coulomb/net-kingdom
4
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

Note NetKingdom layering review in INTENT

Browse source 
Records this repository's layer in the NetKingdom IT-security layer model
(Taxonomy / Tooling / Engines / Staff) and what should change in this INTENT
as a result. Links to the review that established the model:
gate-house/history/2026-08-28-security-layer-model-and-gate-house-recut.md

The note flags pending adaptation only; the body is unchanged.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: opus
Assistant-Process: 2564823@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: 2a7ed827-4928-4b9f-8613-9135c9cadfe9
This commit is contained in:
tegwick 2026-08-28 20:33:42 +02:00
parent d9baa06f7e
commit 56f5ba8a2c
1 changed files with 15 additions and 0 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

15
INTENT.md
View file

@ -1,5 +1,20 @@
# INTENT
> **NetKingdom layering review — 2026-08-28.** This repository's role was reviewed
> against the NetKingdom IT-security layer model: **Taxonomy → Tooling → Engines →
> Staff**, layered by determinism and by the kind of artifact each layer produces.
> Findings and the argument behind them:
> `gate-house/history/2026-08-28-security-layer-model-and-gate-house-recut.md`.
> The model as currently stated is `gate-house/INTENT.md` § "Where Gate House Sits";
> it is ruled to become a `net-kingdom/canon/standards/` standard, not yet written.
>
> The layer rule that binds every repository: **Staff never touches tooling
> directly. It acts only through engine APIs.**
>
> **This repository is Taxonomy — the estate's canon of record.** The layer model belongs here, in `canon/standards/`, as NetKingdom-flavored security architecture rather than general semantic contract. This INTENT should name the four layers as the structure of the estate and reference the standard once written. The canon currently holds no authority or Active Secrets Management standard, and does not mention gate-house at all.
>
> *This note records what should change. The body below is not yet adapted.*
> This file captures **why this repository exists**,
> the **direction it is moving toward**, and
> the **kind of system it is meant to become**.