coulomb/pqrst-practice
4
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

Complete PQRST-WP-0001: bootstrap State Hub integration

Browse source 
T01 — Reviewed the generated integration files. Resolved the
{CREDENTIAL_ROUTING} placeholder in AGENTS.md from the fleet canon, refreshed
the SCOPE.md repository layout (stale after registration), and replaced the
README stub with orientation and entry points.

T02 — Documented the developer workflow in AGENTS.md. This is a Markdown-only
spec repository: nothing to install, build, or run, and no test suite. In place
of a toolchain, added a six-point verification checklist covering prompt/spec
coupling, the closed 5-tuple, example-record arithmetic, cross-references,
version discipline, and the append-only rule for history/. The signature
validation command is verified working — all nine example signatures sum to 100.

T03 — Seeded PQRST-WP-0002 "Validate spec v0.1 against real sessions and cut
v0.2": pilot the closing prompt unassisted on at least eight real sessions,
decide the record-storage boundary SCOPE.md leaves open, then revise. v0.1 was
consolidated from two drafts neither of which had been applied to a session, so
the open questions are empirical rather than editorial.

WP-0001 marked finished with DoR/DoD assessments (clears C-34). No open
residuals — the follow-on work is carried by PQRST-WP-0002.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01SQ6oF1DtVDKcD1FCpvRVLx

Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: opus
Assistant-Process: 272883@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: f40c8f53-fb65-4980-9d29-bcdb3dd946f7
This commit is contained in:
tegwick 2026-09-05 20:38:30 +02:00
parent 14d53264fa
commit 2b36fc187d
5 changed files with 333 additions and 7 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

48
README.md
View file

@ -1,3 +1,49 @@
# pqrst-practice
lightweight retrospective audit for agentic coding sessions on problem/quality/research/security/task-organization
A lightweight retrospective audit for closing agentic coding sessions: a forced
100% allocation of a session's effective engineering effort across five stable
dimensions — **P**roblem, **Q**uality, **R**esearch, **S**ecurity, **T**ask
organization.
> Where did the effective engineering effort of this session actually go?
## Start here
| I want to… | Read |
| --- | --- |
| Close a session right now | [`PqrstPrompt.md`](PqrstPrompt.md) — paste it, done |
| Understand the model | [`spec/PqrstEstimationPractice.md`](spec/PqrstEstimationPractice.md) (v0.1) |
| Know why it exists, and what it must not become | [`INTENT.md`](INTENT.md) |
| Know what belongs in this repo | [`SCOPE.md`](SCOPE.md) |
| Work in this repo as an agent | [`AGENTS.md`](AGENTS.md) |
## What a record looks like
```text
PQRST-Estimate
P: 25%
Q: 15%
R: 45%
S: 0%
T: 15%
Sum: 100%
Confidence: medium
Signature: P25 Q15 R45 S0 T15
Dominant factors: Existing auth middleware was undocumented and contradicted the
README, so most attention went to reconstructing the request path before
changing behavior.
```
The numbers are the index. The `Dominant factors` sentence is the content — a
signature stored without it is not auditable.
## What this is not
Not a productivity score, not telemetry, not a planning target. There is no good
profile: an exploration session is R-heavy, a hardening session Q-heavy, a
credential integration S-heavy. The practice fails the moment anyone tries to
score well on it.
This repository defines the practice and supplies the prompt. Collectors,
validators, dashboards, and record storage belong elsewhere — see
[`SCOPE.md`](SCOPE.md).