docs(RMGR-WP-0005): registrar fix is gated on the railiance01 remote sweep
The registrar fix is one env var, not host provisioning: the state-hub deployment has STATEHUB_REGISTRAR unset, and that pod is the real automated instance -- it mounts /home/tegwick rw and /home/tegwick/.ssh for push. But setting it now would be harmful. railiance01 has 70 repos still on gitea-remote (92.205.130.254) against 7 on forgejo-remote (92.205.62.239), while the workstation is 126/0 on forgejo. The pod would mint identifiers into checkouts tracking the superseded server and push them there. Records the required order -- reconcile railiance01's remotes first, then enable the registrar -- and that the sweep pod is currently operating against those stale checkouts. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
72a01c0b2f
commit
de97132aef
1 changed files with 40 additions and 3 deletions
|
|
@ -101,9 +101,46 @@ Two consequences beyond this task:
|
|||
- **Security.** The `state-hub` pod mounts `/home/tegwick` **and
|
||||
`/home/tegwick/.ssh`** as hostPath volumes. A workload with the operator's
|
||||
private keys is a larger exposure than the registrar problem it surfaced.
|
||||
- **The remote sweep is incomplete.** If `railiance01` was missed, other hosts
|
||||
may also still point at `gitea-remote`; anything reconciling from them compares
|
||||
against a stale lineage.
|
||||
- **The remote sweep is incomplete, and this gates the registrar fix.** Counted
|
||||
2026-08-21:
|
||||
|
||||
| Host | `forgejo-remote` | `gitea-remote` |
|
||||
| --- | --- | --- |
|
||||
| workstation | 126 | 0 |
|
||||
| `railiance01` | 7 | **70** |
|
||||
|
||||
The two aliases are different servers — `forgejo-remote` is `92.205.62.239`
|
||||
(railiance01), `gitea-remote` is `92.205.130.254` (coulombcore) — and both are
|
||||
live. The workstation finished migrating; `railiance01` did not.
|
||||
`forgejo-tier3-remote-url-sweep-playbook` still reads "Gitea remains canonical",
|
||||
which was true when written on 2026-07-04 and is now stale guidance.
|
||||
|
||||
### Why the registrar cannot simply be switched on
|
||||
|
||||
The fix looked like one environment variable: the `state-hub` **deployment** has
|
||||
`STATEHUB_REGISTRAR` unset, and that pod is the real automated instance — it
|
||||
mounts `/home/tegwick` read-write, mounts `/home/tegwick/.ssh` at `/root/.ssh`
|
||||
for push, and carries `STATE_HUB_SWEEP_HOSTNAME`. Host-level provisioning was the
|
||||
wrong target.
|
||||
|
||||
**Setting it today would be actively harmful.** The pod would begin minting
|
||||
identifiers into 70 checkouts that track the superseded server and pushing them
|
||||
there — writing hub primary keys into a lineage nothing reads, and re-animating
|
||||
`gitea-remote` as a write target.
|
||||
|
||||
Required order:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Re-point `railiance01`'s checkouts to `forgejo-remote`, keeping `gitea` as the
|
||||
rollback mirror the playbook specifies. Content diverges — `evidence-binder`
|
||||
there is at `a715492` against the workstation's `9e3f4a6` — so this is a
|
||||
reconcile, not a URL rewrite.
|
||||
2. Then set `STATEHUB_REGISTRAR=1` on the deployment.
|
||||
|
||||
Reversing the order mints into the wrong lineage at fleet scale.
|
||||
|
||||
**Open question worth answering first:** the sweep pod is running now against
|
||||
those 70 stale checkouts. Establish what it has been pushing to `gitea-remote`
|
||||
before changing anything.
|
||||
|
||||
## Re-register identifiers minted outside the registrar
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue