Assign unique publication record and retain exact independent reviews

Assistant: codex
Assistant-Model: gpt-6.1-sol
Assistant-Session: 01a126e1-76f8-7643-8cf3-e93336539ade
This commit is contained in:
tegwick 2026-10-11 02:38:44 +02:00
parent 713af65b33
commit 835d7b0f8d
5 changed files with 1262 additions and 7 deletions

View file

@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
[
{
"id": "CUST-ADR-002",
"decision_section_unchanged": true,
"historical_author_date_preserved": true
},
{
"id": "CUST-ADR-004",
"decision_section_unchanged": true,
"historical_author_date_preserved": true
}
]

File diff suppressed because it is too large Load diff

View file

@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
{
"original_human_packet_hash_matches": true,
"normative_body_except_adoption_unchanged": true,
"whole_body_byte_equal": false,
"body_delta_scope": "Section 14 Adoption: recorded status/memo/approval and historical preparation notice only; no normative rule change observed.",
"accepted_canonical_sha256": "3d8298560069ef471fba28d2b1245fb2309328f231dad1a667cdf0ce5a5a7c8b"
}

View file

@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
# Independent exact source/publication content review — 2026-10-11
Disposition: ready for artifact preparation after the staged history/path/provenance guard patch is applied and committed. This is technical publication-source review, not founder hosting approval, risk acceptance, new owner ratification or authority to alter a native service.
The reviewed candidate is `/tmp/security-policy-complete-history-build`. Publication manifest SHA256 `f95b68123defa0ccfd7c1d005b8c2037fdb63b92f1be8a78360833f09488c514`; source inventory SHA256 `4139d482609bfb8b9bb56970b9930ecb24b5f5fd27c985d5104a0149e492eaf7`. These are preparation-mirror outputs; they are not the final CI image or committed source-lock pins. Final OCI extraction must repeat these gates using its actual manifest/inventory and source revisions.
## Complete content and immutable history
Independently checked all72 archived Markdown sources against actual `git show <original-commit>:<path>` and the receipt's source hashes. All72 archived HTML hashes match and the candidate retains those exact bytes at each old immutable revision URL. All73 candidate Markdown hashes/statuses match current owner source bytes; canonical and current revision files exist. The pending transition guard passes with exactly11 changed IDs and no removals: CUST-ADR002/004, RISK-F0008, RMASTER-ADR0006, work-record-types, workplan-terminology, NetKingdom architecture, security-layer v0.7/v0.8, tenancy-posture, Warden ADR0004. This covers the captured prior current revisions, not every historical URL ever served.
Independently overlaid the four pending guard patch files in a scratch source mirror. Ten history and seven transition tests pass; the full owner test suite passes52 tests. Initial full-suite scratch runs lacked Makefile then Containerfile, producing fixture-environment errors; adding those unchanged owner files corrected setup. No source/code failure was dismissed. This proof does not claim that the pending patch is already on the committed publisher revision.
## Decisions, annotations and proposed material
Security-layer v0.8 is accepted by the confirmed human memo `infd-20261010-security-layer-v08`, version2, approval `8432d0dc-adc0-42d0-9a5b-6b71ff492e15`, accepted2026-10-10T23:23:53Z. Custodian `docs/evidence/2026-10-10-security-consolidation/human-acceptance-receipts.json` records that disposition and its architectural/source-only scope. The exact human packet source hashes to `103a635f19ab9fe53094d69c3eeebcccd8e87ac9588846167e7e204a7c6de167`. The accepted canonical hashes to `3d8298560069ef471fba28d2b1245fb2309328f231dad1a667cdf0ce5a5a7c8b`: frontmatter and Section14 Adoption were annotated with the actual acceptance/history; all body outside Section14 is byte-identical to the accepted proposal. A whole-body byte-equality claim would be inaccurate. The annotations do not grant deployment permission. v0.7's canonical superseded notice changes, while its original immutable page remains byte-exact.
CUST ADR002/004 retain identical original Decision(s) sections, original decided_by and dates. Current accepted-2 revisions add dated technical factual/scope annotations. Bootstrap three-operation permission is not Codex autopilot; transport connectivity is not blanket trust, custody permission or isolation proof. Their current source and rendered pages preserve this distinction and the original accepted-1 pages. The review is not a new founder adoption or a live topology/security audit.
Work-record-types and workplan-terminology reflect existing owner accepted-2 source and September14 founder direction recorded in Custodian `history/20260914-open-workplan-chokepoints.md` Programme and STATE-WP0092; this review independently verifies that recorded direction, not an additional immutable human approval receipt. RMASTER ADR0006 accepted-3 records the existing September21 Kubernetes change gate and explicit unresolved mappings. Warden ADR0004 revision2 states caller-visible markers are advisory and OpenBao is the enforced boundary. Publishing either records no fresh runtime assurance.
Tenancy-posture draft15 and architecture draft4 remain proposed. Their minimal publication revision bumps avoid conflicting prior immutable bytes; they do not accept the standard, expand migration authority or claim current enforcement. The bounded audit restart measurement in tenancy and proposed cadence-profile architecture pointer remain owner evidence/proposal notes. RISK-F0008 published2 remains the existing accepted finding, with original acceptance terms, unresolved retention/erasability gap and overdue substantive review. Later owner history/cadence records are not a renewed acceptance or regulatory assurance. No publication revision bump is a new owner decision.
## Remaining native release gates
Commit the applied guard/archive/source-review changes and use exact publisher/upstream source locks. Obtain the actual CI image and independently extract/audit manifest, inventory, source-set and source provenance; repeat complete immutable/content transition checks. Inspect actual security findings, prepare the exact four-pin binding/chart render, confirm live Helm ownership and unchanged rollback anchor, refresh surge headroom, run server dry-run/diff, and obtain the founder's exact scoped hosting approval before mutation. No Argo adoption, enforcement service, credential change or customer production claim is included. Existing supervision remains supervised. This source disposition cannot satisfy those gates.

View file

@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
---
id: PNEX-WP-0004
id: PNEX-WP-0005
type: workplan
title: "Publish the accepted security-layer v0.8 guardrails"
domain: infotech
@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ migration. GH-WP-0004-T11 is source-complete; hosting is this owner's task.
## Register accepted source and preserve history
```task
id: PNEX-WP-0004-T01
id: PNEX-WP-0005-T01
status: done
priority: high
```
@ -36,22 +36,25 @@ and native acceptance receipts stay with NetKingdom and Custodian evidence.
## Produce a verified source-bound publisher candidate
```task
id: PNEX-WP-0004-T02
id: PNEX-WP-0005-T02
status: progress
priority: high
```
Retain immutable fetched source revision lock, content/manifest hashes and full
release verification. Local build alone is not a served publication. Current
currency gate honestly reports CUST-ADR-002/004 stale; owner technical review
must establish their truthful status, not blindly bump dates or suppress them.
release verification. Local build alone is not a served publication. Dated Custodian ADR002/004 technical annotations preserve the original decisions
and author/date; original served accepted-1 pages are retained. All72 served
immutable pages and their exact owner source commits are verified. Independent
review caught and fixed overwrite/provenance/routing defects;52actualowner tests
pass with the CI source-root environment. The first CI run failed a fixture
environment leak; repaired exactsource CI is being observed, not presumed ready.
Publish/verify the candidate through documented owner CI; retain any failed
checks and exact release output before proposing native activation.
## Serve and verify the accepted guardrails
```task
id: PNEX-WP-0004-T03
id: PNEX-WP-0005-T03
status: todo
priority: high
```
@ -62,3 +65,8 @@ disposition if hosting activation is outside the existing source-publication
approval. Execute through owner path; independently verify v0.8 accepted page,
old route supersession notice and immutableoldrevision survival. No permission
or PDP/runtime capability is introduced by publishing static guardrails.
2026-10-11 record identity correction: initial new-plan ID PNEX-WP-0004
collided with the finished fleet-standards/source-auth plan. This new demand
is PNEX-WP-0005; older plan/tasks/UUIDs remain unchanged. The failed create
receipt is preserved; no historical task or workstream is retired to hide it.