diff --git a/intakes/intakes.md b/intakes/intakes.md index 93bfa75..2e267fe 100644 --- a/intakes/intakes.md +++ b/intakes/intakes.md @@ -28,3 +28,38 @@ created: '2026-08-22T09:33:08.629717Z' updated: '2026-08-22T21:19:02Z' state_hub_intake_id: "01a028d1-c4af-7a06-adb5-c90399721872" ``` + +## MASON-IN-0002 — Declaration requested: state this repository's layer in INTENT.md (security layer model §11) + +```yaml +id: MASON-IN-0002 +kind: intake +title: 'Declaration requested: state this repository''s layer in INTENT.md (security + layer model §11)' +status: open +origin: cross-repo +origin_ref: net-kingdom security-layer-model_v0.4 §11 +priority: low +owner: ops-mason +requested_by: gate-house +proposed_layer: Staff +description: 'A conformance sweep on 2026-08-28 found this repository has no layer + declaration of its own. It carries a layering review note gate-house wrote into + the top of its INTENT.md on 2026-08-24, and that note names a layer — but the words + are gate-house''s, sitting above a line admitting the body is unadapted. Section + 11 has since been amended to say so explicitly: a layer stated about a repository + by another repository is not a declaration; only the repository''s own file, in + its own voice, conforms. Seven of fifteen estate-authored repositories have declared; + this is one of the eight that have not. REQUESTED: state the layer in INTENT.md + in your own voice, or contest it. PROPOSED LAYER: Staff. Builds and tears down access + routes, credentials, and perimeters. Two things to state in your words: the Staff + binding rule (you act through Engine APIs, never directly against Tooling — a grep + of your own source is the check, as ops-warden did and found one), and the demarcation + you are half of: ops-mason and ops-warden own access lanes, access-engine owns access + rules. Contesting is a real option and costs nothing — the three repositories that + reviewed this model each returned a correction, two of which changed the standard. + If the proposed layer is wrong for what this repository actually does, that is more + useful to us than a label added to close a checkbox. Standard: net-kingdom/canon/standards/security-layer-model_v0.4.md.' +created: '2026-08-28T21:03:29.920563Z' +updated: '2026-08-28T21:03:29.920563Z' +```