markitect-main/examples/infospace-with-history/output/evaluations/temporary_statutes.md

64 lines
3.3 KiB
Markdown
Raw Normal View History

---
entity_slug: temporary_statutes
evaluator: null
evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T06:30:16.010233'
overall_score: 4.4
scores:
- name: definition_precision
value: 4.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: The definition is clear and specific, identifying temporary statutes
as short-term legislative measures for economic emergencies with concrete examples.
It avoids circularity and captures a distinct regulatory concept rather than being
vague.
- name: source_grounding
value: 5.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: This entity is well-grounded in Smith's actual argument from Book IV,
Chapter 5, where he explicitly discusses how frequent temporary modifications
to corn laws demonstrate the fundamental flaws in the underlying regulatory system.
The context accurately reflects Smith's reasoning.
- name: domain_placement
value: 5.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: '"Regulation" is the correct domain placement, as temporary statutes
are fundamentally regulatory instruments used to modify existing trade laws. This
fits perfectly within the broader category of governmental economic intervention.'
- name: vsm_relevance
value: 4.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: This entity maps well to S2 (coordination/anti-oscillation) as temporary
statutes function to dampen economic disruptions and coordinate responses to market
volatility. It also has some relevance to S4 (environmental adaptation) as these
measures respond to changing external conditions.
- name: explanatory_value
value: 4.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: The entity provides genuine explanatory power by illuminating Smith's
methodological approach of using systemic failures (need for constant corrections)
as evidence against the underlying policy framework. It reveals a structural relationship
between regulatory instability and policy inadequacy.
---
# Evaluation: Temporary Statutes
## definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0
The definition is clear and specific, identifying temporary statutes as short-term legislative measures for economic emergencies with concrete examples. It avoids circularity and captures a distinct regulatory concept rather than being vague.
## source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0
This entity is well-grounded in Smith's actual argument from Book IV, Chapter 5, where he explicitly discusses how frequent temporary modifications to corn laws demonstrate the fundamental flaws in the underlying regulatory system. The context accurately reflects Smith's reasoning.
## domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0
"Regulation" is the correct domain placement, as temporary statutes are fundamentally regulatory instruments used to modify existing trade laws. This fits perfectly within the broader category of governmental economic intervention.
## vsm_relevance — 4.0 / 5.0
This entity maps well to S2 (coordination/anti-oscillation) as temporary statutes function to dampen economic disruptions and coordinate responses to market volatility. It also has some relevance to S4 (environmental adaptation) as these measures respond to changing external conditions.
## explanatory_value — 4.0 / 5.0
The entity provides genuine explanatory power by illuminating Smith's methodological approach of using systemic failures (need for constant corrections) as evidence against the underlying policy framework. It reveals a structural relationship between regulatory instability and policy inadequacy.