considerable quantity of bullion to the mint, and the burden of the annual
|
|||
|
|
coinage falls entirely, or almost entirely, upon it. If this annual
|
|||
|
|
coinage had nothing to do but to repair the unavoidable losses and
|
|||
|
|
necessary wear and tear of the coin, it could seldom exceed fifty
|
|||
|
|
thousand, or at most a hundred thousand pounds. But when the coin is
|
|||
|
|
degraded below its standard weight, the annual coinage must, besides this,
|
|||
|
|
fill up the large vacuities which exportation and the melting pot are
|
|||
|
|
continually making in the current coin. It was upon this account, that
|
|||
|
|
during the ten or twelve years immediately preceding the late reformation
|
|||
|
|
of the gold coin, the annual coinage amounted, at an average, to more than
|
|||
|
|
£850,000. But if there had been a seignorage of four or five per cent.
|
|||
|
|
upon the gold coin, it would probably, even in the state in which things
|
|||
|
|
then were, have put an effectual stop to the business both of exportation
|
|||
|
|
and of the melting pot. The bank, instead of losing every year about two
|
|||
|
|
and a half per cent. upon the bullion which was to be coined into more
|
|||
|
|
than eight hundred and fifty thousand pounds, or incurring an annual loss
|
|||
|
|
of more than £21,250 pounds, would not probably have incurred the tenth
|
|||
|
|
part of that loss.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
The revenue allotted by parliament for defraying the expense of the
|
|||
|
|
coinage is but fourteen thousand pounds a-year; and the real expense which
|
|||
|
|
it costs the government, or the fees of the officers of the mint, do not,
|
|||
|
|
upon ordinary occasions, I am assured, exceed the half of that sum. The
|
|||
|
|
saving of so very small a sum, or even the gaining of another, which could
|
|||
|
|
not well be much larger, are objects too inconsiderable, it may be
|
|||
|
|
thought, to deserve the serious attention of government. But the saving of
|
|||
|
|
eighteen or twenty thousand pounds a-year, in case of an event which is
|
|||
|
|
not improbable, which has frequently happened before, and which is very
|
|||
|
|
likely to happen again, is surely an object which well deserves the
|
|||
|
|
serious attention, even of so great a company as the bank of England.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Some of the foregoing reasonings and observations might, perhaps, have
|
|||
|
|
been more properly placed in those chapters of the first book which treat
|
|||
|
|
of the origin and use of money, and of the difference between the real and
|
|||
|
|
the nominal price of commodities. But as the law for the encouragement of
|
|||
|
|
coinage derives its origin from those vulgar prejudices which have been
|
|||
|
|
introduced by the mercantile system, I judged it more proper to reserve
|
|||
|
|
them for this chapter. Nothing could be more agreeable to the spirit of
|
|||
|
|
that system than a sort of bounty upon the production of money, the very
|
|||
|
|
thing which, it supposes, constitutes the wealth of every nation. It is
|
|||
|
|
one of its many admirable expedients for enriching the country.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## Extraction Guidelines
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
id: extraction-rules
|
|||
|
|
name: extraction_rules
|
|||
|
|
artifact_type: content
|
|||
|
|
description: Guidelines for extracting economic entities from source text
|
|||
|
|
version: 1.0.0
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
# Entity Extraction Rules
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## What Constitutes an Entity
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
An economic entity is a distinct concept, actor, mechanism, or institution
|
|||
|
|
that plays a functional role in Adam Smith's economic analysis. Extract
|
|||
|
|
entities at the level of specificity where they carry independent meaning.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## Extraction Criteria
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
1. **Concepts**: Abstract economic ideas (e.g., "division of labour",
|
|||
|
|
"effectual demand", "natural price"). Extract when Smith defines,
|
|||
|
|
explains, or argues about the concept.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
2. **Actors**: Economic agents with defined roles (e.g., "the labourer",
|
|||
|
|
"the merchant", "the sovereign"). Extract when the actor performs
|
|||
|
|
a distinct economic function.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
3. **Mechanisms**: Processes or dynamics that produce economic effects
|
|||
|
|
(e.g., "accumulation of stock", "market price adjustment",
|
|||
|
|
"foreign trade"). Extract when the mechanism is described as
|
|||
|
|
producing specific outcomes.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
4. **Institutions**: Organised structures that shape economic behaviour
|
|||
|
|
(e.g., "the corporation", "the guild", "the joint-stock company").
|
|||
|
|
Extract when the institution's economic function is described.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## Granularity Rules
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
- Extract at the level of a single coherent concept.
|
|||
|
|
- Do NOT extract synonyms as separate entities — choose the primary term
|
|||
|
|
Smith uses and note variations.
|
|||
|
|
- DO extract distinct aspects of a broad concept as separate entities when
|
|||
|
|
Smith treats them independently (e.g., "wages of labour" and "profits
|
|||
|
|
of stock" are separate from "price of commodities" even though they
|
|||
|
|
compose it).
|
|||
|
|
- If an entity appears across multiple chapters, extract it on first
|
|||
|
|
significant appearance and note cross-references in later chapters.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## Naming Conventions
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
- Use Smith's own terminology where possible.
|
|||
|
|
- Normalise to lowercase except for proper nouns.
|
|||
|
|
- Use the most common form Smith uses (e.g., "division of labour" not
|
|||
|
|
"divided labour").
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## Quality Checks
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
- Each entity must have a definition that would be comprehensible without
|
|||
|
|
reading the source chapter.
|
|||
|
|
- Each entity must cite the specific book and chapter of first appearance.
|
|||
|
|
- **Economic Domain** must be EXACTLY ONE of: Production, Distribution,
|
|||
|
|
Exchange, Consumption, Accumulation, Regulation, or General Theory.
|
|||
|
|
Do not combine multiple domains. Do not use any other value.
|
|||
|
|
- **Source Chapter format**: Use `Book [Roman numeral], Chapter [number]`
|
|||
|
|
— for example `Book I, Chapter 3`. Do not include the chapter title,
|
|||
|
|
quotation marks, markdown formatting, or asterisks. Use Roman numerals
|
|||
|
|
for the book (I, II, III, IV, V).
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## VSM Framework Context
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Use the following VSM framework as context to guide your extraction.
|
|||
|
|
Prioritize entities that are likely to have clear mappings to VSM concepts,
|
|||
|
|
but do not exclude entities simply because they lack an obvious mapping.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
id: vsm-framework
|
|||
|
|
name: vsm_framework
|
|||
|
|
artifact_type: content
|
|||
|
|
description: Stafford Beer's Viable System Model reference for economic analysis
|
|||
|
|
version: 1.0.0
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
# Stafford Beer's Viable System Model (VSM)
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
The Viable System Model (VSM) is a model of the organisational structure of any
|
|||
|
|
autonomous system capable of producing itself. It was created by management
|
|||
|
|
cybernetician Stafford Beer in his books *Brain of the Firm* (1972) and
|
|||
|
|
*The Heart of Enterprise* (1979).
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## Core Principle: Viability
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
A viable system is any system organised in such a way as to meet the demands
|
|||
|
|
of surviving in a changing environment. One of the prime features of systems
|
|||
|
|
that survive is that they are adaptable. The VSM expresses a model for a
|
|||
|
|
viable system, which is an abstracted cybernetic description applicable to
|
|||
|
|
any organisation that is a going concern.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## The Five Systems
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
### System 1 (S1) — Operations
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
The primary activities that produce the organisation's purpose. These are the
|
|||
|
|
operational units that directly create value. Each operational element is itself
|
|||
|
|
a viable system (the principle of recursion).
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
**In economic terms:** Productive enterprises, factories, farms, workshops,
|
|||
|
|
individual labourers performing specialised tasks, merchant operations.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
**Key properties:** Autonomy within constraints, self-organisation,
|
|||
|
|
direct engagement with the environment.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
### System 2 (S2) — Coordination
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
The information channels and bodies that allow the primary activities in
|
|||
|
|
System 1 to communicate with each other and that allow System 3 to monitor
|
|||
|
|
and coordinate activities. System 2 dampens oscillations and resolves
|
|||
|
|
conflicts between operational units.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
**In economic terms:** Market price mechanisms, trade customs, standard
|
|||
|
|
weights and measures, commercial law, banking clearinghouses, trade guilds.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
**Key properties:** Anti-oscillatory, dampening, scheduling, conflict
|
|||
|
|
resolution, standardisation.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
### System 3 (S3) — Control / Operational Management
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
The structures and controls that establish the rules, resources, rights,
|
|||
|
|
and responsibilities of System 1 and provide an interface between Systems 1
|
|||
|
|
and Systems 4/5. System 3 represents the day-to-day control of the
|
|||
|
|
organisation. It optimises the internal environment.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
**In economic terms:** Government regulation of trade, taxation policy, labour
|
|||
|
|
laws, enforcement of contracts, the "invisible hand" as emergent internal
|
|||
|
|
regulation, guilds and corporations governing members.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
**Key properties:** Internal regulation, resource allocation, accountability,
|
|||
|
|
synergy extraction, performance management.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
### System 3* (S3*) — Audit / Monitoring
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
The audit and monitoring channel that allows System 3 to verify information
|
|||
|
|
coming from System 1 through channels other than those provided by System 2.
|
|||
|
|
System 3* provides sporadic, direct access to operational reality.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
**In economic terms:** Market inspections, quality checks, auditing of accounts,
|
|||
|
|
surprise investigations into trade practices, verification of weights and measures.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
**Key properties:** Sporadic direct investigation, reality checking, bypassing
|
|||
|
|
normal reporting channels.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
### System 4 (S4) — Intelligence / Adaptation
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
The bodies and processes that look outward to the environment to monitor
|
|||
|
|
how the organisation needs to adapt to remain viable. System 4 captures
|
|||
|
|
all relevant information about the outside-and-then environment. It is
|
|||
|
|
responsible for strategic responses.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
**In economic terms:** Foreign intelligence about trade opportunities,
|
|||
|
|
market research, new technology adoption, colonial exploration and trade
|
|||
|
|
route development, understanding of foreign economic systems.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
**Key properties:** Environmental scanning, future orientation, strategic
|
|||
|
|
planning, modelling, research and development.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
### System 5 (S5) — Policy / Identity
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
The policy-making body that balances demands from Systems 3 and 4 and defines
|
|||
|
|
the identity, values, and purpose of the organisation. System 5 provides
|
|||
|
|
closure to the whole system and represents its supreme authority.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
**In economic terms:** Sovereign authority, constitutional principles governing
|
|||
|
|
economic policy, national economic identity, the philosophical foundations
|
|||
|
|
of economic systems (mercantilism vs. free trade), the overarching purpose
|
|||
|
|
of the commonwealth.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
**Key properties:** Identity, ethos, supreme command, policy closure,
|
|||
|
|
balancing internal and external perspectives.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## Key Concepts
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
### Recursion
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Every viable system contains and is contained in a viable system. The same
|
|||
|
|
five-system structure recurs at every level of organisation. A workshop is
|
|||
|
|
a viable system within a factory, which is a viable system within an
|
|||
|
|
industry, which is a viable system within a national economy.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
### Variety
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
A measure of the number of possible states of a system. The Law of Requisite
|
|||
|
|
Variety (Ashby's Law) states that only variety can absorb variety. A
|
|||
|
|
controller must have at least as much variety as the system it controls.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
### Requisite Variety
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
The principle that for effective regulation, the variety of the regulator
|
|||
|
|
must match the variety of the system being regulated. This is achieved
|
|||
|
|
through variety attenuation (reducing the variety coming up from operations)
|
|||
|
|
and variety amplification (increasing the variety of management's responses).
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
### Attenuation and Amplification
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Variety engineering mechanisms. Attenuation reduces variety (e.g., reporting
|
|||
|
|
summaries, statistical aggregation, standardisation). Amplification increases
|
|||
|
|
variety (e.g., delegation, empowerment, decentralisation).
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
### Algedonic Signals
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Emergency signals that bypass the normal management hierarchy to alert
|
|||
|
|
higher systems of critical situations requiring immediate attention. Named
|
|||
|
|
from the Greek words for pain (algos) and pleasure (hedone).
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
**In economic terms:** Market panics, famine signals, sudden price collapses,
|
|||
|
|
trade embargoes, economic crises that demand immediate sovereign intervention.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
### Autonomy
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
The degree of freedom granted to operational units (System 1) to self-organise
|
|||
|
|
within constraints set by System 3. Beer argued that maximum autonomy
|
|||
|
|
consistent with systemic cohesion yields maximum viability.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
### Viability
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
The capacity of a system to maintain a separate existence and survive in a
|
|||
|
|
changing environment. A viable system continuously adapts while maintaining
|
|||
|
|
its identity.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## Existing Entities
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
The following entities have already been extracted from previous chapters
|
|||
|
|
of this work. Do NOT re-extract any of these. If one of these entities
|
|||
|
|
appears in the current chapter, you may omit it entirely — the infospace
|
|||
|
|
already contains it. Only extract entities that are genuinely new.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
- accumulation-of-stock
|
|||
|
|
- active-and-productive-stock
|
|||
|
|
- adulteration-of-metals
|
|||
|
|
- adulterine-guilds
|
|||
|
|
- advanced-state-of-society
|
|||
|
|
- advancing-state-of-manufacture
|
|||
|
|
- agio-of-bank-money
|
|||
|
|
- agricultural-capital
|
|||
|
|
- agricultural-capital-structure
|
|||
|
|
- agricultural-comparative-advantage
|
|||
|
|
- agricultural-cultivation
|
|||
|
|
- agricultural-cultivation-at-farmer-expense
|
|||
|
|
- agricultural-cultivation-at-proprietor-expense
|
|||
|
|
- agricultural-demand
|
|||
|
|
- agricultural-development-constraints
|
|||
|
|
- agricultural-development-sequence
|
|||
|
|
- agricultural-economic-potential
|
|||
|
|
- agricultural-efficiency
|
|||
|
|
- agricultural-improvement
|
|||
|
|
- agricultural-improvement-discouragement
|
|||
|
|
- agricultural-improvement-foundation
|
|||
|
|
- agricultural-labour
|
|||
|
|
- agricultural-market-access-cost-structure
|
|||
|
|
- agricultural-market-access-development-prerequisites
|
|||
|
|
- agricultural-market-access-development-sequence
|
|||
|
|
- agricultural-market-access-gradient
|
|||
|
|
- agricultural-market-access-inequality
|
|||
|
|
- agricultural-market-access-opportunity-cost
|
|||
|
|
- agricultural-market-communication-channels
|
|||
|
|
- agricultural-market-integration
|
|||
|
|
- agricultural-market-size-threshold
|
|||
|
|
- agricultural-opportunity-cost
|
|||
|
|
- agricultural-price-ceilings
|
|||
|
|
- agricultural-price-differential
|
|||
|
|
- agricultural-price-discovery
|
|||
|
|
- agricultural-price-discrimination
|
|||
|
|
- agricultural-price-elasticity
|
|||
|
|
- agricultural-price-equalization
|
|||
|
|
- agricultural-price-floors
|
|||
|
|
- agricultural-price-mechanism
|
|||
|
|
- agricultural-price-regulation
|
|||
|
|
- agricultural-price-stability
|
|||
|
|
- agricultural-price-transmission
|
|||
|
|
- agricultural-price-volatility
|
|||
|
|
- agricultural-productivity
|
|||
|
|
- agricultural-productivity-limits
|
|||
|
|
- agricultural-security-gradient
|
|||
|
|
- agricultural-spatial-inequality
|
|||
|
|
- agricultural-specialization
|
|||
|
|
- agricultural-stock
|
|||
|
|
- agricultural-supply
|
|||
|
|
- agricultural-surplus
|
|||
|
|
- agricultural-surplus-determination
|
|||
|
|
- agricultural-technology
|
|||
|
|
- agricultural-technology-adoption
|
|||
|
|
- agricultural-trade
|
|||
|
|
- alien-merchant-duties
|
|||
|
|
- ancient-system-of-political-economy
|
|||
|
|
- annual-consumption-of-goods
|
|||
|
|
- annual-consumption-of-metals
|
|||
|
|
- annual-industry-employed-in-production
|
|||
|
|
- annual-produce-of-land-and-labour
|
|||
|
|
- apprenticeships
|
|||
|
|
- artificer-neighbourhood-settlement
|
|||
|
|
- artificer-planter-independence
|
|||
|
|
- artificer-planter-transition
|
|||
|
|
- artificer-servant-status
|
|||
|
|
- artificers-and-retailers
|
|||
|
|
- artificial-direction-of-industry
|
|||
|
|
- artificial-grasses
|
|||
|
|
- artificial-market-creation
|
|||
|
|
- artisan-specialisation
|
|||
|
|
- assaying
|
|||
|
|
- assize-of-bread
|
|||
|
|
- assize-of-bread-and-ale
|
|||
|
|
- aulnagers
|
|||
|
|
- average-price-of-corn
|
|||
|
|
- balance-of-produce-and-consumption
|
|||
|
|
- balance-of-trade
|
|||
|
|
- balance-of-trade-doctrine
|
|||
|
|
- bank-capital-adequacy
|
|||
|
|
- bank-capital-structure
|
|||
|
|
- bank-circulation-limits
|
|||
|
|
- bank-competition-effects
|
|||
|
|
- bank-credit-allocation
|
|||
|
|
- bank-credit-cycles
|
|||
|
|
- bank-credit-extension
|
|||
|
|
- bank-credit-quality
|
|||
|
|
- bank-economic-contribution
|
|||
|
|
- bank-economic-contribution-metrics
|
|||
|
|
- bank-economic-cycles
|
|||
|
|
- bank-economic-development
|
|||
|
|
- bank-economic-development-metrics
|
|||
|
|
- bank-economic-efficiency
|
|||
|
|
- bank-economic-efficiency-factors
|
|||
|
|
- bank-economic-efficiency-metrics
|
|||
|
|
- bank-economic-growth
|
|||
|
|
- bank-economic-resilience
|
|||
|
|
- bank-economic-resilience-factors
|
|||
|
|
- bank-economic-resilience-metrics
|
|||
|
|
- bank-economic-stability
|
|||
|
|
- bank-failure-mechanisms
|
|||
|
|
- bank-financial-development
|
|||
|
|
- bank-financial-innovation
|
|||
|
|
- bank-financial-innovation-adoption
|
|||
|
|
- bank-financial-innovation-diffusion
|
|||
|
|
- bank-financial-innovation-factors
|
|||
|
|
- bank-financial-innovation-impact
|
|||
|
|
- bank-financial-innovation-metrics
|
|||
|
|
- bank-financial-intermediation
|
|||
|
|
- bank-financial-intermediation-efficiency
|
|||
|
|
- bank-financial-stability
|
|||
|
|
- bank-financial-stability-factors
|
|||
|
|
- bank-financial-stability-metrics
|
|||
|
|
- bank-financial-system-integration
|
|||
|
|
- bank-financial-system-stability
|
|||
|
|
- bank-information-asymmetry
|
|||
|
|
- bank-interest-rate-determination
|
|||
|
|
- bank-liquidity-management
|
|||
|
|
- bank-market-discipline
|
|||
|
|
- bank-market-structure
|
|||
|
|
- bank-monetary-policy
|
|||
|
|
- bank-monetary-stability
|
|||
|
|
- bank-money
|
|||
|
|
- bank-notes
|
|||
|
|
- bank-operational-efficiency
|
|||
|
|
- bank-operational-risk
|
|||
|
|
- bank-public-utility
|
|||
|
|
- bank-regulatory-compliance
|
|||
|
|
- bank-regulatory-effectiveness
|
|||
|
|
- bank-regulatory-evolution
|
|||
|
|
- bank-regulatory-framework
|
|||
|
|
- bank-regulatory-framework-evolution
|
|||
|
|
- bank-reserves
|
|||
|
|
- bank-risk-management
|
|||
|
|
- bank-systemic-risk
|
|||
|
|
- bank-systemic-risk-management
|
|||
|
|
- bank-systemic-stability
|
|||
|
|
- bank-transaction-costs
|
|||
|
|
- barbarous-nations-barrier
|
|||
|
|
- barter-and-exchange
|
|||
|
|
- benevolence
|
|||
|
|
- bills-of-exchange
|
|||
|
|
- bleacher
|
|||
|
|
- boat-fishery
|
|||
|
|
- bounty
|
|||
|
|
- bullion
|
|||
|
|
- buss-fishery
|
|||
|
|
- butcher-trade
|
|||
|
|
- bye-laws
|
|||
|
|
- canal-communication
|
|||
|
|
- capital
|
|||
|
|
- capital-accumulation
|
|||
|
|
- capital-accumulation-through-frugality
|
|||
|
|
- capital-decay-through-excessive-consumption
|
|||
|
|
- capital-employed
|
|||
|
|
- capital-employment-advantages
|
|||
|
|
- capital-employment-effects
|
|||
|
|
- capital-employment-security-gradient
|
|||
|
|
- capital-of-the-farmer
|
|||
|
|
- capital-replacement
|
|||
|
|
- capital-security-preference
|
|||
|
|
- capital-security-visibility
|
|||
|
|
- carriage-value-savings
|
|||
|
|
- carrying-trade
|
|||
|
|
- cash-accounts
|
|||
|
|
- certificates
|
|||
|
|
- cheap-years
|
|||
|
|
- circulating-capital
|
|||
|
|
- circulating-capital-components
|
|||
|
|
- circulating-money
|
|||
|
|
- circulation-of-money
|
|||
|
|
- coal-heaver
|
|||
|
|
- coal-price
|
|||
|
|
- coarser-and-finer-materials
|
|||
|
|
- coined-money
|
|||
|
|
- collier
|
|||
|
|
- colonial-trade-monopoly
|
|||
|
|
- colonial-wine-duty-drawback
|
|||
|
|
- colony-prosperity
|
|||
|
|
- combination-of-masters
|
|||
|
|
- combination-of-workmen
|
|||
|
|
- command-over-labour
|
|||
|
|
- commerce-between-town-and-country
|
|||
|
|
- commerce-of-towns
|
|||
|
|
- commercial-country-ruin-predictions
|
|||
|
|
- commercial-development-sequence-inversion
|
|||
|
|
- commercial-discord-source
|
|||
|
|
- commercial-family-duration-pattern
|
|||
|
|
- commercial-hospitality-contrast
|
|||
|
|
- commercial-independence-effect
|
|||
|
|
- commercial-interactions
|
|||
|
|
- commercial-maxims-inversion
|
|||
|
|
- commercial-or-mercantile-system
|
|||
|
|
- commercial-order-and-government-introduction
|
|||
|
|
- commercial-society
|
|||
|
|
- commercial-society-emergence
|
|||
|
|
- commercial-society-formation
|
|||
|
|
- commercial-system-enrichment-mechanism
|
|||
|
|
- commercial-system-principles
|
|||
|
|
- commercial-transactions
|
|||
|
|
- common-annual-profits-of-manufacturing-stock
|
|||
|
|
- common-labour-wages
|
|||
|
|
- common-returns-of-stock
|
|||
|
|
- commonalty
|
|||
|
|
- comparative-advantage-principle
|
|||
|
|
- competition-among-buyers
|
|||
|
|
- competition-among-dealers
|
|||
|
|
- competition-among-sellers
|
|||
|
|
- complete-manufacture
|
|||
|
|
- component-parts-of-price
|
|||
|
|
- computed-exchange-rate
|
|||
|
|
- consumption-of-foreign-goods
|
|||
|
|
- contract
|
|||
|
|
- conversion-price
|
|||
|
|
- copper-money
|
|||
|
|
- corn-exportation-prohibition
|
|||
|
|
- corn-land
|
|||
|
|
- corn-rent
|
|||
|
|
- corporation-laws
|
|||
|
|
- corporation-privileges-and-market-prices
|
|||
|
|
- country-gentlemen
|
|||
|
|
- country-gentlemen-versus-merchants
|
|||
|
|
- country-life-charms
|
|||
|
|
- cultivation-improvement-priority
|
|||
|
|
- dead-stock
|
|||
|
|
- dear-years
|
|||
|
|
- debasement-of-currency
|
|||
|
|
- declining-manufacture
|
|||
|
|
- degradation-of-coin
|
|||
|
|
- degradation-of-silver
|
|||
|
|
- demand-for-labour
|
|||
|
|
- demesne
|
|||
|
|
- diamond-buckles-metaphor
|
|||
|
|
- direct-foreign-trade-of-consumption
|
|||
|
|
- disadvantageous-balance-trade-restraints
|
|||
|
|
- discount-of-bills
|
|||
|
|
- distant-country-subsistence
|
|||
|
|
- distant-market-manufacturing
|
|||
|
|
- distant-sale-manufacturing
|
|||
|
|
- division-of-labour
|
|||
|
|
- division-of-labour-advantage
|
|||
|
|
- domestic-industry-protection
|
|||
|
|
- domestic-market-monopoly
|
|||
|
|
- domestic-market-size-effects
|
|||
|
|
- double-coincidence-of-wants
|
|||
|
|
- drawback
|
|||
|
|
- drawbacks
|
|||
|
|
- drawing-and-redrawing
|
|||
|
|
- dwelling-house-distinction
|
|||
|
|
- early-and-rude-state-of-society
|
|||
|
|
- early-navigation-advantages
|
|||
|
|
- economic-accessibility-determinants
|
|||
|
|
- economic-accessibility-gradient
|
|||
|
|
- economic-autonomy
|
|||
|
|
- economic-autonomy-gradient
|
|||
|
|
- economic-backwardness
|
|||
|
|
- economic-connectivity-importance
|
|||
|
|
- economic-development-constraints
|
|||
|
|
- economic-development-geography
|
|||
|
|
- economic-development-geography-theory
|
|||
|
|
- economic-development-sequence
|
|||
|
|
- economic-development-sequencing
|
|||
|
|
- economic-development-spatial-patterns
|
|||
|
|
- economic-geography
|
|||
|
|
- economic-geography-determinism
|
|||
|
|
- economic-geography-impact
|
|||
|
|
- economic-identity
|
|||
|
|
- economic-isolation-effects
|
|||
|
|
- economic-opportunity-cost
|
|||
|
|
- economic-opportunity-geography
|
|||
|
|
- economic-prosperity-symptoms
|
|||
|
|
- economic-spatial-inequality
|
|||
|
|
- economic-spatial-organisation
|
|||
|
|
- economic-stagnation-symptoms
|
|||
|
|
- economic-system-actor
|
|||
|
|
- economic-system-adaptability
|
|||
|
|
- economic-system-adaptation
|
|||
|
|
- economic-system-adoption-factor
|
|||
|
|
- economic-system-analysis
|
|||
|
|
- economic-system-application
|
|||
|
|
- economic-system-benchmark
|
|||
|
|
- economic-system-best-practice
|
|||
|
|
- economic-system-change-agent
|
|||
|
|
- economic-system-comparison
|
|||
|
|
- economic-system-comprehension
|
|||
|
|
- economic-system-consequence
|
|||
|
|
- economic-system-context
|
|||
|
|
- economic-system-coordination
|
|||
|
|
- economic-system-development
|
|||
|
|
- economic-system-diffusion-mechanism
|
|||
|
|
- economic-system-effectiveness
|
|||
|
|
- economic-system-effectiveness-evaluation
|
|||
|
|
- economic-system-efficiency
|
|||
|
|
- economic-system-evaluation
|
|||
|
|
- economic-system-evaluation-criteria
|
|||
|
|
- economic-system-evolution
|
|||
|
|
- economic-system-experience-accumulation
|
|||
|
|
- economic-system-explanation
|
|||
|
|
- economic-system-failure-indicator
|
|||
|
|
- economic-system-framework
|
|||
|
|
- economic-system-function
|
|||
|
|
- economic-system-governance
|
|||
|
|
- economic-system-implementation
|
|||
|
|
- economic-system-implementation-barrier
|
|||
|
|
- economic-system-improvement
|
|||
|
|
- economic-system-influence
|
|||
|
|
- economic-system-innovation
|
|||
|
|
- economic-system-innovation-driver
|
|||
|
|
- economic-system-institution
|
|||
|
|
- economic-system-integration
|
|||
|
|
- economic-system-interaction
|
|||
|
|
- economic-system-knowledge
|
|||
|
|
- economic-system-knowledge-transfer
|
|||
|
|
- economic-system-learning-process
|
|||
|
|
- economic-system-legitimacy
|
|||
|
|
- economic-system-management
|
|||
|
|
- economic-system-mechanism
|
|||
|
|
- economic-system-mechanisms
|
|||
|
|
- economic-system-objectives
|
|||
|
|
- economic-system-operation
|
|||
|
|
- economic-system-outcome-measure
|
|||
|
|
- economic-system-outcomes
|
|||
|
|
- economic-system-performance-indicator
|
|||
|
|
- economic-system-policy
|
|||
|
|
- economic-system-practice
|
|||
|
|
- economic-system-principles
|
|||
|
|
- economic-system-purpose
|
|||
|
|
- economic-system-relationship
|
|||
|
|
- economic-system-resistance-factor
|
|||
|
|
- economic-system-selection
|
|||
|
|
- economic-system-standard
|
|||
|
|
- economic-system-structure
|
|||
|
|
- economic-system-success-measure
|
|||
|
|
- economic-system-sustainability
|
|||
|
|
- economic-system-theory
|
|||
|
|
- economic-system-transformation
|
|||
|
|
- economic-system-transition-challenge
|
|||
|
|
- economic-systems-distinction
|
|||
|
|
- effect-of-prohibition-on-gold-and-silver-export
|
|||
|
|
- effectual-demand
|
|||
|
|
- ejectment-action
|
|||
|
|
- encroachment-upon-capital
|
|||
|
|
- engrossers-and-forestallers
|
|||
|
|
- engrossing
|
|||
|
|
- entail
|
|||
|
|
- environmental-scanning
|
|||
|
|
- equal-profit-employment-choice
|
|||
|
|
- exchange
|
|||
|
|
- exchange-rate-mechanism
|
|||
|
|
- exchangeable-value
|
|||
|
|
- exchequer
|
|||
|
|
- excise-duty-drawback
|
|||
|
|
- exclusive-corporation
|
|||
|
|
- export-bounty
|
|||
|
|
- exportation-bounty
|
|||
|
|
- exportation-of-gold-and-silver-as-effect-of-declension
|
|||
|
|
- exportation-trade
|
|||
|
|
- extraordinary-expense
|
|||
|
|
- extraordinary-profits
|
|||
|
|
- extraordinary-restraints-on-importation
|
|||
|
|
- fairs-and-markets
|
|||
|
|
- farm-rent
|
|||
|
|
- farmer
|
|||
|
|
- farmers-capital
|
|||
|
|
- farmers-profit
|
|||
|
|
- favour
|
|||
|
|
- feudal-anarchy
|
|||
|
|
- feudal-government-effects
|
|||
|
|
- fixed-capital
|
|||
|
|
- flax-grower
|
|||
|
|
- fluctuations-in-value-of-gold-and-silver
|
|||
|
|
- forced-corn-trade
|
|||
|
|
- foreign-capital-exportation
|
|||
|
|
- foreign-commerce-manufactures-birth
|
|||
|
|
- foreign-commodities
|
|||
|
|
- foreign-corn-importation-effects
|
|||
|
|
- foreign-manufacture-prohibitions
|
|||
|
|
- foreign-market
|
|||
|
|
- foreign-sale-encouragement
|
|||
|
|
- foreign-trade
|
|||
|
|
- foreign-trade-enrichment-mechanism
|
|||
|
|
- foreign-trade-of-consumption
|
|||
|
|
- forestalling
|
|||
|
|
- four-methods-of-employing-capital
|
|||
|
|
- fraud-in-drawback-system
|
|||
|
|
- free-burgh
|
|||
|
|
- free-ports
|
|||
|
|
- free-trade
|
|||
|
|
- freeholder-yeomanry
|
|||
|
|
- french-goods-export-restrictions
|
|||
|
|
- frozen-ocean-barrier
|
|||
|
|
- frugal-and-industrious-borrowers
|
|||
|
|
- frugality-versus-prodigality
|
|||
|
|
- fruit-garden
|
|||
|
|
- fruit-wall
|
|||
|
|
- funds-for-maintaining-labour
|
|||
|
|
- funds-for-maintaining-productive-labour
|
|||
|
|
- funds-for-maintaining-unproductive-hands
|
|||
|
|
- gold-and-silver-as-measure-of-value
|
|||
|
|
- gold-money
|
|||
|
|
- gold-price-variation
|
|||
|
|
- gradual-restoration-of-trade-freedom
|
|||
|
|
- graziers-versus-manufacturers-interests
|
|||
|
|
- gross-revenue
|
|||
|
|
- hanseatic-league
|
|||
|
|
- higgling-and-bargaining-of-the-market
|
|||
|
|
- home-made-commodities
|
|||
|
|
- home-market
|
|||
|
|
- home-market-monopoly
|
|||
|
|
- home-trade
|
|||
|
|
- hop-garden
|
|||
|
|
- human-folly-injustice-exposure
|
|||
|
|
- human-nature
|
|||
|
|
- idle-consumers
|
|||
|
|
- immediate-consumption
|
|||
|
|
- import-restraint
|
|||
|
|
- importation-trade
|
|||
|
|
- improved-farm-advantages
|
|||
|
|
- improved-land
|
|||
|
|
- improvement-of-the-country
|
|||
|
|
- inclosure
|
|||
|
|
- increase-of-money-as-effect-of-prosperity
|
|||
|
|
- inland-corn-dealer
|
|||
|
|
- inland-duty-drawback
|
|||
|
|
- inland-market-limitation
|
|||
|
|
- inland-navigation-extent
|
|||
|
|
- inland-parts-of-the-country
|
|||
|
|
- inland-trade
|
|||
|
|
- inn-or-tavern-keeper
|
|||
|
|
- instruments-of-husbandry
|
|||
|
|
- interest
|
|||
|
|
- interest-of-money
|
|||
|
|
- interest-or-use-of-money
|
|||
|
|
- invisible-hand-mechanism
|
|||
|
|
- joint-stock-company
|
|||
|
|
- journeymen
|
|||
|
|
- judgment-in-labour-application
|
|||
|
|
- kelp
|
|||
|
|
- kitchen-garden
|
|||
|
|
- labour-of-inspection-and-direction
|
|||
|
|
- labouring-cattle
|
|||
|
|
- labouring-poor
|
|||
|
|
- land-carriage
|
|||
|
|
- land-mines-and-fisheries
|
|||
|
|
- landlord
|
|||
|
|
- landlords-share
|
|||
|
|
- law-of-primogeniture
|
|||
|
|
- legal-rate-of-interest
|
|||
|
|
- legal-tender
|
|||
|
|
- licence-to-gather-natural-produce
|
|||
|
|
- lowest-rate-of-wages
|
|||
|
|
- machinery-invention
|
|||
|
|
- madeira-wine-trade-exception
|
|||
|
|
- manufactured-produce
|
|||
|
|
- manufacturer
|
|||
|
|
- manufacturers-monopoly-power
|
|||
|
|
- manufacturing-capital
|
|||
|
|
- manufacturing-process-subdivision
|
|||
|
|
- manufacturing-subdivision
|
|||
|
|
- maritime-commerce-development
|
|||
|
|
- maritime-employment
|
|||
|
|
- market-access-cost-structure
|
|||
|
|
- market-access-development-sequence
|
|||
|
|
- market-access-economic-potential
|
|||
|
|
- market-access-gradient
|
|||
|
|
- market-access-inequality
|
|||
|
|
- market-access-opportunity-cost
|
|||
|
|
- market-based-economic-geography
|
|||
|
|
- market-based-economic-identity
|
|||
|
|
- market-based-economic-structure
|
|||
|
|
- market-based-productivity-limits
|
|||
|
|
- market-based-specialisation
|
|||
|
|
- market-communication-channels
|
|||
|
|
- market-demand-regulation
|
|||
|
|
- market-development-prerequisites
|
|||
|
|
- market-driven-division
|
|||
|
|
- market-extent
|
|||
|
|
- market-extent-advantageousness
|
|||
|
|
- market-extent-economic-impact
|
|||
|
|
- market-extent-measurement
|
|||
|
|
- market-for-surplus-produce
|
|||
|
|
- market-integration-barriers
|
|||
|
|
- market-integration-potential
|
|||
|
|
- market-integration-timeline
|
|||
|
|
- market-obstruction
|
|||
|
|
- market-price-adjustment
|
|||
|
|
- market-price-mechanism
|
|||
|
|
- market-price-mechanism-for-rude-produce
|
|||
|
|
- market-price-mechanism-regulation
|
|||
|
|
- market-price-of-bullion
|
|||
|
|
- market-price-of-commodities
|
|||
|
|
- market-price-of-things
|
|||
|
|
- market-price-regulation-mechanism
|
|||
|
|
- market-proximity-advantage
|
|||
|
|
- market-rate-of-interest
|
|||
|
|
- market-regulation-of-prices
|
|||
|
|
- market-separation
|
|||
|
|
- market-size-economies
|
|||
|
|
- market-size-specialisation-threshold
|
|||
|
|
- market-size-specialization
|
|||
|
|
- market-size-threshold
|
|||
|
|
- market-town-economy
|
|||
|
|
- market-town-formation
|
|||
|
|
- masquerade-dress-trade
|
|||
|
|
- master-artificer
|
|||
|
|
- master-manufacturer
|
|||
|
|
- materials-and-subsistence
|
|||
|
|
- measure-of-exchangeable-value
|
|||
|
|
- mediterranean-civilisation-pattern
|
|||
|
|
- menial-servants
|
|||
|
|
- mercantile-jealousy
|
|||
|
|
- mercantile-system
|
|||
|
|
- merchant
|
|||
|
|
- merchant-capital
|
|||
|
|
- merchant-carrier
|
|||
|
|
- merchant-country-gentleman-transition
|
|||
|
|
- merchantable-herrings
|
|||
|
|
- metal-currency
|
|||
|
|
- metayer
|
|||
|
|
- military-assistance
|
|||
|
|
- military-discipline
|
|||
|
|
- military-employment
|
|||
|
|
- mine-fertility
|
|||
|
|
- mine-situation
|
|||
|
|
- mint
|
|||
|
|
- mint-price
|
|||
|
|
- modern-states-inversion
|
|||
|
|
- modern-system-of-political-economy
|
|||
|
|
- modes-of-expense-affecting-public-opulence
|
|||
|
|
- money
|
|||
|
|
- money-as-instrument-of-commerce
|
|||
|
|
- money-price-of-corn
|
|||
|
|
- money-price-of-labour
|
|||
|
|
- money-rent
|
|||
|
|
- moneys-worth
|
|||
|
|
- monied-interest
|
|||
|
|
- monopoly-effects-on-market-price
|
|||
|
|
- monopoly-effects-on-prices
|
|||
|
|
- monopoly-of-sugar-trade
|
|||
|
|
- monopoly-of-tobacco-trade
|
|||
|
|
- monopoly-price-of-land
|
|||
|
|
- mutual-gain-reciprocity
|
|||
|
|
- mutual-good-offices
|
|||
|
|
- mutual-servitude
|
|||
|
|
- national-animosity-in-commerce
|
|||
|
|
- national-animosity-in-trade-policy
|
|||
|
|
- national-capital-composition
|
|||
|
|
- national-economic-identity
|
|||
|
|
- national-enrichment-through-neighbours-wealth
|
|||
|
|
- national-prejudice-and-animosity-in-trade
|
|||
|
|
- natural-advantages-in-trade
|
|||
|
|
- natural-balance-of-employments
|
|||
|
|
- natural-complement-of-riches
|
|||
|
|
- natural-course-of-capital-employment
|
|||
|
|
- natural-course-of-things
|
|||
|
|
- natural-development-sequence
|
|||
|
|
- natural-division-of-labour
|
|||
|
|
- natural-employment-of-capital
|
|||
|
|
- natural-inclinations-thwarting
|
|||
|
|
- natural-liberty-in-banking
|
|||
|
|
- natural-liberty-in-trade
|
|||
|
|
- natural-market-advantages
|
|||
|
|
- natural-order-inversion
|
|||
|
|
- natural-order-of-economic-development
|
|||
|
|
- natural-preference-cultivation
|
|||
|
|
- natural-price-as-central-price
|
|||
|
|
- natural-price-of-commodities
|
|||
|
|
- natural-produce-of-land
|
|||
|
|
- natural-progress-of-improvement
|
|||
|
|
- natural-rates-of-wages-profit-and-rent
|
|||
|
|
- natural-rent-of-land
|
|||
|
|
- natural-state-of-employments
|
|||
|
|
- navigable-rivers
|
|||
|
|
- neat-revenue
|
|||
|
|
- necessity
|
|||
|
|
- nominal-measure-of-value
|
|||
|
|
- nominal-price
|
|||
|
|
- nominal-price-of-commodities
|
|||
|
|
- non-enumerated-commodities
|
|||
|
|
- non-standard-metal
|
|||
|
|
- occasional-and-temporary-market-fluctuations
|
|||
|
|
- old-subsidy-drawback-rules
|
|||
|
|
- ordinary-market-price-of-land
|
|||
|
|
- ordinary-profits-of-stock
|
|||
|
|
- ordinary-rates-of-wages-profit-and-rent
|
|||
|
|
- ordinary-state-of-employments
|
|||
|
|
- original-destination-of-man
|
|||
|
|
- original-government-manners
|
|||
|
|
- overstocked-market-conditions
|
|||
|
|
- paper-money
|
|||
|
|
- pasture-land
|
|||
|
|
- payment-in-kind
|
|||
|
|
- perfect-liberty-in-trade
|
|||
|
|
- permanent-market-price-enhancements
|
|||
|
|
- perpetual-fund-for-maintenance-of-labour
|
|||
|
|
- piece-work-wages
|
|||
|
|
- pin-maker-trade
|
|||
|
|
- planter-independence
|
|||
|
|
- plate-household-silver
|
|||
|
|
- poacher
|
|||
|
|
- policy-closure
|
|||
|
|
- political-arithmetic
|
|||
|
|
- political-economy
|
|||
|
|
- political-economy-objectives
|
|||
|
|
- poll-tax
|
|||
|
|
- poll-tax-compensation
|
|||
|
|
- potato-cultivation
|
|||
|
|
- precious-metals-consumption
|
|||
|
|
- present-state-of-the-nation-analysis
|
|||
|
|
- price-in-labour
|
|||
|
|
- price-in-money
|
|||
|
|
- price-of-commodities
|
|||
|
|
- prime-cost-of-commodities
|
|||
|
|
- principal-clerk
|
|||
|
|
- principal-employments
|
|||
|
|
- private-interest-monopoly-spirit
|
|||
|
|
- private-misconduct-versus-public-prodigality
|
|||
|
|
- prodigals
|
|||
|
|
- prodigals-and-projectors
|
|||
|
|
- productive-abilities
|
|||
|
|
- productive-and-unproductive-labour
|
|||
|
|
- productive-labourers
|
|||
|
|
- productive-powers-of-labour
|
|||
|
|
- profits-of-stock
|
|||
|
|
- progress-of-opulence
|
|||
|
|
- progressive-state-of-society
|
|||
|
|
- progressive-wealth-consequentiality
|
|||
|
|
- promissory-notes
|
|||
|
|
- proportion-between-metals
|
|||
|
|
- proportion-between-productive-and-unproductive-hands
|
|||
|
|
- prudent-family-maxim
|
|||
|
|
- public-education-of-professionals
|
|||
|
|
- public-executioner
|
|||
|
|
- public-fiars
|
|||
|
|
- public-good-versus-private-interest
|
|||
|
|
- public-law-on-coinage
|
|||
|
|
- public-lottery
|
|||
|
|
- public-mourning-effects
|
|||
|
|
- public-registers-of-manufactures
|
|||
|
|
- public-revenue
|
|||
|
|
- public-services-funding
|
|||
|
|
- public-tranquillity
|
|||
|
|
- purveyance
|
|||
|
|
- quantity-of-labour
|
|||
|
|
- rate-of-interest
|
|||
|
|
- rate-of-profit
|
|||
|
|
- re-exportation-drawback
|
|||
|
|
- real-exchange-rate
|
|||
|
|
- real-measure-of-value
|
|||
|
|
- real-price
|
|||
|
|
- real-price-of-commodities
|
|||
|
|
- real-value-of-corn-rent
|
|||
|
|
- real-value-of-silver
|
|||
|
|
- regulated-proportion
|
|||
|
|
- religious-occupational-restrictions
|
|||
|
|
- rent-of-land
|
|||
|
|
- requisite-variety
|
|||
|
|
- requisite-variety-in-banking
|
|||
|
|
- restraints-upon-importation
|
|||
|
|
- retail-trade
|
|||
|
|
- retailers
|
|||
|
|
- retainers-and-dependents-system
|
|||
|
|
- retaliation-in-trade-policy
|
|||
|
|
- revenue
|
|||
|
|
- revenue-constituting-profit-and-rent
|
|||
|
|
- revenue-destined-for-capital-replacement
|
|||
|
|
- revenue-for-public-services
|
|||
|
|
- revenue-or-subsistence-for-the-people
|
|||
|
|
- revenue-versus-capital-effects
|
|||
|
|
- rice-countries
|
|||
|
|
- river-navigation-infrastructure
|
|||
|
|
- round-about-foreign-trade-of-consumption
|
|||
|
|
- rude-produce
|
|||
|
|
- rural-urban-reciprocity
|
|||
|
|
- scarcity-of-hands
|
|||
|
|
- sea-coast-development
|
|||
|
|
- sea-sticks
|
|||
|
|
- security-preference-capital
|
|||
|
|
- seed-as-fixed-capital
|
|||
|
|
- seed-time-and-harvest-metaphor
|
|||
|
|
- seignorage
|
|||
|
|
- self-love
|
|||
|
|
- servile-condition
|
|||
|
|
- settlement-laws
|
|||
|
|
- silver-money
|
|||
|
|
- silver-price-variation
|
|||
|
|
- skill-and-dexterity
|
|||
|
|
- smuggling
|
|||
|
|
- smuggling-as-principal-import-method
|
|||
|
|
- smuggling-of-precious-metals
|
|||
|
|
- smuggling-trade
|
|||
|
|
- sober-people
|
|||
|
|
- societys-general-stock
|
|||
|
|
- sovereign-economic-policy-authority
|
|||
|
|
- sovereign-parsimony
|
|||
|
|
- spare-revenue
|
|||
|
|
- specie
|
|||
|
|
- specie-export-prohibition-effects
|
|||
|
|
- species-of-industry-with-consistent-output
|
|||
|
|
- species-of-industry-with-variable-output
|
|||
|
|
- speculative-trade
|
|||
|
|
- stamp-masters
|
|||
|
|
- standard-metal
|
|||
|
|
- standard-weight-of-coin
|
|||
|
|
- state-or-commonwealth-revenue
|
|||
|
|
- stationary-country
|
|||
|
|
- statute-of-labourers
|
|||
|
|
- statutes-of-apprenticeship-effects
|
|||
|
|
- sterling-mark
|
|||
|
|
- stock
|
|||
|
|
- stock-lent-at-interest
|
|||
|
|
- stock-of-the-country
|
|||
|
|
- stock-of-the-farmer
|
|||
|
|
- strategic-planning
|
|||
|
|
- subsistence
|
|||
|
|
- subsistence-agriculture
|
|||
|
|
- subsistence-industry-priority
|
|||
|
|
- subsistence-necessity-priority
|
|||
|
|
- subsistence-of-the-dealer
|
|||
|
|
- subsistence-prioritization
|
|||
|
|
- sugar-colonies
|
|||
|
|
- superfluity
|
|||
|
|
- superior-hardship-and-superior-skill
|
|||
|
|
- surplus-produce
|
|||
|
|
- system-of-agriculture
|
|||
|
|
- system-of-commerce
|
|||
|
|
- systemic-stability
|
|||
|
|
- taille
|
|||
|
|
- tale
|
|||
|
|
- temporary-price-of-corn
|
|||
|
|
- temporary-statutes
|
|||
|
|
- temporary-versus-permanent-price-effects
|
|||
|
|
- territorial-cultivation-completeness
|
|||
|
|
- territorial-cultivation-limit
|
|||
|
|
- territorial-improvement-support
|
|||
|
|
- territorial-support-limitation
|
|||
|
|
- three-original-sources-of-revenue
|
|||
|
|
- three-way-employment-of-stock
|
|||
|
|
- thriving-country
|
|||
|
|
- tobacco-colonies
|
|||
|
|
- toil-and-trouble-of-acquiring
|
|||
|
|
- tonnage-bounty
|
|||
|
|
- town-country-dependency
|
|||
|
|
- town-market-function
|
|||
|
|
- town-reproduction-impossibility
|
|||
|
|
- trade-as-union-and-friendship
|
|||
|
|
- trade-balance-mechanism
|
|||
|
|
- trade-capital
|
|||
|
|
- trade-encouragement
|
|||
|
|
- trade-route-dependency
|
|||
|
|
- transportation-cost-differential
|
|||
|
|
- transportation-infrastructure-importance
|
|||
|
|
- transportation-mode-economic-effects
|
|||
|
|
- treasure-accumulation
|
|||
|
|
- treasure-trove
|
|||
|
|
- treaty
|
|||
|
|
- truck
|
|||
|
|
- two-branches-of-circulation
|
|||
|
|
- uncultivated-land-availability
|
|||
|
|
- underling-tradesmen-maxims
|
|||
|
|
- unimproved-land
|
|||
|
|
- university-of-trades
|
|||
|
|
- unproductive-labourers
|
|||
|
|
- unstamped-bars
|
|||
|
|
- urban-autonomy
|
|||
|
|
- urban-rural-reciprocity
|
|||
|
|
- usury
|
|||
|
|
- value-in-exchange
|
|||
|
|
- value-in-use
|
|||
|
|
- value-of-gold
|
|||
|
|
- value-of-silver
|
|||
|
|
- variety-of-talents
|
|||
|
|
- venison
|
|||
|
|
- victuals
|
|||
|
|
- villeinage
|
|||
|
|
- vineyard
|
|||
|
|
- wages-of-a-journeyman
|
|||
|
|
- wages-of-labour
|
|||
|
|
- waggon-way-through-the-air-metaphor
|
|||
|
|
- warehouse-export-system
|
|||
|
|
- warehouse-rent-for-bullion-deposits
|
|||
|
|
- warehouse-system
|
|||
|
|
- water-carriage
|
|||
|
|
- water-pond-metaphor
|
|||
|
|
- weighing
|
|||
|
|
- whole-produce-of-labour
|
|||
|
|
- wholesale-merchants
|
|||
|
|
- wholesale-trade
|
|||
|
|
- wood-price
|
|||
|
|
- wool-grower
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## Instructions
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
1. Read the source chapter carefully.
|
|||
|
|
2. Review the list of existing entities above and do not duplicate them.
|
|||
|
|
3. Identify all distinct economic concepts, actors, mechanisms, and institutions
|
|||
|
|
that are NOT already in the existing entities list.
|
|||
|
|
4. For each new entity, produce a separate markdown document following the
|
|||
|
|
Economic Entity Schema v1.0.
|
|||
|
|
5. Each entity document must include:
|
|||
|
|
- An H1 heading with the entity name
|
|||
|
|
- A Definition section (20-150 words)
|
|||
|
|
- A Source Chapter section citing the specific chapter
|
|||
|
|
- A Context section describing where in the argument the entity appears
|
|||
|
|
- An Economic Domain section classifying the entity
|
|||
|
|
6. Optionally include Smith's Original Wording (direct quote) and
|
|||
|
|
Modern Interpretation sections.
|
|||
|
|
7. Use neutral, analytical language throughout.
|
|||
|
|
8. Ensure each entity is distinct and self-contained.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## Output Format
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Output each entity as a separate markdown document, delimited by
|
|||
|
|
`--- ENTITY: <entity-name> ---` markers.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Use **H2 headings** (`##`) for each section inside the entity document.
|
|||
|
|
Do NOT use inline `Section:` format or H3 headings.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Example of a correctly formatted entity:
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
```
|
|||
|
|
--- ENTITY: division of labour ---
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
# Division of Labour
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## Definition
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
The separation of a work process into distinct tasks performed by specialised
|
|||
|
|
workers, increasing productivity through greater dexterity, saved time, and
|
|||
|
|
the invention of labour-saving machinery.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## Source Chapter
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Book I, Chapter 1
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## Context
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
The opening chapter's central argument, illustrated by Smith's pin factory
|
|||
|
|
example showing how dividing 18 operations dramatically increases output.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## Economic Domain
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Production
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
```
|