docs: align master with canon and policy publication
This commit is contained in:
parent
6e230be13a
commit
7d32673812
12 changed files with 403 additions and 70 deletions
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,138 @@
|
|||
---
|
||||
id: RMASTER-WP-0024
|
||||
type: workplan
|
||||
title: "Align railiance-master with InfoTechCanon and policy publication"
|
||||
domain: financials
|
||||
repo: railiance-master
|
||||
status: active
|
||||
owner: codex
|
||||
topic_slug: railiance
|
||||
created: "2026-08-18"
|
||||
updated: "2026-08-18"
|
||||
state_hub_workstream_id: "de6681cd-9f8b-4a17-89d8-d3e3ce506388"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# RMASTER-WP-0024 - Canon and policy publication alignment
|
||||
|
||||
## Goal
|
||||
|
||||
Adopt the useful parts of the InfoTechCanon consumer and repository-layout
|
||||
standards while preserving Railiance-specific authority, and make this repo's
|
||||
accepted ADRs consumable by `policy-nexus` without creating a second source of
|
||||
truth.
|
||||
|
||||
## Boundaries
|
||||
|
||||
- `info-tech-canon` owns the general semantic and layout standards; this repo
|
||||
records consumer alignment and sends canon pressure back explicitly.
|
||||
- `railiance-master` owns Railiance framework ADR content and lifecycle.
|
||||
- `policy-nexus` owns publication addresses, rendering, history, and currency;
|
||||
it reads this repo and never writes back.
|
||||
- This workplan does not publish workplans, evidence, runbooks, schemas, or
|
||||
general documentation as policy.
|
||||
- Custodian ADR-001 workplan discovery remains controlling where the generic ITC
|
||||
layout recommendation would break State Hub indexing.
|
||||
|
||||
## T01 - Separate intent, current scope, canon authority, and publication
|
||||
|
||||
```task
|
||||
id: RMASTER-WP-0024-T01
|
||||
status: done
|
||||
priority: high
|
||||
state_hub_task_id: "bc28546d-4184-40df-b9e5-5f1c1015ba1e"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Review `INTENT.md` and `SCOPE.md` against ITC-REPO-LAYOUT, the canon consumer
|
||||
review workflow, and the `policy-nexus` source/publication boundary. Record an
|
||||
honest layout conformance level, current omissions, authority relationships,
|
||||
and the SCOPE-to-INTENT gap.
|
||||
|
||||
Completed 2026-08-18. `INTENT.md` now distinguishes semantic canon, Railiance
|
||||
content authority, and downstream publication. `SCOPE.md` describes current
|
||||
artifacts and active work, declares minimal ITC layout conformance, preserves
|
||||
the Custodian archive deviation, and records the policy-publication gap.
|
||||
|
||||
## T02 - Make framework ADR source metadata publication-ready
|
||||
|
||||
```task
|
||||
id: RMASTER-WP-0024-T02
|
||||
status: progress
|
||||
priority: high
|
||||
state_hub_task_id: "00e6bc8b-5ff1-4f12-9ea0-08fe2d8486ca"
|
||||
state_hub_task_id: "00e6bc8b-bb75-44a0-b6aa-5a4ce034ce99"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Add consistent source metadata to every accepted ADR under `docs/adr/`: title,
|
||||
status, owner, immutable semantic revision, and last-reviewed date. Review each
|
||||
date rather than copying file timestamps. Define how amendments advance a
|
||||
revision without rewriting an already-published immutable revision.
|
||||
|
||||
Coordinate with `policy-nexus` for explicit stable and revision addresses and a
|
||||
review interval. The publication manifest remains downstream; the source
|
||||
metadata remains here.
|
||||
|
||||
Done when all eight currently discovered ADRs move from `metadata-pending` to
|
||||
published or carry an explicit reviewed reason not to publish, and the
|
||||
`policy-nexus` source audit/build/currency checks pass against a clean
|
||||
`railiance-master` revision.
|
||||
|
||||
2026-08-18: Source-side metadata is present on all eight ADRs using stable
|
||||
`RMASTER-ADR-NNNN` identities, `accepted-1` as their first immutable semantic
|
||||
revision, source ownership, evidence-based last-reviewed dates, and a six-month
|
||||
review interval. Remaining work is downstream explicit addressing, manifest
|
||||
registration, and clean-revision publication verification in `policy-nexus`.
|
||||
|
||||
## T03 - Establish reviewed demand intake without demand-as-task
|
||||
|
||||
```task
|
||||
id: RMASTER-WP-0024-T03
|
||||
status: todo
|
||||
priority: medium
|
||||
state_hub_task_id: "54e321e2-e603-4b72-9d76-7a36f6b30782"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Decide whether recurring cross-repo architecture proposals justify adopting
|
||||
the ITC `demand/` surface and `core` layout conformance. If adopted, define a
|
||||
small demand record that captures provenance, consumer purpose, purpose fit,
|
||||
scope pressure, review disposition, and the resulting workplan or rejection.
|
||||
|
||||
Do not mirror the State Hub inbox wholesale and do not promote raw requests
|
||||
directly to tasks. Empty directories alone do not count as adoption.
|
||||
|
||||
Done when the repo either has a used, documented demand intake with one worked
|
||||
example or records why `minimal` conformance remains the honest level.
|
||||
|
||||
## T04 - Reconcile completed-work archival with State Hub discovery
|
||||
|
||||
```task
|
||||
id: RMASTER-WP-0024-T04
|
||||
status: todo
|
||||
priority: medium
|
||||
state_hub_task_id: "27f1b916-d6fc-4cc4-8bd2-52eda8994666"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Review finished workplans still present in `workplans/`. Archive eligible files
|
||||
using the repository's Custodian convention
|
||||
`workplans/archived/YYMMDD-RMASTER-WP-...` and preserve frontmatter IDs and
|
||||
links. Keep `history/` for dated inactive architecture exploration rather than
|
||||
silently adopting the generic ITC finished-workplan placement.
|
||||
|
||||
Done when active retrieval is uncluttered, archived records remain indexed, and
|
||||
`statehub fix-consistency` reports no task or workplan drift.
|
||||
|
||||
## T05 - Produce a repeatable canon-consumer alignment packet
|
||||
|
||||
```task
|
||||
id: RMASTER-WP-0024-T05
|
||||
status: todo
|
||||
priority: low
|
||||
state_hub_task_id: "ff70f0e3-32ba-4420-8ce5-983224d792a3"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Apply the InfoTechCanon consumer review kit using the smallest relevant surface
|
||||
set: Purpose/Demand, Intent-Scope-Purposes, Governance, Task, Information Space,
|
||||
Landscape, and ITC-REPO-LAYOUT. Record mappings, evidence, prioritized gaps,
|
||||
repo-local work, and any canon feedback without silently changing canon terms.
|
||||
|
||||
Done when a future reviewer can repeat the assessment and distinguish a
|
||||
Railiance-specific gap from genuine pressure on InfoTechCanon.
|
||||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue