ops-warden/docs/adr
tegwick 35aff380a3
All checks were successful
CI Smoke / host-smoke (push) Successful in 0s
CI Smoke / container-smoke (push) Successful in 1s
Lift ops-warden's binding rules into owned ADRs
Five rules that governed this repo lived in wiki prose, a workplan, and a
comment at the top of catalog.yaml. All were followed; none was addressable.
A reader outside ops-warden could not cite one, could not tell whether it was
current, and — the point of this change — could not tell whether it was ours
to change or someone else's that we merely obey.

  ADR-0001  The routing catalog is a pointer layer, never a second copy
  ADR-0002  ops-warden is a transparent conduit, never a secret broker
  ADR-0003  Cover gaps, but never silently own them
  ADR-0004  High-risk lanes refuse raw value streaming to agent sessions
  ADR-0005  Implement one lane narrowly, route everything else

Each carries owner: ops-warden, which is the load-bearing field. It says we
follow the rule AND we are responsible for changing it — by superseding ADR,
never an in-place edit. The failure this prevents runs both ways: a rule we own
mistaken for inherited canon never gets fixed, because we wait for an owner who
does not exist; inherited canon mistaken for ours gets quietly bent, and the
drift is invisible until it breaks a repo that trusted the canonical version.

Rules we follow but do not own — NetKingdom canon, the IAM profile, the
credential-management standard, the-custodian's ADR-001 workplan convention —
are cited, never copied into docs/adr/. Copying them would recreate exactly the
second-source-of-truth failure ADR-0001 exists to prevent. architecture.md also
now flags the three-digit/four-digit ADR-001 vs ADR-0001 collision, which is
itself an ours-versus-inherited confusion waiting to happen.

Publication verified rather than assumed: all five render through policy-nexus
tools/render.py, and owner reaches the reader in three places — the page eyebrow
(render.py:346), the index Owner column (build_site.py:123,137), and the
publication manifest. build_site.py:179 makes title/status/owner required, so
ownership cannot be dropped on the way out. policy-nexus publishes and never
writes back; docs/adr/ stays the source of truth.

Documentation adapted: SCOPE.md gains a Governing rules section and an orientation
entry; .claude/rules/architecture.md replaced its stub with the ADR index, the
owned-versus-inherited rule, and ADR-over-wiki precedence; finding-routing.md's
ADR-gap section closed; catalog.yaml's no-double-source header now cites ADR-0001
rather than the originating workplan.

uv run pytest -q → 338 passed, 4 deselected.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-18 13:35:13 +02:00
..
ADR-0001-catalog-is-a-pointer-layer.md Lift ops-warden's binding rules into owned ADRs 2026-08-18 13:35:13 +02:00
ADR-0002-conduit-not-broker.md Lift ops-warden's binding rules into owned ADRs 2026-08-18 13:35:13 +02:00
ADR-0003-cover-gaps-never-silently-own-them.md Lift ops-warden's binding rules into owned ADRs 2026-08-18 13:35:13 +02:00
ADR-0004-agent-read-boundary-on-high-risk-lanes.md Lift ops-warden's binding rules into owned ADRs 2026-08-18 13:35:13 +02:00
ADR-0005-implement-narrowly-route-broadly.md Lift ops-warden's binding rules into owned ADRs 2026-08-18 13:35:13 +02:00
README.md Lift ops-warden's binding rules into owned ADRs 2026-08-18 13:35:13 +02:00

ops-warden architecture decision records

This directory holds the rules ops-warden owns — the decisions this repo made, is bound by, and is responsible for changing.

Why these exist as ADRs rather than wiki prose

Until 2026-08-18 every rule in this list lived in wiki prose, a workplan, or a comment at the top of registry/routing/catalog.yaml. All of them were being followed. None of them was addressable: a reader outside ops-warden could not cite one, could not tell whether it was current, and could not tell whether it was ours to change or someone else's that we merely obey.

That distinction is the point of this directory. It matters in both directions:

  • A rule we own, mistaken for inherited canon, never gets fixed. We wait for an owner who does not exist.
  • Inherited canon, mistaken for ours, gets quietly bent. We change something we had no authority over, and the drift is invisible until it breaks a repo that trusted the canonical version.

Owned versus inherited

Every ADR here carries owner: in its frontmatter. It is the load-bearing field.

owner: Meaning How it changes
ops-warden Ours. We decided it, we are bound by it, and we may change it A new ADR that supersedes this one. Never an edit-in-place that rewrites a decision
anything else Inherited. We follow it; we do not own it Through that owner's process. We may dispute it — we may not amend it

Everything currently in this directory is owner: ops-warden. Rules we follow but do not own — NetKingdom canon, the IAM profile, the credential-management standard — are not copied here. They are cited. Copying inherited canon into our own ADR directory would recreate exactly the second-source-of-truth failure that ADR-0001 exists to prevent.

Superseding one of these

A decision here changed the behaviour of other repos, so retracting it silently is not available. Write a new ADR, set the old one's status: superseded and successor:, and leave it in place. Superseded is a lifecycle state; deletion is not. policy-nexus publishes the history, and a reader asking "what did this say when we made that decision" must be able to find out.

Relationship to .claude/rules/

.claude/rules/*.md are agent-facing operational instructions. They tell an agent what to do in a session. They are derived from these ADRs and should cite them rather than restate the reasoning. If the two disagree, the ADR is right and the rule file is a defect.

Publication

These are publishable through policy-nexus at policy.coulomb.social, which requires title, status and owner on every document and renders Owner as a column in its index. The ownership knowledge therefore survives publication rather than being a local convention that evaporates at the repo boundary.

policy-nexus publishes; it never writes back. The file in this directory is the source of truth. If the site and this directory disagree, this directory is right and the publication is a defect.

ADR Rule Binds
ADR-0001 The routing catalog is a pointer layer, never a second copy of an owner's procedure ops-warden, and every repo contributing a catalog entry
ADR-0002 ops-warden is a transparent conduit, never a secret broker ops-warden
ADR-0003 Cover gaps, but never silently own them ops-warden
ADR-0004 High-risk lanes refuse raw value streaming to agent sessions ops-warden, and any agent runtime calling warden access
ADR-0005 Implement one lane narrowly, route everything else ops-warden