# INTENT — policy-nexus

## Why this repo exists

`policy-nexus` is the permanent home for the estate's **policy surface**: the
place where policy is published and kept current. It serves
`policy.coulomb.social`, and is **owned by `the-custodian`**.

It does one thing. Gathering policy from the outside world was originally
scoped here and moved to `risk-nexus` on 2026-08-17 — judging what an external
rule demands of the estate is risk work, not publishing work.

Before this repo existed, published policy lived in a bad place.

**Published policy was temporary.** Documents that other people needed to read
were pushed to disposable artifact pages — private URLs, no index, no history,
no guarantee the link resolves next month. A document that governs how six
repos behave cannot be delivered as a link that might expire. The estate has
already been bitten by the adjacent failure: a canon draft routed for
ratification on 2026-08-10 sat unratified in neither canon directory because
nothing tracked that it was in flight.

This repo exists so that policy has a permanent address and a known freshness.

## What it owns

- **`policy.coulomb.social`** — the public publication surface: its
  infrastructure, deployment, availability and rollback.
- **Publication of estate policy**, scoped to **canon and architecture decision
  records**. Rendering governing documents from their source repos into a
  durable, addressable, indexed site. The source of truth stays in the owning
  repo; this repo owns the *publication*, not the content.

  The corpus in scope today is bounded and countable: two canon trees
  (`the-custodian/canon`, `net-kingdom/canon`) and roughly 68 ADRs across 18
  repositories. Workplans, evidence, runbooks and general documentation are
  **out of scope** — this is a policy site, not a documentation site. That line
  is deliberate: a site that publishes everything publishes nothing in
  particular, and the value here is that a reader knows what governs and what
  merely describes.
- **Stable addressing.** A published document keeps its URL. Superseded
  versions remain reachable and are marked superseded rather than removed.
- **Currency.** Every published document carries its status, revision, and when
  it was last reviewed. A stale document is visibly stale rather than silently
  wrong.
- **Publication for `risk-nexus`.** Regulatory records and publishable findings
  arrive as another source in the manifest. This repo renders and hosts them;
  it does not decide what they mean or when they may be seen.
- **The relevance loop.** Detecting when a published or gathered document has
  gone out of date, and surfacing that rather than waiting for someone to
  notice.

## What it does not own

- **The content of estate policy.** Canon lives in its owning canon repo;
  per-repo ADRs live in their repos. This repo publishes what those own and
  must never become a second place where policy is edited. The local-files-are-
  source-of-truth rule applies with full force: if the site and the source
  disagree, the source is right and the publication is a defect.
- **Ratification.** Whether a draft becomes canon is a canon-process decision.
  This repo can show that a draft is in flight and how long it has been; it
  cannot advance it.
- **Legal advice.** Gathered external policy is recorded with its source and
  date. Interpreting what it requires of the estate is the owning repo's
  decision, informed by the record, and the record must not read as a ruling.
- **Identity, authorization, storage, secrets.** Consumed from the platform
  packages, never reimplemented.
- **Being a CMS.** No editing surface, no drafting in a browser. Documents
  arrive from repositories.

## Permanence is the point

The word doing the work in this repo's purpose is *permanent*. It sets
requirements that a temporary page does not have:

- **A URL that resolves in five years.** Addressing is a design decision made
  once and then honoured, not a consequence of whatever generated the page.
- **History that survives.** A superseded policy is part of the record. Anyone
  asking "what did this say when we made that decision" must be able to find
  out.
- **Availability that is somebody's job.** If policy governs behaviour, policy
  being unreachable is an incident, not an inconvenience.
- **Generated, never authored.** Every page is derived from a source document
  in a repository. Nothing is hand-written into the site, because hand-written
  content diverges from its source — a failure this estate has already had
  once, between an ADR and its published page, and fixed by generating the page
  from the markdown.

## Relationship to the rest of the estate

`policy-nexus` is downstream of every repo that owns policy and upstream of
nobody. It reads; it does not write back. That direction is deliberate: a
publication surface with write authority becomes a second source of truth, and
the estate has a standing rule against exactly that.

The first content it must carry is already waiting: NetKingdom's *Tenancy
Posture* standard, now reviewed by all six affected repos and still served from
a disposable artifact URL. The renderer that produces that page from canon
markdown lives here as `tools/render.py`.

## What good looks like

A person outside the estate can find the policy that governs a decision, see
when it was last reviewed, read the version that was current at any past date,
and tell at a glance whether it is ratified or in flight. A person inside the
estate never asks "where is the current version of that" and never has to be
told "the link expired".
