Founder decision 2026-10-07, option (c)+(a): ops-mason surveys and verifies
only. Policy/role writes, secret-id minting and token creation go through the
founder-attended railiance-platform delegated applier. ops-mason-build retired
to policies/retired/ (never installed).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: opus
Assistant-Process: 132360@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: 769b1afd-4330-4c86-96b2-e510e26db42b
scripts/plan-survey.py runs under the ops-mason-build grant and prints a
pasteable section 2: relevant secrets/auth/policy/role listings with counts,
policy stanzas covering the target for name-matched policies, KV metadata
existence, matching ops-warden catalog entries, timestamp, BAO_ADDR, token
display_name and a draft yes/no/partial answer. Metadata only: an allowlist
refuses kv get, */data/* and role-id/secret-id before any process starts; a
non-grant token is refused and the token is never printed. Denied queries
degrade to 'not permitted by ops-mason-build'. Tests use a fake bao runner.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: opus
Assistant-Process: 1170398@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: 622cd705-cb31-4322-ba08-dd42e44fa583
docs/construction-plan-format.md: one file per plan (plans/<id>.md),
frontmatter status tracker (draft -> reviewed -> approved -> built ->
catalogued, the phase-4 hard gate), six body sections threading all
four phases through one document.
Proven against real demand: plans/rein-openweights-openrouter-approle.md,
phases 1-2 filled in. Found and reasoned through a real existing-structure
question along the way -- the openrouter-llm-connect catalog lane could
technically be reused, but its auth_method is interactive-caller-shaped
and its policy is shared/high-risk; recommends a dedicated, narrowly
scoped AppRole instead, same reasoning agent-harness-binky-mail used for
its own dedicated lane.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
