coulomb/railiance-platform
5
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

Prepare proposed KEY39 coding client custody admission

Browse source 
Assistant: codex
Assistant-Model: gpt-6.1-sol
Assistant-Session: 01a126e1-76f8-7643-8cf3-e93336539ade
This commit is contained in:
codex 2026-10-11 19:45:10 +02:00
parent 5ae70642a7
commit 9460f6f200
3 changed files with 169 additions and 1 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

27
workplans/ADHOC-2026-10-11.md
View file

@ -92,3 +92,30 @@ full ExecutionContract matching with authoritative grant/baseline/estate/deadlin
journal dispatch, restricted native adapter, token custody/revoke/cleanup and
owner-private unknown recovery are not implemented by this component. No native,
credential, Secret read, API access, owner checkout write or full adoption claim.
## Complete bounded KEY39 coding-client custody source inspection and proposal preparation
```task
id: RPF-WP-ADHOC-2026-10-11-T03
status: done
priority: low
```
2026-10-11: completed bounded public-source inspection and proposed owner
projection for existing KEY39/RPF35 dependency. Key client source and Platform
JWT-role source agree on codex-railiance-platform, service:codex:railiance-platform
and tenant:platform; standing identity table still says tenant:coulomb. Checked
Deployment source has no named coding-client env reference. Scoped CCR/grant/
routing source search found no exact named admission receipt; this does not
assert live absence. Warden route lookup returned unrelated pointers then its
local memory append refused read-only filesystem; no credential request/fetch.
Prepared explicitly NEW CANDIDATE custody/issuer/founder delivery coordinates,
existing-policy pins and exact missing owner/value-free receipt gates. No CCR
number or runtime binding invented. Existing CLI validates signature/issuer/
audience/expiry/requested scope but not exact coding subject/tenant/type/roles
or 900-second maximum: additional reviewed producer verification remains needed.
This bounded source preparation is completed before any formal owner agreement;
root must persist this record before that entry. Parent KEY39 native and RPF35
owner gates remain unchanged. No residual promotion, source policy widening,
Secret contents, credential/native call, owner checkout write or native grant.