WARDEN-WP-0033 finished — key-cape accepted the issuance question five days ago
T04 was the last open task, waiting on key-cape to accept or refuse ownership of the coding-agent OpenBao issuance identity. They accepted, in KEY-WP-0009-T03, on 2026-08-23: codex-railiance-platform is published in their config/service-clients.example.yaml with subject service:codex:railiance-platform, role coding-agent, scope openbao:login, 15m lifetime, and the service-auth semantics in docs/openbao-service-auth-contract.md. The split is the one we routed for — KeyCape issues, railiance-platform binds the OpenBao role, OpenBao enforces, no secret value in either repo. We found it by reading their repository. KEY-WP-0009-T04 records replying to ops-warden; the inbox has zero messages from key-cape, read or unread. The task sat `wait` on an answer that already existed. That is T05's own lesson arriving on T04: a blocker is a claim about the world at a date. So the same pass re-verified the two lanes pointing at key-cape against their source instead of bumping dates: - rapp-qonto-keycape-client -> verified: source-read. KEY-WP-0009-T02 did add bounded service-auth, but that is client_credentials JWT issuance for OpenBao machine login and does not front this client_secret_basic exchange or its rotation. Blocker stands, now with evidence rather than memory. - key-cape-oidc-login -> asked of key-cape today, which the entry had recorded as still outstanding since 2026-08-21. Also cleared the inbox that hid this: 9 stale unread, all superseded by shipped work, with late closes sent to secrets-engine and llm-connect on the two threads that had asked ops-warden something and never got an answer. 391 tests pass, ruff clean, boundary coverage 0 uncovered. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01YWBMovyFoy9RRrfL7zKvPJ Assistant: claude-code Assistant-Model: opus Assistant-Process: 4014535@bnt-lap001 Assistant-Session: d0036016-73e8-4da1-8e47-563e3ab39a3c
This commit is contained in:
parent
d7f4ebcfe0
commit
ee94c18938
3 changed files with 37 additions and 10 deletions
|
|
@ -281,8 +281,8 @@ entries:
|
|||
delegation:
|
||||
mode: interim
|
||||
intended_owner: key-cape
|
||||
blocked_on: "REFUSED by secrets-engine 2026-08-21: login, MFA and identity-token issuance are key-cape/Keycloak's; secrets-engine may consume OIDC for OpenBao auth but does not own the login capability. ops-warden agrees — intended_owner corrected from secrets-engine to key-cape. Not yet asked of key-cape."
|
||||
reviewed: "2026-08-21"
|
||||
blocked_on: "REFUSED by secrets-engine 2026-08-21: login, MFA and identity-token issuance are key-cape/Keycloak's; secrets-engine may consume OIDC for OpenBao auth but does not own the login capability. ops-warden agrees — intended_owner corrected from secrets-engine to key-cape. Asked of key-cape 2026-08-28; KEY-WP-0009 accepting issuance ownership for machine identities is the precedent that makes it answerable."
|
||||
reviewed: "2026-08-28"
|
||||
verified: asked-and-waiting
|
||||
# Login lane (WP-0014 T4) — interactive auth bootstrap, not a secret read. No
|
||||
# secret-read gate (you have no identity yet) and no caller-auth precheck (the
|
||||
|
|
@ -710,9 +710,9 @@ entries:
|
|||
delegation:
|
||||
mode: interim
|
||||
intended_owner: key-cape
|
||||
blocked_on: "client_secret_basic exchange is a key-cape protocol procedure, not a KV read; KEY-WP-0008 finished 2026-08-15 without a key-cape-native exchange/rotation command, and the workplan that would add one is not yet opened (key-cape acked interim 2026-08-15)"
|
||||
reviewed: "2026-08-17"
|
||||
verified: unverified
|
||||
blocked_on: "client_secret_basic exchange is a key-cape protocol procedure, not a KV read; still no key-cape-native exchange/rotation command. Re-checked against key-cape source 2026-08-28: KEY-WP-0009 finished 2026-08-23 and did add bounded service-auth (per-client tokenLifetime, docs/openbao-service-auth-contract.md), but that is client_credentials JWT issuance for OpenBao machine login — it does not front this client_secret_basic exchange or its rotation. The server advertises client_secret_basic (src/internal/server/oidc/discovery.go) without exposing an owner command for it. Blocker stands."
|
||||
reviewed: "2026-08-28"
|
||||
verified: source-read
|
||||
risk: high
|
||||
workload_ref:
|
||||
applicability: applicable
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue