coulomb/policy-nexus
4
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

feat: publish Risk Nexus findings and methods
All checks were successful
Build and publish policy-nexus image / build-and-push (push) Successful in 1m10s
Details

Browse source 
Assistant: codex
Assistant-Model: gpt-5.6-sol
Assistant-Session: 01a058f3-8ba0-7692-a042-9a870fc3d663
This commit is contained in:
tegwick 2026-09-01 01:56:46 +02:00
parent 4c8a7b9666
commit c1b60f322e
70 changed files with 3888 additions and 198 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

6
build/adr/custodian-hub-authority/v1/index.html
View file

@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
<!doctype html>
<html lang="en"><meta charset="utf-8">
<meta name="policy-source-revision" content="4b951be3947f9457cc091a7d359d9232646b4c93">
<meta name="policy-source-revision" content="f9435cd605cc5b3cb0f2e957ce6287d9f3129aac">
<meta name="policy-source-digest" content="5979da20799118259fc19246f51e8cc8f2c0c1be3d414318bd51d5a27d9ad565">
<title>Hub Authority, Local Cache, and the Two Kinds of Hub Data</title>
<style>
@ -191,7 +191,7 @@ a:focus-visible,.rail a:focus-visible{outline:2px solid var(--brass);outline-off
@media (prefers-reduced-motion:reduce){*{animation:none!important;transition:none!important}}
</style>
<div class="wrap"><header><div class="eyebrow"><span>CUST-ADR-010</span> <span class="stat">proposed · draft-2</span> <span>the-custodian</span> <span>reviewed 2026-08-31</span><span>generated from canonical source — do not edit</span></div><h1>Hub Authority, Local Cache, and the Two Kinds of Hub Data</h1><p class="sub">Source: <code>the-custodian · canon/architecture/adr-010-hub-authority-and-local-cache-model.md · 4b951be3947f9457cc091a7d359d9232646b4c93</code></p><p class="sub">Review due: 2027-02-28</p></header><div class="layout"><nav class="rail" aria-label="Sections"><ol><li><a href="#status"><span class="n">·</span>Status</a></li><li><a href="#context"><span class="n">·</span>Context</a></li><li><a href="#decision"><span class="n">·</span>Decision</a></li><li><a href="#orphan-disposition"><span class="n">·</span>Orphan disposition</a></li><li><a href="#consequences"><span class="n">·</span>Consequences</a></li><li><a href="#implementation"><span class="n">·</span>Implementation</a></li><li><a href="#references"><span class="n">·</span>References</a></li><li><a href="#outcome-2026-08-24"><span class="n">·</span>Outcome (2026-08-24)</a></li><li><a href="#outcome-2026-08-28"><span class="n">·</span>Outcome (2026-08-28)</a></li></ol></nav><main><section id="status"><h2>Status</h2>
<div class="wrap"><header><div class="eyebrow"><span>CUST-ADR-010</span> <span class="stat">proposed · draft-2</span> <span>the-custodian</span> <span>reviewed 2026-08-31</span><span>generated from canonical source — do not edit</span></div><h1>Hub Authority, Local Cache, and the Two Kinds of Hub Data</h1><p class="sub">Source: <code>the-custodian · canon/architecture/adr-010-hub-authority-and-local-cache-model.md · f9435cd605cc5b3cb0f2e957ce6287d9f3129aac</code></p><p class="sub">Review due: 2027-02-28</p></header><div class="layout"><nav class="rail" aria-label="Sections"><ol><li><a href="#status"><span class="n">·</span>Status</a></li><li><a href="#context"><span class="n">·</span>Context</a></li><li><a href="#decision"><span class="n">·</span>Decision</a></li><li><a href="#orphan-disposition"><span class="n">·</span>Orphan disposition</a></li><li><a href="#consequences"><span class="n">·</span>Consequences</a></li><li><a href="#implementation"><span class="n">·</span>Implementation</a></li><li><a href="#references"><span class="n">·</span>References</a></li><li><a href="#outcome-2026-08-24"><span class="n">·</span>Outcome (2026-08-24)</a></li><li><a href="#outcome-2026-08-28"><span class="n">·</span>Outcome (2026-08-28)</a></li></ol></nav><main><section id="status"><h2>Status</h2>
<p>Proposed, and <strong>partially superseded by <code>ADR-012</code></strong> (accepted 2026-08-25). Decisions 1, 5 and 6 are sharpened or given a mechanism there; see the notes on each below. Everything else in this ADR remains in force.</p>
</section>
<section id="context"><h2>Context</h2>
@ -250,4 +250,4 @@ same filename, different UUID 4 duplicate registration</pre>
<section id="outcome-2026-08-28"><h2>Outcome (2026-08-28)</h2>
<div class="rule-quote"><p>Added by <code>CUST-WP-0068</code>. The 2026-08-24 outcome closed the <em>repository</em> divergence. The work-record divergence this ADR originally measured — 955 local / 649 primary — remained, because the retired instance's database was still load-bearing. That is now closed.</p></div>
<ul><li><strong>Central holds 1167 workplans.</strong> Records that existed only in the cache were re-derived from their files, renamed onto the canonical scheme, or given a written disposition (<code>docs/recovery/cache-only-disposition-2026-08-28.md</code>).</li><li><strong>No open work record exists only in the cache.</strong> Remaining cache-only slugs are aliases of recovered records, clay-borg product files (not workplans), or prefix-migration residue.</li><li><strong>The cache database is discarded.</strong> Final dump <code>~/backups/state-hub-cache-2026-08-28.dump</code>. Container <code>infra-postgres-1</code> and volume <code>infra_pg_data</code> removed. Port 5432 is free.</li><li><strong>The local instance is no longer load-bearing for any record type.</strong> Decision 3 is now true in operation, not only in argument.</li></ul>
</section><footer><span>CUST-ADR-010 · draft-2 · proposed</span><span>the-custodian · canon/architecture/adr-010-hub-authority-and-local-cache-model.md · 4b951be3947f9457cc091a7d359d9232646b4c93</span></footer></main></div></div></html>
</section><footer><span>CUST-ADR-010 · draft-2 · proposed</span><span>the-custodian · canon/architecture/adr-010-hub-authority-and-local-cache-model.md · f9435cd605cc5b3cb0f2e957ce6287d9f3129aac</span></footer></main></div></div></html>