coulomb/ops-warden
4
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases 2 Packages Wiki Activity Actions
ops-warden/registry
History
tegwick 35aff380a3
All checks were successful
CI Smoke / host-smoke (push) Successful in 0s
Details
CI Smoke / container-smoke (push) Successful in 1s
Details
Lift ops-warden's binding rules into owned ADRs 
Five rules that governed this repo lived in wiki prose, a workplan, and a
comment at the top of catalog.yaml. All were followed; none was addressable.
A reader outside ops-warden could not cite one, could not tell whether it was
current, and — the point of this change — could not tell whether it was ours
to change or someone else's that we merely obey.

  ADR-0001  The routing catalog is a pointer layer, never a second copy
  ADR-0002  ops-warden is a transparent conduit, never a secret broker
  ADR-0003  Cover gaps, but never silently own them
  ADR-0004  High-risk lanes refuse raw value streaming to agent sessions
  ADR-0005  Implement one lane narrowly, route everything else

Each carries owner: ops-warden, which is the load-bearing field. It says we
follow the rule AND we are responsible for changing it — by superseding ADR,
never an in-place edit. The failure this prevents runs both ways: a rule we own
mistaken for inherited canon never gets fixed, because we wait for an owner who
does not exist; inherited canon mistaken for ours gets quietly bent, and the
drift is invisible until it breaks a repo that trusted the canonical version.

Rules we follow but do not own — NetKingdom canon, the IAM profile, the
credential-management standard, the-custodian's ADR-001 workplan convention —
are cited, never copied into docs/adr/. Copying them would recreate exactly the
second-source-of-truth failure ADR-0001 exists to prevent. architecture.md also
now flags the three-digit/four-digit ADR-001 vs ADR-0001 collision, which is
itself an ours-versus-inherited confusion waiting to happen.

Publication verified rather than assumed: all five render through policy-nexus
tools/render.py, and owner reaches the reader in three places — the page eyebrow
(render.py:346), the index Owner column (build_site.py:123,137), and the
publication manifest. build_site.py:179 makes title/status/owner required, so
ownership cannot be dropped on the way out. policy-nexus publishes and never
writes back; docs/adr/ stays the source of truth.

Documentation adapted: SCOPE.md gains a Governing rules section and an orientation
entry; .claude/rules/architecture.md replaced its stub with the ADR index, the
owned-versus-inherited rule, and ADR-over-wiki precedence; finding-routing.md's
ADR-gap section closed; catalog.yaml's no-double-source header now cites ADR-0001
rather than the originating workplan.

uv run pytest -q → 338 passed, 4 deselected.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-18 13:35:13 +02:00
..
capabilities docs(WP-0010): sharpen mission to "issue SSH, route the rest" + pointer catalog 2026-06-18 20:44:53 +02:00
flex-auth feat: close WP-0009/WP-0013 production integration stewardship strand 2026-06-24 12:44:32 +02:00
indexes WARDEN-WP-0006: NetKingdom stewardship docs and alignment 2026-06-17 08:22:45 +02:00
policy WARDEN-WP-0029: implement plan front door, org posture, desk, freshness 2026-07-18 16:59:37 +02:00
routing Lift ops-warden's binding rules into owned ADRs 2026-08-18 13:35:13 +02:00
README.md Add capability registry scaffold (REUSE-WP-0014-T06 B04) 2026-06-16 01:56:08 +02:00

README.md

Capability Registry

Markdown-first capability index for federation and reuse planning.

Authoring

  1. Copy a capability entry template (see reuse-surface templates/capability-entry.template.md).
  2. Add the row to indexes/capabilities.yaml.
  3. Run reuse-surface validate from a checkout with the CLI installed.
  4. Merge to main and verify publish with reuse-surface establish --publish-check.

Federation contract: reuse-surface docs/RegistryFederation.md.