feat: accept ADR-0008 private-by-default exposure (WP-0023 T01)

Operator ratified the recommended table. Record the sibling ADR,
point ADR-0006 at it, and open T02.
This commit is contained in:
codex 2026-08-15 19:50:46 +02:00
parent 567682c902
commit b3e9980321
5 changed files with 121 additions and 9 deletions

View file

@ -24,6 +24,8 @@ recorded before they are spread across implementation repos.
- [docs/adr/ADR-0004-first-wave-reef-rollout.md](docs/adr/ADR-0004-first-wave-reef-rollout.md)
- [docs/adr/ADR-0005-derived-rail-composition.md](docs/adr/ADR-0005-derived-rail-composition.md)
- [docs/adr/ADR-0006-reef-production-admission.md](docs/adr/ADR-0006-reef-production-admission.md)
- [docs/adr/ADR-0007-rapp-declaration-contract.md](docs/adr/ADR-0007-rapp-declaration-contract.md)
- [docs/adr/ADR-0008-private-by-default-exposure.md](docs/adr/ADR-0008-private-by-default-exposure.md)
## Current Explorations

View file

@ -21,9 +21,16 @@ defined split triggers.
The detailed contract is
[`docs/reef-production-readiness-contract.md`](../reef-production-readiness-contract.md).
Who may reach a listener is a different axis:
[`ADR-0008`](ADR-0008-private-by-default-exposure.md). Production
admission does not imply a public surface. A public surface requires
this admission **and** an exposure grant.
## Consequences
- `hosts_rail` and `binds_rapp` no longer imply deployability.
- `reef-railiance` may host Knative in wave 2, but Qonto cannot be called
production-approved solely from that declaration.
- Repeated evidence collection should become functional automation.
- `production-approved` is not permission to publish a listener. See
ADR-0008.

View file

@ -0,0 +1,92 @@
# ADR-0008: Private-by-default Exposure
Date: 2026-08-15
Status: Accepted
## Context
ADR-0006 says a topology binding is not permission to run a workload in
production. It does not say who may reach a listener. A working deploy,
a `hosts_rail` / `binds_rapp` line, or an Ingress object has been enough
to put something on the public internet.
Family readiness vocabularies are deliberately not unified
(`schemas/README.md`). Reef `lifecycle_state` has no
`production-approved`. Rapp `readiness_state` has no
`production-approved` either. Exposure cannot be derived from those
enums.
Live public surfaces already exist on `reef-railiance`. They must be
named as grants, not silently grandfathered and not taken down by this
decision.
Ratified 2026-08-15 under `RMASTER-WP-0023-T01`.
## Decision
New reefs, rails, and rapps are unreachable from the public internet
until they are production-safe **and** explicitly granted. The field
name is `exposure`. Missing field means `private`.
| Posture | Meaning | Who may reach it |
| --- | --- | --- |
| `private` | No extra listener we control | in-cluster DNS, same-reef services |
| `operator` | Same listener as `private`, plus a named ops-bridge / SSH tunnel | operator and approved agents |
| `public` | Internet listener we publish | anyone the Ingress / DNS / UFW surface allows |
`operator` is an access annotation, not a different packet posture. It
does not open a host port or a public Ingress.
Default for a new reef, rail, or rapp is `private`. Use `operator` only
for a named admin or API surface that must be reachable before admission
(k3s API, OpenBao UI). Do not prefer `operator` as the debug default.
`public` requires both an ADR-0006 binding of `production-approved` and
an explicit grant. A deploy, a binding line, or an Ingress object is not
a grant. Do not key `public` off rapp `readiness_state` and do not add
`production-approved` to the rapp enum for this purpose.
A reef public surface (host port or public DNS we publish) is a
**substrate grant**, not reef `lifecycle_state`. A rapp cannot be
`public` on a reef that has not granted a public surface. Conflicting
declarations fail closed.
The shared vocabulary is one enum. It is not one schema shape and not
one admission check:
| Family | What the field means | What makes `public` legal |
| --- | --- | --- |
| `rapp-*` | intended consumer-facing listener | binding `production-approved` + grant |
| `rail-*` | which listener classes the rail may emit | rail may emit public Ingress only when a bound grant exists |
| `reef-*` | host ports and public DNS we publish | substrate grant |
A grant is accepted residual risk, not a self-serve wish. Required
fields: hostname or port, reason, `approved_on`, residual-risk owner.
`6443` / the k3s API is not a grantable public surface.
This contract covers listeners we control: host ports, Ingress, Service
types, and public DNS we publish. Provider-native internet APIs
(Scaleway S3 and other provider-delegated endpoints) are outside this
enum.
Ops-bridge is the normal path to a shielded thing.
The detailed per-family reading lives in
[`docs/exposure-posture-contract.md`](../exposure-posture-contract.md)
once `RMASTER-WP-0023-T02` writes it.
## Consequences
- ADR-0006 still answers "may this binding run in production?" This ADR
answers "who may reach the listener?" Do not merge the axes.
- The three readiness enums stay distinct on purpose.
- Family schemas grow an additive `exposure` field. Rapp
`data_classification: public` is a different field and must not be
reused as the posture name.
- Implementation stays in the owning repos. This ADR does not install
NetworkPolicy, UFW, Ingress, or tunnels.
- Existing public surfaces on `reef-railiance` remain up until named as
grants. This ADR is not a shutdown plan.
- CoulombCore host inventory and Q7 / Goss reaction stay outside this
decision.

View file

@ -11,6 +11,11 @@ critical workload.
`hosts_rail` and `binds_rapp` describe intended composition. Production use
requires explicit readiness evidence.
This contract does not decide who may reach a listener. That is
[`ADR-0008`](adr/ADR-0008-private-by-default-exposure.md). A
`production-approved` binding is still private until an exposure grant
exists.
## Admission States
Every hosted rail and bound `rapp` uses:

View file

@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ type: workplan
title: "Private-by-default exposure until production admission"
domain: financials
repo: railiance-master
status: ready
status: active
owner: bernd
topic_slug: railiance
planning_priority: high
@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ created: "2026-08-15"
updated: "2026-08-15"
related:
- ADR-0006
- ADR-0008
- RMASTER-WP-0017
- RMASTER-WP-0019
- RMASTER-WP-0021
@ -93,10 +94,10 @@ It does **not** belong as the system owner in:
provider API on the internet. That is a different category from a
listener we open.
## Decision to ratify (T01)
## Decision (T01, accepted 2026-08-15)
Recommended default, for review. T01 may amend; it should not start from
a blank page.
Ratified as written. Recorded in
[`docs/adr/ADR-0008-private-by-default-exposure.md`](../docs/adr/ADR-0008-private-by-default-exposure.md).
| Posture | Meaning | Who may reach it |
| --- | --- | --- |
@ -187,7 +188,7 @@ It must not:
```task
id: RMASTER-WP-0023-T01
status: todo
status: done
priority: high
state_hub_task_id: "40d50848-d59e-4f7c-98df-a442dce90439"
```
@ -202,11 +203,16 @@ substrate grant. Confirm `6443` is not grantable as `public`.
distinct on purpose, and the per-family meaning of `public` is written
down.
Completed 2026-08-15: operator accepted the recommended table as
written. ADR-0008 records the postures, the per-family meaning of
`public`, the grant shape, and the 6443 exclusion. Readiness enums stay
distinct.
### T02 — Write the exposure contract
```task
id: RMASTER-WP-0023-T02
status: wait
status: todo
priority: high
state_hub_task_id: "96db2a2d-670c-4b98-b6f3-860f9b3009b3"
```
@ -322,6 +328,6 @@ with a back-link to this ID.
## Outcome
Reviewed 2026-08-15 against current repo state (`status: ready`). T01
still needs human ratification of ADR-0008. Implementation stays out of
this repo.
T01 accepted 2026-08-15 (`status: active`). ADR-0008 is the record.
Next: T02 contract and T04 exception snapshot. Implementation stays out
of this repo.