#!/usr/bin/env python3 """Check ops-warden against the NetKingdom security layer model (§5, §11). Read-only. Two declaration forms are read, and the precedence between them is `GH-DEC-2026-017` §1 (amendment A11): **INTENT.md's frontmatter governs** and `layer.yaml` is a derived artifact that must be marked derived, must name INTENT.md as its source, and must agree with it. The sidecar is read anyway, because a disagreement between the two is itself a finding and is reported rather than resolved away by precedence. Comparison against §3's closed four-token vocabulary ASCII-folds case before comparing (`GH-DEC-2026-017` §2, amendment A9): two spellings of a token do not describe two boundaries, and a check that reports findings about capital letters buries the one real disagreement it exists to find. Neither form carries a version of the standard or of its companion, in any key or value (`GH-DEC-2026-017` §5, amendment A12 as refined by A12 r2 / `GH-DEC-2026-020` §1-§2). The rule reaches content, not a key name: a `standard_version` key, a `companion_version` key, and a version-bearing path such as `standard: .../security-layer-model_v0.7.md` are the same pin. Comments and a file's own `schema_version` are not reached. Stance, claims and evidence-classification maps (`pep-stance.yaml`) are NOT declarations and this check does not read them (`GH-DEC-2026-020` §3). The version belongs to the run (`GH-DEC-2026-020` §4): every run prints VALIDATED_AGAINST and SCOPE below, including the PASS line, following kings-guard's pattern. A retained copy of this output is a derived artifact whose version is owed by whoever retains it. Makes §11's second mechanical check real: every direct Tooling client in a Staff repository maps to a declared §5.1, §5.2, or §5.3 entry The failure this catches is a *new* direct OpenBao contact appearing in src/warden/ without an entry in layer.yaml — an undeclared violation (§11), which is a finding rather than a tracked gap. It deliberately does NOT check the review dates: a date-triggered failure breaks the build on a calendar day with no code change (the reasoning recorded in WARDEN-WP-0033-T05), so staleness is reported and left to `--report`, never to CI. Exit 0 clean, 1 undeclared contact found, 2 declaration malformed. """ from __future__ import annotations import argparse import re import sys from datetime import date from pathlib import Path import yaml ROOT = Path(__file__).resolve().parents[1] SRC = ROOT / "src" / "warden" INTENT = ROOT / "INTENT.md" DECL = ROOT / "layer.yaml" VALID_SHAPES = {"5.1", "5.2", "5.3"} # What every run checks against, printed on every run (GH-DEC-2026-020 §4, # GH-DEC-2026-021 §2). The accepted text is v0.7 at net-kingdom@66dc491; the # decision records whose rulings this checker enforces beyond v0.7 are named with it. VALIDATED_AGAINST = ( "net-kingdom/canon/standards/security-layer-model_v0.7.md (net-kingdom@66dc491) " "as amended by GH-DEC-2026-017, GH-DEC-2026-020 and GH-DEC-2026-021 " "(A9-A13, A12 r3; gate-house@39d9287)" ) # What every run ranges over. pep-stance.yaml is deliberately outside it. SCOPE = "INTENT.md frontmatter, layer.yaml, src/warden/**/*.py" # A12 r2: a version of the standard or companion in any key or value of the # declaration. Keys: anything naming a standard/companion version. Values: a # versioned file name or path (`_v0.7`, `-v0.8.md`) or a bare version string on a # version-named key. `schema_version` is the file's own schema, not reached. # GH-DEC-2026-021 §1/§3 (A12 r3): a version is reached only as a pin. Any version # token (`v?N.N`) in the value of an identity-bearing key (`standard:`, # `companion:`) is a pin; a revision cited in other prose is provenance and is not # reached. Keys such as `intent_version` name neither and are not flagged. VERSION_KEY = re.compile(r"(standard|companion).*version|version.*(standard|companion)", re.I) VERSION_IN_VALUE = re.compile(r"[_\-.]v\d+(\.\d+)*(\.md)?\b|@v?\d+\.\d+", re.I) NOT_REACHED_KEYS = {"schema_version"} IDENTITY_KEYS = {"standard", "companion"} IDENTITY_VERSION = re.compile(r"\bv?\d+\.\d+", re.I) def find_version_pins(node, where: str = "", identity: bool = False) -> list[str]: """Every place in a parsed declaration that carries a standard/companion version. Walks every key and value (comments are gone after parsing, which is the A12 r2 exclusion). Returns human-readable locations; empty means clean. """ pins: list[str] = [] if isinstance(node, dict): for k, v in node.items(): here = f"{where}.{k}" if where else str(k) if str(k) in NOT_REACHED_KEYS: continue if VERSION_KEY.search(str(k)): pins.append(f"{here} (key names a standard/companion version)") continue pins.extend(find_version_pins(v, here, str(k).lower() in IDENTITY_KEYS)) elif isinstance(node, list): for i, v in enumerate(node): pins.extend(find_version_pins(v, f"{where}[{i}]", identity)) elif isinstance(node, str) and VERSION_IN_VALUE.search(node): pins.append(f"{where} = {node!r} (value carries a version)") elif isinstance(node, str) and identity and IDENTITY_VERSION.search(node): pins.append(f"{where} = {node!r} (identity-bearing value carries a version)") return pins def _reject_version_pins(label: str, node) -> None: pins = find_version_pins(node) if pins: print( f"MALFORMED: {label} carries a standard/companion version — a layer " "declaration MUST NOT, in any key or value (§11 as amended by A12 r2, " "GH-DEC-2026-020 §1-§2):" ) for p in pins: print(f" {p}") raise SystemExit(2) # §3's vocabulary, closed, four tokens (GH-DEC-2026-017 §3, amendment A9). The # canonical spellings are §4's catalog-column forms; comparison is ASCII # case-insensitive, so the fold is what is stored and `Taxonomy` is in the set — # omitting it is the defect A9 records against the estate's other validator. LAYER_VOCABULARY = {"taxonomy", "tooling", "engine", "staff"} def _fold(value: str) -> str: """ASCII case-fold, per §3 as amended: two spellings of a token are one token.""" return str(value).strip().encode("ascii", "ignore").decode().lower() def load_governing_layer() -> str: """The declaration is INTENT.md's frontmatter `layer:` key (§11, GH-DEC-2026-017 §1). layer.yaml is derived and does not govern. Read without a YAML frontmatter dependency: the file is read by humans first and a parser second. """ if not INTENT.exists(): print(f"MISSING: {INTENT} — §11's governing declaration form") raise SystemExit(2) lines = INTENT.read_text().splitlines() if not lines or lines[0].strip() != "---": print("MALFORMED: INTENT.md has no frontmatter to carry the declaration (§11)") raise SystemExit(2) end = next((i for i, ln in enumerate(lines[1:], 1) if ln.strip() == "---"), None) if end is None: print("MALFORMED: INTENT.md frontmatter is not terminated") raise SystemExit(2) front = yaml.safe_load("\n".join(lines[1:end])) or {} if "layer" not in front: print("MALFORMED: INTENT.md frontmatter has no 'layer' key — §11's declaration") raise SystemExit(2) _reject_version_pins("INTENT.md frontmatter", front) layer = front["layer"] if _fold(layer) not in LAYER_VOCABULARY: print( f"MALFORMED: INTENT.md declares layer {layer!r}, outside §3's closed " f"vocabulary {sorted(LAYER_VOCABULARY)} (case-insensitive)" ) raise SystemExit(2) return layer # A direct Tooling contact is an *invocation*, not a mention. Matching the word # "bao" caught help text, a docstring, and the dev-tier doubles library that # simulates bao rather than calling it — three false positives on first run. # So match the two shapes that actually execute: # 1. an HTTP request built against the OpenBao address # 2. an argv list whose first element is the bao binary TOOLING_PATTERNS = ( # httpx call whose URL is built from the configured OpenBao/Vault address re.compile(r"""\bhttpx\.\w+\(|url\s*=\s*f?["'].*\{self\._cfg\.addr\}"""), # argv construction: [bao_bin, ...] / ["bao", ...] / [bao_binary, ...] re.compile(r"""\[\s*(?:["']bao["']|bao_bin\b|bao_binary\b)\s*,"""), ) # httpx alone is not a Tooling contact — policy.py calls an Engine and worker.py # calls the State Hub. A module matching only the httpx pattern counts as a # contact only if it also references the OpenBao address configuration. ADDR_HINT = re.compile(r"""_cfg\.addr|VAULT_ADDR|BAO_ADDR""") # Modules that talk to an Engine or to something outside the §4 catalog. Listed # in layer.yaml under non_tooling_clients and excluded from the scan with it. def _excluded(decl: dict) -> set[str]: return {e["module"].split("/")[-1] for e in decl.get("non_tooling_clients", [])} def load_declaration() -> dict: if not DECL.exists(): print(f"MISSING: {DECL} — ops-warden must declare in its own voice (§11)") raise SystemExit(2) decl = yaml.safe_load(DECL.read_text()) for key in ("layer", "repository", "derived", "derived_from", "tooling_contacts"): if key not in decl: print(f"MALFORMED: layer.yaml has no {key!r}") raise SystemExit(2) # §11's derived-artifact rule: marked as derived, naming what it derives from. if decl["derived"] is not True: print("MALFORMED: layer.yaml must be marked 'derived: true' (§11, GH-DEC-2026-017 §1)") raise SystemExit(2) if decl["derived_from"] != "INTENT.md": print( f"MALFORMED: layer.yaml derives from {decl['derived_from']!r}; §11 names " "INTENT.md as the governing declaration" ) raise SystemExit(2) # A12: the version has no home in a declaration, governing or derived. _reject_version_pins("layer.yaml", decl) if _fold(decl["layer"]) not in LAYER_VOCABULARY: print( f"MALFORMED: layer.yaml declares layer {decl['layer']!r}, outside §3's " f"closed vocabulary {sorted(LAYER_VOCABULARY)} (case-insensitive)" ) raise SystemExit(2) for c in decl["tooling_contacts"]: if c.get("shape") not in VALID_SHAPES: print(f"MALFORMED: {c.get('id')} has shape {c.get('shape')!r}, not one of {sorted(VALID_SHAPES)}") raise SystemExit(2) # §5.3 carries four fields, machine-readably. That is the whole point of # the shape; a gap missing them is prose wearing a schema. if c["shape"] == "5.3": for field in ("capability", "intended_owner", "blocked_on", "review"): if not c.get(field): print(f"MALFORMED: §5.3 entry {c['id']!r} is missing {field!r}") raise SystemExit(2) # §5.2's test is the supplied-authority property. if c["shape"] == "5.2" and c.get("supplied_authority") != "none": print(f"MALFORMED: §5.2 conduit {c['id']!r} must declare supplied_authority: none") raise SystemExit(2) return decl def scan_modules() -> dict[str, list[int]]: """Return {module_name: [line numbers]} for direct Tooling contacts.""" found: dict[str, list[int]] = {} for path in sorted(SRC.rglob("*.py")): if path.name.startswith("test_"): continue text = path.read_text() hits: list[int] = [] for n, line in enumerate(text.splitlines(), 1): stripped = line.strip() if stripped.startswith("#") or stripped.startswith('"'): continue if any(p.search(line) for p in TOOLING_PATTERNS): hits.append(n) if hits: # An httpx-only match needs the OpenBao address to be a Tooling # contact; otherwise it is an Engine or non-catalogued call. argv_shape = any(TOOLING_PATTERNS[1].search(ln) for ln in text.splitlines()) if argv_shape or ADDR_HINT.search(text): found[path.name] = hits return found def main() -> int: ap = argparse.ArgumentParser() ap.add_argument("--report", action="store_true", help="also print the declaration and gap review dates") args = ap.parse_args() # Printed before anything can fail, so even a MALFORMED run states what it # checked against and over what (GH-DEC-2026-020 §4). print(f"validated against: {VALIDATED_AGAINST}") print(f"scope: {SCOPE}") governing = load_governing_layer() decl = load_declaration() declared = {c["module"].split("/")[-1] for c in decl["tooling_contacts"]} excluded = _excluded(decl) found = scan_modules() undeclared = {m: lines for m, lines in found.items() if m not in declared and m not in excluded} # A voluntary declaration has no fixed argv shape to detect (an # operator-configured command). Over-declaring is safe; not reporting it as # stale keeps the signal meaningful. voluntary = { c["module"].split("/")[-1] for c in decl["tooling_contacts"] if c.get("detection") == "voluntary" } stale_decls = declared - set(found) - voluntary if args.report: print(f"{decl['repository']} — layer: {governing} (declared in INTENT.md; §11 governing form)") print(f" layer.yaml: derived from {decl['derived_from']}, layer: {decl['layer']}") print(f"declared by {decl['declared_by']}\n") for c in decl["tooling_contacts"]: line = f" §{c['shape']} {c['id']:<28} {c['module']}" if c["shape"] == "5.3": overdue = str(c["review"]) < date.today().isoformat() line += f" -> {c['intended_owner']} review {c['review']}" if overdue: line += " [REVIEW OVERDUE]" print(line) gaps = [c for c in decl["tooling_contacts"] if c["shape"] == "5.3"] print(f"\n{len(gaps)} declared gap(s) — tracked non-conformance, not conformance (§11).") ok = True # §11 as amended (A11): the derived form MUST agree with the governing one, # and a disagreement is a finding in its own right — reported, not resolved # away by precedence. Comparison folds case (A9): `Staff` and `staff` agree. if _fold(decl["layer"]) != _fold(governing): ok = False print( "\nDECLARATION DISAGREEMENT — a finding under §11, not a precedence question:\n" f" INTENT.md (governs): layer: {governing}\n" f" layer.yaml (derived): layer: {decl['layer']}\n" "Precedence says which value is ops-warden's answer. It does not say the\n" "disagreement did not happen. Case is already folded, so this is a real\n" "disagreement about a layer, not about orthography." ) if undeclared: ok = False print("\nUNDECLARED TOOLING CONTACT — a finding under §11, not a tracked gap:") for m, lines in sorted(undeclared.items()): print(f" src/warden/{m}: line(s) {', '.join(map(str, lines[:6]))}") print("\nAdd a §5.1/§5.2/§5.3 entry to layer.yaml, or route it through an engine.") if stale_decls: print("\nNote: declared but no contact found (module removed or refactored?):") for m in sorted(stale_decls): print(f" {m}") if ok and not args.report: print( f"PASS — {len(found)} module(s) with Tooling contact, all declared; " f"validated against {VALIDATED_AGAINST}" ) elif ok: print( "\nPASS — every direct Tooling contact maps to a declared shape; " f"validated against {VALIDATED_AGAINST}" ) return 0 if ok else 1 if __name__ == "__main__": sys.exit(main())