66 lines
3.5 KiB
Markdown
66 lines
3.5 KiB
Markdown
|
---
|
||
|
|
entity_slug: standard_weight_of_coin
|
||
|
|
evaluator: null
|
||
|
|
evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T06:24:53.662979'
|
||
|
|
overall_score: 4.4
|
||
|
|
scores:
|
||
|
|
- name: definition_precision
|
||
|
|
value: 4.0
|
||
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
||
|
|
rationale: The definition clearly specifies what standard weight of coin means -
|
||
|
|
the officially designated weight and fineness of precious metal in coins. It avoids
|
||
|
|
circularity and captures a distinct, measurable concept rather than a vague umbrella
|
||
|
|
term.
|
||
|
|
- name: source_grounding
|
||
|
|
value: 5.0
|
||
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
||
|
|
rationale: This concept is directly grounded in Smith's text, particularly in Book
|
||
|
|
I, Chapter 5 where he extensively discusses how coins' actual weight deviates
|
||
|
|
from their standard weight through wear and clipping, affecting their reliability
|
||
|
|
as measures of value. Smith explicitly addresses this as a fundamental monetary
|
||
|
|
issue.
|
||
|
|
- name: domain_placement
|
||
|
|
value: 5.0
|
||
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
||
|
|
rationale: The "Regulation" domain assignment is highly appropriate since standard
|
||
|
|
weight of coin represents a government regulatory standard that must be established,
|
||
|
|
maintained, and enforced. This is clearly a regulatory rather than market-driven
|
||
|
|
concept.
|
||
|
|
- name: vsm_relevance
|
||
|
|
value: 4.0
|
||
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
||
|
|
rationale: This entity maps well to S3 (internal regulation/audit) as it represents
|
||
|
|
a regulatory standard that requires monitoring and enforcement to maintain system
|
||
|
|
integrity. It also has some S2 relevance as deviations from standard weight create
|
||
|
|
coordination problems in exchange.
|
||
|
|
- name: explanatory_value
|
||
|
|
value: 4.0
|
||
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
||
|
|
rationale: This entity illuminates a crucial mechanism in monetary systems - how
|
||
|
|
physical standards enable money to function reliably as a measure of value and
|
||
|
|
medium of exchange. It explains the structural relationship between regulatory
|
||
|
|
standards and monetary stability rather than merely naming a surface phenomenon.
|
||
|
|
---
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
# Evaluation: Standard Weight Of Coin
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The definition clearly specifies what standard weight of coin means - the officially designated weight and fineness of precious metal in coins. It avoids circularity and captures a distinct, measurable concept rather than a vague umbrella term.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
This concept is directly grounded in Smith's text, particularly in Book I, Chapter 5 where he extensively discusses how coins' actual weight deviates from their standard weight through wear and clipping, affecting their reliability as measures of value. Smith explicitly addresses this as a fundamental monetary issue.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The "Regulation" domain assignment is highly appropriate since standard weight of coin represents a government regulatory standard that must be established, maintained, and enforced. This is clearly a regulatory rather than market-driven concept.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## vsm_relevance — 4.0 / 5.0
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
This entity maps well to S3 (internal regulation/audit) as it represents a regulatory standard that requires monitoring and enforcement to maintain system integrity. It also has some S2 relevance as deviations from standard weight create coordination problems in exchange.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## explanatory_value — 4.0 / 5.0
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
This entity illuminates a crucial mechanism in monetary systems - how physical standards enable money to function reliably as a measure of value and medium of exchange. It explains the structural relationship between regulatory standards and monetary stability rather than merely naming a surface phenomenon.
|