Start rail/rapp/reef fabric adaptation
All checks were successful
CI Smoke / host-smoke (push) Successful in 0s
CI Smoke / container-smoke (push) Successful in 2s

This commit is contained in:
codex 2026-07-25 15:42:53 +02:00
parent 488a7bbf42
commit fff9d0c9fc
11 changed files with 321 additions and 15 deletions

View file

@ -0,0 +1,100 @@
# Rail Rapp Reef Adaptation
Date: 2026-07-25
## Purpose
Define the first compatibility-first Fabric conventions for the new
`rail-*`, `rapp-*`, and `reef-*` repo families without pretending the registry
or export model is already fully adapted.
This document is intentionally narrower than the framework architecture in
`railiance-master`. It answers one question:
> What should Fabric accept and publish first so the new repo families can
> start existing as graph entities?
## Immediate Compatibility Stance
The first adaptation wave is deliberately small:
- onboard the missing current Railiance repos in the seed manifest
- add the first rail-specific capability type
- define canonical `service_type` values for future declarations
- avoid inventing full repo-family metadata or new export relations before the
first repos exist
This keeps Fabric aligned with the architecture without forcing a premature
schema redesign.
## Canonical First-Use Conventions
### `rail-*`
Initial Fabric shape:
- one `ServiceDeclaration` with `spec.service_type: execution-rail`
- one `CapabilityDeclaration` with
`spec.capability_type: workload-execution-contract`
Typical evidence should describe:
- the execution architecture
- substrate prerequisites
- rollout modes or workload lifecycle expectations
- which ownership repo governs the rail
### `rapp-*`
Initial Fabric shape:
- one `ServiceDeclaration` with `spec.service_type: managed-workload-package`
Optional follow-on declarations may later capture runtime dependencies,
verification interfaces, or artifact evidence, but the first requirement is
simply to make the package queryable as a distinct ecosystem entity.
### `reef-*`
Initial Fabric shape:
- one `ServiceDeclaration` with `spec.service_type: substrate-boundary`
The first declarations should make the substrate boundary visible before Fabric
tries to model every machine or placement relation in detail.
## First New Capability Type
Fabric now reserves:
- `workload-execution-contract`
Meaning:
- a stable execution contract that workloads depend on
- usually published by a `rail-*` repo
- expected to expose Kubernetes-, rollout-, or runtime-facing interfaces over
time
This is intentionally rail-focused. `rapp-*` and `reef-*` can start with
service-level visibility before they need their own dedicated capability types.
## What Is Still Missing
The following are not done by this adaptation slice:
- repo-level `repo_family` metadata in the registry
- `ownership_repo`, `supported_rails`, `primary_rail`, or `substrate_kind`
registry metadata
- export relations such as `supports_rail`, `hosts_rail`, `binds_rapp`, or
`governed_by`
- validator rules for repo-family-specific declaration completeness
Those require a second wave after the first real `rail-*`, `rapp-*`, and
`reef-*` repos exist.
## Outcome
Fabric can now move from "the new repo families exist only in architecture
docs" to "the registry and declaration guidance are ready for the first repo
instances" without overcommitting to a premature graph redesign.