coulomb/ops-warden
5
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases 2 Packages Wiki Activity Actions

Record owner-scoped Emergent repository pilot feedback

Browse source 
Assistant: codex
Assistant-Model: gpt-6.1-sol
Assistant-Session: 01a10238-7ecc-78e2-903d-075f50e913cc
This commit is contained in:
tegwick 2026-10-03 17:50:12 +02:00
parent c9ebe0122a
commit 9ed5e22165
2 changed files with 94 additions and 0 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

65
docs/evidence/2026-10-03-emergent-pilot-owner-feedback.md Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
# ops-warden — documentary feedback on the Emergent read-only pilot
Date: 2026-10-03. Reviewer: Codex repository worker under the user's
EMERGENT-WP-0002 delegation. Owner checkout: `c9ebe0122a969e9a9188154d152133d8dc50cfcc`.
This is scoped documentary feedback, not institution/human assent, independent
assurance, current-release provider certification or authorization for effects.
## Evidence and version
Retained report: `emergent-security/docs/evidence/2026-10-03-closure-pilot-ops-warden.json`.
Actual-checkout read-only Claude scenario, Claude Code 2.1.288 and
claude-opus-5-5, knowledge 0.2.0, digest
`33bd6ea3b7bf3ea28144ffb20a62b4fcf4b2b7cb7aeddc1da0585fa6853b6162`,
source status verified-files, implementing Codex semantic review. One answered
scenario returned the shared `access` card and refused unsafe authority shortcuts.
The worker agrees with the bounded results subject to the qualifications below.
No new provider session was run; old results retain their original version.
The coordinator's corrected release is 0.2.2, digest
`19de26540c693b94ac8c19d7ed2ddd901acbc828c9b8a78b44c1a43ca468222c`.
Current read-only card retrieval reported verified-files; source-file agreement
is not live-state verification. The coordinator reports unchanged card wording,
retrieval integrity/lifecycle fixes and refreshed Glas source. Those changes
need affected tests and independent close-out before adoption.
## Findings and next scoped scenarios
Reviewed the retained access answer against INTENT/SCOPE, AGENTS' plan-first
rule, WARDEN-WP-0029, WARDEN-WP-0039 and the current access card. Correct: catalog
discovery does not grant authority, a readable broader token cannot be selected,
SSH is Warden's issuance lane, other lifecycle belongs to the named owner, and
`warden plan` precedes drafting any founder credential act. The answer knows the
plan's autonomous/founder_required/unroutable branches and sanctioned transports.
Qualification: its generalized informed-decision/approval-engine handoff must
not be read as proof that every typed `warden desk` login/provision act already
has that integration. Use the actual owner surface and prerequisite contract.
`warden plan`'s autonomous verdict is not a generic offline AUTONOMOUS grant.
Explicit 401/403 refusals stop the effect; they are not outage/fail-open cases.
WARDEN-WP-0039-T03 still needs founder go and exact route evidence; the pilot
does not admit the new fetch pin or close that work.
Next bounded current-release cases: catalogue discovery then required plan,
missing/stale lane, founder_required typed act without drafting a file drop,
wrong-owner policy refusal, withdrawn source procedure refresh, and missing
source events. Answers must name the route/source owner and preserve unknown
scope; no credential read, CA issue, login or live policy probe is part of this
review. Retain WARDEN-WP-0039/WARDEN-WP-0040 as owners of their operational gates.
## Continuity and wider use
Before counting a replacement-release pilot, record exact package digest/commit,
provider/client/model metadata, the card/source receipt, task/delegator and scope,
scenario corpus, all returned answers, review provenance and failures. Obtain
actual resume/compaction and repository/provider-transition evidence separately;
a fresh session or reload unit test does not prove either. Independent whitehat
review and Glas/Custodian readiness remain distinct gates. Broader bounded work
requires a named owner and exact target/delegation, never the knowledge receipt
as its grant. The existing tested pointer rollback applies; no instruction file
was rewritten by this review.
Work record: WARDEN-WP-ADHOC-2026-10-03-T01. Documentary feedback is complete.
Current-release pilot and distribution acceptance remain EMERGENT-WP-0002-T08/T09
and the existing open adoption decision d20a9750-2b29-534e-8227-fb866581a6ca;
no foreign task list or duplicate blocked plan was created here.

29
workplans/ADHOC-2026-10-03.md Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
---
id: WARDEN-WP-ADHOC-2026-10-03
type: workplan
title: "Documentary feedback on Emergent Security repository pilot"
domain: infotech
repo: ops-warden
status: finished
owner: codex
topic_slug: ops-warden
created: "2026-10-03"
updated: "2026-10-03"
---
## Review retained pilot evidence against owner boundaries
```task
id: WARDEN-WP-ADHOC-2026-10-03-T01
status: done
priority: medium
```
Evidence: docs/evidence/2026-10-03-emergent-pilot-owner-feedback.md.
Completed authorized documentary feedback on the retained read-only 0.2.0
Claude scenario; preserved original version and evidence limits, qualified
owner boundary wording and identified bounded 0.2.2 follow-up scenarios.
No provider session, runtime control, deployment, credential or institutional
adoption was performed. Next pilot/adoption gates remain existing
EMERGENT-WP-0002-T08/T09 and decision d20a9750-2b29-534e-8227-fb866581a6ca.
No new operational residual was created.