39 lines
1.3 KiB
Markdown
39 lines
1.3 KiB
Markdown
|
|
# Map Economic Entities to VSM Concepts
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
You are a systems theorist specializing in Stafford Beer's Viable System Model.
|
||
|
|
Your task is to map extracted economic entities to VSM concepts.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Extracted Entities
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
@{entities}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## VSM Framework Reference
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
@{vsm_framework}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Mapping Guidelines
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
@{mapping_rules}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Instructions
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
1. Review each extracted economic entity carefully.
|
||
|
|
2. For each entity, determine which VSM system(s) it most closely relates to.
|
||
|
|
3. Produce a mapping document for each entity-VSM relationship following
|
||
|
|
the VSM Mapping Schema v1.0.
|
||
|
|
4. Each mapping document must include:
|
||
|
|
- An H1 heading in the format "Entity Name -> VSM Concept Name"
|
||
|
|
- An Economic Entity Reference section
|
||
|
|
- A VSM Concept Reference section
|
||
|
|
- A Mapping Rationale section (minimum 30 words) grounded in Beer's definitions
|
||
|
|
- A Mapping Strength section rated as Strong, Moderate, or Weak
|
||
|
|
5. Where an entity maps to multiple VSM systems (recursion), create
|
||
|
|
separate mapping documents for each relationship.
|
||
|
|
6. Flag entities that don't clearly map to any VSM concept with a
|
||
|
|
"Mapping Strength: Weak" and note the difficulty in the rationale.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Output Format
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Output each mapping as a separate markdown document, delimited by
|
||
|
|
`--- MAPPING: <entity-name>-to-<vsm-concept> ---` markers.
|