The layer model is now published as
net-kingdom/canon/standards/security-layer-model_v0.1.md (proposed) and
ratified by gate-house GH-DEC-2026-001. The note previously said the
standard was not yet written.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: opus
Assistant-Process: 2564823@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: 2a7ed827-4928-4b9f-8613-9135c9cadfe9
Records this repository's layer in the NetKingdom IT-security layer model
(Taxonomy / Tooling / Engines / Staff) and what should change in this INTENT
as a result. Links to the review that established the model:
gate-house/history/2026-08-28-security-layer-model-and-gate-house-recut.md
The note flags pending adaptation only; the body is unchanged.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: opus
Assistant-Process: 2564823@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: 2a7ed827-4928-4b9f-8613-9135c9cadfe9
- ADR-0007: refine (not overturn) the orchestration boundary with the
two-layer model — Railiance executes parametrized playbooks, NetKingdom
does meta-orchestration (scenario->playbook selection, parametrization,
responsibility map). Add the playbook/capability-contract dependency as
the prerequisite, analogous to the IAM Profile.
- INTENT.md: add "Why NetKingdom" (the kingdom metaphor: governed,
defended, living/evolving, tended by its people); Principle 7
(Meta-Orchestration over Re-Implementation); an Operating Model section
(kaizen-agent workforce for recurring duties + change/improvement); and
matching Direction-of-Evolution entries.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Make the lightweight->expanded decision explicitly capability-driven (not
scale-driven) and capture the turn-key, capability-selectable framework
ambition.
- arch doc: add capability-driven rationale to the identity-mode choice;
add a "Capability Progression (Start Small -> Enterprise)" ladder
(C0 bootstrap -> C6 self-optimizing), including the C2a/C2b 2FA split
(Authelia built-in vs privacyIDEA); answer the lightweight/expanded
open question as capability-driven
- INTENT.md: recast Progressive Expansion as capability-driven with a
no-structural-breaks guarantee; add capability-selection + turn-key
orchestration to the mission and identity
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>