tegwick
2aaf46ce95
Conformance sweep across the §4 catalog found two defects in this standard. §11 required every catalogued repository to declare its layer in INTENT.md, which OpenBao cannot do — the estate catalogues it but does not author it. That is the §9.1 defect applied to conformance rather than capability: a rule assigning an obligation the holder cannot discharge. For components the estate does not author, the catalog row is the declaration. §11 also did not say what a declaration is. A layer stated about a repository by another repository is not one. The nine repositories carrying gate-house's layering review note appear to declare a layer, but the words are gate-house's and sit above a line admitting the body is unadapted — assertion, not assent, which is the pattern this estate rejects. §14 now records the honest count: seven of fifteen estate-authored repositories have declared in their own voice. Adoption is not claimed on the basis of notes gate-house wrote into other repositories. Amended in place rather than versioned: v0.4 is proposed and unassented. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Assistant: claude-code Assistant-Model: opus Assistant-Process: 2564823@bnt-lap001 Assistant-Session: 2a7ed827-4928-4b9f-8613-9135c9cadfe9 |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| schemas | ||
| standards | ||