--- id: MASON-WP-0003 type: workplan title: "Forge read lane so central can derive private repositories" domain: infotech repo: ops-mason status: proposed owner: codex topic_slug: custodian created: "2026-08-26" updated: "2026-08-26" related: - CUST-ADR-012 - STATE-WP-0083 - STATE-WP-0084 state_hub_workstream_id: "4015b46d-02f1-56ac-853e-87e8542cf0dd" --- # Forge read lane so central can derive private repositories ## Goal Build the credential lane that lets the State Hub read private repositories from Forgejo, and register it so `warden route find` answers this question the next time someone asks it. This workplan builds the lane. It does not consume it — see the handoff below. ## Why this exists `ADR-012` makes the forge the projection source: central clones a repository's default branch and derives its work records from what Forgejo holds. That works today because the pod clones anonymously. It does not work for private repositories. The first fleet-wide reset (`STATE-WP-0083-T04`, 2026-08-26) covered 121 repositories and nine failed identically: ```text fatal: could not read Username for 'https://forgejo.coulomb.social' ``` `rapp-core-hub`, `rapp-issue-core`, `rapp-openbao`, `rapp-policy-nexus` and five others are invisible to the hub's derivation entirely. This is a limit on the ADR's own premise. *The forge is the projection source* holds only for repositories central can read, and nothing in the current design says so. ## Why ops-mason owns it `warden route find` returns no lane for this need. The nearest entry is `forgejo-admin-api-token` — an operator PAT owned by `railiance-platform` — which is far more authority than derivation requires and the wrong thing to reuse. This repository builds "OpenBao AppRoles, policies, and KV secret paths so ops-warden always has something real to route to", which is exactly what is missing. ops-warden issues SSH certificates only and routes everything else; a Forgejo token is not its to vend. ## What ops-mason does not own Three parts of the end-to-end fix belong to other repositories and are tracked in `state-hub/STATE-WP-0084`: - mounting the credential into the `state-hub` deployment; - teaching `derive_from_forge()` to use it, and to distinguish "cannot read" from "does not exist"; - re-running the fleet reset and reviewing the nine first diffs. `STATE-WP-0084-T01` (the unreadable-vs-missing distinction) is not merely downstream: the recommendation in this lane's construction plan depends on it, because it is what makes a narrow grant fail visibly. It is worth landing with or without this credential. ## Run the construction plan through the decision gate ```task id: MASON-WP-0003-T01 status: todo priority: high state_hub_task_id: "36d26000-ae71-5a58-a563-a07ff5be664f" ``` `plans/state-hub-forge-derivation-read.md` holds phases 1–3: the demand, the existing-structure survey (including why `forgejo-admin-api-token` is rejected rather than reused), the proposed AppRole/policy/KV path, the review pass, and the executive summary. Three things need deciding, and they determine what the credential can do if it leaks: 1. **Approve, reject, or send back to phase 1.** 2. **Breadth** — organisation-wide repository read, or per-repository. The plan recommends organisation-wide *contingent on `STATE-WP-0084-T01`*, and argues the counter-case: an organisation-wide token that leaks reads every private repository in the organisation. 3. **Rotation** — accept build-phase posture (no scheduled `secret_id` expiry), or require rotation now. Permission is not in question: derivation performs `git clone --depth 1` and nothing else, so the token gets repository *read* and no other scope. Acceptance: the plan reaches `status: reviewed`, the founder decision is recorded with its reasoning rather than as a bare value, and the plan carries `approved_by`/`approved_at`. ## Build the AppRole, policy, and KV path structure ```task id: MASON-WP-0003-T02 status: wait priority: high state_hub_task_id: "68a1c8e4-c12b-550e-962c-06a90ab8c1c2" ``` Phase 4, after T01 approval only. Create the OpenBao policy granting read on exactly one KV path, the KV path *structure*, and the AppRole the `state-hub` workload authenticates with. **ops-mason does not touch the token value, even transiently.** The forge owner mints the read-only Forgejo token; it reaches the KV path through ops-warden's existing `paste_once_provision` desk. This task records *where* the credential lives and *who* may read it — never what it is. The value never appears in Git, State Hub, a workplan, a log, or a chat message. Acceptance: the policy grants read on that path alone; the AppRole authenticates and can read nothing else; the KV path exists and the desk has delivered a working token into it, confirmed by the consumer rather than by reading the value here. Recorded in `audit/build-log.jsonl` against the approved plan. ## Register the lane in the routing catalog ```task id: MASON-WP-0003-T03 status: wait priority: high state_hub_task_id: "e14f0eb3-a920-5623-b4c1-c20858dbb45d" ``` Propose a pointer-only entry (`warden_executes: false`, no authored `steps`, `status: draft`) so `warden route find "state hub read private repository"` resolves. Its absence is why this had to be reasoned out from first principles rather than looked up. The entry names the owner, the subsystem, the KV path, the rotation method, and states plainly that ops-warden routes but does not execute it. Normal git contribution to `ops-warden`, not a live API call. Acceptance: `warden route find` returns the lane; `warden route show` gives an operator enough to act without reading this workplan. ## Handoff Once T02 and T03 are done, notify `state-hub` so `STATE-WP-0084-T02` can unblock. `STATE-WP-0084-T01` does not wait on this workplan.