66 lines
3.5 KiB
Markdown
66 lines
3.5 KiB
Markdown
|
---
|
||
|
|
entity_slug: economic_autonomy
|
||
|
|
evaluator: null
|
||
|
|
evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T05:09:15.119171'
|
||
|
|
overall_score: 1.8
|
||
|
|
scores:
|
||
|
|
- name: definition_precision
|
||
|
|
value: 1.0
|
||
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
||
|
|
rationale: There is no definition provided at all, making this entity completely
|
||
|
|
imprecise. Without any definitional content, it's impossible to assess whether
|
||
|
|
the concept captures something distinct or is merely a vague umbrella term.
|
||
|
|
- name: source_grounding
|
||
|
|
value: 2.0
|
||
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
||
|
|
rationale: While "economic autonomy" could relate to Smith's discussions of individual
|
||
|
|
economic freedom and self-interest, without a definition or specified source chapter,
|
||
|
|
there's no way to verify this entity is grounded in actual textual content. The
|
||
|
|
term itself is plausible but unsubstantiated.
|
||
|
|
- name: domain_placement
|
||
|
|
value: 2.0
|
||
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
||
|
|
rationale: The domain is listed as "unspecified," which is problematic for an economic
|
||
|
|
concept that should clearly belong to a particular thematic category. Economic
|
||
|
|
autonomy could reasonably fit in domains related to individual liberty, market
|
||
|
|
mechanisms, or institutional frameworks, but without specification it's poorly
|
||
|
|
placed.
|
||
|
|
- name: vsm_relevance
|
||
|
|
value: 3.0
|
||
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
||
|
|
rationale: Economic autonomy could potentially map to multiple VSM systems - S1
|
||
|
|
(autonomous operational units), S4 (adaptive capacity), or S5 (identity/policy
|
||
|
|
autonomy) - but without a clear definition, the VSM placement remains speculative.
|
||
|
|
The concept has potential VSM relevance but lacks the precision needed for confident
|
||
|
|
mapping.
|
||
|
|
- name: explanatory_value
|
||
|
|
value: 1.0
|
||
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
||
|
|
rationale: Without any definition, context, or source grounding, this entity provides
|
||
|
|
no explanatory power whatsoever. It's merely a label that could refer to various
|
||
|
|
economic phenomena but illuminates no specific mechanisms or structural relations
|
||
|
|
from Smith's work.
|
||
|
|
---
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
# Evaluation: Economic Autonomy
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## definition_precision — 1.0 / 5.0
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
There is no definition provided at all, making this entity completely imprecise. Without any definitional content, it's impossible to assess whether the concept captures something distinct or is merely a vague umbrella term.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## source_grounding — 2.0 / 5.0
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
While "economic autonomy" could relate to Smith's discussions of individual economic freedom and self-interest, without a definition or specified source chapter, there's no way to verify this entity is grounded in actual textual content. The term itself is plausible but unsubstantiated.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## domain_placement — 2.0 / 5.0
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The domain is listed as "unspecified," which is problematic for an economic concept that should clearly belong to a particular thematic category. Economic autonomy could reasonably fit in domains related to individual liberty, market mechanisms, or institutional frameworks, but without specification it's poorly placed.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## vsm_relevance — 3.0 / 5.0
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Economic autonomy could potentially map to multiple VSM systems - S1 (autonomous operational units), S4 (adaptive capacity), or S5 (identity/policy autonomy) - but without a clear definition, the VSM placement remains speculative. The concept has potential VSM relevance but lacks the precision needed for confident mapping.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## explanatory_value — 1.0 / 5.0
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Without any definition, context, or source grounding, this entity provides no explanatory power whatsoever. It's merely a label that could refer to various economic phenomena but illuminates no specific mechanisms or structural relations from Smith's work.
|