# apps-pg Shared PostgreSQL Cluster `apps-pg` is the shared CloudNativePG cluster for S5 application databases. It lives in the `databases` namespace and is owned by `railiance-platform` as an S3 platform service. ## Cluster Identity - CNPG Cluster: `apps-pg` - Namespace: `databases` - PostgreSQL major version: `16` - Primary endpoint: `apps-pg-rw.databases.svc.cluster.local:5432` - Read-only endpoint: `apps-pg-ro.databases.svc.cluster.local:5432` - Bootstrap database: `apps_meta` - Bootstrap role: `apps_admin` `apps_admin` is a platform bootstrap and smoke-test role. Do not copy it into application namespaces, use it in S5 runtime configuration, or treat it as a consumer credential. ## Which cluster this is **Two reachable clusters each carry a CNPG `Cluster` named `apps-pg` in a namespace named `databases`.** The one this document describes is **railiance01** (k3s v1.35.1) — it also carries `platform-pg` and `forgejo-db`, and holds both apps-pg consumers (`vergabe_db`, `coulomb_social_db`). The other cluster carries `gitea-db` and only one apps-pg consumer. Selecting the right one by kubeconfig filename is not safe: `KUBECONFIG` is an environment variable that overrides the Makefile default, and both files resolve to a `127.0.0.1` tunnel port. Every `apps-pg-*` target therefore runs `railiance01-guard` first, which compares the live `kube-system` namespace UID against `RAILIANCE01_CLUSTER_UID` and fails closed on mismatch or unreachability. ```bash make cluster-id # what KUBECONFIG currently selects make railiance01-guard # assert it is railiance01, or refuse ``` If a target refuses, the fix is `KUBECONFIG=~/.kube/config-railiance01`, not `--force` and not editing the pinned UID. `db-status` deliberately targets the other cluster for `gitea-db`, which is why the guard is per-target. ## Consumer Onboarding Each S5 application gets its own role, database, and runtime Secret. The current flow is platform-administered until OpenBao or a dedicated database onboarding automation owns the lifecycle end to end. 1. Request an app database in the consuming repo workplan. Include the app name, namespace, database name, role name, intended owners, and any required extensions. 2. Platform reviews and approves the database/role names. Names should be app-scoped, for example `vergabe` and `vergabe_db`. 3. Platform provisions the backing PostgreSQL role and credential for the approved app. Until automation exists, this is a controlled operator SQL action against `apps-pg`, not a self-service repo apply. 4. Add a CNPG `Database` manifest in the platform-managed database manifests, with `spec.cluster.name: apps-pg` and `spec.owner` set to the approved role. 5. Label the consuming namespace so NetworkPolicy allows access: ```bash kubectl label namespace \ railiance.io/postgres-client=apps-pg ``` 6. Publish or mirror the runtime Secret into the consumer namespace. The Secret should contain only that app's role credential and DSN fields. 7. Wire the DSN into the application Helm values or runtime configuration. Prefer the RW service for migrations and writes: `postgresql://:@apps-pg-rw.databases.svc.cluster.local:5432/`. Example CNPG `Database` resource: ```yaml apiVersion: postgresql.cnpg.io/v1 kind: Database metadata: name: vergabe-db namespace: databases spec: cluster: name: apps-pg name: vergabe_db owner: vergabe ``` ## CNPG Boundary CNPG 1.28 provides a standalone `Database` CRD. It does not provide a standalone `Role` CRD in this cluster. Role lifecycle is cluster-scoped, through `Cluster.spec.managed.roles` or a controlled SQL workflow. Consumer repos must therefore not assume they can create PostgreSQL roles themselves. They can request a database and consume a runtime Secret after the platform role has been provisioned. ## Network Policy The `databases` namespace has a default-deny posture. `apps-pg` accepts client traffic on TCP/5432 only from namespaces labeled: ```text railiance.io/postgres-client=apps-pg ``` The CNPG operator in `cnpg-system` is allowed to manage the cluster on the standard PostgreSQL, instance manager, and metrics ports. ## Consumers (live) | App | Role | Database | Password secret (databases ns) | Consumer ns label | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | vergabe-teilnahme | `vergabe` | `vergabe_db` | `vergabe-app-credentials` | `vergabe-teilnahme` | | coulomb-social | `coulomb_social` | `coulomb_social_db` | `coulomb-social-app-credentials` | `coulomb-social` | Bootstrapped 2026-08-09 on railiance01: cluster healthy; both Database CRs applied; coulomb-social connectivity smoke from labeled consumer ns OK. ## Backup And Roadmap `apps-pg` remains a conservative single-instance, 10Gi cluster. The desired state now includes continuous WAL archival, a daily 02:15 UTC base backup and 30-day retention under the distinct `platform-pg/apps-pg/` object-store prefix. The credential lane and its bucket-policy top-level prefix are shared with `platform-pg`; the backup data path beneath that prefix is not. The declared ceiling is three consumers. Each gets at most 20 connections; 40 of the explicit 100-connection aggregate remains for CNPG and operator headroom. Memory (1Gi limit), not the clean connection refusal, is treated as the binding safety constraint. A fourth consumer goes to the named `apps-pg-2` overflow substrate, which must be provisioned before onboarding. Reviewed, unapplied source for that cell is `helm/apps-pg-2-{cluster,backup,networkpolicies}.yaml`; it uses a distinct bootstrap Secret and backup prefix. `make apps-pg-verify-capacity` rejects a fourth role on either cell, missing connection limits, duplicate roles, missing resource envelopes, or a reused backup path. `statement_timeout` and `idle_in_transaction_session_timeout` are 15 seconds per consumer role. CNPG 1.28 cannot express those role settings, so `helm/apps-pg-consumer-controls.sql` is the idempotent controlled-operator step; `connectionLimit` remains declaratively reconciled by CNPG. The same SQL removes PostgreSQL's default `PUBLIC` `CONNECT`/`TEMPORARY` grants and grants each consumer role access only to its own database. Resource evidence for `resource:railiance:apps-pg` (capacity, recovery, labor, allocation drivers) is published under `docs/evidence/RAILIANCE-WP-0016-apps-pg-resource-evidence.md`. The 2026-08-14 observation remains historically correct. Live backup, restore and isolation evidence captured on 2026-08-20 is in `docs/evidence/RPF-WP-0019-backup-restore-2026-08-20.md` and `docs/evidence/RPF-WP-0019-isolation-2026-08-20.md`.