Record verified root reader admission and empty custody publication
All checks were successful
CI Smoke / host-smoke (push) Successful in 0s
CI Smoke / container-smoke (push) Successful in 1s

Assistant: codex
Assistant-Model: gpt-6.1-sol
Assistant-Session: 01a1029d-2c93-7500-a0e0-e3e089668b29
This commit is contained in:
codex 2026-10-03 20:24:57 +02:00
parent 35d326f0cf
commit dff2d6e9f7
3 changed files with 106 additions and 12 deletions

View file

@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
# Platform-root custody delivery evidence — 2026-10-03
Owner: railiance-platform. Tracks RPF-WP-0049 / NK-WP-0045-T05.
Bounded operator execution is verified; full delivery/recovery acceptance is
still pending. This is a non-secret evidence summary, not a real custody grant.
## Verified attended admission and publication
The founder executed the reviewed attended commands under continued approval.
Fresh success receipts were independently read and checked locally:
- /tmp/platform-root-admission-20261003T181954Z-333977.json
- /tmp/platform-root-publish-20261003T181954Z-333977.json
Admission confirms namespace/SA user-engine/user-engine, role
user-engine-root-custody-reader on auth/kubernetes, audience openbao, active
OpenBao audit and per-key required CAS. Publication confirms whole-document
write and owner readback. Initial fact: nk-custody:platform-root, revision 1,
KV version 1, entries empty. It grants nobody root authority.
Content SHA256:
33a2ae086385028db1b654aa5646b7a98bcde1c5878c804e19315dadc3f87248.
Publisher receipt time: 2026-10-03T18:21:14.370633+00:00.
Publisher baseline mode: 0600. Immutable history receipt equals the baseline,
and both equal the publication receipt digest and current initial candidate.
The old oidc-role-platform-admin.20260828T112740.json is role configuration,
not a success receipt for these October 3 acts.
## Independent retained history and recovery requirement
Operator-owned publisher state is on the workstation:
/home/worsch/.local/state/net-kingdom-root-custody/baseline.json and history/.
It is already off-host and independent of OpenBao on railiance01 and OpenBao
snapshots. No additional runtime/service is required merely to duplicate it.
The human operator owns retaining and backing up this receipt holder. Preserve
baseline.json, history/ and any pending publication journal together; never
reset state to an older OpenBao snapshot or discard an ambiguous journal.
Retain publication history until an explicitly reviewed custody record
retirement; root custody entries are never removed to simulate revocation.
Remaining evidence, not a fresh generic approval:
1. Record the workstation receipt-holder backup destination/procedure and
verify a copy/restore/readback of this non-secret state, retaining the exact
latest revision and digest. A local process fsync proves durability, not
workstation disaster recovery.
2. Run the attended restore-check against the current owner source with the
retained baseline and fresh receipt. This proves today's independent state
agrees with current owner readback; it is not proof of a snapshot exercise.
3. In the platform/OpenBao owner's isolated recovery procedure, restore a
snapshot and compare with the independently retained latest history. Prove
that an older/missing/mutated record is refused and source authority is not
reopened until retained latest content is restored and readback matches.
Do not roll back live OpenBao merely to manufacture a test receipt.
4. Complete reader identity success and wrong-identity/anonymous/list/sibling/
write denial, outage/fail-closed and audit correlation receipts. The publisher
success receipt and configured reader policy do not alone prove workload
admission or workload denial behavior. Consumer rollout follows its owner.
No genuine root ceremony is known. A future real grant requires signed human
ceremony evidence and exact issuer/subject; IAM projections and a planned
custody roster cannot ground it. Algorithm grant/revoke/supersession testing
uses synthetic fixtures; no real grant is created or revoked for acceptance.
Security orientation reloaded: Emergent 0.2.4 root, verified-files,
orientation-only; digest
025aab4f38246219c924bc94954e70ea0e6e7f72bcaf8d4344cd599602d345c3.
No secret values, privileged role dump or token material are copied here.

View file

@ -112,8 +112,10 @@ readback and journal recovery. Bootstrap uses CAS=0. The publisher retains
baseline.json and immutable history/ receipts. Restore `baseline.json`, history/
and any pending journal from independently retained latest evidence before a
recovery check; restoring only an older OpenBao snapshot cannot establish
current authority. Off-host history backup destination, owner and readback
receipt remain an explicit acceptance dependency. Local state enables safe
current authority. The operator-workstation state is already off-host and independent of
railiance01/OpenBao. Documenting backup and readback of that receipt holder
remains an explicit acceptance dependency; no new service is required merely
to duplicate it. Local state enables safe
publication but does not satisfy that independent recovery proof.
`restore-check` takes the same source pins and state but no candidate or
@ -136,8 +138,8 @@ restart. A restored snapshot must not reactivate an older grant: suspend reads,
compare restored record with independently retained latest baseline, reconcile
all later custody actions, and re-enable only after owner receipts. Do not
reset baselines, destroy versions or recreate an old record under the same ID.
KV CAS prevents races, but is not proof against snapshot rollback. Retention
settings and independent backup location remain an owner implementation gate.
KV CAS prevents races, but is not proof against snapshot rollback. Retention and workstation receipt-holder backup/readback proof remain owner
acceptance requirements, alongside isolated OpenBao recovery evidence.
No control was relaxed and no live action was taken. Emergent knowledge 0.2.3
start was withheld/orientation-only (digest
@ -148,3 +150,11 @@ informed-decision README, plus the source NetKingdom contract/schema/validator.
Producer delivery receipts complete RPF-WP-0049-T05 / NK-WP-0045-T05.
Consumer integration and runtime acceptance follow in USER-WP-0037-T02 /
NK-WP-0045-T06; they do not block initial producer delivery.
## Attended execution outcome — 2026-10-03
The founder executed admission and empty publication. Fresh receipts, initial
revision 1/KV1/no-grant digest and exact residual recovery/reader evidence are
recorded in [delivery evidence](../../docs/evidence/2026-10-03-platform-root-custody-delivery.md).
This completes RPF-WP-0049-T04. T05 remains evidence-blocked; generic approval
is not pending. Old operator role configuration is not an execution receipt.

View file

@ -70,18 +70,17 @@ Implemented silent attended provision/publish/restore-check executor with exact
reader admission, per-key required CAS, active-audit check, pinned canon, retained
high-water baseline, fsynced pending journal and immutable local history.
Readback is mandatory; replay is idempotent; conflicting existing role/policy,
missing state and rollback fail closed. Off-host history placement and actual
recovery evidence remain execution/acceptance dependencies in T04/T05.
missing state and rollback fail closed. Publisher state is independently retained on the operator workstation, outside
railiance01. Workstation receipt-holder backup/readback and actual isolated
OpenBao recovery evidence remain acceptance dependencies in T05.
## Execute authorized attended provisioning and establish initial baseline
```task
id: RPF-WP-0049-T04
status: wait
status: done
priority: high
depends_on: [RPF-WP-0049-T03]
needs_human: true
blocking_reason: "Go-forward covers the prepared no-grant empty baseline; founder terminal OIDC/MFA must execute reader admission and empty publication. Independent history backup owner/destination/readback receipt remain unresolved; no real ceremony or root grant is claimed."
state_hub_task_id: "88b932e8-1010-56c6-be27-ad46f47e1e80"
```
@ -94,8 +93,8 @@ examples/custody-record/initial-empty-record.json (entries=[]), with provenance
docs/evidence/2026-10-03-root-grant-delivery-progress.md. Concrete admission
and empty publication commands are in the packet; state is retained at
/home/worsch/.local/state/net-kingdom-root-custody. No root grant is seeded.
Independent history backup destination/owner/readback proof is still required
for T05 acceptance. Any later real grant requires genuine signed human ceremony.
The operator workstation already holds history independently of OpenBao;
receipt-holder backup/readback and isolated recovery proof remain T05 requirements. Any later real grant requires genuine signed human ceremony.
## Return producer delivery receipts
@ -104,7 +103,7 @@ id: RPF-WP-0049-T05
status: wait
priority: high
depends_on: [RPF-WP-0049-T04]
blocking_reason: "Live authenticated/denial/outage/revocation/restore/audit producer delivery receipts remain absent."
blocking_reason: "Admission and empty publication receipts verified; workload success/denial/outage/audit correlation and independent workstation receipt-holder backup/readback plus isolated OpenBao rollback/restore evidence remain. No new generic approval gate."
state_hub_task_id: "871e3236-61c0-58a1-a307-399cd662be6b"
```
@ -143,3 +142,20 @@ attended admission then empty publication handoff without a real root grant or
new generic approval gate. State directory is explicit outside Git; independent
off-host history receipt remains an acceptance dependency. No login or live
publication was executed by this agent.
## Verified attended execution — 2026-10-03
T04 done: founder executed reviewed reader admission and empty publication.
Verified fresh receipts platform-root-admission-20261003T181954Z-333977.json
and platform-root-publish-20261003T181954Z-333977.json. Initial source revision 1,
KV version 1, no entries/root grants, content digest
33a2ae086385028db1b654aa5646b7a98bcde1c5878c804e19315dadc3f87248.
Publisher baseline and immutable history match, mode 0600. The August operator
role configuration file is not evidence of this execution. No agent human
admin login was performed. Details and exact remaining acceptance requirements:
[delivery evidence](../docs/evidence/2026-10-03-platform-root-custody-delivery.md).
T05 remains wait for workload and independent recovery receipts; the source
workplan stays blocked on evidence, not another generic approval. The publisher
state holder is already independent/off-host relative to railiance01. No new
service dependency is introduced solely to duplicate that holder.