Record forge layer inheritance and the real reach of GitOps
Decision d151d817 gives S4 the forge layer responsibility - runner placement, registry retention, artifact lifecycle, package credentials - its first concrete owned accountability. The existing ArgoCD claim was verified and is accurate: ArgoCD is on CoulombCore as an S2-managed addon. What was missing is that GitOps does not reach the live cluster - ArgoCD is absent from railiance01, its Applications target CoulombCore in-cluster, nothing on railiance01 is ArgoCD-managed, and the live workloads deploy by Makefile. Two Applications are Degraded and one is OutOfSync/Missing. Also states plainly that this layer's INTENT promises more than the repo contains, and that the gap is open debt rather than description. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
a2525a404c
commit
f910c7c873
1 changed files with 21 additions and 7 deletions
28
SCOPE.md
28
SCOPE.md
|
|
@ -74,13 +74,27 @@ services. S5 applications consume S4 templates and conventions, while
|
|||
|
||||
## Current State
|
||||
|
||||
- Status: emerging (ArgoCD deployed; no S4 workplans yet)
|
||||
- Implementation: ArgoCD is deployed in the `argocd` namespace on COULOMBCORE
|
||||
as a cluster addon managed from S2 for now; no S4-owned workplans yet
|
||||
- Stability: n/a for S4-owned content; ArgoCD itself is operational
|
||||
- Usage: ArgoCD available for GitOps deployments; formal S4 tooling work begins
|
||||
after S3 baseline and should consume runner/registry capabilities from
|
||||
`railiance-forge`
|
||||
- Status: emerging — **now owns the forge layer responsibility** (decision
|
||||
`d151d817`, 2026-08-11), which is S4's first concrete owned accountability;
|
||||
still no S4-owned workplans
|
||||
- Inherited from `railiance-forge`: runner placement and labels, registry
|
||||
retention, artifact lifecycle, package credentials. The Forgejo **workload**
|
||||
becomes `rapp-forgejo`; this layer takes the **layer** responsibility, because
|
||||
it already declared the handoff contract for exactly those concerns
|
||||
- Implementation: ArgoCD is deployed in the `argocd` namespace on CoulombCore as
|
||||
a cluster addon managed from S2 — verified still true 2026-08-12
|
||||
- **But GitOps does not reach the live cluster.** ArgoCD is not deployed on
|
||||
`railiance01`, its Applications target CoulombCore in-cluster, and no
|
||||
`railiance01` namespace is ArgoCD-managed. The live workloads deploy by
|
||||
Makefile, outside GitOps. Whether to adopt, retire or relocate ArgoCD is
|
||||
reopened — see `railiance-platform/ArchitectureBlueprint.md` §5.6
|
||||
- Stability: n/a for S4-owned content; ArgoCD itself runs, but two of its
|
||||
Applications are Degraded and one is OutOfSync/Missing
|
||||
- Usage: formal S4 tooling work begins after S3 baseline and should consume
|
||||
runner/registry capabilities from `railiance-forge` until that migration
|
||||
completes
|
||||
- Honest gap: this layer's `INTENT.md` promises considerably more than the repo
|
||||
contains (25 commits, no workplans). Read that as open debt, not description
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue