docs(reuse): establish reviewed NetKingdom security capabilities
All checks were successful
CI Smoke / host-smoke (push) Successful in 0s
CI Smoke / container-smoke (push) Successful in 2s

Assistant: codex
Assistant-Model: gpt-6-astra
Assistant-Session: 01a137ca-5c77-7a71-b9ae-23ad9b0b5684
This commit is contained in:
tegwick 2026-10-14 06:40:30 +02:00
parent 1a36e857cc
commit e99c3e9791
7 changed files with 658 additions and 87 deletions

View file

@ -0,0 +1,100 @@
---
id: capability.security.bootstrap-recovery
owner: net-kingdom
status: draft
domain: infotech
maturity:
discovery:
current: D3
target: D5
confidence: medium
rationale: Owner scope, neighboring responsibilities, concrete use cases and limitations
are documented; no exhaustive or generalized maturity claim.
availability:
current: A2
target: A2
confidence: medium
rationale: 'Source interface assessed 2026-10-14: Local identity, bootstrap console,
encrypted custody handoff and caller tools. Availability describes the delivery
form, not production acceptance. Source repairs and disposable native fixtures
do not prove estate root isolation or recovery.'
external_evidence:
completeness:
level: C1
confidence: low
basis: Source artifacts establish a bounded capability; no independent consumer-completeness
assessment in this review.
reliability:
level: R0
confidence: low
basis: No longitudinal consumer reliability measurement established by this review.
name: Guarded bootstrap and recovery preparation
summary: Local identity, bootstrap console, encrypted custody handoff and caller tools.
tags:
- security
- netkingdom
- framework-reuse
discovery:
intent: Local identity, bootstrap console, encrypted custody handoff and caller
tools
includes:
- Local identity, bootstrap console, encrypted custody handoff and caller tools
excludes:
- Source repairs and disposable native fixtures do not prove estate root isolation
or recovery
use_cases:
- 'U10: Operator recovers identity, custody or data with independently held recovery
material'
availability:
current_level: A2
target_level: A2
current_artifacts:
- tools/security-bootstrap-console/README.md
- tools/custody-record/README.md
consumption_modes:
- CLI
- source
relations:
related_to:
- capability.security.practice-canon
- capability.security.doctrine-review
- capability.iam.key-cape
- capability.authorization.policy-evaluate
- capability.registry.register
specializes:
- capability.security.iam-tooling-suite
evidence:
documentation:
- tools/security-bootstrap-console/README.md
- tools/custody-record/README.md
consumer_guidance:
recommended_for:
- Operator recovers identity, custody or data with independently held recovery material
not_recommended_for:
- Source repairs and disposable native fixtures do not prove estate root isolation
or recovery
known_limitations:
- Source repairs and disposable native fixtures do not prove estate root isolation
or recovery
- 2026-10-14 architecture review estimates operational maturity separately; a registry
entry does not authorize execution or establish deployment.
---
# Guarded bootstrap and recovery preparation
Local identity, bootstrap console, encrypted custody handoff and caller tools.
## Reuse boundary
Source repairs and disposable native fixtures do not prove estate root isolation or recovery.
## Supported use cases
- U10: Operator recovers identity, custody or data with independently held recovery material
## Evidence and integration
- [tools/security-bootstrap-console/README.md](../../tools/security-bootstrap-console/README.md)
- [tools/custody-record/README.md](../../tools/custody-record/README.md)
Assessment: CUST-WP-0081, 2026-10-14. Relations identify interfaces to compose; they do not certify native integration. Existing external evidence levels are retained where present. New entries use conservative C1/R0 until consumer assessment exists.

View file

@ -0,0 +1,110 @@
---
id: capability.security.case-contracts
owner: net-kingdom
status: draft
domain: infotech
maturity:
discovery:
current: D3
target: D5
confidence: medium
rationale: Owner scope, neighboring responsibilities, concrete use cases and limitations
are documented; no exhaustive or generalized maturity claim.
availability:
current: A2
target: A2
confidence: medium
rationale: 'Source interface assessed 2026-10-14: Versioned types, cases and schema
validation. Availability describes the delivery form, not production acceptance.
Type acknowledgment, case acceptance, structural materialization and native
execution are distinct.'
external_evidence:
completeness:
level: C1
confidence: low
basis: Source artifacts establish a bounded capability; no independent consumer-completeness
assessment in this review.
reliability:
level: R0
confidence: low
basis: No longitudinal consumer reliability measurement established by this review.
name: Security case types and instance validation
summary: Versioned types, cases and schema validation.
tags:
- security
- netkingdom
- framework-reuse
discovery:
intent: Versioned types, cases and schema validation
includes:
- Versioned types, cases and schema validation
excludes:
- Type acknowledgment, case acceptance, structural materialization and native execution
are distinct
use_cases:
- 'U01: Architect composes a security deployment from explicit owner contracts and
case types'
- 'U05: Operator provisions and delivers a scoped workload credential through the
approved owner lane'
- 'U06: Operator or automation obtains a bounded SSH certificate and maintains private
connectivity'
availability:
current_level: A2
target_level: A2
current_artifacts:
- tools/security-case-types/README.md
- canon/standards/security-case-types_v0.1.md
consumption_modes:
- CLI
- source
relations:
related_to:
- capability.security.practice-canon
- capability.security.doctrine-review
- capability.iam.key-cape
- capability.authorization.policy-evaluate
- capability.registry.register
specializes:
- capability.security.iam-tooling-suite
evidence:
documentation:
- tools/security-case-types/README.md
- canon/standards/security-case-types_v0.1.md
consumer_guidance:
recommended_for:
- Architect composes a security deployment from explicit owner contracts and case
types
- Operator provisions and delivers a scoped workload credential through the approved
owner lane
- Operator or automation obtains a bounded SSH certificate and maintains private
connectivity
not_recommended_for:
- Type acknowledgment, case acceptance, structural materialization and native execution
are distinct
known_limitations:
- Type acknowledgment, case acceptance, structural materialization and native execution
are distinct
- 2026-10-14 architecture review estimates operational maturity separately; a registry
entry does not authorize execution or establish deployment.
---
# Security case types and instance validation
Versioned types, cases and schema validation.
## Reuse boundary
Type acknowledgment, case acceptance, structural materialization and native execution are distinct.
## Supported use cases
- U01: Architect composes a security deployment from explicit owner contracts and case types
- U05: Operator provisions and delivers a scoped workload credential through the approved owner lane
- U06: Operator or automation obtains a bounded SSH certificate and maintains private connectivity
## Evidence and integration
- [tools/security-case-types/README.md](../../tools/security-case-types/README.md)
- [canon/standards/security-case-types_v0.1.md](../../canon/standards/security-case-types_v0.1.md)
Assessment: CUST-WP-0081, 2026-10-14. Relations identify interfaces to compose; they do not certify native integration. Existing external evidence levels are retained where present. New entries use conservative C1/R0 until consumer assessment exists.

View file

@ -0,0 +1,97 @@
---
id: capability.security.emission-profile
owner: net-kingdom
status: draft
domain: infotech
maturity:
discovery:
current: D3
target: D5
confidence: medium
rationale: Owner scope, neighboring responsibilities, concrete use cases and limitations
are documented; no exhaustive or generalized maturity claim.
availability:
current: A2
target: A2
confidence: medium
rationale: 'Source interface assessed 2026-10-14: Security profile over generic
emission contracts and validator. Availability describes the delivery form,
not production acceptance. Profile adoption and source completeness require
owner-native evidence.'
external_evidence:
completeness:
level: C1
confidence: low
basis: Source artifacts establish a bounded capability; no independent consumer-completeness
assessment in this review.
reliability:
level: R0
confidence: low
basis: No longitudinal consumer reliability measurement established by this review.
name: Security emission cadence validation
summary: Security profile over generic emission contracts and validator.
tags:
- security
- netkingdom
- framework-reuse
discovery:
intent: Security profile over generic emission contracts and validator
includes:
- Security profile over generic emission contracts and validator
excludes:
- Profile adoption and source completeness require owner-native evidence
use_cases:
- 'U08: Consumer emits security events and reconciles independently retained evidence'
- 'U09: Maintainer observes posture, prioritizes findings, coordinates work and
verifies outcomes'
availability:
current_level: A2
target_level: A2
current_artifacts:
- tools/emission-cadence-profile/README.md
consumption_modes:
- CLI
- source
relations:
related_to:
- capability.security.practice-canon
- capability.security.doctrine-review
- capability.iam.key-cape
- capability.authorization.policy-evaluate
- capability.registry.register
specializes:
- capability.security.iam-tooling-suite
evidence:
documentation:
- tools/emission-cadence-profile/README.md
consumer_guidance:
recommended_for:
- Consumer emits security events and reconciles independently retained evidence
- Maintainer observes posture, prioritizes findings, coordinates work and verifies
outcomes
not_recommended_for:
- Profile adoption and source completeness require owner-native evidence
known_limitations:
- Profile adoption and source completeness require owner-native evidence
- 2026-10-14 architecture review estimates operational maturity separately; a registry
entry does not authorize execution or establish deployment.
---
# Security emission cadence validation
Security profile over generic emission contracts and validator.
## Reuse boundary
Profile adoption and source completeness require owner-native evidence.
## Supported use cases
- U08: Consumer emits security events and reconciles independently retained evidence
- U09: Maintainer observes posture, prioritizes findings, coordinates work and verifies outcomes
## Evidence and integration
- [tools/emission-cadence-profile/README.md](../../tools/emission-cadence-profile/README.md)
Assessment: CUST-WP-0081, 2026-10-14. Relations identify interfaces to compose; they do not certify native integration. Existing external evidence levels are retained where present. New entries use conservative C1/R0 until consumer assessment exists.

View file

@ -1,8 +1,7 @@
---
id: capability.security.iam-tooling-suite
name: NetKingdom Security/IAM Tooling Suite
summary: Canonical security architecture and executable reference tooling for IAM, bootstrap, posture validation,
deterministic plan-only security scenario composition, and proposal-only posture feedback.
name: NetKingdom security architecture and conformance tooling
summary: Versioned IAM, layer, tenancy and credential contracts plus validators.
owner: net-kingdom
status: draft
domain: infotech
@ -11,22 +10,26 @@ tags:
- iam
- kubernetes
- conformance
- netkingdom
- framework-reuse
maturity:
discovery:
current: D3
target: D5
confidence: medium
rationale: SCOPE plus docs/secrets-engine-security-infrastructure-boundary.md describe an explicit
integration boundary with OpenBao, flex-auth, user-engine, ops-warden, ops-bridge, info-tech-canon,
and State Hub; canon/standards/ holds versioned IAM v0.3, playbook capability, scenario composition,
tenancy, zone, and boundary standards that provider repos implement against.
rationale: SCOPE plus docs/secrets-engine-security-infrastructure-boundary.md
describe an explicit integration boundary with OpenBao, flex-auth, user-engine,
ops-warden, ops-bridge, info-tech-canon, and State Hub; canon/standards/ holds
versioned IAM v0.3, playbook capability, scenario composition, tenancy, zone,
and boundary standards that provider repos implement against.
availability:
current: A2
target: A3
confidence: medium
rationale: 'No top-level package manifest, but tools/ holds independently documented and runnable
conformance, posture, posture-feedback, scenario-composition, and guarded bootstrap tools; local-identity is separately
packaged and tested.'
rationale: 'Source interface assessed 2026-10-14: Versioned IAM, layer, tenancy
and credential contracts plus validators. Availability describes the delivery
form, not production acceptance. Mixed accepted and proposed standards; framework
integration remains incomplete.'
external_evidence:
completeness:
level: C1
@ -34,7 +37,8 @@ external_evidence:
basis: scope_vs_intent_and_consumer_expectations
satisfied_expectations:
- versioned canon standards already implemented by a sibling repo (key-cape)
- documented, runnable conformance, posture, composition, and bootstrap tools under tools/
- documented, runnable conformance, posture, composition, and bootstrap tools
under tools/
broken_expectations: []
out_of_scope_expectations: []
reliability:
@ -42,50 +46,47 @@ external_evidence:
confidence: low
basis: consumer_quality_signals
known_reliability_risks:
- no top-level packaging; each tool under tools/ has its own runtime dependencies, no unified install
path yet
- no top-level packaging; each tool under tools/ has its own runtime dependencies,
no unified install path yet
discovery:
intent: Own canonical NetKingdom security semantics and provide executable reference and conformance tooling
so provider implementations can integrate without inferred authority or hidden deployment coupling.
intent: Versioned IAM, layer, tenancy and credential contracts plus validators
includes:
- canon/standards/ versioned IAM, tenancy, zone, credential, boundary, and composition standards
- IAM profile conformance checker
- playbook capability contract validator
- deterministic plan-only security scenario composer
- tenancy posture schema and validator
- deterministic proposal-only posture feedback evaluator
- security bootstrap console (local, non-secret-collecting)
- packaged local bootstrap identity CLI
- Versioned IAM, layer, tenancy and credential contracts plus validators
excludes:
- concrete IAM implementations themselves (see key-cape for lightweight mode)
- live secret value handling (bootstrap console explicitly refuses live OpenBao initialization)
- Mixed accepted and proposed standards; framework integration remains incomplete
assumptions: []
use_cases: []
use_cases:
- 'U01: Architect composes a security deployment from explicit owner contracts and
case types'
- 'U02: Human signs in with MFA and manages account or factor recovery'
- 'U03: Application combines identity, tenant and resource facts and enforces a
bound decision'
- 'U14: Framework adopter validates and reuses selected contracts, tools and reference
compositions'
research_memos: []
availability:
current_level: A2
target_level: A3
current_artifacts:
- tools/iam-profile-conformance
- tools/playbook-capability-contract
- tools/security-scenario-composer
- tools/tenancy-posture
- tools/posture-feedback
- tools/security-bootstrap-console
- local-identity
- SCOPE.md
- SECURITY-COMPANION.md
target_artifacts: []
consumption_modes:
- cli
- local web ui
- CLI
- source
relations:
depends_on: []
supports: []
related_to: []
related_to:
- capability.security.practice-canon
- capability.security.doctrine-review
- capability.iam.key-cape
- capability.authorization.policy-evaluate
- capability.registry.register
evidence:
documentation:
- README.md
- docs/secrets-engine-security-infrastructure-boundary.md
- tools/*/README.md
- SCOPE.md
- SECURITY-COMPANION.md
tests:
- tools/iam-profile-conformance (pytest fixtures)
consumer_feedback: []
@ -93,56 +94,40 @@ evidence:
incidents: []
consumer_guidance:
recommended_for:
- implementers needing to verify IAM/security conformance against Coulomb's canonical standards
- Architect composes a security deployment from explicit owner contracts and case
types
- Human signs in with MFA and manages account or factor recovery
- Application combines identity, tenant and resource facts and enforces a bound
decision
- Framework adopter validates and reuses selected contracts, tools and reference
compositions
not_recommended_for:
- needs for a packaged, single-install security suite (currently three separate tools)
- Mixed accepted and proposed standards; framework integration remains incomplete
known_limitations:
- no unified top-level packaging across the three tools
- Mixed accepted and proposed standards; framework integration remains incomplete
- 2026-10-14 architecture review estimates operational maturity separately; a registry
entry does not authorize execution or establish deployment.
promotion_history: []
---
# NetKingdom Security/IAM Tooling Suite
# NetKingdom security architecture and conformance tooling
## Overview
Versioned IAM, layer, tenancy and credential contracts plus validators.
`net-kingdom` provides canonical IAM and security architecture, executable
conformance and posture checks, deterministic plan-only scenario composition,
proposal-only posture feedback, a local bootstrap identity package, and a non-secret-collecting security
bootstrap console. Provider implementations remain in sibling repositories such
as `key-cape`; the self-optimizing platform remains an intent rather than a
current delivery claim.
## Reuse boundary
## Assessment notes
Mixed accepted and proposed standards; framework integration remains incomplete.
### Discovery
## Supported use cases
SCOPE plus docs/secrets-engine-security-infrastructure-boundary.md describe an
explicit integration boundary with OpenBao, flex-auth, user-engine, ops-warden,
ops-bridge, info-tech-canon, and State Hub. `canon/standards/` holds the current
IAM v0.3 and related boundary, posture, zone, credential, playbook, and scenario
composition standards.
- U01: Architect composes a security deployment from explicit owner contracts and case types
- U02: Human signs in with MFA and manages account or factor recovery
- U03: Application combines identity, tenant and resource facts and enforces a bound decision
- U14: Framework adopter validates and reuses selected contracts, tools and reference compositions
### Availability
## Evidence and integration
No top-level package manifest exists. The independently runnable surfaces are
documented under `tools/`, and `local-identity` has its own package manifest and
test environment.
- [SCOPE.md](../../SCOPE.md)
- [SECURITY-COMPANION.md](../../SECURITY-COMPANION.md)
### Completeness
First-pass honest assessment from the REUSE-WP-0017 coverage campaign
(reuse-surface). No external consumer feedback exists yet; levels reflect
scope-vs-intent documentation quality, not internal code quality.
### Reliability
No production consumer telemetry exists yet; reliability level is
intentionally conservative pending REUSE-WP-0019 reuse-telemetry evidence.
## Promotion checklist
- [x] ID follows `capability.<domain>.<name>` pattern
- [x] Maturity enums match `specs/CapabilityMaturityStandard.md`
- [x] `external_evidence` is populated separately from `maturity`
- [ ] Relations reference valid capability IDs (none yet)
- [x] Index entry added in `registry/indexes/capabilities.yaml`
Assessment: CUST-WP-0081, 2026-10-14. Relations identify interfaces to compose; they do not certify native integration. Existing external evidence levels are retained where present. New entries use conservative C1/R0 until consumer assessment exists.

View file

@ -0,0 +1,101 @@
---
id: capability.security.posture-feedback
owner: net-kingdom
status: draft
domain: infotech
maturity:
discovery:
current: D3
target: D5
confidence: medium
rationale: Owner scope, neighboring responsibilities, concrete use cases and limitations
are documented; no exhaustive or generalized maturity claim.
availability:
current: A2
target: A2
confidence: medium
rationale: 'Source interface assessed 2026-10-14: CLI evaluates evidence age and
posture into owner-routed findings. Availability describes the delivery form,
not production acceptance. Proposal only; no policy changes or remediation execution.'
external_evidence:
completeness:
level: C1
confidence: low
basis: Source artifacts establish a bounded capability; no independent consumer-completeness
assessment in this review.
reliability:
level: R0
confidence: low
basis: No longitudinal consumer reliability measurement established by this review.
name: Deterministic posture feedback
summary: CLI evaluates evidence age and posture into owner-routed findings.
tags:
- security
- netkingdom
- framework-reuse
discovery:
intent: CLI evaluates evidence age and posture into owner-routed findings
includes:
- CLI evaluates evidence age and posture into owner-routed findings
excludes:
- Proposal only; no policy changes or remediation execution
use_cases:
- 'U09: Maintainer observes posture, prioritizes findings, coordinates work and
verifies outcomes'
- 'U14: Framework adopter validates and reuses selected contracts, tools and reference
compositions'
availability:
current_level: A2
target_level: A2
current_artifacts:
- tools/posture-feedback/README.md
- tools/posture-feedback/posture_feedback.py
consumption_modes:
- CLI
- source
relations:
related_to:
- capability.security.practice-canon
- capability.security.doctrine-review
- capability.iam.key-cape
- capability.authorization.policy-evaluate
- capability.registry.register
specializes:
- capability.security.iam-tooling-suite
evidence:
documentation:
- tools/posture-feedback/README.md
- tools/posture-feedback/posture_feedback.py
consumer_guidance:
recommended_for:
- Maintainer observes posture, prioritizes findings, coordinates work and verifies
outcomes
- Framework adopter validates and reuses selected contracts, tools and reference
compositions
not_recommended_for:
- Proposal only; no policy changes or remediation execution
known_limitations:
- Proposal only; no policy changes or remediation execution
- 2026-10-14 architecture review estimates operational maturity separately; a registry
entry does not authorize execution or establish deployment.
---
# Deterministic posture feedback
CLI evaluates evidence age and posture into owner-routed findings.
## Reuse boundary
Proposal only; no policy changes or remediation execution.
## Supported use cases
- U09: Maintainer observes posture, prioritizes findings, coordinates work and verifies outcomes
- U14: Framework adopter validates and reuses selected contracts, tools and reference compositions
## Evidence and integration
- [tools/posture-feedback/README.md](../../tools/posture-feedback/README.md)
- [tools/posture-feedback/posture_feedback.py](../../tools/posture-feedback/posture_feedback.py)
Assessment: CUST-WP-0081, 2026-10-14. Relations identify interfaces to compose; they do not certify native integration. Existing external evidence levels are retained where present. New entries use conservative C1/R0 until consumer assessment exists.

View file

@ -0,0 +1,101 @@
---
id: capability.security.scenario-compose
owner: net-kingdom
status: draft
domain: infotech
maturity:
discovery:
current: D3
target: D5
confidence: medium
rationale: Owner scope, neighboring responsibilities, concrete use cases and limitations
are documented; no exhaustive or generalized maturity claim.
availability:
current: A2
target: A2
confidence: medium
rationale: 'Source interface assessed 2026-10-14: CLI selects pinned providers
and orders trust transitions. Availability describes the delivery form, not
production acceptance. Plan only; execution.permitted is always false.'
external_evidence:
completeness:
level: C1
confidence: low
basis: Source artifacts establish a bounded capability; no independent consumer-completeness
assessment in this review.
reliability:
level: R0
confidence: low
basis: No longitudinal consumer reliability measurement established by this review.
name: Deterministic security scenario composition
summary: CLI selects pinned providers and orders trust transitions.
tags:
- security
- netkingdom
- framework-reuse
discovery:
intent: CLI selects pinned providers and orders trust transitions
includes:
- CLI selects pinned providers and orders trust transitions
excludes:
- Plan only; execution.permitted is always false
use_cases:
- 'U01: Architect composes a security deployment from explicit owner contracts and
case types'
- 'U14: Framework adopter validates and reuses selected contracts, tools and reference
compositions'
availability:
current_level: A2
target_level: A2
current_artifacts:
- tools/security-scenario-composer/README.md
- tools/security-scenario-composer/security_scenario_composer.py
consumption_modes:
- CLI
- source
relations:
related_to:
- capability.security.practice-canon
- capability.security.doctrine-review
- capability.iam.key-cape
- capability.authorization.policy-evaluate
- capability.registry.register
specializes:
- capability.security.iam-tooling-suite
evidence:
documentation:
- tools/security-scenario-composer/README.md
- tools/security-scenario-composer/security_scenario_composer.py
consumer_guidance:
recommended_for:
- Architect composes a security deployment from explicit owner contracts and case
types
- Framework adopter validates and reuses selected contracts, tools and reference
compositions
not_recommended_for:
- Plan only; execution.permitted is always false
known_limitations:
- Plan only; execution.permitted is always false
- 2026-10-14 architecture review estimates operational maturity separately; a registry
entry does not authorize execution or establish deployment.
---
# Deterministic security scenario composition
CLI selects pinned providers and orders trust transitions.
## Reuse boundary
Plan only; execution.permitted is always false.
## Supported use cases
- U01: Architect composes a security deployment from explicit owner contracts and case types
- U14: Framework adopter validates and reuses selected contracts, tools and reference compositions
## Evidence and integration
- [tools/security-scenario-composer/README.md](../../tools/security-scenario-composer/README.md)
- [tools/security-scenario-composer/security_scenario_composer.py](../../tools/security-scenario-composer/security_scenario_composer.py)
Assessment: CUST-WP-0081, 2026-10-14. Relations identify interfaces to compose; they do not certify native integration. Existing external evidence levels are retained where present. New entries use conservative C1/R0 until consumer assessment exists.

View file

@ -1,21 +1,98 @@
version: 1
updated: '2026-08-23'
updated: '2026-10-14'
domain: helix_forge
capabilities:
- id: capability.security.iam-tooling-suite
name: NetKingdom Security/IAM Tooling Suite
summary: Canonical security architecture and executable reference tooling for IAM, bootstrap, posture
validation, deterministic plan-only security scenario composition, and proposal-only posture feedback.
vector: D3 / A2 / C1 / R1
name: NetKingdom security architecture and conformance tooling
summary: Versioned IAM, layer, tenancy and credential contracts plus validators.
domain: infotech
status: draft
owner: net-kingdom
path: registry/capabilities/capability.security.iam-tooling-suite.md
tags:
- security
- iam
- kubernetes
- conformance
- netkingdom
- framework-reuse
vector: D3 / A2 / C1 / R1
path: registry/capabilities/capability.security.iam-tooling-suite.md
consumption_modes:
- cli
- local web ui
- CLI
- source
- id: capability.security.scenario-compose
name: Deterministic security scenario composition
summary: CLI selects pinned providers and orders trust transitions.
domain: infotech
status: draft
owner: net-kingdom
tags:
- security
- netkingdom
- framework-reuse
vector: D3 / A2 / C1 / R0
path: registry/capabilities/capability.security.scenario-compose.md
consumption_modes:
- CLI
- source
- id: capability.security.posture-feedback
name: Deterministic posture feedback
summary: CLI evaluates evidence age and posture into owner-routed findings.
domain: infotech
status: draft
owner: net-kingdom
tags:
- security
- netkingdom
- framework-reuse
vector: D3 / A2 / C1 / R0
path: registry/capabilities/capability.security.posture-feedback.md
consumption_modes:
- CLI
- source
- id: capability.security.case-contracts
name: Security case types and instance validation
summary: Versioned types, cases and schema validation.
domain: infotech
status: draft
owner: net-kingdom
tags:
- security
- netkingdom
- framework-reuse
vector: D3 / A2 / C1 / R0
path: registry/capabilities/capability.security.case-contracts.md
consumption_modes:
- CLI
- source
- id: capability.security.bootstrap-recovery
name: Guarded bootstrap and recovery preparation
summary: Local identity, bootstrap console, encrypted custody handoff and caller
tools.
domain: infotech
status: draft
owner: net-kingdom
tags:
- security
- netkingdom
- framework-reuse
vector: D3 / A2 / C1 / R0
path: registry/capabilities/capability.security.bootstrap-recovery.md
consumption_modes:
- CLI
- source
- id: capability.security.emission-profile
name: Security emission cadence validation
summary: Security profile over generic emission contracts and validator.
domain: infotech
status: draft
owner: net-kingdom
tags:
- security
- netkingdom
- framework-reuse
vector: D3 / A2 / C1 / R0
path: registry/capabilities/capability.security.emission-profile.md
consumption_modes:
- CLI
- source