55 lines
1.7 KiB
Markdown
55 lines
1.7 KiB
Markdown
|
# WoN Mapping Schema v1.0
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Every mapping from a supply chain entity to a Wealth of Nations concept
|
|||
|
|
must contain the following sections.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## Required Sections
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
### H1 Heading
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Format: `Supply Chain Entity → WoN Entity`
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Example: `# Bullwhip Effect → Natural Price as Central Price`
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
### Supply Chain Entity
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
The supply chain entity being mapped (title case name).
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
### WoN Entity
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
The Wealth of Nations entity being mapped to. Must be an entity that
|
|||
|
|
exists in the WoN infospace (see `artifacts/won-reference/core-entities.md`
|
|||
|
|
for the curated reference set).
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
### Mapping Rationale
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Minimum 40 words. Explain why this supply chain concept corresponds to
|
|||
|
|
this WoN concept. Ground the mapping in both the supply chain definition
|
|||
|
|
and Smith's original analysis. Do not rely on surface-level name similarity.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
### Conceptual Continuity
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
One of: **Strong**, **Moderate**, **Weak**
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
- **Strong**: The modern concept directly instantiates the WoN concept —
|
|||
|
|
same mechanism, different technology or scale
|
|||
|
|
- **Moderate**: The modern concept resembles the WoN concept in structure
|
|||
|
|
but differs in important ways
|
|||
|
|
- **Weak**: The mapping is analogical — useful for analysis but not a
|
|||
|
|
direct correspondence
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
### VSM Inheritance
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Because the WoN entity is already mapped to a VSM system in the WoN
|
|||
|
|
infospace, the supply chain entity inherits a VSM position by transitivity.
|
|||
|
|
State: `[Supply Chain Entity] inherits [VSM System] via [WoN Entity]`
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## Quality Metrics
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
- **Rationale Rigour** (1–5): Is the mapping justified by substantive
|
|||
|
|
analysis, not just surface similarity?
|
|||
|
|
- **Continuity Calibration** (1–5): Is the declared strength consistent
|
|||
|
|
with the rationale?
|
|||
|
|
- **VSM Coherence** (1–5): Does the inherited VSM assignment make sense
|
|||
|
|
for the supply chain entity?
|