I retired OPS-WP on the reasoning that it names an ops family rather than a repository, without checking whether a repo owns it. ops-hub does: all 14 of its workplans use it. The anomaly is the reverse of what I wrote - the 16 OPS-WP ids in ops-bridge are the strays, against its 73 BRIDGE-WP ids. Recorded as debt rather than fixed here: re-keying those 16 to BRIDGE-WP is a separate migration with its own hub retirements, and today's pass is scoped to ad-hoc identifiers. WHYNOT-WP stays with whynot-design (26 ids vs whynot-control's 6), ruled by Bernd. whynot-control's 6 are the same class of stray. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Assistant: claude-code Assistant-Model: opus Assistant-Process: 2583210@bnt-lap001 Assistant-Session: f2bff2d5-e9b2-4338-92ca-10282a927006 |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| assistant-provenance.yaml | ||
| dual-run.pilot.example.yaml | ||
| fleet-namespace.yaml | ||
| hub-record-authority.yaml | ||
| work-record-types.yaml | ||
| workplan-prefix-registry.yaml | ||