Record GH-DEC-2026-015's narrow R3 permission on the approval page
A correction that only matters when someone finally wires the consume belongs on the page, not in the thread that delivered it. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Assistant: claude-code Assistant-Model: opus Assistant-Process: 63291@bnt-lap001 Assistant-Session: 8bd77868-ca68-4f49-bb1e-d539ecc0d703
This commit is contained in:
parent
b4c8be8648
commit
284bfd6521
1 changed files with 8 additions and 0 deletions
|
|
@ -23,6 +23,14 @@ v0.8 §6.4 obligation 5 hardened this: each artifact **must** be validated again
|
|||
the layer that owns its data, and a PIP **must not** republish the PDP's decision.
|
||||
Neither artifact may be taken from the other.
|
||||
|
||||
**One narrow exception now exists (`GH-DEC-2026-015`, 2026-09-10).** It revised
|
||||
`GH-DEC-2026-012`'s R3 to permit nesting a binding digest inside a presentation
|
||||
hash **for one specific pair, conditioned**. It does not reach this lane and
|
||||
requires nothing here. It is recorded on this page for one reason: if a composed
|
||||
artifact ever appears on the approval path, read it as a permission that may
|
||||
exist rather than as a violation of the rule above — and then go and check which
|
||||
pair the permission covers, because it is not general.
|
||||
|
||||
## Three things that are easy to get wrong
|
||||
|
||||
**1. Do not require `provenance.authority == 'state-hub'`.**
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue