Layer declaration (gate-house). INTENT.md now carries the declaration in its own
voice with layer.yaml as the machine-readable form, adapted from ops-warden's
reference. railiance-platform is Staff: operating OpenBao is not a claim to the
Tooling layer, because §4 is explicit that no operator-of-third-party-Tooling
shape exists and that someone running it stays a declared gap. Six direct
Tooling contacts are mapped by capability rather than by file — one §5.2
conduit, one §5.1 diagnostic, four §5.3 gaps with intended owners and review
dates — and the uncatalogued contacts are listed so the check is total. We are
PEP-shaped and the unreachable-engine stance map is NOT published; that is
recorded as an open obligation to build against v0.8, not left silent.
Placement admission. canned-prompts was added as a PostgresConsumer on
platform-pg-2 in rapp-postgres 1b68b4c without a placement owner here, which is
exactly the cross-repo drift the assurance check exists to catch; the check had
been failing on it. Registered with its real boundary evidence, corrected the
stale test expectation that pinned the overflow cell at one consumer, and
updated the SCOPE occupancy line to 2/4.
Also records owner input received today: key-cape's issuer view on CCR-2026-0020's
presenting actor, and their confirmation that codex-railiance-platform correctly
stays tenant:coulomb, so the flagged T02 discrepancy is closed as not-a-defect.
The whynot-design npm field is NOT changed. Two dated live receipts here name
NPM_AUTH_TOKEN as the field, including an attended founder fetch; that is
recorded against the counterparty claim rather than either side being flipped
before the session settles it.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01WLUjpv3ssxNRAEPPgLFnEB
Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: opus
Assistant-Process: 1275505@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: 97265baa-f08f-4032-b290-a1e2965a69c5
RPF-WP-0035-T06. Adds CCR-2026-0019 (secrets-engine) and CCR-2026-0020
(approval-engine-operator) with their exact-path read policies, reusing the
existing version-1 custody from the verifier activation. No reseed, rotation,
shared reader or verifier Secret reuse; both requests are in_flight and nothing
is applied.
The two shapes were decided by read-only survey rather than assumed.
secrets-engine consumes its client secret through an operator-run CLI reading a
protected file, and its namespace holds no workload, so reader 1 is an attended
operator-workstation OIDC lane rather than an ESO lane; its one missing input is
the operator group claim, which NetKingdom and KeyCape own. approval-engine is
not deployed and no owner source names who presents the operator client, so
reader 2 records the undetermined actor instead of guessing one for the widest
approval scope in the pair. Both declare openbao.auth missing rather than
carrying a placeholder binding.
T06 moves to wait on those two owner inputs.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01WLUjpv3ssxNRAEPPgLFnEB
Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: opus
Assistant-Process: 1275505@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: 97265baa-f08f-4032-b290-a1e2965a69c5
Answers KEY-WP-0013-T02. Both proposed KV paths are confirmed unchanged; the
field name is corrected to CLIENT_SECRET for the platform uppercase convention
and the CCR validator. Kubernetes delivery references are confirmed against the
live sso namespace. Attended authority is the governed openbao-platform-admin-login
lane, and the rollout is one attended window ordered after the Authelia issuer
precondition.
Adds CCR-2026-0017/0018, two exact-path read policies, two namespace-limited
ClusterSecretStores with Kubernetes auth, two ExternalSecrets, and RPF-WP-0035-T05.
Nothing is applied and no value exists: both CCRs remain proposed.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01WLUjpv3ssxNRAEPPgLFnEB
Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: opus
Assistant-Process: 1275505@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: 97265baa-f08f-4032-b290-a1e2965a69c5
`ADHOC-YYYY-MM-DD` is unique per date but not per repository, so any two repos
opening an ad-hoc on the same day collide. The 2026-08-26 fleet projection
reset refused 9 records for exactly this reason.
Canon (work-record-types_v0.1, CUST-WP-0066) settled the form as
`{PREFIX}-WP-ADHOC-YYYY-MM-DD`, filename unchanged, and grandfathered existing
ids on the condition they are never *silently* re-derived. This is the explicit
migration that clause allows for.
The hub id is derived from the record id, so a changed id is a different
record: stale state_hub_*_id fields are dropped and fix-consistency re-derives.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: opus
Assistant-Process: 2583210@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: f2bff2d5-e9b2-4338-92ca-10282a927006
The RAILIANCE-WP migration numbered from RPF-WP-0001 without checking whether
the target prefix was already in use. It was: this repository already had
RPF-WP records, and the migration collided at 0018, 0019 and 0020, putting two
unrelated workplans on each identifier.
Central was left holding mixed records — rpf-wp-0018 carried the status of one
file and the backing path of the other, because the reset processed two files
claiming one identifier.
The three files the migration displaced move to 0025-0027; the pre-existing
records keep their numbers. Projection UUIDs are re-derived.
Refs STATE-WP-0083-T05
Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: opus
Assistant-Process: 2583210@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: f2bff2d5-e9b2-4338-92ca-10282a927006
