repo-manager/config
tegwick 906cc2d7a9 fix(registrar): OPS-WP belongs to ops-hub, not retirement
I retired OPS-WP on the reasoning that it names an ops family rather than a
repository, without checking whether a repo owns it. ops-hub does: all 14 of
its workplans use it. The anomaly is the reverse of what I wrote - the 16
OPS-WP ids in ops-bridge are the strays, against its 73 BRIDGE-WP ids.

Recorded as debt rather than fixed here: re-keying those 16 to BRIDGE-WP is a
separate migration with its own hub retirements, and today's pass is scoped to
ad-hoc identifiers.

WHYNOT-WP stays with whynot-design (26 ids vs whynot-control's 6), ruled by
Bernd. whynot-control's 6 are the same class of stray.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: opus
Assistant-Process: 2583210@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: f2bff2d5-e9b2-4338-92ca-10282a927006
2026-08-28 00:58:57 +02:00
..
assistant-provenance.yaml feat: advance repository records and provenance 2026-08-21 22:07:48 +02:00
dual-run.pilot.example.yaml feat(RMGR-WP-0003): production pilot dual-run config, bulk, push 2026-08-11 02:32:14 +02:00
fleet-namespace.yaml feat(identifier): declare helixforge fleet namespace 2026-08-21 23:57:03 +02:00
hub-record-authority.yaml feat: finish register receiving and authority routing 2026-08-21 23:15:48 +02:00
work-record-types.yaml fix(identity): enforce qualified ad-hoc identifiers 2026-08-23 14:45:26 +02:00
workplan-prefix-registry.yaml fix(registrar): OPS-WP belongs to ops-hub, not retirement 2026-08-28 00:58:57 +02:00