61 lines
2.7 KiB
Markdown
61 lines
2.7 KiB
Markdown
|
---
|
||
|
|
entity_slug: bank_systemic_risk_management
|
||
|
|
evaluator: gemini-2.5-flash-lite
|
||
|
|
evaluated_at: '2026-04-21T21:49:35.222637'
|
||
|
|
overall_score: 4.0
|
||
|
|
scores:
|
||
|
|
- name: definition_precision
|
||
|
|
value: 4.0
|
||
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
||
|
|
rationale: The definition is precise and clearly outlines the purpose of bank systemic
|
||
|
|
risk management. It avoids being an overly broad umbrella term.
|
||
|
|
- name: source_grounding
|
||
|
|
value: 3.0
|
||
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
||
|
|
rationale: While the concept of managing risks to the banking system is present
|
||
|
|
in Book II, Chapter 2, the explicit framing of "systemic risk management" as a
|
||
|
|
distinct entity with specific practices might be a slight abstraction beyond Smith's
|
||
|
|
direct terminology.
|
||
|
|
- name: domain_placement
|
||
|
|
value: 5.0
|
||
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
||
|
|
rationale: The "Regulation" domain is highly appropriate. Managing systemic risk
|
||
|
|
is fundamentally a regulatory concern aimed at ensuring the stability of the financial
|
||
|
|
system.
|
||
|
|
- name: vsm_relevance
|
||
|
|
value: 4.0
|
||
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
||
|
|
rationale: This entity strongly maps to VSM System 3 (Internal Regulation/Audit)
|
||
|
|
as it involves monitoring and controlling internal operations to prevent systemic
|
||
|
|
failures. It also has elements of System 5 (Policy) in setting overall stability
|
||
|
|
goals.
|
||
|
|
- name: explanatory_value
|
||
|
|
value: 4.0
|
||
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
||
|
|
rationale: The entity provides good explanatory value by highlighting a crucial
|
||
|
|
mechanism for maintaining financial stability. It explains *how* the banking system
|
||
|
|
can be protected from cascading failures.
|
||
|
|
---
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
# Evaluation: Bank Systemic Risk Management
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The definition is precise and clearly outlines the purpose of bank systemic risk management. It avoids being an overly broad umbrella term.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## source_grounding — 3.0 / 5.0
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
While the concept of managing risks to the banking system is present in Book II, Chapter 2, the explicit framing of "systemic risk management" as a distinct entity with specific practices might be a slight abstraction beyond Smith's direct terminology.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The "Regulation" domain is highly appropriate. Managing systemic risk is fundamentally a regulatory concern aimed at ensuring the stability of the financial system.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## vsm_relevance — 4.0 / 5.0
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
This entity strongly maps to VSM System 3 (Internal Regulation/Audit) as it involves monitoring and controlling internal operations to prevent systemic failures. It also has elements of System 5 (Policy) in setting overall stability goals.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## explanatory_value — 4.0 / 5.0
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The entity provides good explanatory value by highlighting a crucial mechanism for maintaining financial stability. It explains *how* the banking system can be protected from cascading failures.
|