Route auto review requests to agentic review
This commit is contained in:
parent
9fa1d9e9b5
commit
8f484cd855
15 changed files with 208 additions and 47 deletions
|
|
@ -49,9 +49,10 @@ LLMs are most useful for naming and explaining intent:
|
|||
- summarizing README and code context into clearer ability descriptions
|
||||
- suggesting merges or relinks when deterministic names are too generic
|
||||
|
||||
LLM output remains candidate material. It should cite source paths and be reviewed
|
||||
or explicitly auto-approved by a trusted mode before becoming approved registry
|
||||
truth.
|
||||
LLM output remains candidate material. It should cite source paths and be
|
||||
reviewed by a human or configured agentic reviewer before becoming approved
|
||||
registry truth. Deterministic checks can block or flag weak candidates; they do
|
||||
not approve them.
|
||||
|
||||
## Trial Repo Observations
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue