diff --git a/WORK-RECORDS.md b/WORK-RECORDS.md
index c90fa24..eb451a5 100644
--- a/WORK-RECORDS.md
+++ b/WORK-RECORDS.md
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
 | workplan | RAILIANCE-WP-0015 | finished | — | workplans/RAILIANCE-WP-0015-platform-rapp-consistency.md |
 | workplan | RAILIANCE-WP-0016 | finished | — | workplans/RAILIANCE-WP-0016-apps-pg-resource-evidence.md |
 | workplan | RAILIANCE-WP-0016 | active | — | workplans/RAILIANCE-WP-0016-architecture-cleanup-backlog.md |
+| workplan | RAILIANCE-WP-0017 | proposed | — | workplans/RAILIANCE-WP-0017-consumption-mode-enforcement.md |
 | task | RAILIANCE-WP-0005-T01 | done | — | workplans/RAILIANCE-WP-0005-credential-request-and-lease-broker.md |
 | task | RAILIANCE-WP-0005-T02 | done | — | workplans/RAILIANCE-WP-0005-credential-request-and-lease-broker.md |
 | task | RAILIANCE-WP-0005-T03 | done | — | workplans/RAILIANCE-WP-0005-credential-request-and-lease-broker.md |
@@ -78,3 +79,4 @@
 | task | RAILIANCE-WP-0016-T03 | done | — | workplans/RAILIANCE-WP-0016-architecture-cleanup-backlog.md |
 | task | RAILIANCE-WP-0016-T04 | done | — | workplans/RAILIANCE-WP-0016-architecture-cleanup-backlog.md |
 | task | RAILIANCE-WP-0016-T05 | todo | — | workplans/RAILIANCE-WP-0016-architecture-cleanup-backlog.md |
+| task | RAILIANCE-WP-0017-T01 | todo | — | workplans/RAILIANCE-WP-0017-consumption-mode-enforcement.md |
diff --git a/argocd/platform-addons/openbao-secretstore/openbao-backup-object-storage.clustersecretstore.yaml b/argocd/platform-addons/openbao-secretstore/openbao-backup-object-storage.clustersecretstore.yaml
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..a582e58
--- /dev/null
+++ b/argocd/platform-addons/openbao-secretstore/openbao-backup-object-storage.clustersecretstore.yaml
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
+# CCR-2026-0012. Deploy on railiance01 (first consumer lives in
+# databases), not the CoulombCore ArgoCD kustomization.
+#
+# Prereq: Secret external-secrets/openbao-backup-object-storage-approle
+# (role-id, secret-id) for AppRole external-secrets-backup-object-storage.
+# Same-cluster Kubernetes auth remains the follow-up.
+# Add further namespace conditions when another backup consumer is bound.
+apiVersion: external-secrets.io/v1
+kind: ClusterSecretStore
+metadata:
+  name: openbao-backup-object-storage
+  labels:
+    app.kubernetes.io/part-of: railiance-gitops
+    railiance-platform/component: external-secrets
+    app.kubernetes.io/name: backup-object-storage
+spec:
+  provider:
+    vault:
+      server: http://openbao.openbao.svc:8200
+      path: platform
+      version: v2
+      auth:
+        appRole:
+          path: approle
+          roleRef:
+            name: openbao-backup-object-storage-approle
+            namespace: external-secrets
+            key: role-id
+          secretRef:
+            name: openbao-backup-object-storage-approle
+            namespace: external-secrets
+            key: secret-id
+  conditions:
+    - namespaces:
+        - databases
diff --git a/credential-change-requests/CCR-2026-0011-scaleway-object-storage-bootstrap.yaml b/credential-change-requests/CCR-2026-0011-scaleway-object-storage-bootstrap.yaml
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..67b74cd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/credential-change-requests/CCR-2026-0011-scaleway-object-storage-bootstrap.yaml
@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
+id: CCR-2026-0011
+kind: credential-change-request
+schema_version: 1
+request_type: workload-kv-read
+title: Scaleway bootstrap API key for reef-storage / WP-0002 bucket create
+status: apply_pending
+created: '2026-08-14'
+updated: '2026-08-14'
+requester:
+  agent: grok
+  reason: >-
+    RESOURCE-WP-0002 T03 is human-approved to create a private Scaleway
+    Multi-AZ bucket in nl-ams. This session has no Scaleway CLI profile.
+    Founder will provision a bootstrap org/project API key into OpenBao;
+    the agent reads it only to create the bucket and then writes the
+    scoped bucket key to a separate path. Values must not appear in Git
+    or chat.
+review:
+  required: true
+  required_approvers:
+  - platform-operator
+  comments:
+  - at: '2026-08-14T00:00:00+00:00'
+    reviewer: bernd.worsch
+    decision: approved
+    comment: >-
+      Approved in chat (Grok session): put Scaleway bootstrap key in
+      OpenBao first, then create the bucket.
+target:
+  domain: financials
+  tenant: railiance
+  workload: scaleway-bootstrap
+  environment: production
+  purpose: Create reef-storage object-store members; not the Barman runtime key
+openbao:
+  mount: platform
+  kv_path: platform/workloads/railiance/scaleway/bootstrap
+  fields:
+  - ACCESS_KEY
+  - SECRET_KEY
+  - DEFAULT_ORGANIZATION_ID
+  - DEFAULT_PROJECT_ID
+  policy_name: operator-kv-scaleway-bootstrap
+access_frontdoor:
+  type: operator-local
+  catalog_id: scaleway-bootstrap
+  selector: scaleway bootstrap api
+  command: bao kv put platform/workloads/railiance/scaleway/bootstrap
+  resolvable: false
+  readiness: waiting-on-ui-replace-of-xxx-placeholders
+delivery:
+  surface: operator-workstation
+  target: reef-storage/tools/create-platform-audit-bucket.sh (reads, never prints)
+risk:
+  classification: high
+  notes:
+  - Bootstrap key can create projects/buckets; rotate or delete after scoped key exists.
+  - Scoped backup key is a different path: platform/workloads/railiance/backup/object-storage
+  - Values must not appear in Git, State Hub, or chat.
+verification:
+  positive:
+  - Field names present on the KV path; values not printed.
+  negative:
+  - default-policy token denied on the data path.
+lifecycle:
+  deactivate: Delete bootstrap key at Scaleway after the scoped bucket key works.
+  rotate: Put a new bootstrap key; do not reuse the scoped backup key.
+  compromised: Revoke both Scaleway keys; rotate bucket policy.
diff --git a/credential-change-requests/CCR-2026-0012-backup-object-storage.yaml b/credential-change-requests/CCR-2026-0012-backup-object-storage.yaml
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..6b95741
--- /dev/null
+++ b/credential-change-requests/CCR-2026-0012-backup-object-storage.yaml
@@ -0,0 +1,123 @@
+id: CCR-2026-0012
+kind: credential-change-request
+schema_version: 1
+request_type: workload-kv-read
+title: Scaleway scoped backup object-storage key
+status: applied
+created: '2026-08-14'
+updated: '2026-08-14'
+requester:
+  agent: grok
+  reason: >-
+    RESOURCE-WP-0002 T04 needs a renewable, revocable, project-scoped
+    Scaleway backup key in OpenBao. Custody is the resource-control
+    procuring identity, not a Barman-specific application. First
+    consumer is rapp-postgres (Secret platform-pg-backup-s3). The
+    bootstrap key (CCR-2026-0011) must not be the runtime key.
+review:
+  required: true
+  required_approvers:
+  - platform-operator
+  comments:
+  - at: '2026-08-14T17:30:00+00:00'
+    reviewer: bernd.worsch
+    decision: approved
+    comment: >-
+      Approved in chat (Grok session): CCR-2026-0012 and “the backup
+      key is in bao.” Founder used ACCESS_KEY/SECRET_KEY field names.
+target:
+  domain: financials
+  tenant: railiance
+  workload: backup
+  rapp: rapp-postgres
+  environment: production
+  purpose: >-
+    Object-store credentials for Railiance backup destinations.
+    Secret keys ACCESS_KEY and SECRET_KEY (projected to Kubernetes as
+    ACCESS_KEY_ID / ACCESS_SECRET_KEY). Org and project ids are
+    non-secret companions. APPLICATION_ID can be added later for a
+    bucket policy. Endpoint, bucket, prefix, and region stay on
+    reef-storage.
+openbao:
+  mount: platform
+  kv_path: platform/workloads/railiance/backup/object-storage
+  fields:
+  - ACCESS_KEY
+  - SECRET_KEY
+  - DEFAULT_ORGANIZATION_ID
+  - DEFAULT_PROJECT_ID
+  policy_name: workload-kv-read-backup-object-storage
+  policy_file: openbao/policies/workload-kv-read-backup-object-storage.hcl
+  auth:
+    method: kubernetes
+    mount: kubernetes
+    role: external-secrets-backup-object-storage
+    bound_claims:
+      service_account_names:
+      - external-secrets
+      service_account_namespaces:
+      - external-secrets
+    bound_claims_confirmed: false
+    policies:
+    - workload-kv-read-backup-object-storage
+    ttl: 15m
+access_frontdoor:
+  type: ops-warden
+  catalog_id: backup-object-storage
+  selector: resource-control scoped backup access
+  command: warden access backup-object-storage --fetch ACCESS_KEY
+  resolvable: false
+  readiness: applied-pending-verify
+delivery:
+  surface: external-secrets
+  target: >-
+    ClusterSecretStore openbao-backup-object-storage (first namespace
+    condition: databases) → ExternalSecret databases/platform-pg-backup-s3
+    → Secret platform-pg-backup-s3 (ACCESS_KEY_ID / ACCESS_SECRET_KEY
+    projected from ACCESS_KEY / SECRET_KEY). Drafts live
+    under railiance-platform/argocd/platform-addons/openbao-secretstore/
+    and rapp-postgres/helm/platform-pg-backup-s3.externalsecret.yaml.
+    Do not apply until this CCR is approved and the KV values are real.
+risk:
+  classification: high
+  notes:
+  - Scaleway policies attach to the IAM application, not to one API key.
+    Application resource-control must hold only backup-scoped keys.
+  - The runtime key can write and delete backup objects. Compromise can
+    destroy recovery points or fill the bucket.
+  - The bootstrap key (CCR-2026-0011) must stay off this application and
+    be revoked after this key works.
+  - Do not enable continuous WAL archiving until the empty-archive
+    preflight passes (RESOURCE-WP-0002 T05).
+  - Values must not appear in Git, State Hub, logs, or chat.
+verification:
+  positive:
+  - Field names present on the KV path; values not printed.
+  - An approved databases-namespace ExternalSecret can project ACCESS_KEY
+    and SECRET_KEY to Secret platform-pg-backup-s3 as ACCESS_KEY_ID and
+    ACCESS_SECRET_KEY.
+  - The scoped key can list/put/delete backup prefixes on the procured
+    bucket.
+  negative:
+  - A token without this policy cannot read the KV path.
+  - A namespace outside the ClusterSecretStore condition cannot use the store.
+  - A second, unused key (or revoked key) cannot access the bucket.
+  - The scoped key cannot create compute resources.
+  activation_conditions:
+  - Platform-operator approves this CCR.
+  - Founder creates or reuses IAM application resource-control, binds
+    policy Scoped backup access, mints the API key of that name, then
+    puts ACCESS_KEY and SECRET_KEY in OpenBao. Done 2026-08-14.
+  - ESO store and ExternalSecret applied only after values are real.
+lifecycle:
+  deactivate: Disable the catalog entry, delete consumer ExternalSecrets,
+    revoke the Scoped backup access API key. Keep application
+    resource-control if other backup keys remain.
+  rotate: Overlap-first. Put a new key in OpenBao, wait for ESO refresh,
+    revoke the old Scaleway key.
+  compromised: Revoke the Scoped backup access key and the bootstrap key
+    at Scaleway, rotate this path, review bucket contents, open incident
+    follow-up.
+state_hub:
+  workplan_id: RESOURCE-WP-0002
+  task_id: RESOURCE-WP-0002-T04
diff --git a/docs/evidence/CCR-2026-0012-backup-key-verify-2026-08-14.md b/docs/evidence/CCR-2026-0012-backup-key-verify-2026-08-14.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..c51a459
--- /dev/null
+++ b/docs/evidence/CCR-2026-0012-backup-key-verify-2026-08-14.md
@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
+# CCR-2026-0012 — scoped backup key verification
+
+Date: 2026-08-14  
+Status: **applied — Secret `databases/platform-pg-backup-s3` synced**  
+CCR: approved in chat 2026-08-14  
+Path: `platform/workloads/railiance/backup/object-storage` (KV v2 version 1)
+
+No secret values in this file.
+
+## What is in OpenBao
+
+| Field | Present |
+| --- | --- |
+| `ACCESS_KEY` | yes (len 20, `SCW…`) |
+| `SECRET_KEY` | yes |
+| `DEFAULT_ORGANIZATION_ID` | yes |
+| `DEFAULT_PROJECT_ID` | yes |
+| `APPLICATION_ID` | yes as of version 2 (UUID, not printed here) |
+
+Distinct from the CCR-2026-0011 bootstrap key (`keys_differ=yes`).
+
+## Positive
+
+- `scw object bucket list` / `get railiance-platform-pg-backup` in `nl-ams` succeeded.
+- boto3 put/get/delete of a probe object under `platform-pg/` succeeded; probe deleted.
+- Sibling prefix write is now denied (`AccessDenied`) after the
+  `resource-control-scoped-backup` bucket policy
+  (`BackupListPrefix`, `BackupObjectsUnderPrefix`) applied 2026-08-14.
+
+## Negative
+
+- Bogus secret against the same access key: `SignatureDoesNotMatch`.
+- `scw iam application list` / `user list` / `api-key get`: insufficient permissions.
+- `scw billing budget list`: not allowed.
+- `scw k8s cluster list`: insufficient permissions.
+
+`instance` / `vpc` / `rdb` / `registry` / `lb` list returned empty success. That is consistent with a project that has no those resources; it is not a proven compute-write deny. Do not create a paid resource to prove it.
+
+## Cluster delivery (same day)
+
+- Policy `workload-kv-read-backup-object-storage` written.
+- AppRole `external-secrets-backup-object-storage` (15m/30m, 8 uses).
+- Secret `external-secrets/openbao-backup-object-storage-approle` applied; local delivery shredded.
+- ClusterSecretStore `openbao-backup-object-storage` Ready/Valid, condition `databases` only.
+- ExternalSecret `databases/platform-pg-backup-s3` SecretSynced. Keys `ACCESS_KEY_ID` (len 20) and `ACCESS_SECRET_KEY` (len 36). Values not read.
+- Prefix `platform-pg/` object count: 0.
+- `platform-pg` still has no `barmanObjectStore`. WAL is T05.
diff --git a/docs/put-backup-object-storage.md b/docs/put-backup-object-storage.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..ceff57b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/docs/put-backup-object-storage.md
@@ -0,0 +1,89 @@
+# Put the scoped backup object-store key (founder, local only)
+
+Do this on a trusted terminal. **Do not paste ACCESS_KEY_ID or
+ACCESS_SECRET_KEY into chat, Git, or State Hub.**
+
+CCR: `credential-change-requests/CCR-2026-0012-backup-object-storage.yaml`  
+Path: `platform/workloads/railiance/backup/object-storage`
+
+This is **not** the bootstrap key (`…/scaleway/bootstrap`). That key
+created the bucket. This key is the general **backup** runtime identity
+for application `resource-control`. First consumer is `rapp-postgres`
+(Secret `platform-pg-backup-s3`).
+
+## 1. Use IAM application `resource-control`
+
+In [console.scaleway.com](https://console.scaleway.com) → IAM → Applications:
+
+1. Create application `resource-control` if it does not exist. Do **not**
+   create a Barman- or postgres-specific application.
+2. Create an API key **on that application** (not on your user):
+   - Description / name: `Scoped backup access`
+   - **Preferred Project for Object Storage:** the project that owns
+     bucket `railiance-platform-pg-backup`
+3. Copy the access key and secret key into a local scratch file
+   (`chmod 600`). The secret is shown once.
+
+Put **only** backup-scoped keys on this application. Scaleway attaches
+policies to the application, not to one key. The bootstrap key must stay
+off `resource-control`.
+
+## 2. Bind policy `Scoped backup access`
+
+IAM → Policies → create (or reuse) `Scoped backup access`:
+
+- Principal: application `resource-control`
+- Scope: **that one project**, not the whole Organization
+- Permission sets, if the console lists them:
+  - `ObjectStorageBucketsRead`
+  - `ObjectStorageObjectsRead`
+  - `ObjectStorageObjectsWrite`
+  - `ObjectStorageObjectsDelete`
+- If those sets are not listed, `ObjectStorageFullAccess` **on this
+  project only** is acceptable because the project should contain only
+  backup buckets.
+
+Do **not** attach `IAM*` or compute permission sets.
+
+## 3. Put the values in OpenBao
+
+On this host, with a token that can write the `platform` mount:
+
+```bash
+bao kv put platform/workloads/railiance/backup/object-storage \
+  ACCESS_KEY='SCWxxxxxxxx' \
+  SECRET_KEY='xxxxxxxx' \
+  DEFAULT_ORGANIZATION_ID='xxxxxxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxx' \
+  DEFAULT_PROJECT_ID='xxxxxxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxx'
+```
+
+Same four field names as the bootstrap path. External Secrets projects
+`ACCESS_KEY` / `SECRET_KEY` to Kubernetes `ACCESS_KEY_ID` /
+`ACCESS_SECRET_KEY`.
+
+Optional field for the bucket policy (not a secret):
+
+```bash
+bao kv patch platform/workloads/railiance/backup/object-storage \
+  APPLICATION_ID='xxxxxxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxx'
+```
+
+Copy the UUID from IAM → Applications → `resource-control`. Then tell
+the agent **“APPLICATION_ID is in bao.”** They will run
+`reef-storage/tools/apply-backup-bucket-policy.sh`.
+
+## 4. Confirm without printing values
+
+```bash
+bao kv metadata get platform/workloads/railiance/backup/object-storage
+```
+
+You should see a current version greater than any placeholder version.
+Then tell the agent: **“the backup key is in bao.”**
+
+Do not enable WAL archiving yourself. T04 still has to prove a negative
+key cannot access the bucket and to vend the first consumer Secret.
+T05 enables continuous archiving.
+
+After the scoped key works, delete or lock down the bootstrap key from
+CCR-2026-0011.
diff --git a/docs/rapp-credential-lane-binding.md b/docs/rapp-credential-lane-binding.md
index 2962312..c604f63 100644
--- a/docs/rapp-credential-lane-binding.md
+++ b/docs/rapp-credential-lane-binding.md
@@ -47,7 +47,8 @@ the list does not say who provisions the thing that satisfies a name.
 `openbao-database-secrets-engine` and `s3-backup-target` are capabilities.
 The database engine is configured by S3 from statements the package
 owns; the backup bucket is a `resource-control` resource and the
-provider credential is S3 custody (`Secret platform-pg-backup-s3`).
+provider credential is S3 custody (`secret:railiance-platform/backup`,
+first projection Secret `platform-pg-backup-s3`).
 Fail-closed until that handoff lands is correct, not a hole in the
 package.
 
@@ -180,7 +181,7 @@ shape unless it *is* a secrets engine.
 | --- | --- | --- | --- |
 | `rapp-openbao` | none | none — package is the store | correct |
 | `rapp-postgres` | `consumer_contract` + `openbao-database-secrets-engine` | `rapp-postgres/audit-core-runtime`, `rapp-postgres/audit-core-migration` | bound |
-| `rapp-postgres` | `s3-backup-target` | no lane yet; Secret `platform-pg-backup-s3` is S3 custody after RESOURCE-WP-0002 | fail-closed on purpose |
+| `rapp-postgres` | `s3-backup-target` / `secret_references: platform/workloads/railiance/backup/object-storage` | `CCR-2026-0012` | pointer set; CCR `proposed`; first consumer of the general backup key; Secret not vended |
 | `rapp-qonto` | `secret_references: tenants/binky/qonto-api` | `CCR-2026-0009` | pointer set; CCR itself is still `proposed` |
 
 Live CCRs without `target.rapp` are un-rapped workloads. They stay on
diff --git a/openbao/policies/workload-kv-read-backup-object-storage.hcl b/openbao/policies/workload-kv-read-backup-object-storage.hcl
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..e9aa431
--- /dev/null
+++ b/openbao/policies/workload-kv-read-backup-object-storage.hcl
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+# Least-privilege read of the resource-control backup object-store key.
+# ESO (or the later Kubernetes auth role) is the only in-cluster reader.
+# Values never belong in Git.
+
+path "platform/data/workloads/railiance/backup/object-storage" {
+  capabilities = ["read"]
+}
+
+path "platform/metadata/workloads/railiance/backup/object-storage" {
+  capabilities = ["read"]
+}
diff --git a/tools/cmd/cnpg-option-a-backup b/tools/cmd/cnpg-option-a-backup
index 744ad77..490d9db 100755
--- a/tools/cmd/cnpg-option-a-backup
+++ b/tools/cmd/cnpg-option-a-backup
@@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ DEFAULT_TARGETS=(
   "core-net-kingdom-pg|KUBECONFIG_CORE|databases|net-kingdom-pg|interhub,privacyidea_db"
   "core-state-hub-db|KUBECONFIG_CORE|databases|state-hub-db|state_hub"
   "r01-forgejo-db|KUBECONFIG_R01|databases|forgejo-db|forgejo"
+  "r01-platform-pg|KUBECONFIG_R01|databases|platform-pg|audit_core,platform_meta,isolation_probe"
   "r01-net-kingdom-pg|KUBECONFIG_R01|databases|net-kingdom-pg|interhub,privacyidea_db"
   "r01-state-hub-db|KUBECONFIG_R01|databases|state-hub-db|state_hub"
   "r01-user-engine-pg|KUBECONFIG_R01|user-engine|user-engine-pg|user_engine"
diff --git a/workplans/RAILIANCE-WP-0012-rapp-openbao-extraction-boundary.md b/workplans/RAILIANCE-WP-0012-rapp-openbao-extraction-boundary.md
index 8dacbfe..76c86dc 100644
--- a/workplans/RAILIANCE-WP-0012-rapp-openbao-extraction-boundary.md
+++ b/workplans/RAILIANCE-WP-0012-rapp-openbao-extraction-boundary.md
@@ -127,4 +127,4 @@ copies without losing source-of-truth clarity.
 ## Notes
 
 This workplan is repo-local. The framework-level sequencing stays in
-`railiance-master/workplans/RAILIANCE-WP-0017-rail-rapp-reef-repo-separation.md`.
+`railiance-master/workplans/RMASTER-WP-0017-rail-rapp-reef-repo-separation.md`.
diff --git a/workplans/RAILIANCE-WP-0015-platform-rapp-consistency.md b/workplans/RAILIANCE-WP-0015-platform-rapp-consistency.md
index 1eb0861..f8cd4fe 100644
--- a/workplans/RAILIANCE-WP-0015-platform-rapp-consistency.md
+++ b/workplans/RAILIANCE-WP-0015-platform-rapp-consistency.md
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ conforms, and to supply the platform-service reference shape.
 Surveyed 2026-08-11 against the live cluster and all six family repos.
 
 The concepts are in better shape than their enforcement. The four families are
-cleanly defined and `RAILIANCE-WP-0018`/`WP-0019` in `railiance-master` are both
+cleanly defined and `RMASTER-WP-0018`/`RMASTER-WP-0019` in `railiance-master` are both
 `finished`. Nothing, however, validates a declaration file, so the model has
 been drifting quietly since the first wave.
 
diff --git a/workplans/RAILIANCE-WP-0017-consumption-mode-enforcement.md b/workplans/RAILIANCE-WP-0017-consumption-mode-enforcement.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..90a408d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/workplans/RAILIANCE-WP-0017-consumption-mode-enforcement.md
@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
+---
+id: RAILIANCE-WP-0017
+type: workplan
+title: "Enforce resource-control consumption mode"
+domain: financials
+repo: railiance-platform
+status: proposed
+owner: codex
+topic_slug: railiance
+created: "2026-08-14"
+updated: "2026-08-14"
+related:
+  - RESOURCE-WP-0005
+origin: residual
+origin_ref: RESOURCE-WP-0005
+state_hub_workstream_id: "f33be601-51b5-4bcf-82bf-31f8dba59b9f"
+---
+
+# RAILIANCE-WP-0017 — enforce consumption mode
+
+## Goal
+
+Consume the `open` / `restricted` signal published by
+`resource-control` and enforce it on new orders and elastic usage.
+`resource-control` does not throttle the cluster.
+
+Origin: `RESOURCE-WP-0005-T07`. Terms:
+`resource-control/docs/TermsOfResourceProcurement.md` § 11.
+Runbook: `resource-control/docs/resource-procurement-facility.md`.
+
+## Boundaries
+
+- Restricted monthly new-consumption is €50 transfer price minus that
+  month's interest. At the default €1 000 overdue balance that is
+  €45.83 transfer price / €38.19 delivered cost.
+- Already-committed provider contracts are flagged to human financial
+  authority, not cancelled (OQ-2).
+- Safety paths (backup, identity, ingress needed to avoid data loss)
+  may continue; overage is an exception line, not a hidden charge.
+
+## T01 — Subscribe to the consumption-mode signal
+
+```task
+id: RAILIANCE-WP-0017-T01
+status: todo
+priority: high
+state_hub_task_id: "1c872918-0872-4b2a-8596-89b106239e54"
+```
+
+Define how platform procurement and admission read the latest
+per-entity consumption mode and remaining transfer-price allowance for
+the current period.
+
+Done when a restricted entity cannot place a new order that would
+exceed the published allowance, and an `open` entity is unchanged.