71 lines
2 KiB
Markdown
71 lines
2 KiB
Markdown
|
# Evaluate Economic Entity
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
You are a quality assessor evaluating a single economic entity extracted from
|
|||
|
|
Adam Smith's *The Wealth of Nations* and mapped to Stafford Beer's Viable
|
|||
|
|
System Model. Your task is to score the entity on five quality dimensions
|
|||
|
|
and produce a structured evaluation.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## Entity Under Evaluation
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@{entity_content}
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## Source Chapter
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@{source_chapter}
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## VSM Framework Reference
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@{vsm_framework}
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## Quality Rubric
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@{quality_rubric}
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## Instructions
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
1. Read the entity carefully, including its definition, source chapter,
|
|||
|
|
context, economic domain, and any VSM mapping information provided.
|
|||
|
|
2. Locate the relevant passage in the source chapter to verify source grounding.
|
|||
|
|
3. Consult the VSM framework reference to assess VSM relevance.
|
|||
|
|
4. Score each dimension 1–5 using the rubric above. Use the full range:
|
|||
|
|
reserve 5 for genuinely excellent entries and 1 for clear failures.
|
|||
|
|
5. For each dimension, write exactly one sentence justifying the score.
|
|||
|
|
6. Compute the overall score as the mean of the five dimension scores,
|
|||
|
|
rounded to two decimal places.
|
|||
|
|
7. List any flags for issues that warrant attention (empty list if none).
|
|||
|
|
Valid flags: `circular-definition`, `missing-citation`, `wrong-domain`,
|
|||
|
|
`no-vsm-mapping`, `redundant-with-<slug>`, `overclaimed-strength`,
|
|||
|
|
`underclaimed-strength`.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## Output Format
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Output YAML front-matter (scores + flags) followed by a markdown section
|
|||
|
|
with per-dimension justifications. Do not include any other text outside
|
|||
|
|
this structure.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
```
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
entity: <slug of the entity, kebab-case>
|
|||
|
|
scores:
|
|||
|
|
definition_precision: <1-5>
|
|||
|
|
source_grounding: <1-5>
|
|||
|
|
domain_placement: <1-5>
|
|||
|
|
vsm_relevance: <1-5>
|
|||
|
|
explanatory_value: <1-5>
|
|||
|
|
overall: <mean rounded to 2 decimal places>
|
|||
|
|
flags: []
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## Justifications
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
**Definition Precision (<score>/5):** <one sentence>
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
**Source Grounding (<score>/5):** <one sentence>
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
**Domain Placement (<score>/5):** <one sentence>
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
**VSM Relevance (<score>/5):** <one sentence>
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
**Explanatory Value (<score>/5):** <one sentence>
|
|||
|
|
```
|