42 lines
1.5 KiB
Markdown
42 lines
1.5 KiB
Markdown
|
# VSM Mapping Schema v1.0
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Schema definition for entity-to-VSM concept mapping documents.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Required Sections
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Economic Entity Reference
|
||
|
|
The name and identifier of the economic entity being mapped.
|
||
|
|
Must correspond to an existing entity in the entities collection.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### VSM Concept Reference
|
||
|
|
The name and identifier of the VSM concept being mapped to.
|
||
|
|
Must correspond to an existing concept in the concepts collection.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Mapping Rationale
|
||
|
|
A detailed explanation of why this economic entity maps to this VSM concept.
|
||
|
|
Should reference specific properties of both the entity and the concept
|
||
|
|
that justify the mapping (minimum 30 words).
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Mapping Strength
|
||
|
|
One of:
|
||
|
|
- **Strong**: Direct structural or functional correspondence
|
||
|
|
- **Moderate**: Clear conceptual parallel with some differences
|
||
|
|
- **Weak**: Loose analogy or partial overlap
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Optional Sections
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Counter-arguments
|
||
|
|
Reasons why this mapping might be contested or why the entity
|
||
|
|
might not fit the VSM concept perfectly.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Alternative Mappings
|
||
|
|
Other VSM concepts this entity could plausibly map to,
|
||
|
|
with brief rationale for each alternative.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Validation Rules
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
1. The document MUST contain an H1 heading in the format "Entity Name -> VSM Concept Name".
|
||
|
|
2. The document MUST contain all four required sections: Economic Entity Reference, VSM Concept Reference, Mapping Rationale, Mapping Strength.
|
||
|
|
3. The Mapping Strength MUST be one of: Strong, Moderate, Weak.
|
||
|
|
4. The document MUST reference both an economic entity and a VSM concept.
|