docs: complete canon alignment housekeeping
This commit is contained in:
parent
490c2d97b1
commit
debbc13b40
14 changed files with 397 additions and 81 deletions
19
SCOPE.md
19
SCOPE.md
|
|
@ -119,10 +119,12 @@ publication addressing are completed.
|
|||
|
||||
## InfoTechCanon Repository-Layout Alignment
|
||||
|
||||
Declared conformance: **`minimal`** under ITC-REPO-LAYOUT 0.1.0-RC1.
|
||||
Declared conformance: **`core`** under ITC-REPO-LAYOUT 0.1.0-RC1.
|
||||
|
||||
- `INTENT.md` contains stable aspiration and boundaries.
|
||||
- `SCOPE.md` contains current evidenced responsibility and explicit gaps.
|
||||
- `demand/` holds unreviewed architecture demand and requires a purpose/scope
|
||||
disposition before work is committed.
|
||||
- `docs/` contains stakeholder-facing framework contracts and ADRs.
|
||||
- `workplans/` contains committed work and remains authoritative for State Hub.
|
||||
- `history/` contains dated, inactive architecture explorations.
|
||||
|
|
@ -132,11 +134,12 @@ Intentional deviations and omissions:
|
|||
- Finished workplan archival follows the Custodian ADR-001 convention at
|
||||
`workplans/archived/YYMMDD-...`, not the generic ITC `history/` placement, so
|
||||
State Hub discovery remains deterministic.
|
||||
- `demand/`, `research/`, `spec/`, `wiki/`, and `issues/` are not currently
|
||||
claimed. They should be added only when their distinct semantics are needed,
|
||||
not as empty structural decoration.
|
||||
- `research/`, `spec/`, `wiki/`, and `issues/` are not currently claimed. They
|
||||
should be added only when their distinct semantics are needed, not as empty
|
||||
structural decoration.
|
||||
- Consumer purposes and inbound requests are not folded into INTENT or SCOPE;
|
||||
a future demand intake may provide that third plane explicitly.
|
||||
`demand/` provides that third plane and resolved reviews move to dated
|
||||
`history/` records.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -191,6 +194,6 @@ keywords: [schema, validation, declaration, rail, rapp, reef]
|
|||
|
||||
## Gap to Intent
|
||||
|
||||
The next obvious alignment work is to make accepted ADRs publication-ready,
|
||||
formalize how raw architecture demand is reviewed before it becomes a workplan,
|
||||
and cleanly archive completed work without breaking State Hub conventions.
|
||||
The remaining alignment work is to complete downstream ADR publication, cleanly
|
||||
archive completed work without breaking State Hub conventions, and retain a
|
||||
repeatable canon-consumer review packet as the architecture evolves.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue