WARDEN-WP-0027-T02: the owner gate closed five days ago
railiance-platform accepted ops-warden revision0fae0904on 2026-08-23, in RPF-WP-0017 (status: finished), together with railiance-infra approval at 186b030 and all five acceptance criteria met. T02 has been sitting `progress` on a gate that was already open. Verified rather than trusted: the receipt atbc1966dahashes to d2ba444ed16989590325697e69d25283dc75a9432c29a72e627e80bf9fd987e4, matching their record exactly. One reason it went unnoticed is an identifier mismatch — T02 cites the remediation interface as RAILIANCE-WP-0026-T01, but it is RPF-WP-0017-T01 in the owner repo, and the cited id resolves to an unrelated workplan there. Their acceptance is source acceptance only and authorizes no live drill, so T02 stays progress: what unblocks is preparing a NEW scenario, which needs a fresh human GO and is the platform owner s to execute. Surfaced, not taken. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01YWBMovyFoy9RRrfL7zKvPJ Assistant: claude-code Assistant-Model: opus Assistant-Process: 4014535@bnt-lap001 Assistant-Session: d0036016-73e8-4da1-8e47-563e3ab39a3c
This commit is contained in:
parent
ee94c18938
commit
61c992923c
1 changed files with 33 additions and 0 deletions
|
|
@ -222,6 +222,39 @@ test results, and infra acceptance. T02 remains `progress` until
|
|||
that owner gate is open; acceptance will permit preparation of a new scenario,
|
||||
not execution or reuse of the terminal one.
|
||||
|
||||
**Owner gate CLOSED — accepted 2026-08-23, found 2026-08-28.**
|
||||
`railiance-platform` accepted the exact revision `0fae0904`. Recorded in their
|
||||
`RPF-WP-0017-attended-login-output-containment.md` (`status: finished`), which
|
||||
also records railiance-infra's independent approval at `186b030` and marks all
|
||||
five acceptance criteria met. The receipt digest was verified here rather than
|
||||
taken on trust: `docs/evidence/RAILIANCE-WP-0026-T01-ops-warden-receipt.json` at
|
||||
ops-warden `bc1966da` hashes to
|
||||
`d2ba444ed16989590325697e69d25283dc75a9432c29a72e627e80bf9fd987e4`, matching
|
||||
their record exactly.
|
||||
|
||||
Note the identifier: the remediation interface recorded above as
|
||||
`RAILIANCE-WP-0026-T01` is `RPF-WP-0017-T01` in the owner's repo. Searching for
|
||||
the cited id finds an unrelated workplan, which is part of why this sat unnoticed.
|
||||
|
||||
**Their acceptance is source acceptance only and authorizes no live OIDC or
|
||||
drill** — their words, and the boundary holds. So T02's state changes but its
|
||||
`Done when` does not: what was blocked was *preparing a new scenario*, and that
|
||||
is now permitted. The terminal NO-GO scenario and its receipts remain unusable.
|
||||
|
||||
**Third instance of the same failure this session.** The acceptance existed for
|
||||
five days; no message reached ops-warden. Identically, `key-cape` accepted the
|
||||
WP-0033-T04 question on 2026-08-23 with no message, and nine unread messages
|
||||
were sitting on already-superseded threads. The `verified:` field added by
|
||||
WP-0033-T05 was built for exactly this and it works — what does not work is
|
||||
waiting for a counterparty to tell you. Re-checking a blocker means reading the
|
||||
owner's repository.
|
||||
|
||||
**Remaining to close T02:** one attended production emergency seal/unseal drill,
|
||||
requiring a new scenario id, fresh owner receipts from platform/infra/master, a
|
||||
fully parameterized green preflight, and a new human GO. It is executed by the
|
||||
platform owner, never by a coding agent. That is an operator decision, not an
|
||||
agent one, so T02 stays `progress` and the decision is surfaced rather than taken.
|
||||
|
||||
## Task: Tamper-evident policy governance + reconcile
|
||||
|
||||
```task
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue