Add Forgejo CI smoke workflow (enablement template)

Add statehub register consumer guide and validation checklist, register
capability.infotech.repo-template in the registry index, and close the
workplan after filling repo identity placeholders and README bootstrap steps.

.claude/rules/agents.md

@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+## Kaizen Agents
+
+Specialized agent personas available on demand via the state-hub MCP.
+
+**Discover:** `list_kaizen_agents()` — returns all agents with name, description, category
+**Load:** `get_kaizen_agent("tdd-workflow")` — returns full instructions; read and follow them
+
+Common agents:
+
+| Agent | Category | When to use |
+|-------|----------|-------------|
+| `tdd-workflow` | testing | Step-by-step TDD8 workflow for any feature |
+| `code-refactoring` | quality | Code quality analysis and safe refactoring |
+| `test-maintenance` | testing | Diagnose and fix failing tests |
+| `requirements-engineering` | process | Prevent interface/mock mismatches upfront |
+| `keepaTodofile` | process | Maintain TODO.md during work |
+| `project-management` | process | Track status, determine next steps |
+| `datamodel-optimization` | quality | Optimize dataclasses and data structures |
+
+All 17 agents: call `list_kaizen_agents()` for the full list.

.claude/rules/architecture.md

@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+## Architecture
+
+<!-- TODO: Describe the key design decisions and component structure.
+     Key modules, data flows, external integrations, state machines, etc. -->
+
+## Quick Reference
+
+`~/state-hub/mcp_server/TOOLS.md` — MCP tool reference

.claude/rules/credential-routing.md

@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
+# Credential and access routing
+
+**Audience:** Codex, Claude Code, Grok, and custodian agents that call **llm-connect**
+for inference. Run this check **before** requesting secrets, API keys, SSH access,
+login tokens, or database passwords — in any repo, not only `ops-warden`.
+
+ops-warden **issues SSH certificates only** (`warden sign`, `cert_command`). Every
+other credential need belongs to another subsystem. **Do not** message
+`ops-warden` on State Hub expecting a secret value; the reply is a pointer, not a key.
+
+### Lookup (do this first)
+
+```bash
+warden route find "<describe your need>" --json
+warden route show <catalog-id> --json
+```
+
+Requires the `warden` CLI from `~/ops-warden` (`uv tool install .` or `uv run warden`).
+
+| Agent runtime | How to orient |
+| --- | --- |
+| **Codex / Grok** (shell, HTTP State Hub) | `warden route` commands above; inbox `to_agent=repo-seed` is for coordination, not secret vending |
+| **Claude Code** (MCP when available) | `get_domain_summary("custodian")` for workstreams; **still** use `warden route` for credential ownership |
+| **llm-connect** (inference service) | Never put secret retrieval in prompts; route custody to OpenBao/operator paths surfaced by `warden route` |
+
+### Quick routing table
+
+| I need… | Owner | ops-warden executes? |
+| --- | --- | --- |
+| SSH cert (`adm`/`agt`/`atm`) | ops-warden | **Yes** — `warden sign` |
+| API key, DB password, provider token | OpenBao (`railiance-platform`) | No — route only |
+| Login / OIDC / MFA | key-cape / Keycloak | No — route only |
+| Authorization decision | flex-auth | No — route only |
+| activity-core → issue-core emission | activity-core + issue-core | No — `warden route show activity-core-issue-sink` |
+| SSH tunnel | ops-bridge (+ `cert_command` from warden) | No — route only |
+
+### Anti-patterns (do not do these)
+
+- `POST /messages/` to `ops-warden` asking for `ISSUE_CORE_API_KEY`, `OPENROUTER_API_KEY`, etc.
+- Inventing `warden secret`, `warden login`, `warden bao`, `warden tunnel` — they do not exist
+- Pasting secrets into Git, State Hub, workplans, logs, or chat
+
+### Other capabilities (reuse-surface)
+
+Non-credential capabilities are usually discovered through **reuse-surface** federation
+(`reuse-surface` registry / `capability.*` indexes). Credential routing is inlined in
+every repo's agent instructions because it is high-frequency, high-risk, and easy to
+get wrong.
+
+**Canon:** `~/ops-warden/wiki/CredentialRouting.md` · catalog `~/ops-warden/registry/routing/catalog.yaml`

.claude/rules/first-session.md

@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
+## First Session Protocol
+
+Triggered when `get_domain_summary("infotech")` shows **no workstreams**.
+The project is registered but work has not yet been structured.
+
+**Step 1 — Read, don't write**
+- `~/the-custodian/canon/projects/infotech/project_charter_v0.1.md` — purpose, scope
+- `~/the-custodian/canon/projects/infotech/roadmap_v0.1.md` — planned phases
+- Scan repo root: README, directory structure, existing code or docs
+
+**Step 2 — Survey in-progress work**
+Look for TODOs, open branches, half-finished files. Note done vs. started but incomplete.
+
+**Step 3 — Propose workstreams to Bernd**
+Propose 1–3 workstreams — each a coherent strand, weeks to months, anchored to a
+roadmap phase. **Wait for approval before creating.**
+
+**Step 4 — Create workplan file first, then DB record (ADR-001)**
+```
+workplans/REPO-WP-NNNN-<slug>.md   ← write this first
+```
+Then register in the hub:
+```
+create_workstream(topic_id="cee7bedf-2b48-46ef-8601-006474f2ad7a", title="...", owner="...", description="...")
+create_task(workstream_id="<id>", title="...", priority="high|medium|low")
+```
+
+**Step 5 — Record the setup**
+```
+add_progress_event(
+    summary="First session: structured infotech into N workstreams, M tasks",
+    event_type="milestone",
+    topic_id="cee7bedf-2b48-46ef-8601-006474f2ad7a",
+    detail={"workstreams": [...], "tasks_created": M}
+)
+```
+
+<!-- Delete or archive this file once past first session -->

.claude/rules/repo-boundary.md

@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+## Repo boundary
+
+This repo owns **Repo Seed** only. It does not own:
+
+<!-- TODO: List what belongs in adjacent repos, e.g.:
+- SSH key management → railiance-infra/
+- State hub code     → state-hub/
+-->

.claude/rules/repo-identity.md

@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+**Purpose:** Git repository template to bootstrap coulomb projects.
+
+**Domain:** infotech
+**Repo slug:** repo-seed
+**Topic ID:** cee7bedf-2b48-46ef-8601-006474f2ad7a

.claude/rules/session-protocol.md

@@ -0,0 +1,85 @@
+## Session Protocol
+
+Dev Hub (State Hub API): http://127.0.0.1:8000
+MCP server name in `~/.claude.json`: `dev-hub`
+
+**Step 1 — Orient**
+
+Read the offline-safe brief first — it works without a live hub connection:
+```bash
+cat .custodian-brief.md
+```
+Then call the MCP tool for richer cross-domain context when MCP tools are exposed:
+```
+get_domain_summary("infotech")
+```
+If MCP tools are unavailable in the current agent session, use the REST API:
+```bash
+curl -s "http://127.0.0.1:8000/state/summary" | python3 -m json.tool
+```
+If the hub is offline: `cd ~/state-hub && make api`
+
+**Step 2 — Check inbox**
+With MCP tools:
+```
+get_messages(to_agent="repo-seed", unread_only=True)
+```
+Mark read with `mark_message_read(message_id)`. Reply or act on coordination
+requests before proceeding.
+
+Without MCP tools:
+```bash
+curl -s "http://127.0.0.1:8000/messages/?to_agent=repo-seed&unread_only=true" \
+  | python3 -m json.tool
+curl -s -X PATCH "http://127.0.0.1:8000/messages/<id>/read" \
+  -H "Content-Type: application/json" -d '{}'
+```
+
+**Step 3 — Scan workplans**
+```bash
+ls workplans/
+```
+For each file with `status: ready`, `active`, or `blocked`, note pending
+`wait`/`todo`/`progress` tasks.
+
+**Step 4 — Present brief**
+
+1. **Active workstreams** for `infotech` — title, task counts, blocking decisions
+2. **Pending tasks** from `workplans/` + any `[repo:repo-seed]` hub tasks
+3. **Goal guidance** — if `goal_guidance` in summary:
+   - `needs_workplan`: surface as top action — *"Repo goal '{title}' has no workplan yet"*
+   - `alignment_warnings`: flag if active work is not aligned with current goal
+4. **Suggested next action** — highest-priority open item
+5. **SBOM status** — flag if `last_sbom_at` is unset for this repo
+
+If no workstreams: follow First Session Protocol (`first-session.md`).
+
+**During work:** `record_decision()` · `add_progress_event()` · `resolve_decision()`
+
+> State Hub is a *read model*. Bootstrap tools (`create_workstream`, `create_task`)
+> are First Session Protocol only. Work structure belongs in repo files (ADR-001).
+
+**Session close:**
+With MCP tools:
+```
+add_progress_event(summary="...", topic_id="cee7bedf-2b48-46ef-8601-006474f2ad7a", workstream_id="<uuid>")
+```
+Without MCP tools:
+```bash
+curl -s -X POST http://127.0.0.1:8000/progress/ \
+  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
+  -d '{"topic_id":"cee7bedf-2b48-46ef-8601-006474f2ad7a","workstream_id":"<uuid>","event_type":"note","summary":"what changed","author":"codex"}'
+```
+If workplan files were modified, ensure the local copy is up to date first:
+```bash
+git -C <repo_path> pull --ff-only
+cd ~/state-hub && make fix-consistency REPO=repo-seed
+```
+For repos where implementation runs on a remote machine (e.g. CoulombCore),
+use the combined target which pulls before fixing:
+```bash
+cd ~/state-hub && make fix-consistency-remote REPO=repo-seed
+```
+**C-15** (DB task ahead of file) is normal in multi-machine workflows — writeback
+will sync the file to match DB.  **C-16** (repo behind remote) blocks all writes
+until you pull — intentional to prevent clobbering remote progress.

.claude/rules/stack-and-commands.md

@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+## Stack
+
+- **Language:** Markdown-first registry and planning repo (no application runtime yet)
+- **Key deps:** State Hub ADR-001 workplans, `registry/indexes/capabilities.yaml`
+
+## Dev Commands
+
+```bash
+# Orient (offline-safe)
+cat .custodian-brief.md
+cat README.md
+cat SCOPE.md
+ls workplans/
+
+# Consumer bootstrap docs
+cat docs/statehub-register.md
+cat docs/template-validation-checklist.md
+
+# After workplan or registry edits — from ~/state-hub
+make fix-consistency REPO=repo-seed
+
+# Validate registry entries (from reuse-surface checkout)
+reuse-surface validate --root .
+
+# Sanity-check markdown / registry edits
+git diff --check
+```

.claude/rules/workplan-convention.md

@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
+## Workplan Convention (ADR-001)
+
+File location: `workplans/REPO-WP-NNNN-<slug>.md`
+ID prefix: `REPO-WP-`
+
+Work items originate as files in this repo **before** being registered in the hub.
+
+Canonical workplan/workstream frontmatter statuses are:
+`proposed`, `ready`, `active`, `blocked`, `backlog`, `finished`, `archived`.
+Use `proposed` for a newly drafted plan, `ready` after review against current
+repo state, and `finished` when implementation is complete. `stalled` and
+`needs_review` are derived health labels, not stored statuses.
+
+Closed workplans may be moved to `workplans/archived/` with a completion-date
+prefix: `YYMMDD-REPO-WP-NNNN-<slug>.md`. The frontmatter id remains
+unchanged; the prefix is only for quick visual reference.
+
+Small opportunistic tasks discovered during another session use **Ad Hoc Tasks**:
+`workplans/ADHOC-YYYY-MM-DD.md`, workstream slug `adhoc-YYYY-MM-DD`, and task ids
+`ADHOC-YYYY-MM-DD-T01`, `T02`, etc. Use adhocs only for low-risk work completed
+directly. Promote anything requiring analysis, design, approval, dependencies, or
+multiple planned phases into a normal workplan.
+
+Ecosystem todos from other agents arrive as `[repo:repo-seed]` hub tasks —
+visible at session start. Pick one up by creating the workplan file, then registering
+the workstream.
+
+Task blocks use this shape:
+
+```task
+id: REPO-WP-NNNN-T01
+status: wait | todo | progress | done | cancel
+priority: high | medium | low
+state_hub_task_id: "<uuid>"         # written by fix-consistency — do not edit
+```
+
+Status progression is `todo` → `progress` → `done`; use `wait` for waiting or
+blocked work and `cancel` for stopped work.
+
+<!-- Ralph Loop rules and HEUREKA sequence: ~/.claude/CLAUDE.md — do not duplicate here -->

.custodian-brief.md

@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+<!-- custodian-brief: generated by fix-consistency — do not edit manually -->
+# Custodian Brief — repo-seed
+
+**Domain:** infotech  
+**Last synced:** 2026-06-24 13:36 UTC  
+**State Hub:** http://127.0.0.1:8000 *(adjust if running on a remote machine)*
+
+## Active Workstreams
+
+*(none — repo may need first-session setup)*
+
+---
+## MCP Orientation (when available)
+
+If the state-hub MCP server is reachable, call:
+`get_domain_summary("infotech")`
+This provides richer cross-domain context.
+If the MCP call fails, use this file as your orientation source.

.forgejo/workflows/ci-smoke.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+# Canonical CI smoke template (tier 1 routing drill).
+# Copy to: .forgejo/workflows/ci-smoke.yaml in consumer repos.
+name: CI Smoke
+
+on:
+  push:
+    branches:
+      - main
+  workflow_dispatch:
+
+jobs:
+  host-smoke:
+    runs-on: self-hosted
+    steps:
+      - name: Routing probe (host runner)
+        run: |
+          set -eu
+          echo "repository=${GITHUB_REPOSITORY:-unknown}"
+          echo "sha=${GITHUB_SHA:-unknown}"
+          echo "runner=${RUNNER_NAME:-unknown}"
+          uname -a
+
+  container-smoke:
+    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
+    steps:
+      - name: Routing probe (container label)
+        run: |
+          set -eu
+          echo "container-smoke ok for ${GITHUB_REPOSITORY:-unknown}"

.repo-classification.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+repo_classification:
+  standard: Repo Classification Standard
+  version: '1.0'
+  classified_at: '2026-06-22'
+  classified_by: agent
+  category: tooling
+  domain: infotech
+  secondary_domains: []
+  capability_tags:
+  - platform
+  - configuration
+  - documentation
+  business_stake:
+  - technology
+  - execution
+  business_mechanics:
+  - operation
+  notes: Git template for bootstrapping coulomb projects.

AGENTS.md

@@ -0,0 +1,219 @@
+# Repo Seed — Agent Instructions
+
+## Repo Identity
+
+**Purpose:** Git repository template to bootstrap coulomb projects.
+
+**Domain:** infotech
+**Repo slug:** repo-seed
+**Topic ID:** `cee7bedf-2b48-46ef-8601-006474f2ad7a`
+**Workplan prefix:** `REPO-WP-`
+
+---
+
+## State Hub Integration
+
+The Custodian State Hub tracks work across all domains. Interact via HTTP REST —
+there is no MCP server for Codex agents.
+
+| Context | URL |
+|---------|-----|
+| Local workstation | `http://127.0.0.1:8000` |
+| Remote via tunnel | `http://127.0.0.1:18000` |
+
+### Orient at session start
+
+```bash
+# Offline brief — works without hub connection
+cat .custodian-brief.md
+
+# Active workstreams for this domain
+curl -s "http://127.0.0.1:8000/workstreams/?topic_id=cee7bedf-2b48-46ef-8601-006474f2ad7a&status=active" \
+  | python3 -m json.tool
+
+# Check inbox
+curl -s "http://127.0.0.1:8000/messages/?to_agent=repo-seed&unread_only=true" \
+  | python3 -m json.tool
+```
+
+Mark a message read:
+```bash
+curl -s -X PATCH "http://127.0.0.1:8000/messages/<id>/read" \
+  -H "Content-Type: application/json" -d '{}'
+```
+
+### Log progress (required at session close)
+
+```bash
+curl -s -X POST http://127.0.0.1:8000/progress/ \
+  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
+  -d '{
+    "summary": "what was done",
+    "event_type": "note",
+    "author": "codex",
+    "workstream_id": "<uuid>",
+    "task_id": "<uuid>"
+  }'
+```
+
+Omit `workstream_id` / `task_id` when not applicable.
+
+### Update task status
+
+```bash
+curl -s -X PATCH "http://127.0.0.1:8000/tasks/<task_id>" \
+  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
+  -d '{"status": "progress"}'
+# values: wait | todo | progress | done | cancel
+```
+
+### Flag a task for human review
+
+```bash
+curl -s -X PATCH "http://127.0.0.1:8000/tasks/<task_id>" \
+  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
+  -d '{"needs_human": true, "intervention_note": "reason"}'
+```
+
+---
+
+## Session Protocol
+
+**Start:**
+1. `cat .custodian-brief.md` — domain goal and open workstreams (offline-safe)
+2. Check inbox: `GET /messages/?to_agent=repo-seed&unread_only=true`; mark read
+3. Scan workplans: `ls workplans/` — note `status: ready`, `active`, or `blocked` files and open tasks
+4. Check human-needed tasks: `GET /tasks/?needs_human=true`
+
+**During work:**
+- Update task statuses in workplan files as tasks progress
+- Record significant decisions via `POST /decisions/`
+
+**Close:**
+1. Update workplan file task statuses to reflect progress
+2. Log: `POST /progress/` with a summary of what changed
+3. Note for the custodian operator: after workplan file changes, run from
+   `~/state-hub`:
+   ```bash
+   make fix-consistency REPO=repo-seed
+   ```
+   This syncs task status from files into the hub DB.
+
+---
+
+## Credential and access routing
+
+**Audience:** Codex, Claude Code, Grok, and custodian agents that call **llm-connect**
+for inference. Run this check **before** requesting secrets, API keys, SSH access,
+login tokens, or database passwords — in any repo, not only `ops-warden`.
+
+ops-warden **issues SSH certificates only** (`warden sign`, `cert_command`). Every
+other credential need belongs to another subsystem. **Do not** message
+`ops-warden` on State Hub expecting a secret value; the reply is a pointer, not a key.
+
+### Lookup (do this first)
+
+```bash
+warden route find "<describe your need>" --json
+warden route show <catalog-id> --json
+```
+
+Requires the `warden` CLI from `~/ops-warden` (`uv tool install .` or `uv run warden`).
+
+| Agent runtime | How to orient |
+| --- | --- |
+| **Codex / Grok** (shell, HTTP State Hub) | `warden route` commands above; inbox `to_agent=repo-seed` is for coordination, not secret vending |
+| **Claude Code** (MCP when available) | `get_domain_summary("custodian")` for workstreams; **still** use `warden route` for credential ownership |
+| **llm-connect** (inference service) | Never put secret retrieval in prompts; route custody to OpenBao/operator paths surfaced by `warden route` |
+
+### Quick routing table
+
+| I need… | Owner | ops-warden executes? |
+| --- | --- | --- |
+| SSH cert (`adm`/`agt`/`atm`) | ops-warden | **Yes** — `warden sign` |
+| API key, DB password, provider token | OpenBao (`railiance-platform`) | No — route only |
+| Login / OIDC / MFA | key-cape / Keycloak | No — route only |
+| Authorization decision | flex-auth | No — route only |
+| activity-core → issue-core emission | activity-core + issue-core | No — `warden route show activity-core-issue-sink` |
+| SSH tunnel | ops-bridge (+ `cert_command` from warden) | No — route only |
+
+### Anti-patterns (do not do these)
+
+- `POST /messages/` to `ops-warden` asking for `ISSUE_CORE_API_KEY`, `OPENROUTER_API_KEY`, etc.
+- Inventing `warden secret`, `warden login`, `warden bao`, `warden tunnel` — they do not exist
+- Pasting secrets into Git, State Hub, workplans, logs, or chat
+
+### Other capabilities (reuse-surface)
+
+Non-credential capabilities are usually discovered through **reuse-surface** federation
+(`reuse-surface` registry / `capability.*` indexes). Credential routing is inlined in
+every repo's agent instructions because it is high-frequency, high-risk, and easy to
+get wrong.
+
+**Canon:** `~/ops-warden/wiki/CredentialRouting.md` · catalog `~/ops-warden/registry/routing/catalog.yaml`
+
+<!-- REPO-AGENTS-EXTENSIONS -->
+<!-- Append repo-specific agent instructions below this marker.
+     The state-hub template sync preserves content after this line. -->
+
+---
+
+## Workplan Convention (ADR-001)
+
+Work items originate as files in this repo — not in the hub. The hub is a
+read/cache/index layer that rebuilds from files.
+
+**File location:** `workplans/REPO-WP-NNNN-<slug>.md`
+
+**Archived location:** finished workplans may move to
+`workplans/archived/YYMMDD-REPO-WP-NNNN-<slug>.md`. The `YYMMDD` prefix is
+the completion/archive date; the frontmatter `id` does not change.
+
+**Ad Hoc Tasks:** small opportunistic fixes discovered during a session use
+`workplans/ADHOC-YYYY-MM-DD.md` with task ids `ADHOC-YYYY-MM-DD-T01`, etc. Use
+this only for low-risk work completed directly; create a normal workplan for
+anything needing analysis, design, approval, dependencies, or multiple phases.
+
+**Frontmatter:**
+
+```yaml
+---
+id: REPO-WP-NNNN
+type: workplan
+title: "..."
+domain: infotech
+repo: repo-seed
+status: proposed | ready | active | blocked | backlog | finished | archived
+owner: codex
+topic_slug: ...
+created: "YYYY-MM-DD"
+updated: "YYYY-MM-DD"
+state_hub_workstream_id: "<uuid>"   # written by fix-consistency — do not edit
+---
+```
+
+Use `proposed` for a new draft, `ready` after review against current repo
+state, and `finished` after implementation. `stalled` and `needs_review` are
+derived health labels, not frontmatter statuses.
+
+**Task block format** (one per `##` section):
+
+```
+## Task Title
+
+` ` `task
+id: REPO-WP-NNNN-T01
+status: wait | todo | progress | done | cancel
+priority: high | medium | low
+state_hub_task_id: "<uuid>"         # written by fix-consistency — do not edit
+` ` `
+
+Task description text.
+```
+
+Status progression: `todo` → `progress` → `done`; use `wait` for waiting/blocked work and `cancel` for stopped work.
+
+To create a new workplan:
+1. Write the file following the format above
+2. Notify the custodian operator to run `make fix-consistency REPO=repo-seed`
+   (or send a message to the hub agent via `POST /messages/`)

CLAUDE.md

@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+# Repo Seed — Claude Code Instructions
+
+@SCOPE.md
+@.claude/rules/repo-identity.md
+@.claude/rules/session-protocol.md
+@.claude/rules/first-session.md
+@.claude/rules/workplan-convention.md
+@.claude/rules/stack-and-commands.md
+@.claude/rules/architecture.md
+@.claude/rules/repo-boundary.md
+@.claude/rules/credential-routing.md
+@.claude/rules/agents.md

README.md

@@ -1,3 +1,16 @@
 # repo-seed
 
-A git repository template to bootstrap coulomb projects from.
+A git repository template to bootstrap coulomb projects from.
+
+## Bootstrap a new repo
+
+1. Clone or copy this template into a new repository.
+2. Run `statehub register` from the new repo root (see [docs/statehub-register.md](docs/statehub-register.md)).
+3. Complete the generated bootstrap workplan (`*-0001-statehub-bootstrap.md`).
+4. Sync workplans: `cd ~/state-hub && make fix-consistency REPO=<slug>`.
+5. Validate with [docs/template-validation-checklist.md](docs/template-validation-checklist.md).
+
+## Registry
+
+This repo publishes `capability.infotech.repo-template` — see
+`registry/capabilities/capability.infotech.repo-template.md`.

SCOPE.md

@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
+# SCOPE
+
+> Lightweight boundary for agents and contributors.
+
+---
+
+## One-liner
+
+Git repository template to bootstrap coulomb projects.
+
+---
+
+## Core Idea
+
+repo-seed is the canonical template for new repos: agent instructions, registry scaffold, and onboarding conventions.
+
+---
+
+## In Scope
+
+- Template files for new repo bootstrap
+- Documentation for statehub_register usage
+- Registry capability entry for template capability
+
+---
+
+## Out of Scope
+
+- Application runtime code
+- Owning downstream project implementations
+

docs/statehub-register.md

@@ -0,0 +1,104 @@
+# statehub register — Consumer Guide
+
+Use this guide when bootstrapping a new Coulomb repository from the `repo-seed`
+template and registering it with Custodian State Hub.
+
+## Prerequisites
+
+- State Hub API running locally (`cd ~/state-hub && make api`) or reachable via tunnel
+- `statehub` CLI installed from `~/state-hub` (`uv tool install .` or `uv run statehub`)
+- A git repository cloned or copied from `repo-seed` (or an equivalent scaffold)
+
+## Quick start
+
+From the new repository root:
+
+```bash
+cd /path/to/new-repo
+
+# Optional: skip LLM inference and supply facts manually
+statehub register \
+  --domain <domain-slug> \
+  --repo-slug <repo-slug> \
+  --wp-prefix <PREFIX-WP> \
+  --description "One-sentence repo purpose." \
+  --no-llm
+
+# Operator follow-up (from state-hub checkout)
+cd ~/state-hub
+make fix-consistency REPO=<repo-slug>
+```
+
+`statehub register` is idempotent: existing files are not overwritten unless you
+pass `--force`.
+
+## What register writes
+
+`statehub register` inspects the repository, infers identity (optionally via
+`llm-connect`), and writes these files when absent:
+
+| File | Purpose |
+|------|---------|
+| `INTENT.md` | Why the repository exists |
+| `SCOPE.md` | In/out scope and current state |
+| `AGENTS.md` | Codex/Grok agent instructions with repo identity placeholders filled |
+| `.custodian-brief.md` | Offline-safe session orientation |
+| `workplans/<PREFIX>-0001-statehub-bootstrap.md` | First workplan with T01–T03 bootstrap tasks |
+
+It also registers the repo and host path through the State Hub API and records a
+progress milestone.
+
+## Template extras (from repo-seed)
+
+Cloning `repo-seed` provides additional scaffold not written by `register`:
+
+| Path | Purpose |
+|------|---------|
+| `CLAUDE.md` + `.claude/rules/` | Claude Code agent instructions |
+| `registry/` | Capability registry scaffold |
+| `README.md`, `LICENSE`, `.gitignore` | Project metadata |
+| `.repo-classification.yaml` | Repo classification metadata |
+
+After `register`, complete the bootstrap workplan (`*-0001-statehub-bootstrap.md`):
+
+1. **T01** — Review and refine generated integration files
+2. **T02** — Document install/test/lint/build/run commands in agent instructions
+3. **T03** — Create the first real implementation workplan
+
+## CLI reference
+
+```
+statehub register [options]
+
+  --path PATH           Repo directory (default: cwd)
+  --domain SLUG         State Hub domain slug
+  --repo-slug SLUG      Repo slug (auto-detected from directory name)
+  --wp-prefix PREFIX    Workplan prefix, e.g. DEMO-WP
+  --description TEXT    One-sentence repo description
+  --intent TEXT         Intent text when INTENT.md is absent
+  --api-base URL        State Hub API base (default: http://127.0.0.1:8000)
+  --no-llm              Skip LLM inference; use files and flags
+  --force               Overwrite generated files
+```
+
+Environment overrides: `API_BASE`, `STATEHUB_REGISTER_LLM_PROVIDER`,
+`STATEHUB_REGISTER_LLM_MODEL`, `STATEHUB_REGISTER_LLM_API_KEY`,
+`STATEHUB_REGISTER_LLM_TIMEOUT`.
+
+## fix-consistency
+
+Workplans are canonical in repo files (ADR-001). After creating or updating
+workplan files, sync them into State Hub:
+
+```bash
+cd ~/state-hub
+make fix-consistency REPO=<repo-slug>
+```
+
+This rebuilds hub workstreams/tasks from files, updates `.custodian-brief.md`,
+and reports consistency findings (C-15 file/DB drift, C-16 remote behind, etc.).
+
+## Validation
+
+Use [template-validation-checklist.md](template-validation-checklist.md) to
+verify a bootstrapped repo against expected `statehub register` output.

docs/template-validation-checklist.md

@@ -0,0 +1,90 @@
+# Template Validation Checklist
+
+Validate a repository bootstrapped from `repo-seed` against `statehub register`
+output and Coulomb onboarding conventions.
+
+**Validated:** 2026-06-24 against `statehub register` in `~/state-hub`.
+
+---
+
+## 1. Register with State Hub
+
+- [ ] State Hub API is reachable (`curl -s http://127.0.0.1:8000/state/health`)
+- [ ] `statehub register` completes without error
+- [ ] Registration prints repo slug, domain, topic ID, and `make fix-consistency` hint
+- [ ] Progress milestone recorded (`Repo registered with State Hub: <slug>`)
+
+## 2. Agent files (register output)
+
+Confirm these files exist and contain repo-specific values (not `{PLACEHOLDER}` tokens):
+
+- [ ] `INTENT.md` — governing purpose; derived from README or `--intent`
+- [ ] `SCOPE.md` — one-liner, in/out scope, current state
+- [ ] `AGENTS.md` — **Purpose**, **Domain**, **Repo slug**, **Topic ID**, **Workplan prefix**
+- [ ] `.custodian-brief.md` — domain, topic ID, bootstrap workplan reference
+
+### AGENTS.md spot checks
+
+- [ ] `**Repo slug:**` matches directory slug and State Hub registration
+- [ ] `**Workplan prefix:**` matches workplan file prefix (e.g. `DEMO-WP-`)
+- [ ] Session protocol references `cat .custodian-brief.md` and inbox curl examples
+- [ ] `make fix-consistency REPO=<slug>` documented for workplan edits
+
+## 3. First workplan
+
+- [ ] `workplans/<PREFIX>-0001-statehub-bootstrap.md` exists
+- [ ] Frontmatter: `id`, `type: workplan`, `status: ready`, `repo`, `domain`
+- [ ] Tasks T01 (review files), T02 (dev workflow), T03 (seed real workplan) present
+- [ ] T03 references `make fix-consistency REPO=<slug>`
+
+## 4. Template extras (repo-seed scaffold)
+
+Beyond register output, confirm template scaffold is present:
+
+- [ ] `CLAUDE.md` includes `@.claude/rules/*` references
+- [ ] `.claude/rules/` contains session-protocol, workplan-convention, stack-and-commands
+- [ ] `registry/README.md` and `registry/indexes/capabilities.yaml` exist
+- [ ] `README.md` describes the repository purpose
+- [ ] `.gitignore` and `LICENSE` present
+
+## 5. Bootstrap workplan completion
+
+After register, complete `*-0001-statehub-bootstrap.md`:
+
+- [ ] **T01** — Placeholders replaced; SCOPE refined for repo-specific boundaries
+- [ ] **T02** — `.claude/rules/stack-and-commands.md` lists real dev commands
+- [ ] **T03** — First implementation workplan created (`*-0002-*.md` or equivalent)
+- [ ] Workplan status set to `finished` when all tasks done
+
+## 6. fix-consistency sync
+
+- [ ] `make fix-consistency REPO=<slug>` run from `~/state-hub`
+- [ ] `.custodian-brief.md` updated with active workstreams (replaces register stub)
+- [ ] Hub workstreams/tasks match workplan file statuses
+- [ ] No blocking C-16 (repo behind remote) findings
+
+## 7. Registry (optional)
+
+When the repo exposes reusable behavior:
+
+- [ ] Capability entry in `registry/capabilities/`
+- [ ] Row added to `registry/indexes/capabilities.yaml`
+- [ ] `reuse-surface validate --root .` passes
+
+---
+
+## repo-seed self-validation notes
+
+`repo-seed` is the meta-template and intentionally differs in a few places:
+
+| Item | repo-seed state | Consumer expectation |
+|------|-----------------|----------------------|
+| `INTENT.md` | Absent — `README.md` is canonical intent | Present after `register` |
+| `SCOPE.md` | Refined (no "generated by statehub register" banner) | Generated, then refined in T01 |
+| `.custodian-brief.md` | Maintained by `fix-consistency` | Register stub, then fix-consistency |
+| `REPO-WP-0001` | `finished` | `ready` until bootstrap complete |
+| `REPO-WP-0002` | Template validation (this checklist) | First domain-specific workplan |
+
+All register-output structures were verified by running `write_registration_files`
+from `statehub_register.py` with `repo_slug=repo-seed`, `wp_prefix=REPO-WP`,
+`domain=infotech`.

registry/README.md

@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+# Capability Registry
+
+Markdown-first capability index for federation and reuse planning.
+
+## Authoring
+
+1. Copy a capability entry template (see reuse-surface `templates/capability-entry.template.md`).
+2. Add the row to `indexes/capabilities.yaml`.
+3. Run `reuse-surface validate` from a checkout with the CLI installed.
+4. Merge to `main` and verify publish with `reuse-surface establish --publish-check`.
+
+Federation contract: reuse-surface `docs/RegistryFederation.md`.

registry/capabilities/capability.infotech.repo-template.md

@@ -0,0 +1,121 @@
+---
+id: capability.infotech.repo-template
+name: Coulomb Repository Template
+summary: Bootstrap new git repositories with agent instructions, registry scaffold, and State Hub onboarding conventions.
+owner: repo-seed
+status: draft
+domain: infotech
+tags:
+  - template
+  - bootstrap
+  - state-hub
+  - onboarding
+
+maturity:
+  discovery:
+    current: D3
+    target: D5
+    confidence: medium
+    rationale: >
+      Template purpose, consumer guide, and validation checklist are documented.
+      Scope boundaries are explicit in SCOPE.md.
+  availability:
+    current: A3
+    target: A4
+    confidence: medium
+    rationale: >
+      Consumers clone or copy repo-seed and run statehub register. Template
+      files are markdown/git artifacts without a hosted provisioning API.
+
+external_evidence:
+  completeness:
+    level: C2
+    confidence: medium
+    basis: scope_vs_intent_and_consumer_expectations
+    satisfied_expectations:
+      - agent instruction scaffold (AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, .claude/rules/)
+      - registry directory scaffold
+      - statehub register consumer documentation
+      - template validation checklist for bootstrap verification
+      - bootstrap workplan pattern (WP-0001)
+    broken_expectations: []
+    out_of_scope_expectations:
+      - automated repo creation on Gitea
+      - runtime application code generation
+  reliability:
+    level: R2
+    confidence: medium
+    basis: consumer_quality_signals
+    known_reliability_risks:
+      - register output evolves with state-hub releases; checklist must be revalidated
+      - LLM inference path depends on llm-connect availability
+
+discovery:
+  intent: >
+    Give new Coulomb repositories a consistent starting point for agent
+    coordination, capability registry growth, and State Hub workplan tracking.
+  includes:
+    - git template files for agent instructions and registry scaffold
+    - documentation for statehub register usage
+    - consumer validation checklist
+    - bootstrap workplan convention
+  excludes:
+    - application runtime implementation
+    - owning downstream project code
+  assumptions:
+    - consumers have access to state-hub CLI and API
+    - workplans remain canonical in repo files (ADR-001)
+  use_cases: []
+  research_memos:
+    - docs/statehub-register.md
+    - docs/template-validation-checklist.md
+
+availability:
+  current_level: A3
+  target_level: A4
+  current_artifacts:
+    - README.md
+    - AGENTS.md
+    - CLAUDE.md
+    - .claude/rules/
+    - registry/
+    - docs/statehub-register.md
+    - docs/template-validation-checklist.md
+  consumption_modes:
+    - git clone
+    - informational
+
+relations:
+  depends_on:
+    - capability.statehub.workstream-coordinate
+  supports: []
+  related_to:
+    - capability.registry.register
+
+evidence:
+  documentation:
+    - docs/statehub-register.md
+    - docs/template-validation-checklist.md
+    - SCOPE.md
+  tests: []
+
+consumer_guidance:
+  recommended_for:
+    - bootstrapping new Coulomb domain repositories
+    - standardizing agent onboarding and workplan conventions
+  not_recommended_for:
+    - repos that already have mature agent instructions and hub registration
+    - application templates with heavy code generation requirements
+  known_limitations:
+    - register must be run separately after cloning
+    - fix-consistency requires operator access to state-hub checkout
+---
+
+# Coulomb Repository Template
+
+`repo-seed` is the canonical git template for new Coulomb repositories. Clone it,
+run `statehub register`, complete the bootstrap workplan, and sync with
+`make fix-consistency`.
+
+See `docs/statehub-register.md` for the consumer workflow and
+`docs/template-validation-checklist.md` for verification steps.

registry/indexes/capabilities.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+version: 1
+updated: '2026-06-24'
+domain: infotech
+capabilities:
+  - id: capability.infotech.repo-template
+    name: Coulomb Repository Template
+    summary: Bootstrap new git repositories with agent instructions, registry scaffold, and State Hub onboarding conventions.
+    vector: D3 / A3 / C2 / R2
+    domain: infotech
+    status: draft
+    owner: repo-seed
+    path: registry/capabilities/capability.infotech.repo-template.md
+    tags: [template, bootstrap, state-hub, onboarding]
+    consumption_modes: [git clone, informational]

workplans/REPO-WP-0001-statehub-bootstrap.md

@@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
+---
+id: REPO-WP-0001
+type: workplan
+title: "Bootstrap State Hub integration"
+domain: infotech
+repo: repo-seed
+status: finished
+owner: codex
+topic_slug: infotech
+created: "2026-06-22"
+updated: "2026-06-22"
+state_hub_workstream_id: "b809c762-8675-470c-be3e-0e5552f7d79d"
+---
+
+# Bootstrap State Hub integration
+
+Git repository template to bootstrap coulomb projects.
+
+## Review Generated Integration Files
+
+```task
+id: REPO-WP-0001-T01
+status: done
+priority: high
+state_hub_task_id: "65734e48-ec48-47f2-bd5c-5673e94343cc"
+
+```
+
+Result 2026-06-22: Filled SCOPE.md; README is canonical intent.
+
+Review `INTENT.md`, `SCOPE.md`, `AGENTS.md`, and `.custodian-brief.md`.
+Replace generated placeholders with repo-specific facts where needed.
+
+## Verify Local Developer Workflow
+
+```task
+id: REPO-WP-0001-T02
+status: done
+priority: high
+state_hub_task_id: "76f1c245-3f06-4ef7-943f-bf2e9722c71b"
+
+```
+
+Result 2026-06-22: Template workflow documented.
+
+Identify the repo's install, test, lint, build, and run commands. Add or refine
+those commands in the agent instructions so future coding sessions can verify
+changes confidently.
+
+## Seed First Real Workplan
+
+```task
+id: REPO-WP-0001-T03
+status: done
+priority: medium
+state_hub_task_id: "9670ff11-ed7a-49e6-8a1f-944af9794f6a"
+
+```
+
+Result 2026-06-22: Created REPO-WP-0002.
+
+Create the first implementation workplan for the repository's most important
+next change. After workplan file updates, run from `~/state-hub`:
+
+```bash
+make fix-consistency REPO=repo-seed
+```

workplans/REPO-WP-0002-template-validation-checklist.md

@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
+---
+id: REPO-WP-0002
+type: workplan
+title: "Template consumer validation checklist"
+domain: infotech
+repo: repo-seed
+status: finished
+owner: codex
+topic_slug: infotech
+created: "2026-06-22"
+updated: "2026-06-24"
+state_hub_workstream_id: "8aaf98a0-7045-4d5b-915f-bc9ecc5aa319"
+---
+
+# Template consumer validation checklist
+
+Validate repo-seed against statehub_register output and document consumer steps.
+
+## Template validation checklist
+
+```task
+id: REPO-WP-0002-T01
+status: done
+priority: high
+state_hub_task_id: "a1b0aaab-f0dc-4bd0-bde3-89635ac0ca3b"
+```
+
+Result 2026-06-24: Added `docs/statehub-register.md` (consumer guide),
+`docs/template-validation-checklist.md` (bootstrap verification checklist),
+`registry/capabilities/capability.infotech.repo-template.md` with index entry,
+and README bootstrap pointers. Validated register output structure against
+`statehub_register.write_registration_files`.
+
+Author checklist for new repo bootstrap: register, agent files, first workplan, fix-consistency.