Ran the whole approved pipeline against real OpenBao: created the reins/
KV v2 mount (after pausing for explicit founder confirmation -- a bigger
action than the executive summary's blast-radius framing disclosed),
the read-only policy, the AppRole, delivered role_id/secret_id. Caught
and fixed a real bug in the same pass: built with token_num_uses=0
(OpenBao's default = unlimited) instead of the plan's own stated 8;
fixed live and removed the executor's silently-permissive default so it
can't recur. Catalog entry proposed and merged in ops-warden (c0a50bc).
Corrected a real misreading in this repo's own INTENT.md along the way:
pointer fields (auth_method/fetch_command/rotation.steps) are normal on
non-SSH catalog entries; only a bare top-level steps:+cert_command:
pair is SSH-only -- verified against ops-warden's real entries and its
full test suite (326 tests, green).
Plan status: built. Catalog entry status: draft until the founder's
paste-once-provision and glas-harness/GLAS-WP-0002-T02's live
verification succeed.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
status: approved, approved_by: Bernd Worsch, approved_at: 2026-07-27.
Verified against the real executor code: ConstructionPlan.load(...)
.is_approved() returns True for this file. MASON-WP-0001-T05 moves from
todo to wait -- the approval gate is cleared, phase 4 execution is
blocked only on a real OpenBao session existing somewhere (bao token
lookup still 403 from this workstation).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
docs/review-optimize-checklist.md: six checks (naming, TTL/scoping,
redundancy, compaction, ease of use, posture), applied for real to the
rein-openweights plan's section 4 -- including a genuinely useful
finding (credentials.py already expects this exact path/delivery shape,
zero code changes needed to consume it).
docs/executive-summary-format.md: six fixed fields, no bao syntax, no
restating earlier sections, explicit approve/reject/revise decision.
Rendered for real into the plan's section 5 -- ready for an actual
decision.
src/ops_mason/{plan,executor,audit}.py: the phase-4 build executor for
credential_type openbao-approle-kv. Refuses to run against anything but
an approved plan -- verified the refusal never even calls subprocess.run.
role_id/secret_id (the AppRole's own access credential, not the
downstream secret) land as 0600 files, never logged; the HCL policy
goes over stdin, never argv; the audit trail is metadata-only. 12 tests,
all mocked at the bao boundary (no live OpenBao access from this
session).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
docs/construction-plan-format.md: one file per plan (plans/<id>.md),
frontmatter status tracker (draft -> reviewed -> approved -> built ->
catalogued, the phase-4 hard gate), six body sections threading all
four phases through one document.
Proven against real demand: plans/rein-openweights-openrouter-approle.md,
phases 1-2 filled in. Found and reasoned through a real existing-structure
question along the way -- the openrouter-llm-connect catalog lane could
technically be reused, but its auth_method is interactive-caller-shaped
and its policy is shared/high-risk; recommends a dedicated, narrowly
scoped AppRole instead, same reasoning agent-harness-binky-mail used for
its own dedicated lane.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
