NK-WP-0049-T40: unsigned attempt admission prepared for the 19:00 session; evening order recorded
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Assistant: claude-code Assistant-Model: opus Assistant-Process: 4101@bnt-lap001 Assistant-Session: bc7d2ce5-6f32-45f1-83e5-0dcbb8e610a7
This commit is contained in:
parent
5a8958bf08
commit
8314cefa71
1 changed files with 14 additions and 0 deletions
|
|
@ -1312,6 +1312,20 @@ state_hub_task_id: "90865f76-0573-5840-b1b5-937f0820ea82"
|
|||
The signed document is T33's required `--admission` input and T18's surviving
|
||||
offline authorization. The signature does not run the attempt.
|
||||
|
||||
2026-10-23 handoff: the session is scheduled for 19:00 Berlin (17:00Z) today. The unsigned admission is prepared
|
||||
at `~/nk49-attempt-20261023/attempt.json` (outside Git, dir 0700, file 0444, sha256
|
||||
`f8297954…c157`). It binds case `secrets15-nk49-readiness`, issuer `https://kc.coulomb.social`,
|
||||
selector `sha256:02077af3…7012`, service_auth `sha256:c0ade429…86c0`, and window
|
||||
2026-10-23T17:00:00Z to 2026-10-24T05:00:00Z (12 h, ending 07:00 Berlin). Pins were rechecked against secrets-engine
|
||||
HEAD `a14fbc0`, with no change to the selector, service_auth.py, the checker or founder_admission.py
|
||||
since `0f44fbe`. A dry check passed every field and window rule, and refused only the missing signature.
|
||||
Evening order:
|
||||
(1) confirm that sha256 is unchanged;
|
||||
(2) founder signs: `ssh-keygen -Y sign -f ~/.ssh/gexec_approver_ed25519 -n secrets-engine-recovery-attempt ~/nk49-attempt-20261023/attempt.json`;
|
||||
(3) ceremony step 2, selector preflight with `--admission`, must report `founder_admitted_attempt_not_native_acceptance`;
|
||||
(4) ceremony steps 3 to 5 (production ACME reissue under RCLUSTER-WP-0018-T04, launcher, independent receipt verifier with `--not-after 2026-10-24T05:00:00+00:00`) under T18.
|
||||
If the window lapses, write a new file and sign again. Never edit the signed bytes.
|
||||
|
||||
## Verify actual SOPS compatibility and sealed-descriptor read/write custody
|
||||
|
||||
```task
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue