approve: CCR-2026-0012; verify scoped backup key in OpenBao
Founder put ACCESS_KEY/SECRET_KEY. S3 prefix CRUD works. IAM write and ESO apply remain gated. WAL not enabled.
This commit is contained in:
parent
94b2f7cc9c
commit
ddce013cac
3 changed files with 80 additions and 20 deletions
46
docs/evidence/CCR-2026-0012-backup-key-verify-2026-08-14.md
Normal file
46
docs/evidence/CCR-2026-0012-backup-key-verify-2026-08-14.md
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
|
|||
# CCR-2026-0012 — scoped backup key verification
|
||||
|
||||
Date: 2026-08-14
|
||||
Status: **key live in OpenBao; cluster Secret not vended**
|
||||
CCR: approved in chat 2026-08-14
|
||||
Path: `platform/workloads/railiance/backup/object-storage` (KV v2 version 1)
|
||||
|
||||
No secret values in this file.
|
||||
|
||||
## What is in OpenBao
|
||||
|
||||
| Field | Present |
|
||||
| --- | --- |
|
||||
| `ACCESS_KEY` | yes (len 20, `SCW…`) |
|
||||
| `SECRET_KEY` | yes |
|
||||
| `DEFAULT_ORGANIZATION_ID` | yes |
|
||||
| `DEFAULT_PROJECT_ID` | yes |
|
||||
| `APPLICATION_ID` | no (bucket policy deferred) |
|
||||
|
||||
Distinct from the CCR-2026-0011 bootstrap key (`keys_differ=yes`).
|
||||
|
||||
## Positive
|
||||
|
||||
- `scw object bucket list` / `get railiance-platform-pg-backup` in `nl-ams` succeeded.
|
||||
- boto3 put/get/delete of a probe object under `platform-pg/` succeeded; probe deleted.
|
||||
- Sibling prefix write also succeeded: no bucket policy yet, so prefix isolation is not enforced.
|
||||
|
||||
## Negative
|
||||
|
||||
- Bogus secret against the same access key: `SignatureDoesNotMatch`.
|
||||
- `scw iam application list` / `user list` / `api-key get`: insufficient permissions.
|
||||
- `scw billing budget list`: not allowed.
|
||||
- `scw k8s cluster list`: insufficient permissions.
|
||||
|
||||
`instance` / `vpc` / `rdb` / `registry` / `lb` list returned empty success. That is consistent with a project that has no those resources; it is not a proven compute-write deny. Do not create a paid resource to prove it.
|
||||
|
||||
## Not done
|
||||
|
||||
- OpenBao policy `workload-kv-read-backup-object-storage` — this token cannot `sys/policies/acl` write (403).
|
||||
- ClusterSecretStore / ExternalSecret — railiance01 has no `platform-pg-backup-s3` yet; applying the draft store would fail without ESO auth.
|
||||
- Bucket policy — needs `APPLICATION_ID`.
|
||||
- WAL / `barmanObjectStore` on `platform-pg` — T05.
|
||||
|
||||
## Next
|
||||
|
||||
ops-mason (or a token that can write policies and ESO auth) applies the OpenBao policy and the `databases`-scoped store. Then ExternalSecret can project the Secret. After that, empty-WAL-archive preflight; still no continuous archiving until T05.
|
||||
|
|
@ -51,15 +51,18 @@ On this host, with a token that can write the `platform` mount:
|
|||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
bao kv put platform/workloads/railiance/backup/object-storage \
|
||||
ACCESS_KEY_ID='SCWxxxxxxxx' \
|
||||
ACCESS_SECRET_KEY='xxxxxxxx' \
|
||||
APPLICATION_ID='xxxxxxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxx'
|
||||
ACCESS_KEY='SCWxxxxxxxx' \
|
||||
SECRET_KEY='xxxxxxxx' \
|
||||
DEFAULT_ORGANIZATION_ID='xxxxxxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxx' \
|
||||
DEFAULT_PROJECT_ID='xxxxxxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxx'
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Or replace the `xxx` placeholders in the OpenBao UI on that same path.
|
||||
Same four field names as the bootstrap path. External Secrets projects
|
||||
`ACCESS_KEY` / `SECRET_KEY` to Kubernetes `ACCESS_KEY_ID` /
|
||||
`ACCESS_SECRET_KEY`.
|
||||
|
||||
`APPLICATION_ID` is the `resource-control` IAM application UUID (not a
|
||||
secret). It is needed later for the bucket policy.
|
||||
Optional later field: `APPLICATION_ID` (the `resource-control` IAM
|
||||
application UUID, not a secret) so we can attach a bucket policy.
|
||||
|
||||
## 4. Confirm without printing values
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue