Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: opus
Assistant-Process: 308701@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: 5548e447-444c-4dcc-bed1-05c16eebfe56
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: opus
Assistant-Process: 4101@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: bc7d2ce5-6f32-45f1-83e5-0dcbb8e610a7
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: opus
Assistant-Process: 696317@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: bab9e511-0915-45b3-926a-2fab552edff6
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: opus
Assistant-Process: 696317@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: bab9e511-0915-45b3-926a-2fab552edff6
Updated by fix-consistency on 2026-10-11:
- workplan status: backlog → active
Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: opus
Assistant-Process: 1370019@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: d462dd63-16de-4189-ae70-b9cd6566bf87
Founder-authorized triage; tasks unchanged. See the-custodian
history/20261011-netkingdom-security-progress-assessment.md.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: opus
Assistant-Process: 1370019@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: d462dd63-16de-4189-ae70-b9cd6566bf87
Set flavor on open workplans from origin/prose/status. Copy existing
depends_on aliases only. Do not promote residuals.
Assistant: grok
Assistant-Session: 01a09dc1-b21e-77e1-919e-fcad2f82b267
Written back by statehub fix-consistency after NK-WP-0035-T05 was added.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Ek3zTdfMa35bPVDjVUyhxx
Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: opus
Assistant-Process: 868701@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: b2e101b6-f501-40dc-9ee5-438cac36e21a
gate-house circulated v0.8 with two questions for this repository as owner of
the NetKingdom emission-cadence security profile: whether §17's ownership
paragraph reads in our own voice, and whether §11's new conformance item
follows the profile or diverges from it.
§17 is confirmed as written. It assigns the generic EmissionCadenceDeclaration
contract to info-tech-canon and to net-kingdom the MUST/SHOULD split, the
rare-class rate-monitoring prohibition, and the heartbeat-plus-reconciliation
obligation — which is emission-cadence-security-profile_v0.1.md §3, conjunction
included. No change.
§11 diverged in both directions and is corrected. Requiring a detection surface
of "heartbeat or reconciliation" of every load-bearing source withholds from a
volume class the expected-rate form the profile permits, and accepts for a rare
class either control alone where the profile — and the checker in
tools/emission-cadence-profile — require both. A rare class covered by a
heartbeat alone has no reconciliation to catch divergence, and one covered by
reconciliation alone produces no claim that can go missing, which is the whole
reason §9.6 rejects rate monitoring there. The item also contradicted its own
following paragraph, which admits rate monitoring except where the class is
rare.
The check now defers the form to the governing profile rather than restating a
split that is §17's to assign, carries the volume/rare distinction explicitly,
and states that classification is the source's published inventory and never the
checker's to infer from a name, payload, or observed rate — otherwise omission
detection is circular.
Change log item 6 and §14 record the review. The standard stays proposed;
publication and the acceptance flip wait on the close of the circulation round.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Ek3zTdfMa35bPVDjVUyhxx
Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: opus
Assistant-Process: 868701@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: b2e101b6-f501-40dc-9ee5-438cac36e21a
