feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)

Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

examples/infospace-with-history/output/evaluations/economic_system_function.md

@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
+---
+entity_slug: economic_system_function
+evaluator: null
+evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T05:16:23.011806'
+overall_score: 2.0
+scores:
+- name: definition_precision
+  value: 2.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: The definition is overly broad and circular, essentially defining "economic
+    system function" as "how economic systems function." It uses vague terms like
+    "operational role" and "practical effects" without establishing clear boundaries
+    that distinguish this concept from related ones like economic systems themselves
+    or their outcomes.
+- name: source_grounding
+  value: 2.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: While Smith does discuss different economic systems in Book IV, the entity
+    appears to be a modern analytical abstraction rather than a concept Smith explicitly
+    develops. The reference to "Book IV, Chapter 0" is also problematic since Book
+    IV doesn't have a Chapter 0, suggesting weak source grounding.
+- name: domain_placement
+  value: 3.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: '"General Theory" is appropriate given the broad, abstract nature of
+    the concept, though the entity is so general it could arguably fit in multiple
+    domains. The placement isn''t wrong but reflects the entity''s lack of specificity
+    rather than clear conceptual boundaries.'
+- name: vsm_relevance
+  value: 1.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: This entity is too abstract and meta-level to map meaningfully to any
+    specific VSM system. It describes the general notion of "how systems work" rather
+    than identifying particular functional components that would correspond to S1-S5
+    operations.
+- name: explanatory_value
+  value: 2.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: The entity provides minimal explanatory power because it merely labels
+    the general idea that economic systems have functions without identifying specific
+    mechanisms, causal relationships, or structural elements. It names a surface phenomenon
+    rather than illuminating underlying processes that Smith actually analyzes.
+---
+
+# Evaluation: Economic System Function
+
+## definition_precision — 2.0 / 5.0
+
+The definition is overly broad and circular, essentially defining "economic system function" as "how economic systems function." It uses vague terms like "operational role" and "practical effects" without establishing clear boundaries that distinguish this concept from related ones like economic systems themselves or their outcomes.
+
+## source_grounding — 2.0 / 5.0
+
+While Smith does discuss different economic systems in Book IV, the entity appears to be a modern analytical abstraction rather than a concept Smith explicitly develops. The reference to "Book IV, Chapter 0" is also problematic since Book IV doesn't have a Chapter 0, suggesting weak source grounding.
+
+## domain_placement — 3.0 / 5.0
+
+"General Theory" is appropriate given the broad, abstract nature of the concept, though the entity is so general it could arguably fit in multiple domains. The placement isn't wrong but reflects the entity's lack of specificity rather than clear conceptual boundaries.
+
+## vsm_relevance — 1.0 / 5.0
+
+This entity is too abstract and meta-level to map meaningfully to any specific VSM system. It describes the general notion of "how systems work" rather than identifying particular functional components that would correspond to S1-S5 operations.
+
+## explanatory_value — 2.0 / 5.0
+
+The entity provides minimal explanatory power because it merely labels the general idea that economic systems have functions without identifying specific mechanisms, causal relationships, or structural elements. It names a surface phenomenon rather than illuminating underlying processes that Smith actually analyzes.